have been implicitly doingthis for sometime, the focus on outcomes now requires it to become explicit.This new focus on student learning outcomes will have an impact on curriculum at the programlevel. The traditional way of building an engineering curriculum is based on providing afoundation in the sciences, adding engineering science and then introducing program subjectmatter with increasing levels of depth. A parallel process exists for skill development,particularly for acquiring the important engineering design skills. Here, one starts with freshmanexperiencing simple design processes. By the senior year, the student is expected to incorporate
technical currency issues via faculty development activities!” • “Every faculty member should be encouraged to complete several classes from the education department to assist in the development of teaching skills. The skill of teaching young men and women is not automatically obtained…” • “We need easy and rapid dissemination of best practices as found by educational research centers.” • “Why educate our students to a standard that is ten years old? …Wouldn’t it be better to educate our students for the standard that will exist ten years in the future? How can this be done without technical currency?” • “Resources are the key, you can have all the policies and good intentions you want but
classes, conduct research, andinteract with departmental faculty, staff, and other graduate students, the climate they experienceand the support they receive at the departmental level can have a major impact on their success.When interventions address students directly, once they graduate, there may be no lasting changein the department. However, when faculty attitudes and mentoring practices along withdepartmental processes and procedures change, the changes are likely to be more sustainable.Using institutional theory as the analytical lens, the purpose of this paper is to examine how onecollaborative project implements a faculty-led institutional change model for diversifying theSTEM professoriate. Each participating doctoral granting
Paper ID #34418 Amherst, where she was an NSF Graduate Research Fellow, and an Offshore Wind Energy IGERT Fellow. She earned a MSc in Leadership for Sustainable Development at Queen’s University of Belfast, and two BS degrees in Electrical Engineering and Applied Math at North Carolina A&T State University.Prof. Constantine Samaras, Carnegie Mellon University Constantine (Costa) Samaras is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. His research spans energy, climate change, automation, and defense analysis. He analyzes how energy technology and infrastructure system designs affect energy use and national security, resilience to climate change
digital and analog electronics, as well as optics, microfluidics and devices that interface to the biological world. Prior to joining the University of Pittsburgh faculty he was a co-founder and the president of Nanophoretics LLC, where he led the research and development of a novel dielectrophoresis-based lab-on-chip technol- ogy for rapidly detecting drug-resistant bacteria strains. Dr. Dickerson is also interested in enhancing undergraduate engineering education, and investigates new and innovative methods for improving the learning experience for electrical and computer engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Use of SPICE Simulation to Promote
]. 6To break up a semester or modulate its pace, faculty can discuss their research or consultingwork or prior employment [24] or they can invite full-time practicing engineers to speak to theclass [13]. Aspiring engineers are particularly interested in hearing from recent graduates (i.e.young professionals); their talks help students to more easily envision “life after school” [17].Tools that instructors might use to assess the quality of their freshman-intro course are [16] pre-course surveys (pre-existing knowledge & pre-conceptions), real-time computerized student assessment (throughout the semester), common midterms across sections (taught by different faculty), common instructor evaluations (for every module
-making, is one of the critical ways practical labs and hands-on experience can be facilitated (Desha et al., 2007). Creating a toolset for educational andprofessional environments requires utilizing principles related to force sustainability andanalytical tools that are specifically matched with data analysis. To demonstrate and facilitate theengineering management student experience, the researchers utilized foundational tools likeExcel, tableau, and Orange and sophisticated experiments using IBM Watson.Excel serves as a significant touch point for graduate students in analyzing data on sustainabilityconcepts. It also offers a platform for statistical viewpoints and a practical bridge to decision-making. Engineering management students could
appropriate designs, but tocommunicate these designs in written, oral, and graphical form to a variety of audiences rangingfrom their technical peers to the general public. Indeed, almost all professional engineeringorganizations cite effective communication skills as a top priority for graduating engineers. Forinstance, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)’s The Engineer of 2020: Visions ofEngineering in the New Century outlines expectations for engineers entering practice within thenear future (National Academy of Engineering, 2004). The report states that it is impossible topractice engineering without communication, and engineers functioning in global networks musthave “an ability to communicate convincingly and to shape the opinions and
Paper ID #30743Pilot evaluation of a summer camp to Attract Middle School Students toSTEM (Work in Progress)Murad Musa Mahmoud, Wartburg College Murad is an Assistant Professor at the Engineering Science Department at Wartburg College. He has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University. Research interests include recruitment into STEM, diversity in STEM as well pedagogy and instruction.Ms. Trinity Borland, Wartburg CollegeMr. Ripken Gerhig Holst, Wartburg CollegeProf. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education
the information age and rapidly changing businessexpectations. Shrinking budgets and scarce resources are other challenges faced by colleges anduniversities. Enrollment in colleges is also decreasing. Many colleges are exploring creativeways to increase enrollments. Innovative ways must also be developed by colleges anduniversities to be able to disseminate knowledge to non-traditional, non-resident students inmultiple sites, businesses, and directly to learners in their own homes. Distance learning isbecoming widely accepted as an approach to meet the challenge of delivering training to morecitizens on many subjects with higher impact and effectiveness. This paper describes a corporatepartnership with the University of St. Thomas in terms of
downloads each year.Dr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University Dr. Garner is the Associate Director of Program Development and a Research Associate Professor in The Center for Educational Partnerships at Old Dominion University, VA.Prof. Karen A. Thole, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Karen A. Thole is the head of the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering at The Pennsyl- vania State University. She holds two degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois, and a PhD from the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Thole’s expertise is heat transfer and cooling of gas turbine airfoils through detailed experimental and computational studies. At Penn State, Dr. Thole founded the
their Healthcare Systems Engineering Institute (HSyE) as a post- doctoral research fellow. Native from San Juan, Puerto Rico, Dayna graduated with a bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus (¡Colegio!) and then she completed a master’s and PhD degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of South Florida in Tampa. Being Hispanic and an engineer herself, Dayna has a passion for increasing Hispanic representation in STEM. She currently lives with her husband Andrés, their two sons David and Sebastián, and their miniature schnauzer Lucca in Winter Garden, Florida.Esther Gonzalez (Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc
competition2,3, although the pool ofqualified people is quite small. Innovation is key to our industry, and our focus here is to developthe capability of our graduates to innovate4,5 in a field that requires depth and intensecomprehension. The applied mathematicians and aerospace engineers who led the remarkableadvances in high speed designs in the latter half of the 20th century are either retired or nearingretirement. Transferring their knowledge base to the upcoming generation is a concern6, becausethe recipient must have the preparation and discipline needed to grasp the knowledge. This putsthe onus teachers to ensure that candidates aspiring to jobs in the leading aerospaceestablishments have firm basic knowledge and personal discipline in this
targeted engineers. For the two sections of engineeringstudents (roughly 25 students in each section for a total of 50 students), the course was a success[11]. In this paper, we outline the history, curriculum design, and implementation of acommunication course targeted to engineering students. While the course centers on oralcommunication and public speaking, it is best described as a targeted communication coursebecause the curriculum also includes written and teamwork components. Because the course is acollaborative effort between a Communication Arts and Sciences Department and a College ofEngineering, it serves as a model for other universities and colleges interested in implementing acommunication skills course specifically for
style in noway reflects an engineer’s requirement in their job which includes teamwork and multi-disciplineproblem solving skills [1]. Project-based learning (PBL) is a part of a pedagogical practice thatinvolves a wide range of engineering requirements methods. However, this learning method hasnot been holistically implemented [2]. To help with this issue, ABET, in its most recent guidanceis pushing for more PBL which research has shown as key and most prevailing attribute amongsuccessful graduate engineers within the industry [1]. The prevalent method for teaching inengineering disciplines is the “Chalk and Talk” approach. The instructor will lecture and thestudent will be a passive learner, not a student centered method [1]. These authors
Foundation Difficult Dialogues, NSF ADVANCE, and Susan G. Komen (the last in collaboration with MU’s Medical School). She has held 2 national interdisciplinary fellowships: she has been a Kellogg National Fellow (leadership training and interdisciplinary research), and a Carnegie Scholar (scholarship of teaching and learning). In 2011, she attended a summer institute at the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science. Since then, Suzanne has conducted communicating science workshops using actor- training techniques to enhance presentation skills; and collaborated on an MU NSF grant: "NRT-IGE:A test bed for STEM graduate student communication training,” 2015-2018. Suzanne is co-author with Bill Timpson, a member of her Kellogg
recognized as South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence. Dr. De Backer was awarded as one of the Aviation Week’s 20 Twenties, recognized as tomorrow’s aerospace leaders for his contributions to the aerospace field, scientific research, and the broader community. He teaches the Aerospace Systems, Aircraft Design and Senior Design courses for the aerospace program. Prior to USC, Wout graduated from Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands with a bachelor’s and Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering on composite structural design and aircraft design.Monica Gray (Associate Dean)George Wesley Hitt George Wesley Hitt received the Ph.D. degree from Michigan State University in 2009 in the area of experimental nuclear
oriented courses and his main research area deals with the mechanical behavior ofcomposite materials. He also writes and does research in the areas of engineering ethics and engineering education.He is a registered metallurgical engineer in the state of Louisiana.Dr. Ramona Travis is the University Affairs Officer at NASA Stennis Space Center. She received her Ph. D. fromLouisiana State University in Agronomy. She administers a number of university and colleges initiatives andeducational and scientific engineering research programs for various agencies that are administered through Stennisspace Center. In addition to the many undergraduate, graduate
practice information retrieval and evaluationskills. Students are asked to find the best sources to support their answers to the followingquestions (skills practiced noted in parentheses following each question): a. Who developed the patent for the Clif shot litter leash? What earlier innovations did it Page 14.761.5 build upon? (Requires a patent search.) b. Find two peer reviewed original research articles published in the last year about how climate change will affect hurricane frequency in the Atlantic. (Practices database search strategies and proper citation format) c. What is a ballast in a fluorescent light fixture
conversation," Writing to learn: strategies for assigning and responding to writing across the disciplines, eds. M. D. Sorcinelli and P. Elbow, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, (1997).6. Benson, C. "Technical writing for mechanical engineers: an interdisciplinary approach, Proceedings of the Conference on Improving Writing in Engineering Design, Michigan Technological University, June 24-26, (1992).7. Winsor, D., Writing Like an Engineer: A Rhetorical Education, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, (1996).8. Swales, J., Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge U Press, (1990).9. Ding, D. "Object-Centered—How Engineering Writing Embodies Objects: A Study of Four Engineering Documents." Technical Communication, 48, August (2001
NYU Tandon School of Engineering. The teachers were all from localschools and they commuted daily to attend the PD. The project team (facilitators of the PDprogram) included engineering and education faculty, researchers, and graduate students whoperformed a preliminary design of robotics-based lessons meeting state standards for middleschool science and math, based on the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) [14] and theCommon Core State Standards for Math (CCSSM) [15]. During the PD program, we followed aregular schedule for daily activities. Specifically, each day’s schedule consisted of two four-hourslong morning and afternoon sessions. Each session started with short formal lectures thatintroduced foundational material using
AC 2007-2197: GATEWAY INTO FIRST-YEAR STEM CURRICULA: ACOMMUNITY COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY COLLABORATION PROMOTINGRETENTION AND ARTICULATIONMichele Wheatly, Wright State University Michele Wheatly (PI) is Dean of the College of Science and Mathematics at Wright State University. She has had a 25 year history of continuous NSF funding to support her lab research, as well as significant experience directing large projects targeting increasing representation in the STEM disciplines (including the Creating Laboratory Access for Science Students, heralded as one of the most innovative projects in undergraduate STEM curriculum in the US). Her career funding from competitive sources has totaled
insight into engineering research at ASU c) METS Workshops for Survival Strategies are held throughout the semester targeting potential and new transfer students, but anyone is welcome to attend. d) METS Student Mentors is an opportunity for new transfer students to be assigned a peer mentor. The student mentor assigned is a student who has attended ASU for at least one semester. e) METS Pilot Workshop/Bridge for new transfer students is held in early summer to assist students in locating student resources at ASU such as: parking, how to find your classes, scholarships, tutoring, the CEDAR center, and the bookstore. f) METS Orientation to new transfers gives students information about the METS program and how
NSF funded project, she directs a longitudinal study that focuses on measuring engineering curriculum impact on student learning and 21st Century skills. She also has directed a large multi-year multi-institutional social network analysis study to measure changing collaboration patterns among pro- gram investigators as a part of a NIH funded grant. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Policy, with a concentration in Research, Measurement, and Statistics, from Georgia State University.Dr. Roxanne A. Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology Roxanne Moore is currently a Research Faculty member at Georgia Tech with appointments in the school of Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics
. His PhD work at CU Boulder focused on how student’s con- nections of social responsibility and engineering change throughout college as well as how engineering service is valued in employment and supported in the workplace.Dr. Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines Jessica M. Smith is Associate Professor in the Engineering, Design & Society Division at the Colorado School of Mines and Director of Humanitarian Engineering Graduate Programs. Her research and teach- ing bring anthropological perspectives to bear on questions of social responsibility and engineering. In 2016 the National Academy of Engineering recognized her Corporate Social Responsibility course as a national exemplar in teaching engineering
performance (GPA), and community connection(one-year retention) as seen in the Results and Discussion section. These programs are acombination of new and old initiatives whose mutual support lays the foundation for the holisticapproach to student support that OSDS is striving to achieve. These programs include: • Engage ME! (Multicultural Engineers) • WE Engage! (Women in Engineering) • Maximizing Academic and Professional Success (MAPS) Coaching and Mentoring • Engineering Freshman Learning Community (EFLC)Regular, consistent assessment and evaluation of academic success and retention metrics throughthese initiatives will allow us to narrow the strategic focus of each program to develop a commonset of complimentary best practices
,professional conference or seminar and field trips, where students are exposed to andexperiences in working with a variety of people with different backgrounds and expectations.First of all, the program has provided abundant information for scholars about a series ofseminars providing opportunities for discussion and presentations related to student success(e.g., time management, effective communication), research topics, and more from variouscampus student support centers, engineering research and design team projects (students andfaculty), industry, etc. It also includes a series of seminars to help students to build theirportfolio, review students’ resume, and enhance required skills such as research, presentation,and interview skills.Each term
review software.” Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.covidence.org[10] H. Harrison, S. J. Griffin, I. Kuhn, and J. A. Usher-Smith, “Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation,” BMC Med Res Methodol, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 7, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3.[11] “Zotero.” Corporation for Digital Scholarship, Vienna, VA, USA, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.zotero.org/[12] V. Braun and V. Clarke, Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Sage, 2021.[13] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1191
Session 3560 Improving the Classroom Environment: With a Focus on the Arab Gulf States Waddah Akili Professor of Civil Engineering (Retired) Principal, Geotechnical Engineering, Ames, IowaAbstract:This paper focuses on “viable teaching-learning” protocols for potential adoption by educators inthe Arab Gulf States, seeking to improve their classroom effectiveness. It was inspired byremarks and suggestions made by a number of engineering graduates, who have experienced“negative” aspects of the “classroom
implementation activities that are designed to increase the number of underservedminority students interested in STEAM programs in nuclear science and technology. The impact of ouractivities in addressing the challenges and providing skills developed and utilized in the implementationof our project frameworks of SUpporting Strategic Training of Adaptable and Integrated Nuclear(SUSTAIN) Workforce funded by Department of Energy (DOE), Experiment-Centric Pedagogy (ECP),funded by National Science Foundation (NSF) and Homefront Factors Study funded by our school, hasled us to some innovative and practical solutions that need to be enhanced and supported. Our initialactivities include experiential learning and research; collaborating and making use of