Morehouse, wasfunded initially by a major grant from the McKnight Foundation of Minneapolis, Minnesota,and, subsequently, a challenge grant from the Foundation which required matching funds fromthe Florida Legislature. As a not-for-profit corporation established in 1984, the FEF has providedan avenue to ensure that educational advancement is possible. The impact of the FEF'sinnovative programs and non-traditional approach to enhancing educational outcomes has beendemonstrated across various educational levels, through its highly acclaimed programs. One suchprogram is the Center of Excellence, which houses several pre-collegiate programs1.Established in 1985, the Center of Excellence, under the leadership of Lyra Logan, is acommunity-based
relationships and dependencies withinthe university setting. This approach is not limited to predictive capabilities, as seen in traditionalmachine learning models; it also enables us to engage in objective “what-if” analyses. These anal-yses delve into counterfactual reasoning, allowing us to explore hypothetical scenarios and theirpotential impacts on student outcomes. We aim to utilize this model to better understand the causalrelationships between curriculum complexity and student performance metrics. By doing so, weaim to contribute a novel perspective to educational research discourse, offering theoretical insightsand practical implications for curriculum design and student success strategies. This study not onlyseeks to fill a critical gap in
Engineering in the field of Electronics, Circuit Analysis, Instrumentation Systems, and VLSI Design. Dr. Attia earned his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Houston, an M.S. from University of Toronto and B.S. from Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana. Dr. Attia has over 75 publications including four engineering books. His research interests include innovative electronic circuit designs for radiation environment, radiation testing, and power electronics. Dr. Attia is the author of the CRC book, Electronics and Circuits Analysis Using MATLAB, 2nd Edition He has twice received outstanding Teaching Awards. In addition, he is a member of the following honor societies: Sigma Xi, Tau Beta Pi
innovating the MOOC so that learners can have a morepersonalized learning experience.Recognizing the intention of these learners at the time of enrollment was to apply informationfrom the MOOC, there are implications for instructional design of advanced engineeringMOOCs. For example, instructors may want to consider how well they fully bridge the gapfrom conceptual understanding to practical use of information. This may include using real-world contexts in teaching materials and providing resources for later application of courseconcepts. Also considering a large group of learners indicated a desire to achieve a high grade,together, these findings suggest that there may be an opportunity to work with industrialorganizations to offer professional
by Wright StateUniversity and has had a significant positive impact on the retention rate for underpreparedengineering students10. Studies of students taking ENGR 107 at WSU show that they havesignificant improvement in their math efficacy11. Additionally, WSU STARS will take MATH108 Trigonometry, the prerequisite for the first calculus course required of engineers. Theremainder of the second semester is CHEM 101 Introduction to Chemistry (preparation forcollege chemistry), ENGR 120 Innovation in Design (a project-based introduction to engineeringcourse), and general education credits. After two semesters, students will have completed fourcourses required for graduation, lightening the load in the subsequent four years, while alsopreparing
] served as a jumping offpoint for educators to create literacy rich curricula centered on their core STEM requirements. Inparticular, 3rd-5th grade summer school students (i.e., ranging in age from 8-12 years) in SlatonIndependent School District (ISD) (Slaton, Texas) showed an estimated 80 % improvement ontheir practice Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) science tests after havingEngineering Elephants [18] integrated into their summer school curriculum [23].Figure 1: Excerpts from Engineering Elephants that illustrate the interactive, engagingpresentation of engineering concepts tailored to young ages.While we exposed a variety of age groups and grade levels to this story, this study focuses onfindings limited to the 3rd grade level
individual belongs toprofessionally, and/or voluntarily. Therefore, ethical conduct and practice is a traditional cornerstone ofeducation and the professional conduct and development of workforce in all industries.Today, engineers play a crucial role in the development of the direction of technology, research, economicgrowth and thereby impact on the safety, wellbeing, and lives of people. Engineers make decisions or areinvolved in the decision-making and operational processes of business, government, and/or non-profitorganizations at various levels (strategic, tactical, and operational). Since engineers’ design and makesolutions available to use for dealing with the societies’ complex problems, the direct and ripple effects ofthese decision-making
undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation and evaluation. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Fron- tiers of Engineering Education Symposium in 2013 and awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research
environment in the classroom. In 124th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). ASEE, 2017. Paper No. 19953. [9] Peter J. Clarke, Debra L. Davis, Raymond Chang-Lau, and Tariq M. King. Impact of using tools in an under- graduate software testing course supported by WReSTT. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., 17(4):18:1–18:28, August 2017.[10] Michael Prince. Does active learning work? a review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3):223–231, 2004.[11] Barbara Leigh Smith and Jean T. MacGregor. What is Collaborative Learning? In A.S. Goodsell, M.R. Ma- her, and V. Tinto, editors, Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment
learning outcomes is alsodescribed.Introduction:During the summer of 2020, we hosted a virtual summer camp for high school and early-college STEM students. The subject is related to advanced manufacturing (AM) and 3Dprinting. This outreach is funded by the Department of Energy DOE consortium project. Withthis summer program, our objective is to prepare a pool of students in the AM area, in highdemand in industrial and national research laboratories.High school Architectural and Engineering Drafting teachers from Guilford Countyparticipated in the workshop to help with teaching and designing the activities and theprogram. A University faculty participated in organizing the workshop activities andinstructed the students on a number of engineering
Sciences program at Clemson University. Broadly, her research interests include intergenerational learning in informal settings and self-directed learning. Since 2017, Abigail has been the graduate assistant for the General Engineering Learning Community (GELC), a program that supports first-year engineering students in their development of self-regulation and time management skills, effective learning strategies, and positive habits of mind.Baker A. Martin, Clemson University Baker Martin is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University and teaches in the General Engineering Program as part of the first-year engineering curricu- lum. His research interests include choice
groups in engineering education; the methodology and results; then someconclusions.Service-learning has been shown to be effective in a large number of cognitive and affectivemeasures, including critical thinking and tolerance for diversity, and leads to better knowledge ofcourse subject matter, cooperative learning, and recruitment of under-represented groups inengineering; it also leads to better retention of students, and citizenship (Eyler & Giles, 1999). Eyler and Giles also found service-learning to impact positively: tolerance for diversity, personaldevelopment, interpersonal development, and community-to-college connections. Studentsreported working harder, being more curious, connecting learning to personal experience
Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, chair of the First Year Engineering Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart conducts workshops on active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, entrepreneurial mindset education, creative problem solving, and innovation. He is an author of a fluid mechanics textbook. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Assessment of Fluid Power Modules
for the Integrated Teaching and Learning and BOLD Programs at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a B.A. in biochemistry and M.E. in engineering management and is currently a PhD student at the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. She has worked for the University of Colorado in various capacities for 15 years, including as a program manager for a small medical research center and most recently as Director of Access and Recruiting for the College of Engineering and Applied Science. Her interests are in quantitative and qualitative research and data analysis. She has been involved with the BOLD Center and the Engineering GoldShirt Program implementation since
the Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering department. His research interests include machining, effective teaching and engineering mechanics. Before coming to academia, he was a design engineer, maintenance supervisor, and plant engineer. He is a registered professional engineer.Robert O. Warrington, Michigan Technological University Robert O. Warrington is currently Director of the Institute for Leadership and Innovation, which houses the Enterprise program and the new Pavlis Institute for Global Technological Leadership at Michigan Technological University. Dr. Warrington was Dean of the College of Engineering from 1996 to 2007 and was the founder and Director of the Institute for Micromanufacturing at
paper presents results from the introduction in fall 2010 of an innovative assignment into atraditional fluid mechanics course. The new assignment built on students’ work experiences,observations of the natural and built environment, current events, and curiosity and is called theApp, named specifically as a spin on the many apps that are available for smart phones.For the assignment titled CEE310 App: Real-world Application of Fluid Mechanics Concept,students begin with their experience, observation, or curiosity and work in pairs to demonstratetheir understanding of a fluid mechanics concept introduced in class. This assignment has fourparts: (1) identify and research an example that relates to a fluid mechanics concept;(2) designand deliver
between faculty interest and theiractual adoption rates. The research objectives center on examining the real-life experiences ofengineering faculty as they implement innovative teaching methods, such as EBIPs, in theircourses, aiming to gain a better understanding of the limited integration of these practices. Thispaper shares initial insights derived from exploratory interviews with engineering facultyregarding their adoption of EBIPs. This report highlights three engineering faculty (n=3) who havegenerally experienced success in implementing EBIPs within their classrooms. These patternsemerged through initial thematic analysis of their interview transcripts. This analysis emphasizesthe significance of instructors' openness to experimenting
serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, chair of the First Year Engineering Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart conducts workshops on active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, entrepreneurial mindset education, creative problem solving, and innovation. He is an author of a fluid mechanics textbook. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Embedding Fluid Power into Fluid Mechanics and
an understanding of how current undergraduate engineering students andengineering faculty understand power and power dynamics, the research team developed a set ofworkshops for students and faculty to co-design inclusive practices while exploring their ownidentities with respect to power. Part of this study was exploring the possibility of consciousnessraising for students and faculty in their understanding of power.The participants were recruited from the College of Engineering at a large public university inthe Pacific Northwest. Recruitment emails were sent to various mailing lists and students wererecruited through large courses. The final set of participants included two faculty members, onegraduate student who had served as an
Paper ID #41879WIP: Managing and Assessing Students in Hybrid Software Project ClassesProf. Bruce R Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn Bruce R. Maxim has worked as a software engineer, project manager, professor, author, and consultant for more than forty years. His research interests include software engineering, human computer interaction, game design, virtual reality, AIMs. Bency Thomas, University of Michigan, Dearborn Bency Thomas is a Computer and Information Science graduate student at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. She has previously worked as a Software Engineer and later as a Team Lead at The Shams
innovative instructional strategies and technologies in their classrooms and designs and delivers professional devel- opment programs for faculty in the college.Dr. Jody Koenig Kellas, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Jody Koenig Kellas (Ph.D., University of Washington, 2002) is a Professor of Communication Studies at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) in the area of interpersonal, family, and health communication. She is trained in both quantitative and qualitative methods and has published over 50 articles and book chapters, as well as an edited book on storytelling in the family. She has overseen more than a dozen research projects and is a leader in the communication field on narratives and storytelling in the
) Identifyspecific student characteristics that can be leveraged to grow programs oriented toward socialand/or ethical responsibility, while increasing program alignment with – and impacts on –participating individuals. As these objectives suggest, the findings from this project are intendedto help guide ongoing efforts to positively impact the social and ethical commitments ofengineering graduates, including through research-based recommendations for curricular reform.In this paper we give an overview of this research project, with particular emphasis on thelongitudinal, mixed-methods study design being leveraged in support of the objectives givenabove. More specifically, we present our research questions, study contexts, target subjectpopulations, and
degree in Mathematics and a PhD in Computer Science under Neil Wiseman. He is a Chartered Engineer and a Fellow of the British Computer Society.Warren Seering, MIT Warren Seering, PhD is Weber-Shaugness Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Professor of Engineering Systems at MIT. His prior positions at MIT have included Division Head of the Design and Systems Division of Mechanical Engineering, Co-Director of the Nissan Cambridge Basic Research Laboratory, and Co-Director of the MIT Center for Innovation in Product Development. He has won several teaching awards and is a Fellow of ASME.Sallie Sheppard, Texas A&M University Sallie Sheppard, PhD is Professor Emeritus of Computer Science at
of I-CELER implementation and research (Year 3- 5), we willhave evidence of transformative impact of this project at student, faculty, and department levels.2.3. Cultivating and Sustaining Departmental Transformation In the intervention and research design, we adopt Jamieson and Lohmann’s [3] research topractice cycle. This project provides the potential for departmental and institutionaltransformation, specifically because (i) numerous key stakeholders of departmental andinstitutional changes are key project personnel, (ii) these stakeholders will have an explicit andintegral project role, and (iii) each will have opportunities to share best practices, perspectives,and insights. As Jamieson and Lohmann indicated, “[I]nnovation depends
confronting issues related to inclusion. The department undergoes annual review byexternal evaluators Inverness Research. The 2019 review revealed instances where students didnot feel included. These situations involved faculty, staff, and students. Since becoming aware ofthe situations, the department has spent considerable time addressing inclusivity. All facultyattended microaggression and inclusion training (see below). Inclusion training has been addedto the new vertically integrated design project courses (see below) that will be required of allstudents. One faculty piloted a syllabus that includes a policy on microaggressions andharassment. The Department has prompted University’s Center for Teaching and Learning tolead the establishment of a
Paper ID #11882The Washington STate Academic RedShirt (STARS) in Engineering ProgramProf. Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington Eve Riskin received her BS degree in Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and her graduate degrees in EE from Stanford. Since 1990, she has been in the EE Department at the University of Washington where she is now Associate Dean of Diversity and Access in the College of Engineering, Professor of Electri- cal Engineering and Director of the ADVANCE Center for Institutional Change. With ADVANCE, she works on mentoring and leadership development programs for women faculty in SEM. Her research in
student body also can mean incorporating male students into programs that strive toincrease female participation and success.5Supplemental enrichment programs can greatly help recruit and retain women in engineeringmajors.6 Such programs are part of a larger need. According to the Bayer Facts of ScienceEducation Survey XV in 2011, 71% of those surveyed reported that additional staff is warrantedto enrich the amount of academic support necessary for retaining more engineering students.7These programs are particularly critical given that “weeding-out” practices have been found tobe harmful to young engineering students, with women and minority students more affected thantheir white male counterparts.7 Such support is especially warranted during the
Paper ID #17026Engineering Together Sustainable Communities: Sustainability Engineeringin ActionDr. Noe Vargas Hernandez, Carnegie Mellon University Noe Vargas Hernandez researches creativity and innovation in engineering design. He studies ideation methods, journaling, smartpens, and other methods and technology to aid designers improve their creativ- ity levels. He also applies his research to the design of rehabilitation devices (in which he has various patents under process) and design for sustainability.Dr. Heidi A. Taboada, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Heidi A. Taboada is an Associate Professor in the
policies have: changedpromotion and tenure procedures (tenure extension); required announcements of opportunitiesfor administrative appointments; addressed challenges in students' evaluations of instruction;supported on-campus childcare; emphasized spousal/partner hiring; and created the option formodified duties. As a result of search committee training that addresses best practices and unconsciousbias, members of faculty search committees have increased awareness of search pitfalls andimproved skills for successfully completing their work. Substantial funding has been devotedto research support for women faculty (large research grants; course buyouts; travel grants
laboratories. The primarylearning objectives of the course are based on criteria for graduating competent engineers asrecommended by the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)39 and ABET28. Four weeks of thesemester comprise general lectures that provide an overview of the engineering profession andinclude the topics of failure analysis, design methodology and human-centered design, societalcontext of engineering, as well as leadership and ethical considerations in engineering as adiscipline. Following the general lectures are two sets of five-week modules.For the semester in which this study took place, a five-week module on leadership was offered inaddition to two other modules focused on more traditional engineering topics, bioengineeringand