arguments see your text. (Excel’s DB function makes different assumptions.)The students discussed the case again after the cases were graded by the instructor and returnedto them. The students found case studies to be extremely helpful in understanding how to applythe theory to practical situations to reach an optimal solution in an objective manner.4. Applicable ABET OutcomesCriterion 3 ABET outcomes applicable for this course are suggested as follows:Engineering graduates have:(2): an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering(3): an ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs(7): an ability to communicate effectively(8): had the broad education necessary to understand the impact of
. goals. AITE’s success in graduating college and workforce ready students can be attributed in large part to its adoption of G. Maigh Attre, 11th Grader at AITE High School best practices. It provides a technology-rich immersion “I may live in Connecticut, but I compete on the global experience for its students, and encourages hands-on,stage. One of the commonalities I share with my international experiential learning. Perhaps more importantly, the schoolcompetitors is
Paper ID #33669Industry-University Capstone Design: How Did Students Adapt to theCOVID-19 Pandemic?Ms. Shruti Misra, Unviersity of Washington Shruti Misra is a graduate student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Wash- ington, Seattle. Her research interest is broadly focused on studying innovation in university-industry partnerships. She is interested in the various ways that universities and industry come together and par- ticipate in driving technological innovation at the regional and global level.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering
anddesigners. The course covers a timeline that begins with early iron structures of the industrialrevolution and culminates with supertall buildings, long-span bridges, and sustainable designs ofthe 21st century. The second introductory course, “Engineering in the Modern World”, begun in1985, centers on the transformation of American society by engineering through studies of thegreat innovations of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in the main branches of engineering:civil, mechanical, electrical, chemical.This paper focuses on the first course, “Structures in the Urban Environment”. As a result of bothcontent and effective pedagogical approaches, it has positively changed perceptions aboutengineering and the societal role of engineers for
, Sensor Networks, Multimedia Communi- cation, Cloud Networks, Voice-over-IP and Computer Security. Dr. El-Tawab introduced a system named ”FRIEND”: A Cyber-Physical System for Traffic Flow Related Information aggrEgatioN and Dissemi- nation. In 2009, he was awarded a prize for Excellence in Scholarship at The College of William and Mary’s 8th Annual Graduate Research Symposium. He has more than 40 publications including jour- nal/conference papers, book chapters, and posters. He also serves as a reviewer in several journals and conferences. His class ”JMU Autonomous Vehicles” was a winner of Virginia Governor’s Technology Award 2018 (Innovative Use of Technology in Education) that was taught at JMU X-Labs Spring 2018
, Kenya, and Ethiopia to cultivate innovation ecosystems and provide hands-on design education opportunities at nine universities across sub-Saharan Africa and the United States. Together, collaborators from across these universities developed the Invention Education Toolkit (ive-toolkit.org), an open-access resource to support the transformation of engineering education in African universities to solve local and global challenges. Taylor received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, MPH in Public Health Education, and MS and BS in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech.Dr. Josh Iorio Josh Iorio is a Visiting Professor of Practice in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction. He primarily works with graduate
this process continue to grow andexcel. Notice that Category 7 appears to imply a combination of both technology innovation andbusiness results. In practice however; most organizations treat their Research and Developmentefforts coupled with marketing considerations, but essentially independent from the businessgrowth model for their core business units. This practical observation resulting from reviewingmore than 1000 Tennessee organizations over the past 20 years, underscores the gap identified in Page 26.297.3the relevant literature section of this article.It is also noteworthy that the 2014 Baldrige criteria place an increased emphasis on the
passions is teaching. Her area of teaching specialization is structural engineering with a particular emphasis in the analysis and design of buildings. At Penn State she currently teaches a structural analysis course, the advanced steel design course and a graduate level course in steel connections. Her approach to these courses is to provide strategies for complex problem solving and a framework for lifelong learning. She is the recipient of the Penn State Engineering Society’s Outstanding Teaching Award (2003) and the Premier Teaching Award (2008). Building on a strong teaching record and an interest in building a more diverse engineering community, Dr. Hanagan has begun to expand her research into engineering
Assessing Women in Engineering (AWE)Project, is producing its Advancing Research into Practice (ARP) series, which translatesresearch findings on many these issues into practical recommendations for use in the classroom(http://www.engr.psu.edu/awe/ARPResources.aspx).ConclusionThe ADVANCE Project at Louisiana Tech University is approximately half-way through a four-year NSF ADVANCE PAID, utilizing a college-wide, systematic, sustainable approach forincreasing the impact and presence of women faculty in STEM. As suggested by initial focusgroup surveys, the project is focusing on the issues of climate, retention andpromotion/leadership, using a theoretical framework suggested by Social Cognitive CareerTheory. Namely, a concerted development of formal
programs introducing “design across the curriculum”approaches to student engagement; our programming extends this logic to include designcoursework as a strategic location for comprehensive sociotechnical integration for engineeringstudents. Finally, the key assessment component—and the thrust of our argument—is that ABETassessment practices can and should be crafted to advance programmatic innovations anddifferentiation rather than constraining them. Since we are not yet accredited, this may be a risk,but it is a risk worth taking and one that we believe is well aligned with ABET’s stated goalssurrounding assessment best practices.Ultimately, our key achievement at this stage of program development is to have created ABETperformance indicators
, theElectrical and Computer Engineering Department provided seed monies to begin the project.Project Overview: The overriding goal of the project was to best prepare University ofWyoming Computer Engineering graduates for the technological work force. To achieve thisgoal we targeted our first microprocessor course for improvement. This course required updatedpedagogy, instructional aids, equipment, software, and laboratory exercises. In effort to savemoney and provide design experiences for our students, we proposed having students design theprototype teaching aids for the course. Specifically, two undergraduate senior design students,Abbie Wells and Carrie Hernadez, would design a microprocessor laboratory platform for theirsenior design project. Also
Innovation assisting withIRB approval, and Dr. Kameryn Denaro at the Teaching and Learning Research Center at UCIfor her assistance with data collection. We would also like to thank the Department ofBiomedical Engineering for their ongoing support. We would like to thank the EconomicDevelopment Agency (EDA) of the US Department of Commerce (ED15HDQ0200008), andthe UCI Innovation and Entrepreneurship Legislative Initiative (AB2664).References:[1] C.L. Dym, A.M. Agogino, O. Eris, D.D. Frey, and L.J. Leifer. "Engineering design thinking, teaching, andlearning." IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 34(1), pp. 65-92, 2006.[2] A.J. Dutson, R.H. Todd, S.P. Magleby, and C.D. Sorensen. "A review of literature on teaching engineeringdesign through project
Research Scientist/Engineer at NorthWest Research Associates. Jeremy believes that curricula should be student-centered and embedded within an engaged, collaborative community who un- derstand the broader, societal implications of their work. He aims to achieve this through the design of project-based and experiential curricula, including a recent redesign of the Computer Engineering pro- gram. He serves on several committees including the steering committee for the Faculty Senate. He also leads ABET accreditation and coordinates assessment for the Computer Engineering program. Jeremy’s research is in space physics and electrical engineering, including atmospheric electricity, radio wave propagation, and digital signal
taught over 1600 AEs in 19 courses in the past 15 years. He is aprincipal researcher in the Rotorcraft Center of Excellence at Georgia Tech since its inception in 1982. He is anAssociate Fellow of AIAA. He has won GT awards for Outstanding Graduate Student Development, OutstandingPhD thesis advisor, and Most Valuable Professor (GTAE Class of '91). EAG research projects have enjoyed theparticipation of nearly 100 undergraduates over the past 14 years. EAG is a leader in multidisciplinary team- Page 6.1050.12oriented projects, including the Aerospace Digital Library Project at Georgia Tech: http://www.adl.gatech.edu Proceedings
universities, especially in STEMdisciplines. Research has shown that graduate students’ educational experiences aresignificantly impacted by their relationship with their adviser, yet this relationship is one of themost frequently mentioned challenges by international students. Based on the literature review,we argue that being aware of intercultural competence is essential for STEM faculty to providepositive advising experiences for international graduate students. Despite the promise ofintercultural competence promoting effective and healthy advising relationships, there islimited literature about its use at the graduate level in STEM. Because of the huge participationof Chinese students in the US educational system, this paper includes a fictional
Where Others Fail, New York: Villard Books, 1995.13. Cross, K. Patricia, “Teaching for Learning,” AAHE Bulletin 39: 3-7, April, 1987, ED 283 446, 6pp MF-01, PC-0114. Eccles, J. 1989. "Bringing Young Women into Math and Science," In M. Crawford and M. Gentry, eds, Gender and Thought: Psychological Perspectives, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. Page 5.662.1115. Evans, D. L., G. C. Beakley, P. E. Crouch, and G. T. Yamaguchi, "Attributes of Engineering Graduates and Their Impact on Curriculum Design," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 82, no. 4, October 199316. Frair, Karen and David Cordes, "Sharing Innovation: The NSF Foundation
technology is chosen as a medium for teaching CT, it is recommended that teachers beaware of the best practices for using technology around children. This will help ensure that thetechnology used is safe, age-appropriate, and aligns with the curriculum's learning goals [32].Limitations and Future WorkThe CTPF+ frameworks based on the systematic review collected from ProQuest. Therefore,works that can provide different insight into this research may have been missed. Also, mostliterature reviews build their work on Brennan and Resnick, which can lead to bias as itinfluences all the author’s views. Other limitations are the limited work for data science, and AIinfers the need to have more research to influence the judgments, and the inclusion of CT
I. INTRODUCTION for baccalaureate programs [1]. This adjustment was to haveIt is acknowledged by many ‘experts’ that the World is far reaching impacts that may still haunt current practice. Ourchanging; it has been changing for many centuries. However American academic ‘models’ have gradually matured and nowmany of our cultural and social arrangements do not with modified formats are having some pervasive effects innecessarily keep pace with these changes. There are many other nations. Today US research universities are held in highdichotomies, and to some social change is
transgenderstudents, the best practices at other institutions, the attitudes and desires of the WPIcommunity, and what design changes might be most successful in that context. The workthey had done was not only a valuable learning experience for them, but it introduced acampus-wide conversation about transgender students and it concluded with specificrecommendations tailored for WPI’s particular institutional context. The report hasprompted WPI’s administration to take a new approach to bathrooms: the campus nowincludes either single-stall or multi-stall gender-neutral bathrooms in 17 buildings and theuniversity has made a commitment for gender-inclusive bathrooms in all new buildings.All gender-inclusive bathrooms are indicated on WPI’s interactive campus
, and critiques for video game designing (Finkel, 2017). The instructor role varied by age and level of skill depending on organizational structure.In research apprenticeships, students worked directly with a graduate student or researcher andreceived additional support from a faculty advisor (Avent et al., 2018). Some programs traincollege students to teach and tutor high school students in STEM subject areas (Finkel, 2017). Afew programs incorporated skilled high school students to provide instruction to their peers(Tucker-Raymond et al., 2016). The role in which instructors served beyond instruction as asource of support and guidance which helped bolster students’ confidence.Theme 3: Formal and Informal Support Systems Support
). For Gee,discourse becomes a kind of tool to fashion a social identity. Like Fairclough’s account, it is bothlanguage used and social practice, but the focus is less on the interplay of discourse andindividual on a macro scale and more on individuals themselves. It shifts from a sociologicalaccount to a psychological one [10]. Thus, we see resonance with this theoretical understandingof discourse and our methodological approach, wherein we seek to understand how engineeringstudents use text (in the form of EDMAIC assignments) to position themselves as not simplyengineers but empathetic individuals as well.Empathy. Empathy is an important ability and skill, especially with the continued emphasis onhuman-centered design and social justice
, the list and definitions of professional skills varies widely, as does howthese skills are learned. Some methods focus on direct learning, via workshops, skill-buildingclasses, mentoring or direct required practice. Other methods are more indirect, such as rolemodeling, practice as part of project and assignments or from the indirect lessons of theUnwritten Syllabus itself.The engineer of 2020 has a set of guiding strategies that may be of help in forming teachingtechniques. The set of strategies is: Engage in a comprehensive effort Consider the linkages Focus on levers for change Pursue student-centered education Develop a research base Communicate, communicate, communicateWhile some of these do not apply
Scientific and Technical Communication program at Michigan Technological University. Her research interests include interdisciplinary theory and practice as well as the intersections of rhetorical theory and communication in the workplace.Karina Jousma, Michigan Technological University Karina Jousma is an undergraduate student earning a Bachelor of Science in Scientific and Technical Communication at Michigan Technological University. Her concentrations include writing and engineering. She joined Civil and Environmental Engineering International Senior Design this summer. Page 12.944.1
., and Yokomoto, C., “Development of an Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Laboratory for a Course on Design and Manufacture of Surface Mount Printed Circuit Board Assemblies,” Proceedings of the 1997 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.9. Rizkalla, M.E., O’Loughlin, C., and Yokomoto, C., “An innovative model for senior level undergraduate engineering education in electronic manufacturing,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1996, pp. 147-151.10. Cal Poly’s iDesign PCB Tutorial, http://idesign.calpoly.edu/dip-trace/11. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., and McKeachie, W.J., “Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual,” National Center for
Chemical Engineering. Her research interests rely on understanding how different languages and cultures impact students' learning engineering in the US.Allison Godwin (Associate Professor) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and of Chemical Engineering at Purdue University. She is also the Engineering Workforce Development Director for CISTAR, the Center for Innovative and Strategic Transformation of Alkane Resources, a National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice
unique contributions, particularly within aSTEM field that is often misunderstood [4]. Further, the nature and context of learningenvironments was found to impact caregivers’ adoption of various roles and speaks to the valueof purposefully designed and supplied environments to facilitate learning.Related WorkCaregivers play an important role in shaping their children’s STEM experiences, dispositions,identities, interests, and practices [12]–[17]. For example, Vedder-Weis [17] highlighted howfamily negotiations of roles and recognition within everyday interactions around sciencepositioned one child as the science person (i.e., “good” science participant) and another child asthe science antagonist (i.e., uncooperative or a hostile science
funds for competitive education proposals, andrevising promotion and tenure requirements to emphasize education.Since curriculum reform is time-consuming, ECEN is actively recruiting graduatestudents for a joint teaching-research program to prepare Ph.D. students for academicpositions. Graduate students will be given opportunities to both teach classes anddevelop curricular materials in conjunction with more traditional research.Assessment: Measuring the impact on students and the programTo assess how emphasizing student development over knowledge acquisition affectsstudent learning, project evaluation is focused on three questions that reflect the maingoals of this project: 1) what are the gains and losses in student learning, particularly
those of prior years (Fig. 1). Graduation Rates For the incoming class of2004, the impact of EGR 101 on 6-year graduation rates is overwhelming (Fig. 2). Of thestudents who took EGR 101, 71% completed a bachelor's degree from Wright State University,and 52% completed theirdegrees in an engineeringor computer science(CECS) field. Thiscompared to rates of 40%and 15% for students whodid not take EGR 101.Based on tuition revenueassociated with increasedenrollment and graduationrates, the Wright Statemodel is now fullysustainable. Figure 2. Impact of EGR 101 on 6-Year Graduation RatesHighlights from a CCLI Phase 3 InitiativeA nationwide adoption
facilitate participation of a larger, more diverse student base.• Disseminate research products and findings to the broader engineering education community.II. MotivationA. The Lecture/Laboratory DisconnectIn curricula that teach EE concepts, hands-on laboratories that accompany circuit theory, signals& systems, and digital design courses are often scheduled separately, partly because textbooksoften adopt a written-work and software paradigm. Additionally, organizing students and topicsin laboratory-only environments is more efficient than interspersing hands-on assignments withlectures, so unless lecture and laboratory courses are paired, laboratories can be separated in timefrom their corresponding lecture material, making it difficult for
AC 2007-1192: SOPHOMORE YEAR IN CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTALENGINEERING AT ROWAN UNIVERSITY: INTEGRATION OFCOMMUNICATION, MECHANICS AND DESIGNWilliam Riddell, Rowan University William Riddell is an Assistant Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rowan University. His research interests include design education, fatigue and fracture mechanics, transportation safety, and enegy efficiency. He is currently sophomore clinic coordinator for the college of engineering.Eric Constans, Rowan University Eric Constans is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Rowan University. His areas of interest include developing innovative techniques in engineering education and