individual belongs toprofessionally, and/or voluntarily. Therefore, ethical conduct and practice is a traditional cornerstone ofeducation and the professional conduct and development of workforce in all industries.Today, engineers play a crucial role in the development of the direction of technology, research, economicgrowth and thereby impact on the safety, wellbeing, and lives of people. Engineers make decisions or areinvolved in the decision-making and operational processes of business, government, and/or non-profitorganizations at various levels (strategic, tactical, and operational). Since engineers’ design and makesolutions available to use for dealing with the societies’ complex problems, the direct and ripple effects ofthese decision-making
undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation and evaluation. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Fron- tiers of Engineering Education Symposium in 2013 and awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research
environment in the classroom. In 124th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). ASEE, 2017. Paper No. 19953. [9] Peter J. Clarke, Debra L. Davis, Raymond Chang-Lau, and Tariq M. King. Impact of using tools in an under- graduate software testing course supported by WReSTT. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., 17(4):18:1–18:28, August 2017.[10] Michael Prince. Does active learning work? a review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3):223–231, 2004.[11] Barbara Leigh Smith and Jean T. MacGregor. What is Collaborative Learning? In A.S. Goodsell, M.R. Ma- her, and V. Tinto, editors, Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment
learning outcomes is alsodescribed.Introduction:During the summer of 2020, we hosted a virtual summer camp for high school and early-college STEM students. The subject is related to advanced manufacturing (AM) and 3Dprinting. This outreach is funded by the Department of Energy DOE consortium project. Withthis summer program, our objective is to prepare a pool of students in the AM area, in highdemand in industrial and national research laboratories.High school Architectural and Engineering Drafting teachers from Guilford Countyparticipated in the workshop to help with teaching and designing the activities and theprogram. A University faculty participated in organizing the workshop activities andinstructed the students on a number of engineering
Sciences program at Clemson University. Broadly, her research interests include intergenerational learning in informal settings and self-directed learning. Since 2017, Abigail has been the graduate assistant for the General Engineering Learning Community (GELC), a program that supports first-year engineering students in their development of self-regulation and time management skills, effective learning strategies, and positive habits of mind.Baker A. Martin, Clemson University Baker Martin is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University and teaches in the General Engineering Program as part of the first-year engineering curricu- lum. His research interests include choice
groups in engineering education; the methodology and results; then someconclusions.Service-learning has been shown to be effective in a large number of cognitive and affectivemeasures, including critical thinking and tolerance for diversity, and leads to better knowledge ofcourse subject matter, cooperative learning, and recruitment of under-represented groups inengineering; it also leads to better retention of students, and citizenship (Eyler & Giles, 1999). Eyler and Giles also found service-learning to impact positively: tolerance for diversity, personaldevelopment, interpersonal development, and community-to-college connections. Studentsreported working harder, being more curious, connecting learning to personal experience
Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, chair of the First Year Engineering Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart conducts workshops on active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, entrepreneurial mindset education, creative problem solving, and innovation. He is an author of a fluid mechanics textbook. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Assessment of Fluid Power Modules
for the Integrated Teaching and Learning and BOLD Programs at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a B.A. in biochemistry and M.E. in engineering management and is currently a PhD student at the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. She has worked for the University of Colorado in various capacities for 15 years, including as a program manager for a small medical research center and most recently as Director of Access and Recruiting for the College of Engineering and Applied Science. Her interests are in quantitative and qualitative research and data analysis. She has been involved with the BOLD Center and the Engineering GoldShirt Program implementation since
the Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering department. His research interests include machining, effective teaching and engineering mechanics. Before coming to academia, he was a design engineer, maintenance supervisor, and plant engineer. He is a registered professional engineer.Robert O. Warrington, Michigan Technological University Robert O. Warrington is currently Director of the Institute for Leadership and Innovation, which houses the Enterprise program and the new Pavlis Institute for Global Technological Leadership at Michigan Technological University. Dr. Warrington was Dean of the College of Engineering from 1996 to 2007 and was the founder and Director of the Institute for Micromanufacturing at
paper presents results from the introduction in fall 2010 of an innovative assignment into atraditional fluid mechanics course. The new assignment built on students’ work experiences,observations of the natural and built environment, current events, and curiosity and is called theApp, named specifically as a spin on the many apps that are available for smart phones.For the assignment titled CEE310 App: Real-world Application of Fluid Mechanics Concept,students begin with their experience, observation, or curiosity and work in pairs to demonstratetheir understanding of a fluid mechanics concept introduced in class. This assignment has fourparts: (1) identify and research an example that relates to a fluid mechanics concept;(2) designand deliver
between faculty interest and theiractual adoption rates. The research objectives center on examining the real-life experiences ofengineering faculty as they implement innovative teaching methods, such as EBIPs, in theircourses, aiming to gain a better understanding of the limited integration of these practices. Thispaper shares initial insights derived from exploratory interviews with engineering facultyregarding their adoption of EBIPs. This report highlights three engineering faculty (n=3) who havegenerally experienced success in implementing EBIPs within their classrooms. These patternsemerged through initial thematic analysis of their interview transcripts. This analysis emphasizesthe significance of instructors' openness to experimenting
serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, chair of the First Year Engineering Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart conducts workshops on active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, entrepreneurial mindset education, creative problem solving, and innovation. He is an author of a fluid mechanics textbook. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Embedding Fluid Power into Fluid Mechanics and
an understanding of how current undergraduate engineering students andengineering faculty understand power and power dynamics, the research team developed a set ofworkshops for students and faculty to co-design inclusive practices while exploring their ownidentities with respect to power. Part of this study was exploring the possibility of consciousnessraising for students and faculty in their understanding of power.The participants were recruited from the College of Engineering at a large public university inthe Pacific Northwest. Recruitment emails were sent to various mailing lists and students wererecruited through large courses. The final set of participants included two faculty members, onegraduate student who had served as an
Paper ID #41879WIP: Managing and Assessing Students in Hybrid Software Project ClassesProf. Bruce R Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn Bruce R. Maxim has worked as a software engineer, project manager, professor, author, and consultant for more than forty years. His research interests include software engineering, human computer interaction, game design, virtual reality, AIMs. Bency Thomas, University of Michigan, Dearborn Bency Thomas is a Computer and Information Science graduate student at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. She has previously worked as a Software Engineer and later as a Team Lead at The Shams
innovative instructional strategies and technologies in their classrooms and designs and delivers professional devel- opment programs for faculty in the college.Dr. Jody Koenig Kellas, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Jody Koenig Kellas (Ph.D., University of Washington, 2002) is a Professor of Communication Studies at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) in the area of interpersonal, family, and health communication. She is trained in both quantitative and qualitative methods and has published over 50 articles and book chapters, as well as an edited book on storytelling in the family. She has overseen more than a dozen research projects and is a leader in the communication field on narratives and storytelling in the
) Identifyspecific student characteristics that can be leveraged to grow programs oriented toward socialand/or ethical responsibility, while increasing program alignment with – and impacts on –participating individuals. As these objectives suggest, the findings from this project are intendedto help guide ongoing efforts to positively impact the social and ethical commitments ofengineering graduates, including through research-based recommendations for curricular reform.In this paper we give an overview of this research project, with particular emphasis on thelongitudinal, mixed-methods study design being leveraged in support of the objectives givenabove. More specifically, we present our research questions, study contexts, target subjectpopulations, and
degree in Mathematics and a PhD in Computer Science under Neil Wiseman. He is a Chartered Engineer and a Fellow of the British Computer Society.Warren Seering, MIT Warren Seering, PhD is Weber-Shaugness Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Professor of Engineering Systems at MIT. His prior positions at MIT have included Division Head of the Design and Systems Division of Mechanical Engineering, Co-Director of the Nissan Cambridge Basic Research Laboratory, and Co-Director of the MIT Center for Innovation in Product Development. He has won several teaching awards and is a Fellow of ASME.Sallie Sheppard, Texas A&M University Sallie Sheppard, PhD is Professor Emeritus of Computer Science at
of I-CELER implementation and research (Year 3- 5), we willhave evidence of transformative impact of this project at student, faculty, and department levels.2.3. Cultivating and Sustaining Departmental Transformation In the intervention and research design, we adopt Jamieson and Lohmann’s [3] research topractice cycle. This project provides the potential for departmental and institutionaltransformation, specifically because (i) numerous key stakeholders of departmental andinstitutional changes are key project personnel, (ii) these stakeholders will have an explicit andintegral project role, and (iii) each will have opportunities to share best practices, perspectives,and insights. As Jamieson and Lohmann indicated, “[I]nnovation depends
confronting issues related to inclusion. The department undergoes annual review byexternal evaluators Inverness Research. The 2019 review revealed instances where students didnot feel included. These situations involved faculty, staff, and students. Since becoming aware ofthe situations, the department has spent considerable time addressing inclusivity. All facultyattended microaggression and inclusion training (see below). Inclusion training has been addedto the new vertically integrated design project courses (see below) that will be required of allstudents. One faculty piloted a syllabus that includes a policy on microaggressions andharassment. The Department has prompted University’s Center for Teaching and Learning tolead the establishment of a
Paper ID #11882The Washington STate Academic RedShirt (STARS) in Engineering ProgramProf. Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington Eve Riskin received her BS degree in Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and her graduate degrees in EE from Stanford. Since 1990, she has been in the EE Department at the University of Washington where she is now Associate Dean of Diversity and Access in the College of Engineering, Professor of Electri- cal Engineering and Director of the ADVANCE Center for Institutional Change. With ADVANCE, she works on mentoring and leadership development programs for women faculty in SEM. Her research in
student body also can mean incorporating male students into programs that strive toincrease female participation and success.5Supplemental enrichment programs can greatly help recruit and retain women in engineeringmajors.6 Such programs are part of a larger need. According to the Bayer Facts of ScienceEducation Survey XV in 2011, 71% of those surveyed reported that additional staff is warrantedto enrich the amount of academic support necessary for retaining more engineering students.7These programs are particularly critical given that “weeding-out” practices have been found tobe harmful to young engineering students, with women and minority students more affected thantheir white male counterparts.7 Such support is especially warranted during the
Paper ID #17026Engineering Together Sustainable Communities: Sustainability Engineeringin ActionDr. Noe Vargas Hernandez, Carnegie Mellon University Noe Vargas Hernandez researches creativity and innovation in engineering design. He studies ideation methods, journaling, smartpens, and other methods and technology to aid designers improve their creativ- ity levels. He also applies his research to the design of rehabilitation devices (in which he has various patents under process) and design for sustainability.Dr. Heidi A. Taboada, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Heidi A. Taboada is an Associate Professor in the
policies have: changedpromotion and tenure procedures (tenure extension); required announcements of opportunitiesfor administrative appointments; addressed challenges in students' evaluations of instruction;supported on-campus childcare; emphasized spousal/partner hiring; and created the option formodified duties. As a result of search committee training that addresses best practices and unconsciousbias, members of faculty search committees have increased awareness of search pitfalls andimproved skills for successfully completing their work. Substantial funding has been devotedto research support for women faculty (large research grants; course buyouts; travel grants
laboratories. The primarylearning objectives of the course are based on criteria for graduating competent engineers asrecommended by the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)39 and ABET28. Four weeks of thesemester comprise general lectures that provide an overview of the engineering profession andinclude the topics of failure analysis, design methodology and human-centered design, societalcontext of engineering, as well as leadership and ethical considerations in engineering as adiscipline. Following the general lectures are two sets of five-week modules.For the semester in which this study took place, a five-week module on leadership was offered inaddition to two other modules focused on more traditional engineering topics, bioengineeringand
Paper ID #25356Using Campus Energy System Data to Save Energy and Provide Studentswith Real-world Learning ExperiencesDr. Jennifer Lynn Wade, Northern Arizona University Jennifer has been teaching thermal fluid topics and engineering design as a Lecturer in the Mechanical Engineering department at Northern Arizona University since 2015. Prior to this, she spent two years in a research faculty role continuing earlier work on carbon capture technologies. She spent four years as a research/product development engineer for BASF where she was developing catalytic converter and refining catalyst technologies.Dr. Karin E
and requirements to guide teams through their Capstone experience are necessary.Considering the data provided it is evident that support from both the professional and academicmentor is essential for a positive Capstone experience.ConclusionThis paper represents a first step in what is to become a multi –institutional initiative focused onidentifying best practices for developing and improving teamwork skills within the Capstoneexperiences of engineering, technology and computing programs. The collaborators represent adiverse set of Technology Capstone course designs and philosophies. We expect the annualworkshops and use of the CATME training and peer evaluation tools and the measurement ofbehavioral complexity to lead to new research
year 2. Goal 5: Develop an adaptable model for implementing a STEM guided pathways approach at other community colleges. Study the effectiveness and impact of implemented strategies. Broad dissemination of project findings and best practices.STEM Success and Orientation Course Development and ImplementationHow do we teach STEM Identity?While the nuances of the development of our cohort course will be summarized below, it isimportant to begin by noting that the initial course in which SEECRS scholars were placed wasspecifically designed to develop STEM identity. This focus on identity development utilizeddiscourse based identity theory to help students envision themselves as belonging in STEM.Discourse
practices by learning from evidence-based techniques and approaches within the field. We work to help our community stay current on well-founded best practices by critically engaging with recent literature and hearing from experts within the engineering education sphere. · We grow through effort and persistence: We cultivate a growth mindset culture, seeking development and improvement in our understanding and practice of engineering pedagogy. The canon of engineering education research is always growing, so we continue to grow along with it and stay up to date via journal club and cutting-edge discussions. · Our community makes us strong: We strive to build a supportive space for students and educators alike to learn from one
of the practice of professionalengineering (where a PE license is required), but they all generally conform to the definitionincluded in the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) ModelLaw (4) as follows: “The term “Practice of Engineering”, as used in this Act, shall mean anyservice or creative work requiring engineering education, training and experience in theapplication of engineering principles and the interpretation of engineering data to engineeringactivities that potentially impact the health, safety, and welfare of the public. The services mayinclude, but are not limited to, providing planning, studies, design, design coordination,drawings, specifications, and other technical submissions…”As the world
thinking and practice essential for CEE systems development. Contentincludes sustainability in professional codes of ethics, and models and rating tools forsustainability, environmental impact, and social equity assessment. During this module, the 3Csof EM are discussed and then referred back to throughout the semester. In the second module, thestudents study how to apply optimization, multiple criteria and uncertainty evaluation tools. In thethird module, the students study and apply engineering economic decision analysis tools. In thefourth and final module, which occurs across the entire semester, the students research, evaluateand recommend changes to a large-scale system to enhance its sustainability and performance byapplying the tools they