. Of the five ControlEngineers, three of them are directly working with PLC programming and automation systemdesigns. Before the students graduated from the college, they had developed and presented thefollowing papers at national and international conferences."Automated Sorting Using PLC Technology", 2013 Mid-Atlantic ASEE EngineeringConference, April 27, 2013, New York City, New York. Page 26.1483.11"A PLC Automated Security Checkpoint", Ninth LACCEI Latin American and CaribbeanConference (LACCEI’2011), Engineering for a Smart Planet, Innovation, InformationTechnology and Computational Tools for Sustainable Development, August 3-5, 2011
evaluates programmatic inter- ventions designed to recruit, retain and advance diverse faculty at UMBC. Dr. Reed also routinely dis- seminates best practices learned from UMBC’s diversity initiatives at national and international venues. Dr. Reed is on the advisory board for the Mid-Atlantic Higher Education Recruitment Consortium.Dr. Renetta G. Tull, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Renetta Garrison Tull is Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Student Professional Development & Post- doctoral Affairs at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC: An Honors University in Mary- land), where she is the Co-PI and Founding Director for the National Science Foundation’s PROMISE: Maryland’s Alliance for
Role Identities and Future-Time Perspectives,” J of Engineering Edu, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 362–383, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20324.[19] B. J. Sottile, L. E. Cruz, Y.-A. L. Burleson, and K. McLain, “It’s about time: An analysis of student activities under remote learning,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual Conference, Jul. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37412[20] B. J. Sottile, L. E. Cruz, and K. McLain, “Through The Looking Glass: STEM Students’ Changing Relationships with Time Across the COVID-19 Pandemic,” presented at the Spring 2022 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Conference, Newark, NJ, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/40075[21] J. W. Creswell and V. L
Research and Applications, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1347–1352, 2012. [5] J. Sutherland and K. Schwaber, “The scrum papers: Nuts, bolts, and origins of an agile process,” Boston: Scrum, Inc., 2007. [6] D. Lee, C. E. Wick, and H. Figueroa, “Applying scrum project management methods in biomedical and electrical and computer engineering capstone design courses,” in 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Spring Conference, no. 10.18260/1-2–29456, April 2018, https://peer.asee.org/29456. [7] X. Ma, “Mini scrum: An innovative project for an introductory digital logic design course,” https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/2318, 2023. [8] M. G. Software, “User stories,” https://www.mountaingoatsoftware.com/agile/user-stories. [9] C. H. Roth and L. Kinney
for Practical Adoption,” Information, v.15, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/info1506034511. Z. Zhang and Y. Chang, Y, “Leveraging Generative AI To Enhance Engineering Education at Both Low-Level And High-Level Study,” in 2024 Fall ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Conference, Farmingdale State College, NY, New York. Oct. 25-26, 2024. Available: https://peer.asee.org/4945012. M.M. Rahman and Y. Watanobe, “ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, 5783, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/app1309578313. S.M. J.Uddon, A. Albert, M. Tamanna, and A. Ovid, “ChatGPT as an Educational Resource for Civil Engineering,” Computer Applications in Engineering
prompt reflection and integration of sociotechnical perspectivesinto every step of the design work students engage in, which requires students to keep thebroader impacts of their work in mind both in the course and beyond the classroom inprofessional practice. To properly understand the development and implementation of the CEQs,background on the course will first be provided.Course HistoryIn 2019, administrators at a large public mid-Atlantic university began a study of their FYEprogram to evaluate whether it was providing students with the skills and knowledge that wouldbe most useful to them in their professional careers. To do so, a survey was sent to engineeringfaculty, university alumni, and employers who had hired university graduates in
Excellence in Teaching by Stony Brook University and the winner of the 2018 FACT2 award for Excellence in Instruction given to one professor from the entire SUNY system. He also received the 2021 Distinguished Teaching Award from the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Mid-Atlantic Division. He has been twice elected as a member of the ASME Mechanisms and Robotics committee and served as the Program Chair for the 2014 ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, as the Conference Chair for ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Paper ID #48502 the 2015 ASME Mechanisms and Robotics
to enable diversecontexts to ease comparison and contrasts across participant views (Morelock, Matusovich,Cunningham, & Hermundstad, 2016). The first research site (PubU) was a large, public,research-focused university in the Mid-Atlantic United States (PubU). The second research site(PriU) was a small, private not-for-profit, teaching-focused university in the Midwestern UnitedStates. The student population at PriU was less than 5000 (approximated at the time of theinterview), while that for PubU was larger at approximately 35,000. A comparative descriptionof the sites is available from Morelock et al. (2016) to provide an overview of the differencesbetween the two sites. Table 1: Comparison of
2019 Physics I STEM degree; students with better grades[13] (n=4,498) 98.1% more likely to graduateInkelas et Mid-Atlantic 2009- longitudinal Calc I and Calc graduation Students beginning in Calc I had lower Sequential, exploratory,al., 2021 university 2016 II (on-track GPA (p ≤ .001), and longer time-to- mixed-methods design; t-[14] (n=2,689) calculus) degree (p ≤ .05) than those in Calc II. tests, hierarchical
fora rubber band launcher based on this benchmark design (Model PL7920, Funtime).Course EvaluationThe primary aim of the Technical Communications course, as described in the previous section,was for first-year engineering students to develop multiple, industry-aligned communicationskills. A preliminary evaluation was conducted to determine if the course was meeting this goal.The study setting was a large-enrollment introductory design course taken by second semester,first-year, mechanical engineering students at a mid-sized university in the Mid-Atlantic region.Most students in the course had already taken a university-required general composition coursethe prior semester. The course was taught as a single lecture section that met twice weekly
, June 14-17, 2015, Paper ID # 13620 5) L. Lee, R. Hackett, and H. Estrada, “Evaluation of a Flipped Classroom in Mechanics of Materials”, 122 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14-17, 2015, Paper ID # 11392 6) K. Sharpe, Ph. D., University of Virginia, Darden School of Business) personal communication. 7) S. Chetcuti, H.Thomas, and B. Pafford, ”Flipping the Engineering Classroom, Lessons Learned in the Creation, Production and Implementation”, page 7, Fall 2013 Middle Atlantic Section Proceedings Archives, ASEE 8) T. L. Bergman, A. S. Lavine, F. P. Incropera, and D. P. Dewitt, “Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer” 7th ed.; Pg 38, J. Wiley and Sons. ©2011, 2007, 2002 9) B. Kerr, “The flipped
following the design method taught in class.In this paper, the authors will describe the rationale, pedagogical choices, and administrativetasks involved in providing a design-related service learning experience for first-year students onsuch a large scale. Excerpts from students’ reflection essays are presented as anecdotal evidencethat the proposed program assisted students in achieving the course objectives and learningoutcomes.1. Offering a First Year Engineering Design Experience on a Large Scale1.1 Context: “Exploration of Engineering Design”The context for this paper is a required introductory course for first-year engineering students ofVirginia Tech. Virginia Tech is a large mid-Atlantic land-grant university; the engineeringcollege is its
. Each class (or “section”) includes typically no more than 16 studentsenabling high levels of student engagement. For example, in the Spring 2020 semester, studentsenrolled in EV350 were distributed among 13 sections taught by six instructors. During thatsemester, one lab, one field trip, and 20 lessons were transitioned from in-person learning to anonline platform, Blackboard Collaborate. During the pivot, all lessons, labs, and field trips, wereprerecorded using existing materials (e.g., slideshows and handouts). Lessons learned duringSpring 2020 were immediately refined and the entire course (40-lessons) was transitioned to100% remote for a summer course offering. To do so, an additional lab, field trip, and the first 20lessons of the course
university in the Mid-Atlantic, my responsibility is toteach courses that take engineering from the outset to be about both technology and society. Alarge introductory lecture course offered in our department is called “Technology and Society”(as it is at many other schools). In it, I aim to appreciate together with the students technologyand society as phenomena that we can subject to systematic analysis just as phenomenaelsewhere in the universe (physics, genetics, linguistics, etc.). I also try to appreciate togetherwith them that, at this point, we have at our disposal well-developed and widely sharedmethodical techniques to do this. I assign texts, film, music, and photography/painting, and byreading, watching, and listening to, others’ work
skills gap forengineering graduates: Recent trends in higher education Paper presented at 2023 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43338[2] M.S. Kleine, K. Zacharias, and D. Ozkan, D. Contextualization in engineering education: Ascoping literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 2024.113(4), pp.894-918.[3] J. Goggins, M. Hajdukiewicz. The role of community-engaged learning in engineeringeducation for sustainable development. Sustainability, 2022. 14(13), p.8208.[4] M. Mosleh, K.A. Shirvani, K.A. Design, Build, and Test Projects in an Engineering MaterialsLaboratory. In 2017 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Fall Conference.[5] A. Verma, K. Snyder. Integrating community-engaged research and energy justice
Paper ID #33885Relationship Between Guided Interactive Activities and Self-concept inEngineering StudentsDr. Ing. Giannina Costa, Universidad Andres Bello Doctor en tecnolog´ıa de informaci´on Universidad Atlantic International University, Magister en Inform´atica de la Universidad Andr´es Bello de Chile, Ingeniero Inform´atica de la Universidad T´ecnica Federico Santa Mar´ıa de Chile. Experiencia docente de m´as de 12 a˜nos, realizando diversas asignaturas del a´ rea de la In- genier´ıa de Software, inteligencia de negocios, metodolog´ıas a´ giles en las carreras de Pre grado, Advance y Mag´ıster de la Universidad Andr
and record book for student outcomes assessment and institutional effectiveness. New York, NY: Agathon Press.3. ABET. (2015a). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/E001-16-17-EAC-Criteria-10-20-15.pdf4. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2003). Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7–25. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00734.x5. Joye, D. D. (2010). A lifelong learning exercise (ABET required) in an undergraduate fluids course. Published in Fall 2010 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, Villanova, PA.6. Marra, R. M., Camplese, K. Z., & Litzinger, T. A. (1999). Lifelong learning: A
on qualitative analysis ofstudent performance on exam problems administered before and after the project, theirperformance on structural analysis of their prototypes during the project, and their responses toan exit survey. Subsequent to qualitative analyses, we performed statistical analyses to determinewhat quantitative differences existed, if any, in student performance on structural analysis beforeand after the project. This method allowed us to discern the quality of student learning throughconvergent data analysis and triangulation.Context and ParticipantsThe study setting was a single, large-enrollment section of a statics course that enrolled firstsemester sophomore year mechanical engineering students (N = 155) at a mid-sized
prototyping and presentationCollege of engineering designs. A physics engine is supported which provides the effects of gravity,My Fall 2009 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section friction, and collision detection. Within thepaper titled Teaching Passive House Construction: Second Life virtual environment, engineering 12designs, physical models, and prototypes architectural model) is created. This facilitatescan be constructed, tested and evaluated investigative and speculative approach to designin a collaborative fashion. Users from
The Second Life® virtual world provides 3Dand Construction Management building tools and scripting capabilities whichState University of New York - Farmingdale State facilitate the prototyping and presentationCollege of engineering designs. A physics engine is supported which provides the effects of gravity,My Fall 2009 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section friction, and collision detection. Within thepaper titled Teaching Passive House Construction: Second Life virtual environment, engineering 12designs, physical models, and
accessing.These individual student differences are important and can seriously impact their learning[18]. Wetherefore observe a gap in the literature that helps to motivate this study: for students in a realclassroom environment, what are the usage patterns of the various instructional supports (videos,peers, textbook, instructor) available to them, and in what ways does the ecosystem shape theseusage patterns? This paper gives a preliminary look at these issues using data collected during arecent academic semester in a Dynamics course.Study population, data, and methodologyStudent population. The subjects in this study were students in the sophomore-level courseDynamics at a large, mid-Atlantic public university during the Spring 2012 semester
15 Communication C6 difficult than other kinds of teams.Participants and ProcedureData for this study was collected with students enrolled in a first-year general engineeringprogram at a suburban mid-Atlantic R1 institution. All participants were enrolled in differentsections of an introductory engineering design course, where students were introduced todifferent engineering concepts and the engineering design process. The course was taught in afully online synchronous modality due to Covid-19 precautions. All participants were required tocomplete an assignment that outlined the basic function of their design teams, includingindividual member
executive committee of this division (Program Chair 2011, Division Chair 2012, and Nominating Committee Chair 2013). Dr. Allen is the recipient of ten teaching awards at UVA, including the All-University Teaching Award in 2017. Since 2016, he has been the PI on an NSF REU site focused on multi-scale systems bioengineering and biomedical data sciences, a collab- oration involving faculty in SEAS, SOM, SDS, and CLAS at UVA, as well as six partner institutions in the mid-Atlantic and Southeast. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Effect of In-person versus Pre-recorded Final Presentations on Student Learning Outcomes and EngagementAbstractPre-recorded
conducted at a public university in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic region. Through aquasi-experimental design approach, this research assessed the impact of Ed+gineering on PSTs’engineering and pedagogical knowledge and beliefs towards engineering integration. PSTs wereassigned to treatment and comparison groups based on their course section. All participatingcourses had two versions (treatment and comparison) with the same learning objectives andsimilar content. The PSTs in the treatment group completed the Ed+gineering collaborationproject with engineering students as one of their class assignments. The comparison group wascomposed of PSTs enrolled in the same courses as the treatment group, but in sections that didnot participate in the Ed+gineering
Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021, July. ASEE Conferences, 2021.8. Tinkercad website https://www.tinkercad.com/9. Arduino website https://www.arduino.cc/10. Yu Wang, Warren Hunter, XiaoLin Chen, Housney Ahmed, and Haneefah Safo. "Improved Hardware Design of IoT Prosthetic Device". 2018 Mid Atlantic Section Fall Meeting, Brooklyn, New York, 2018, October. ASEE Conferences, 2018.11. Afsaneh Minaie and Reza Sanati-Mehrizy. "Capstone Projects in a Computer Engineering Program Using Arduino". 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016, June. ASEE Conferences, 2016.
System Instruction to Improve Undergraduate Education.” In Proceedings of ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Spring 2016 Conference, Washington, DC, USA.[17] Teichman, A., Levinson, J., and Thrun, S. 2011. “Towards 3D Object Recognition Via Classification of Arbitrary Object Tracks.” In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4034-4041.[18] Janoch, A., Karayev, S., Jia, Y., Barron, J. T., Fritz, M., Saenko, K., and Darrell, T. 2013. “A Category-Level 3d Object Dataset: Putting the Kinect to Work.” In Consumer Depth Cameras for Computer Vision, pp. 141-165. 10[19] Socher, R., Huval, B., Bath, B., Manning, C. D., and Ng, A. Y. 2012
a PhD in Computer Science from SUNY, with particular emphasis on Data Mining and Big data analytics. He is an author or co-author of over 25 peer reviewed journal and conference publications and co-authored a textbook – ”Essential As- pects of Physical Design and Implementation of Relational Databases.” He has four patents in the area of Search Engine research. He is also a recipient of the Math Olympiad Award, and is currently serving as Chair Elect of the ASEE (American Society of Engineering Education) Mid-Atlantic Conference. He also serves as an NSF (National Science Foundation) panelist.Prof. Karen Goodlad, New York City College of Technology, CUNY Karen Goodlad is an Assistant Professor specializing in
recipients that are female is often used in research because it allows forinstitutional comparisons, accounts for persistence, and provides an index of whatmight at some point in the future be reflected in the composition of the workforce.The final pool of participating institutions consisted five private and three publicdoctoral/research universities of varying sizes. Four of the institutions are locatedin the Northeast, one in the Mid-Atlantic Region, and three in the West. Page 15.297.4The Engineering Student Survey and RespondentsThe survey distributed to students in the participating colleges of engineering was basedon The Student Persisting in
theinstitution.Bibliography1. R.E. Lyons, Deepening our understanding of adjunct faculty. In R.E. Lyons (ed.), Best Practices for Supporting Adjunct Faculty, Anker Publishing, Bolton, MA, 2007.2. N.A. Lewis, The engineer as a professor: Bringing experience to the engineering classroom, presented at the ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section meeting, U.S. Military Academy at West Point (New York), March 28-29, 2008.3. C. Baukal, J. Colannino, W. Bussman and J. Matsson, Industry-University Partnership Case Study, presented at the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Midwest Section Annual Conference, September 22-24, 2010, Lawrence, KS.4. J.H. McMasters and N. Komerath, Boeing-university relations – A review and prospects for the future
ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section’s Distinguished Teaching Award.Dr. Jumoke O. Ladeji-Osias, Morgan State University Page 25.1413.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Useful Strategies for Implementing an Online Undergraduate Electrical Engineering ProgramAbstractOnline programs in Electrical Engineering disciplines have been mainly offered at the graduateschool level to avoid the complexities associated with conducting courses that require alaboratory component. To our knowledge, there are only a handful of online Accreditation Boardfor Engineering and