Engineering, The State University of New York (SUNY) at Buffalo and from 2008 to 2012, I was an assistant professor in the Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Dakota State University (NDSU). Previously, from 2004 to 2008, I worked for Magma Design Automation, San Jose CA, where I received the outstanding technical contribution award in 2007. During the Summer of 2001, I worked on analog circuit synthesis and layout at NeoLinear Inc., Pittsburgh PA. During 1996-1997, I was an Erasmus graduate student at the University of Patras, Greece. I serve on the technical program committee of several conferences including NOCS, SOCC, and ReConFig. I am a senior member of IEEE and a member of ACM and Eta Kappa Nu. I
WashingtonKathleen E Kearney, University of WashingtonJonathan T.C. Liu, University of WashingtonJonathan D. Posner, University of WashingtonErin Blakeney, University of WashingtonERIC SEIBEL, University of WashingtonShayla PayneFull PaperThe University of Washington’s Engineering Innovation in Health program is a yearlong engineering design coursesequence where senior undergraduate and graduate engineering students across different disciplines work in teamswith health professionals to address their unmet needs. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, these team- andproject-based courses shifted from an in-person to remote course environment. Here, we share innovative teachingstrategies for team-based, remote course environments. We show how this shift
, it also takes a very talented leader to blend the voice of the customer with thevoice of the business to create a true culture of innovation. This type of culture is especiallyimportant to product design, as well as to the sustainability of further growth as technology-based organizations dominate industrial productivity.2.1 Building a Culture of InnovationIn today’s innovation-driven economy, the vast majority of engineering innovations are needs-driven and market-focused, requiring deliberate engineering problem-solving and responsibleleadership. Today the practice of engineering for creative technology development and Page
Paper ID #39355”We’re Learning like Everyone Else”: Best Practices from Men AlliesDanielle Vegas Lewis, SUNY Fredonia Danielle Vegas Lewis is a doctoral candidate in the University at Buffalo’s Higher Education program. She earned a B.A. in Political Science from SUNY Cortland in 2005 and a M.Ed. in Higher Education and Student Affairs from the University of South Carolina in 2007. She is currently the SUNY PRODiG Fellow at SUNY Fredonia where she teaches sociology and gender courses. She also serves as a Research Associate for Dr. Linda DeAngelo at the University of Pittsburgh. Her research agenda aims to under
Amir Kabir Univer- sity of Techonology (biomedical engineering) and a Ph.D. degrees from the University of Conecticut (mechanical engineering). She also received a certificate in college instruction from the University of Connecticut. Her current research involves modeling and simulation of protein molecules as nano bio robots with applications in new drug design. The other aspect of her research is engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Best Practices in Encouraging STEM Majors Among Grade 6-12 StudentsThe world is always in need of people who are interested and knowledgeable in STEM topics.Engineering Ambassadors is
Paper ID #9639Rethinking Automotive Engineering Education – Deep Orange as a Collabo-rative Innovation Framework for Project-Based Learning Incorporating Real-World Case StudiesDr. Ala A. Qattawi, Automotive Engineering Department at Clemson University –International Center forAutomotive Research (CU-ICAR) Dr. Ala Qattawi, Clemson University Ala Qattawi is a post-doctoral fellow at Clemson University- International Center for Automotive Engineering (CU-ICAR). She received her PhD in automotive en- gineering from Clemson University in 2012 and became the first women in USA to earn a PhD degree in that field. Dr. Qattawi’s area
students in engineering disciplines.With a four year graduation rate exceeding that of Non-Bridge African American students in 2010,the efforts of the Bridge program are viewed favorably. The MSU Bridge program remains diligentin utilizing the best practices shared in this paper to continue to improve URM student outcomes.References[1] Reisel, J. R. (2012). Assessment of Factors Impacting Success for Incoming College Engineering Students in a Summer Bridge Program. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Volume 43 Issue 4, 421-433.[2] Booth Womack, V., Dickerson, D., Solis, F., Stawlley, C. S., & Zephirin, T. (2014, June 15). Can an Engineering Summer Bridge Program Effectively
D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school
Powered by www.slayte.com The STEM Center to Promote Undergraduate Education and Research at Sam Houston State UniversityAbstractThe STEM Center at Sam Houston State University (SHSU) has received funding from theNational Science Foundation (NSF - IUSE) and was established in 2017. The STEM Center seeksto increase the number and quality of STEM graduates by establishing a strong foundation forlearning using innovative teaching practices, supporting students in finding research and internshipopportunities, and building lifelong skills needed for advancement and leadership in STEMcareers. The center is in one of the STEM buildings with two fully equipped classrooms and officespace for full-time staff members. The center
Ph.D. (Aerospace Engineering Science) from the University of Colorado at Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and MSC Software Corp. His research includes design of Micro Air Vehicles, development of innovative de- sign methodologies and enhancement of engineering education. Dr Jensen has authored over 120 refereed papers and has been awarded over $4.5 million of research grants. He is a Fellow at the Singapore Univ. of Technology and Design’s International Design Center. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Creativity exercises to enhance innovation in undergraduate
-based research topics as students are into the second year of their research projects. Thecurriculum will introduce students to practices in many areas of engineering and relateddisciplines. During the course, students apply programming and electronics knowledge to theRaspberry Pi computer and interface with a variety of sensors for real world data collection, suchas wireless water quality sensors. Students can also use robotics platforms for understandingbasic concepts in kinetics, control, programming, and intelligent systems. Other projects arerelated to the design and development of floating platforms and turbines for offshore windenergy. While the aim of this course is on integrating general engineering practices with scienceconcepts, we
identify best practices,” Proceedings of the 2003 Frontiers in Education Conference, Denver, CO, November 2003.14. Eliot, M., Neal, R., and Turns, J. (accepted). “Recognizing need: The analysis of qualitative data to inform web site design,” To appear in Proceedings of the 2005 International Professional Communicator’s Conference, Limerick, Ireland, July 2005.15. Turns, J., Atman, C.A., Adams, R.S., and Barker, T. (2005). “Research on Engineering Student Knowing: Trends and Opportunities,” Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), pp. 27-40.JENNIFER TURNS is an assistant professor of Technical Communication at the University ofWashington and the head of the Laboratory for User-Centered Engineering Education (LUCEE).Dr. Turns
students have in idea generation and development and the impact that instruction canhave on their incorporation of best practices.IntroductionTo solve major challenges of the 21st century, engineers must be prepared to use designprinciples that lead to innovative solutions [1]. ABET also emphasizes the importance of trainingundergraduate engineering students to develop design skills [2]. In a design process, ideageneration and development are important steps that contribute to the innovative designoutcomes [3]. However, research indicates challenges for students in generating creativeconcepts for open-ended design problems [4]. Successful implementations of creative ideas can lead to innovation. Ideally, ideageneration and development
teaching practices impact the student experience in theStructures course? To answer the guiding research questions, we utilized a mixed-methodapproach to collecting and analyzing quantitative and qualitative data. The following sectionsdescribe the theoretical framework guiding the evaluation, the analytical methodology,preliminary findings, and future work.Theoretical FrameworkA two-pronged theoretical framework guided the study. First, we explored the notion of STEM-literacy for the 21st Century. Second, we aimed to define and use constructs of affect to i This material is based upon work supported by the National Science
Entrepreneurship in the Carle Illinois College of Medicine. His research focuses primarily on engineering design/Bio Design collaboration in transdisciplinary teams. He has used and developed tools to study the alignment of products and services with organizational processes as an organization seeks to address needs and bring new products and services to the market. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring Opportunities for Innovative Professional Impact: Implementation of a Multidisciplinary CourseAbstractEngineering programs offer programmatic opportunities for students to develop the necessaryknowledge, skills, attitudes to be prepared as holistic
Paper ID #15980Design, Implementation, and Outcomes of a Comprehensive Professional De-velopment Program for Post-Graduate Studies in EngineeringProf. Laleh Behjat Dr. Laleh Behjat is an associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Calgary. Her research interests include designing computer chips, electronic design automation and developing software for computer hardware. She has won several awards for her work on the development of software tools for computer engineering. In addition, Dr. Behjat has a passion for increasing the statues of women in Science, technology
male-dominated norms30. These data does not refute those claims, but offers a deeper understanding ofdisciplinary identity for graduate students. Over three-quarters of the total themes for biomedicalengineering are focused on intellectual merits despite the clear linkage for most biomedicalresearch to impact the lives or well-being of whole groups of people. One reason for thisdiscrepancy may be that they felt like the broader impact to affect humans was so obvious theyneed not discuss it explicitly within the paragraphs that discuss explicit impacts of the projects.Another alternative explanation is a potential need to maintain engineering “rigor,”understanding that human-centered research may be considered outside the typical
- als in businesses, academia and institutes nationally and internationally. Most recently he was a visiting professor at the University of Maryland (at Mtech, Maryland Technology Enterprise Institute) and at Johns Hopkins University (at the Center for Leadership Education) where he researched and delivered processes for creative & innovative problem solving. For his unique contributions he received the prestigious Distinguished Teacher of the Year Award, the Faculty Talon Award, the University Researcher of the Year AEA Abacus Award, and the President’s Leadership Award. Dr. Raviv has published in the areas of vision-based driverless cars, green innovation, and innovative thinking. He is a co-holder of a
,” which is building an online history of the development of the NSDL. She is also PI on ”Learning from the Best: How Award Winning Courseware has Impacted Engineering Education.” This research focuses on determining how high quality courseware is being disseminated and how it is impacting the culture of engineering education as measured by changes in student learning, teaching practices, and the careers of the authors of these materials.Prof. Joseph G. Tront, Virginia TechSarah Giersch, Broad-based Knowledge, LLC Sarah Giersch is a Consultant for Broad-based Knowledge, LLC (BbK), where she conducts quantita- tive and qualitative evaluations for BbK’s higher education clients. Giersch also consults in the areas of
certified as an EFL and ESL teacher as well as a School Principal. Ari’s research and language revitalization interests include Mikasuki, Salish Ql’ispe (aka Salish-Pend d’Oreille, Montana Salish, and Flathead Salish) and Safaliba. His ethnographic work documents situated practice in grassroots policy initiatives and school-based activism among the Safaliba in rural Ghana. His language documentation includes conceptual metaphors and formulaic language in Salish Ql’ispe and Safaliba. He also explores applications of task-based language teaching in the pedagogy of revitalization. His practitioner papers analyze integrated content and language instruction, academic English instruction for graduate students, and asset-based
between U.S.engineering graduate education and the creative practice of engineering ─ has contributedto a long-term underdevelopment of the nation’s graduate engineers for technologydevelopment and innovation, reflected in a long-term decline of our core competence forengineering innovation of new technology which has been a contributing factor to thenation’s long-term decline of U.S. competitiveness. It is now evident that one-size ofgraduate education for the nation’s academic scientific researchers, who are pursuingcareers of scientific discovery and inquiry at research universities, and that of graduateeducation for the nation’s graduate engineers who are pursuing professional careers ofadvanced engineering practice for technological
processes. Dr. Davis is a licensed private pilot and performs research primarily in areas related to aviation. His current research at OU involves the design and development of a new GPS Ground Based Augmentation System utilizing feedback control and the design of instrumentation and data acquisition for navigational systems. Additionally, he serves as the ECE recruiting coordinator and one of the primary academic advisers for ECE students.Mark B. Yeary, University of Oklahoma Mark B. Yeary (S’95M’00SM’03) received the B.S. (honors), M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from the Depart- ment of Electrical Engineering, Texas A&M University (TAMU), College Station, in 1992, 1994, and 1999, respectively. Following his graduation
regarding specific scenarios but inconsistencies in approaches have minimized thegreater possible impact of center evaluations [11, 12].Large-scale, cooperative efforts are essential to further innovation and effective practicesemerging from such centers [11]. A multi-institutional consortium, The ERC EvaluationConsortium (TEEC), was formed to combat prior shortcomings through the design of easilyaccessible quantitative and qualitative [13] evaluation instruments shared by all centers. Theconsortium is composed of ERC education directors, researchers, and evaluators from six NSF-funded ERCs.This research paper reports on the in-progress validation efforts for the Multi-ERC InstrumentInventory (MERCII) survey designed to assess the perceived impact
University of Florida, she is on the board of a local non-profit that focuses on supporting the growth of the innovation ecosystem in Greater Gainesville.Ms. Megan Stowers, University of Florida Megan is an undergraduate student pursuing a bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering. She is re- searching educational approaches to promote community in online classes and to promote innovation culture across a college campus. Her interests include human factors, innovation, and engineering educa- tion. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Building a sense of community in a multidisciplinary, split-level online project-based innovation design
process of making – have a profound impact on individual students. Makerspaces are oftencharacterized not only by possibilities for design and innovation, but also by unique cultures thatprofoundly shape the education of students (Forest et al., 2014). Makerspaces have been shownto increase confidence, creativity, and entrepreneurial thinking (Longo et al., 2017). Makingexperiences in education also increase practical skills that are key to a comprehensiveengineering education (Foster et al., 2015).These spaces impact student educational experiences by improving the quality of individualprojects. Prototyping, an engineering practice that is among the primary functions of thesefacilities, has been shown to result in better final project outcomes
States invested wisely in research-oriented graduate education and has become preeminent in basic university research that advances science and benefits the scientific workforce for discovery. But a parallel investment and balanced emphasis has not been made in professional graduate engineering education during this same time frame to support the continued development of the U.S. engineering workforce in industry for technology development and innovation. One-size in graduate education doesn’t fit all. Excellence in basic research and in the practice of engineering for world-class technology development and innovation are two very different pursuits. A disconnect has existed between U.S. graduate engineering education and
for accessibility, and engineering design education.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering students through the lens of identity theory (NSF BRIGE grant), advancing problem
several federal agencies including NSF, USDA and NASA. He recently received an NSF-IGE award for launching a new Gradu- ate for Advancing Professional Skills (GAPS) education program, which integrates project management training with thesis research for graduate students.Dr. Ann M Gansemer-Topf, Iowa State University Ann Gansemer-Topf is an Associate Professor in Higher Education and Student Affairs, and Faculty Fel- low in the Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching at Iowa State University She teaches courses in program evaluation and assessment, student affairs and higher education. Her research interests focus on examining the micro (student) and macro (institutional, state, federal) factors that impact
Paper ID #8781The Design Problem Framework: Using Adaption-Innovation Theory to Con-struct Design Problem StatementsEli M. Silk, University of Michigan Eli Silk is a Research Fellow in the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. He has a B.A. in Computer Science from Swarthmore College and a Ph.D. in Cognitive Studies in Education from the University of Pittsburgh. His research interests are focused broadly on investigating processes of learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. The central aspect of his
the customers; f) How much would itcost; g) What should be the competitive strategy; h) What is the schedule and i) What are therisks and critical issues. Providing answers to these questions resulted in an effort to developa synthesis of engineering best practices with ABET AC2K within the new mechanicalengineering curriculum.III. The Big Picture; Converging Views for a New Engineering Curricula.A series of documents emerged by the mid-nineties that represented a national view on thesubject of engineering education. These documents are enlightening and were helpful indeveloping the new ME curricula . A few points from them are discussed briefly herein.National Research CouncilIn 1995, a report was issued on a new study conducted by the Board