-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI Grad: 08/2014 Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX Grad: 08/2007 BachelorDr. Phapanin Charoenphol, Texas A&M University Phapanin Charoenphol is an Assistant Professor of Instruction in the J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. She earned her M.S., and Ph.D. from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She teaches thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, engineering laboratory, and senior design studio courses. Her research interests include engineering education and targeted drug delivery. In 2022, she was awarded the ASME Best Teacher Award and earned the ACUE Certificate in Effective College
, philanthropic efforts, college courses, and research grants and publications. She currently holds the following Quality Matters Certifications: Master Reviewer, Peer Reviewer, Ac- celerated Designing Your Online Course F2F Facilitator, Accelerated Improving Your Online Course F2F Facilitator, Reviewer Course for Program Reviews, and Applying the QM Rubric Face to Face Facilitator. She is a board member of the Winston-Salem State University Foundation, National Girls Collabora- tive Project, American Association for the Advancement of Science National Conference of Lawyers and Scientists, an advisory member for Nvolve, Inc, and several grants. She is also a member of sev- eral associations, including the Alpha Zeta Omega
://www.raconteur.net/business-innovation/top-ten-construction-innovations • https://online.norwich.edu/academic-programs/masters/civil-engineering/resources/articles/5-innovations-in- civil-engineering-aimed-at-improving-sustainability • https://www.autodesk.com/redshift/innovation-in-civil-engineering/ • https://www.activesustainability.com/construction-and-urban-development/the-evolution-of-innovation-in-civil- engineering/ • https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-latest-innovations-in-civil-engineering • https://www.ennomotive.com/4-new-techniques-in-civil-engineering/ • https://www.asce.org/cemagazine/originality-built-in/ • Video: youtube.com/watch?v=vfZ7ToBvwn4 10 futuristic construction technologies, 2018 Your write up / video should: a) Identify the
kits and MOOCs toward enhanc- ing science literacy.Heather Ruth Arnett, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Heather Arnett is the Coordinator of STEM Engagement Activities in Aerospace Engineering at the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She received her Master of Library and Information Science (MLIS) from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2018 with an emphasis on experiential STEAM learning and outreach programs. Her work focuses on recognizing resource assets in diverse learning spaces and developing methods for accessible learning.Dr. Luisa-Maria Rosu Dr. Luisa-Maria Rosu is the Director of I-STEM, (Illinois Science Technology Engineering and Mathe- matics) Education
can be detrimental to thelearning of the mentee and the mentor (Dominguez and Hager 2013, p. 175).It seems then that is can be more beneficial if the relationship is viewed as amutual learning experience, where each partner can gain wisdom from the other(Dominguez and Hager 2013, p. 175). This allows the mentor to act more asa facilitator rather than an authoritarian, which can generate a more positivementoring experience, potentially having more positive outcomes for the mentee(Dominguez and Hager 2013, p. 176). This also draws on a traditional ’master-apprentice’ relationship, where good habits in the mentee are formed throughwatching and learning from the mentor, but the mentor still cares about thewell-being and learning of the mentee
Appendix 2; Tables 3.1 – 3.6). Thiswas a process of constant comparison, going back and forth between the data (texts) and thedevelopment of thematic categories. The findings are followed by a discussion and conclusion ofthe results.ParticipantsWe interviewed nine engineers working on the transmission side of the company. They wereresponsible for designing, building, and maintaining the transmission lines that delivered electricpower in the region.Table 1: Participants in the study Role/position in UtilityCo Education/training P-1 Engineer IV; Geotech, Civil group BS-Civil Engineering P-2 Distribution Systems Operator, Design BS-Masters-electrical engineering P-3 Design Engineer
in cell, developmental and molecular biology. She has mentored numerous undergraduate and graduate students as well as postdoctoral fel- lows in her laboratory. In the Graduate School she oversees over 9.000 students in masters, specialist and doctoral programs. She is responsible for all academic and administrative matters related to graduate education at FIU. She has served as the Executive Editor for the journal Pigment Cell and Melanoma Re- search and is currently in its editorial board. She has served as a member of grant review panels for NSF, NIH, and AHA and is currently on the NIGMS TWD review panel. She has been funded by NIGMS, NIAMS and AHA and is currently the PI of FL-AGEP and co-PI of an NIGMS T32
marginalization when working in teams. These experiences of marginalization for somestudents act as another barrier for the team’s ability to understand and agree upon goals (Mathieu et al.,2008). Marginalization in student teamwork limits the utilization of resources available within the team’srepertoire, raises issues of trust and conflict, and causes conflict due to roles assignment and sharedleadership (Yang and Yan, 2002). While clearly defining goals for the team seems to be the easiest taskon the part of the engineering educator, providing a safe environment for effective communication withindiverse teams, along with accountable interdependence, is a more sophisticated task. This task requiresthe engineering educator to master a new set of tools
study in a new environment, pursuing master degree in mechanical and aerospace engineering and accomplish all the short-term goals will open a door for me to become a performing engineer and work for an engineering company in a larger range of achievement.The quotes provided above indicated that students saw themselves as active agents and hadcertain expectations with regard to future career goals. Compared to students who took up bothan engineering intern and an agentic position, these students lack evidence of their experiencesthat are explicitly situated in the profession. Through engaging in agentic positions, studentswere able to develop their professional identities by providing insights into their aspirations tobecome
degree from Purdue University, WestLafayette in 1996 in both history and psychology, and my Masters and PhD in East AsianLanguages and Civilization from the University of Pennsylvania in 2006. I am currently aprofessor in the Department of History at the Rochester Institute of Technology and have taughtat RIT for 15 years. I value team teaching courses, especially when the two instructors bringvastly different backgrounds and expertise to the course. In this particular project, I am the leadinstructor for the College of Liberal Arts, teaching alongside an instructor with an engineeringbackground. My responsibility is to deliver the historical content, lead discussions around thehistorical content, and grade the research project in the course. I
]. Table 1summarizes the various reasoning modalities employed in STEM education. Engineering has themost variety of thinking modalities and technology has the least. Creativity and innovation areessential in the engineering design process. Researchers, academics, educators, and engineeringorganizations all agree that further improvement in engineering education is necessary to fostercreativity [e.g., 10; 36]. Such a task appears daunting because instructors usually prefertraditional teaching styles by relying on a didactic approach rather than modern strategies callingfor activity-based methods. Because it is more difficult for STEM pedagogy to master differentthinking strategies in a passive learning environment, student’s STEM learning must
Paper ID #37279Emergent Engineering Judgment: Making Assumptions inEngineering Science Homework (Research)Karen Miel Karen Miel is a Research Scientist at the University at Buffalo. Her research interests include the undergraduate students' development of engineering judgment and elementary students' engineering teamwork.Jessica Swenson Jessica Swenson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She was awarded her doctorate and masters from Tufts University in mechanical engineering and STEM education respectively, and completed postdoctoral work at the
for visualizing and comparing crystal structures in 2020 (4%),compared to 12% in 2019 and 19% in 2021, which suggests a likely negative effect of onlinelearning. Because students generally feel difficult with OVITO tasks in the MSE 182 class asdiscovered by Kang et al. 32 , this might suggest that in-person learning is currently better thanonline learning at mastering difficult skills for students.Figure 3: Positive answers from students in the MSE 182 course in questions 9, 11, 12, 15 and18, which reflect perception to learning experience with OVITO. Answers are scaled from 1 (mostnegative, such as most uncomfortable, difficult or unlikely) to 5 (most positive, such as most com-fortable, easiest or most likely). The total valid responses in
representations of patients in medical texts and how those representations are linked to doctor/patient communication and patient treatment and care at individual and institutional levels.Olukemi Akintewe (Assistant Professor of Instruction) Dr. Kemi Akintewe is an Assistant Professor of Instruction in the Department of Medical Engineering and the Director of the First-year Engineering Experiential learning at the University of South Florida (USF). Dr. Akintewe holds a Doctorate in Chemical Engineering from USF, a Masters in Materials Science & Engineering from the Ohio State University, and her Bachelors in Chemical Engineering from the City College of New York. Her research focuses on active learning in engineering
holds degrees in Computing Technology (PhD), Education (Masters), Cybersecurity (MS), Business Administration and Finance (MBA), Marketing (BS), and Physics (Minor). Dr. Jaurez has professional experience in scientific instruments and software development. He also has led and been awarded many grants from Hewlett Packard, NASA, Qualcomm, Pratt and Whitney, WE Electronics, Department of Defense, NU Innovation, and NU Continued Innovations in the fields of game methodologies, robotics, fabrication, education, and community outreach. Dr. Jaurez has books, publications, and presentations in education technology, robotics, cybersecurity, project management, productivity, gamification, and simulations. Finally, Dr. Jaurez
. Kremer is Dean-elect of Engineering at University of Dayton. Kremer served as chair of the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering (2016-2021) and Senior Director Presidential Projects (2021-2022), in addition to past leadership roles at Penn State. Dr. Kremer has degrees in industrial engineering from Yildiz Technical University, a masters in business from Istanbul University, and a PhD in Engineering Management from Missouri University of Science and Technology. She was a National Research Council-US AFRL Summer Faculty Fellow in the Human Effectiveness Directorate (2002-2004), a Fulbright Scholar (2010-2011), and Program Director in NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education (2013-2016). Dr
game that helps students to understand the AgileSoftware Development Process Model. In PIG the player takes the role of Scrum Master andattempts to schedule the completion of a software project on time, under budget, and with anacceptable number of defects. The user experience is similar, but not identical in the two games.The SCRUM card game involves working with a group and the process improvement gamerelies on individual play. Each game involves completing several sprints, including creating tasksand reacting to game events that may prohibit timely completion of the project. In addition toplaying the games, the students were asked to share their play strategies and any processimprovement tips in their activity write-ups.For the in-person
Paper ID #37512Features of Identity-based Engineering LeadershipInstructionBrett Tallman (Instructor) (Montana State University - Bozeman) Brett Tallman is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at University of Texas, El Paso studying faculty agency development at HSIs. He received his doctorate in Engineering from Montana State University (MSU), with focus on engineering leader identity development. His previous degrees include a Masters degree in Education from MSU (active learning in an advanced quantum mechanics environment) and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Cornell. In addition to his academic career, he
address TRC calls to action. and the project work. them. Completes STK master Supports analysis activities Completes STK higher-level certification or skill-specific Identifies goals of mission analysis. within areas of competence. Performs lower-level analysis certification. Performs certification
the cooperative group [23, 24] The roles of mentor-mentee or master-apprentice can flex based on lived experiences of each member of thegroup [25]. In general, the community-based model has been credited with benefits suchas “goal setting, connection to the broader institutional community, interdisciplinary groupmakeup, friendship, being connected to a group, and support of professional development”[26]. From these foundations and those with which the PI team had lived experiences, we refinedan approach to support individuals from similar disciplines and identity groups. From the premise of setting new faculty up for success, the University of Michigan beganLaunch Committees in 2012 [27]. These regularly scheduled meetings with a
than $9M. In addition, her STEM outreach programs and curricula have impacted hundreds of thousands of K-12 students nationwide. She is the co- founder and director of Georgia Tech’s K-12 InVenture Prize, a statewide invention competition, open to all students and teachers in Georgia. She earned her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign in 2007, and her Masters and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2012. Dr. Moore received the Georgia Tech Teaching Effectiveness Award in 2018.Leslie Flynn Professor of STEM Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the University of IowaStephanie CouchNisha Detchprohm (Research Engineer I)W. Ethan Eagle (Lecturer)Joanna K
: We conducted interviews with disciplinary leaders at the University of CentralFlorida (UCF). UCF is a public university in Orlando, Florida, with more than 70,000 students,the largest university in the state and one of the largest universities in the nation. The universityconfers over 18,000 degrees per year across 106 undergraduate programs, 95 masters programs,and 34 doctoral programs (31 research and 3 professional). The College of Engineering andComputer Science is the second largest college at UCF, with higher enrollments than any otherarea besides the College of Science [10].Participants: Recognizing that program leaders often have the responsibility for implementingethics frameworks that are mandated and the opportunity to support a
dashes per grid length), and Student X took 3 attempts in this particularassignment. In the first actual hidden line assignment, Student X drew the shape conceptuallycorrect, but the hidden lines were not accurately drawn and some dashes were too long to begraded as a dashed line. It took Student X a total of 8 attempts to get the assignment correct. Itthen seemed that Student X had mastered drawing dashes precisely, and completed the nexthidden line assignment in a single attempt. At this point, the assignment in Figure 10 wasencountered, which is the first conceptual error Student X made in hidden line assignments. Thestudent missed drawing a hidden line in the Right View. The Mini-Hint feedback messageprovided was “Hidden line(s) incorrect
engineering education remain denounced as shallowand ineffective [23]. Further, HE graduate programs have reported struggling to increase thepresence of students from low-income countries [1]. Given that engineering spaces can continueto be hostile environments, where students of color represent 21% and 14% of engineering andscience masters and doctorates, respectively [24], we must utilize educational frameworkscentered on race and racism to understand the current accessibility and value of HE to thestudents who continue to be underrepresented.Introductions to Humanitarian EngineeringThere is insufficient research unearthing the learning experiences that influence student pathwaystowards HE education. In fact, scholars have called for studies that
. As one lab member described the manner in which they took onparticular projects, “I started working on that. But [the leaders] were initially setting up adifferent project for me to work on. And then after thinking about it and talking with somepeople, I said, ‘I’d really like to work on something a little bit different than that.’ And they said,‘Okay. Great. We have this project if you’d like to work on it.’” In this way, the members of thelab sites in this study were not bounded to developing specific domain expertise as dictated bytheir disciplinary identities, and were instead encouraged to cultivate diverse interests anddevelop varied expertise. This lack of established expertise among lab members – whether theybe doctoral, masters, or
outreach programs and curricula have impacted hundreds of thousands of K-12 students nationwide. She is the co- founder and director of Georgia Tech’s K-12 InVenture Prize, a statewide invention competition, open to all students and teachers in Georgia. She earned her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign in 2007, and her Masters and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2012. Dr. Moore received the Georgia Tech Teaching Effectiveness Award in 2018.Chalece Arial DelacoudraySunni Haag Newton (Senior Research Scientist) I am a Senior Research Scientist at Georgia Tech's Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). I work on
began recording their lectures to help studentswho might be absent, for example due to illness or new caregiving roles.56 Recorded lecturesare an accommodation that students can request. Providing this material without being askedcan be helpful not only for students who need the accommodation, but also for those who wantto revisit a topic when studying. These recordings can be a way to implementing UDL andfurthermore result in a Curb-Cut Effect.56f Closed captions contain information about sound and music in a video. Subtitles only contain informationon words spoken.7) Upload notes and class slides and/or recordings.Note-taking is a skill that takes time to master and can be difficult for people with certaindisabilities.57,58 A common
Paper ID #37222The Impact of Students’ Grit & Project Ownership onStudents’ Learning Outcomes in Maker-based CornerstoneEngineering Design CoursesMohamed Jalal Mohamed Jalal is a recent PhD graduate from the University of Ottawa in Ontario. His primary research was focused on engineering design education, makerspaces and innovation. He is a licensed professional engineer in Ontario, Canada with a background in mechanical engineering. He earned a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Khartoum, Sudan, a Masters of Engineering Management from and a Ph.D. in Digital Transformation and Innovation from the
harder course material and by the second exam. The improved performance observed inprevious research on flipped or partially-flipped classrooms 13 were not evident in this study.Conditionals and loops are the most difficult course subject for Fall 2019 and 2020 students tograsp and strongly affect the performance on the first exam. However, the performance onconditionals and loops was worse for Fall 2020 students. The hybrid format evidently may nothave been as conducive to mastering certain topics. The results suggest allocating more class timeand resources to conditionals and loops, virtual or not.Teamwork in laboratory activities are a large part of the course and intended to help students getimmediate support from teammates, thereby helping