markets, complex technology-based problem solving, innovative system integration, high-tech entrepreneurship and international social entrepreneurship. Steve is a member of the WishVast team and the work described in this paper was conducted during his Senior year studying towards a Bachelors degree in Information Sciences and Technology at Penn State University.Khanjan Mehta, Pennsylvania State University KHANJAN MEHTA is a Senior Research Associate in the Electronic and Computer Services department and an affiliate faculty member in the School of Engineering Design, Technology and Professional Programs in the College of Engineering at Penn State. Khanjan leads Humanitarian Engineering and
Paper ID #31751WIP: Integrating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into a SoftwareRequirements CourseDr. Walter W Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering Walter Schilling is a Professor in the Software Engineering program at the Milwaukee School of Engi- neering in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He received his B.S.E.E. from Ohio Northern University and M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Toledo. He worked for Ford Motor Company and Visteon as an Embedded Software Engineer for several years prior to returning for doctoral work. He has spent time at NASA Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio, and consulted for multiple embedded
in anthropology from Dickinson College.Dr. Matthew Frenkel, New York UniversityMr. Mikolaj Wilk, New York University Engineering Reference Associate at Bern Dibner Library c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Project Shhh! A library design contest for engineering studentsBackground Bern Dibner Library of Science and Technology is an academic engineering librarysupporting the teaching and research needs of the faculty and student body of the New YorkUniversity Tandon School of Engineering. Tandon maintains a student population of about5,000 students, with roughly an even distribution between undergraduate and graduate students[1]. Located in Brooklyn, New York, Dibner Library is in an urban
: Implementing a Systems Engineering Framework For Multidisciplinary Capstone DesignSynopsisIn this paper we discuss a pilot project at Stevens Institute of Technology to develop a systemsengineering (SE) framework for multidisciplinary capstone design which can be a model forbroad implementation. It is part of an initiative involving 14 institutions (including all themilitary academies), sponsored by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research andEngineering (ASD(R&E)) STEM Development Office to incorporate SE in undergraduatecapstone design. The initiative is a clear demonstration of the significance placed by DoD on theneed to have graduating engineers educated in the overarching significance of systemsengineering for the
AC 2007-80: TEACHING OPERABILITY IN UNDERGRADUATE CHEMICALENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATIONThomas Marlin, McMaster University Department of Chemical Engineering McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Tom Marlin joined the Department of Chemical Engineering at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, as NSERC Research Professor in Industrial Process Control in 1988. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts in 1972; then, he practiced engineering for 15 years in the chemical and petroleum industries. In 1987, he served as the Visiting Fellow, for the Warren Centre Study located at the University of Sydney, Australia. During the one-year project, a
the contrary, Charette (2013) suggested that there are more STEM workers than suitable jobsand many STEM graduates work for non-STEM related jobs. Whether one thinks there is a STEMshortage or surplus, an important factor that hinders any STEM graduate from securing a STEMjob is their inadequate level of academic preparation for college. This preparation begins in gradesK-12.STEM integration in K-12 has been on the rise since the idea was introduced almost a decade ago(Nathan & Pearson, 2014). Zuger (2015) noted the most commonly reported challenges that theK-12 schools are facing to implement STEM programs are funding (48.4%), inadequate K-8education (46.5%), insufficient teacher PD (46.4%), unclear best practices for STEM education(35.3
Engineering, and serves as a Center Associate for the Learn- ing Research and Development Center. Her principal research is in engineering education assessment, which has been funded by the NSF, Department of Education, Sloan Foundation, Engineering Informa- tion Foundation, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engi- neering. She has served as an associate editor for the JEE; and is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal. Page 24.917.1Dr. Larry J. Shuman
long range planning for ProCEED. The board consists of two primaryfaculty members, the Pi Tau Sigma President (or the president’s designate), a representative fromthe College of Engineering, and a representative from the Center for Learning throughCommunity Service. This advisory board assists Pi Tau Sigma in contacting and describingME450 opportunities to the community partners and in helping screen and select final candidatesfor ME450 projects that will be presented to the ME450 course leadership. Project selection is Page 5.502.7based on the likelihood of success in ME450, the impact on the community, and the supportstructure (finances
Paper ID #25491The University’s Role in Professional Development for Computer-Aided En-gineeringMs. Emily Nutwell, Ohio State University Emily Nutwell is pursuing her PhD at Ohio State in Engineering Education where her research inter- ests focus on workforce development, adult learning, and distance education. She is also the Education Manager at the Ohio State SIMCenter, the Simulation Innovation, and Modeling Research center, which supports educational initiatives to promote simulation and modeling. She has several years of experience in industry as a CAE analyst focusing on vehicle crash modeling and topology
, Associate Director of the Burton D. Morgan Center, and an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University. She is responsible for the launch and devel- opment of the university’s multidisciplinary undergraduate entrepreneurship program, which has involved over 6000 students from all majors since 2005. She has established entrepreneurship capstone, global en- trepreneurship, and women and leadership courses and initiatives at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. Prior to her work in academia, Nathalie spent several years in the field of market research and business strategy consulting in Europe and the United States with Booz Allen and Hamilton and Data and
performancefor research purposes so we are not able to report those data. Initial reports do indicate that theprocess does indeed better prepare students for the language and requirements of design controland QSR. Additionally, we received very positive feedback from our Industrial Advisory Boardon the incorporation of this program. John Kirwan, President of Incite Innovation, LLC gave thefollowing incite in response to the program, "As a biomedical industry veteran, I frequentlyevaluate skill sets of potential new hires. Having a solid education in the engineeringfundamentals coupled with a firm grasp of design controls and quality systems regulationprovides recent graduates with the definite advantage of being able to join a R&D group and hitthe
criterion to achieve their programmaticaccreditation. It is assumed for the purposes of this research that all the programs reviewed meetthese criteria and will continue to do so going forward. The criteria for this paper are centered onthe incorporation of the human design factors in the engineering design curriculum and the threetopics suggested by Dolan (social support, social justice, and social capital).3Bridger and Luloff offer a set of five criteria that defines the criteria of a sustainable communitydevelopment project. Their criteria includes local economic diversity, self-reliance, decreasedenergy usage and waste management, enhancement of biodiversity and stewardship of resources,and social justice.4 Dr. Juan Lucena of Colorado School of
students for innovationcompetitions and their upcoming careers as well as catalyze their entrepreneurial minds forfuture success. Based on a series of interviews with experienced mentors of innovationcompetitions and programs, this paper presents a set of best practices for mentoring studentinnovation teams.IntroductionInnovation competitions and programs encourage students to think creatively and innovatively,solve complex problems, develop professional and technical skills, and improve communicationand teamwork skills. Hackathons, pitch competitions, design challenges, startup competitions,and entrepreneurship programs can be considered innovation competitions and programs, whichhave been known to have many important benefits for undergraduate
for engineering, and fall shortof identifying the differences across student academic maturity and engineering discipline. Giventhe potential for strong impact on engineering students’ experiences, and faculty resourcelimitations, we sought to elucidate if some behaviors have a higher potential for impact thanothers, and if so, which faculty behaviors may best contribute to building faculty-student rapport.With these insights, engineering faculty can be trained to selectively focus on those which areexpected to have the greatest return on investment. To support the primary aim, students frommultiple disciplines in an engineering college were surveyed and asked to rank their perceptionsof faculty behaviors that best establish rapport with
student’s successful engineering knowledge, practices, and values during the semester? 2. What factors other than the course contribute to developing student’s successful engineering knowledge, practices, and values during the semester? 3. What have you lost or retained about your own culture in favor of engineering culture? II. MethodA. SettingIn fall 2016, over 3,600 students registered for a FYE foundation course at asouthwestern university. The FYE program at this institution has undergone numerouschanges. These revisions are well-grounded in research and best practices. The course istaught to all those first-year students in about 30 sections. Instructors manage
. Prior to joining ODU’s Engineering Technology Department Dr. Jovanovic was teaching at Trine Uni- versity, Angola, Indiana at Design Engineering Technology Department. Before Trine, she was working as an instructor and a graduate research assistant at Product Lifecycle Management Center of Excellence at Purdue University. She also served as instructor in STEM Academic Boot Camp, Diversity Program. Prior to joining Purdue, Dr. Jovanovic worked as a faculty at University of Novi Sad at departments of In- dustrial Engineering and Management. Dr. Jovanovic received M.Eng. (dipl.ing.) degree from University of Novi Sad, Serbia in Robotics, Mechatronics and Automation and M.Sc. (Magistar) degree in Produc- tion Systems
were 59 total papers that included a Portuguese authorwith nearly half of these (26) published in the last two years. Thus, it appears that EERjournal publications are increasing at a rapid pace in Portugal at this time.OutcomesFensham1 argues that the findings from the research should have an impact on its practice;however, in the case of EER, this data is particularly difficult to detect. Borrego et al12foundthat despite the large investment made by the U.S. over the past three decades that theadoption in U.S. engineering departments of approaches like student-centered pedagogies,service learning, and design projects was not as high as might have been expected and madethe comment that “despite decades of effort focused on improvement of
. He received his Ph.D. in industrial engineering in 1996 from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where, as a graduate student, he taught quality and applied statistics and researched machining models for monitoring and control. At Cal Poly, Dr. Waldorf has taught and developed courses in manufacturing process design, computer-aided manufacturing, tool en- gineering, quality engineering, and reliability. He has participated in numerous activities related to the improvement of teaching methods, teaching assessment, and curriculum design. He is currently the fac- ulty advisor for Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME). His research interests are in metal cutting process modeling, tool wear, cutting tool
innovations include: the introductionof undergraduate student portfolios; the adoption of a new perspective on “Design” for the ABETprogram criteria; enhancement of the senior research and design project through incorporation ofthe ABET professional components; incorporation of non-technical abstracts in bothundergraduate and graduate theses; professional development seminars for both undergraduateand graduate students; the introduction of an informal education seminar to prepare PhD studentswishing to pursue academic careers; and introduction of new courses to support the department’sstrategic plan. With an underlying focus on the development of multilevel communication skills,the aim of these initiatives is to foster an interdisciplinary and
University of Michigan in August 2014. She received her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan in 2008 and her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2005. Julianna’s current research interests lie in the model-based design of smart material technologies. She is particularly interested in flexible actuators that leverage material and geometric properties to enable innovative actuator forms. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engaging Pre-college Minority Students at a Technical Engineering Research ConferenceAbstractIncreasing diversity in the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM
(CoE), Engineering Education Innovation Center (EEIC)at The Ohio State University has conducted an engineering service-learning program inHonduras. The program consists of three components: preparation, implementation, andevaluation. These components are aimed to introduce and teach students the concepts ofhumanitarian engineering through a practical, real-world, hands-on experience. During the firststage, the students assess needs in collaboration with in-country partners, and then research,design, develop, prototype, test and document their chosen projects. In the second stage, thestudents implement and execute these projects. Finally, the students evaluate their designs anddocument their results as well as make recommendations for future
assessment instruments will be invaluable for thecontinuous improvement of the engineering programs in our college, and will better preparethem for the next ABET accreditation cycle starting in 2016.6. Summary In summary, as a model for professional university education in the 21st century,Philadelphia University’s College of Design, Engineering and Commerce is focused onproviding graduates with the skills necessary to be leaders in their professions at every level oftheir careers. By bringing these three disciplines together (design, engineering, and business),the new College will push students to think beyond the boundaries of existing disciplines andfocus on market-driven innovation through teamwork, collaboration and connections withindustry
to North Jersey under the Workforce Innovation for Regional Economic Development (WIRED) initiative.Peter Schmitt, Schmitt & Associates, LLC Peter Schmitt has extensive experience in both academia and industry. He started out with a study of physics at the University of Wuerzburg, Germany. He did his Ph.D. at DESY (Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron) in Hamburg and work at CERN (Geneva) as a postdoctoral research assistant for Harvard University. Peter Schmitt went into industry starting as project manager for the development or car phones at AEG in Ulm. In 1995 he moved to the United States to work for BASF in various IT positions, among them Director of Infrastructure in the U.S. and Project Leader for SAP
graduate in less time than non-research active students.” Graduating in less time equates to a lower cost of obtaining a degree,and when combined with added benefit of higher retention rates, undergraduate researchprograms offer research universities the double impact of helping recruit and retain students.Of the almost 4,000 degree granting institutions, only 146 are classified as R1 universities [13]according to the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education [14], and only 131are designated as R2 universities [15]. For research universities, leveraging the researchknowledge, practices, and culture already prominent on their campus will help them retainstudents, reduce the amount of time it takes students to graduate, and also
options and over thirty graduate students in the master’sprogram, and each year there were over ten graduate students graduated, most of themaccepting a job offer before they graduated. Several graduate students received campusrecognitions, such as the best graduate student in Engineering Management, best posteraward in Intelligent Systems Center, and won several national awards or recognitions,such as the best poster in 2005 ASNT Conference, the best poster award in 2005 SFFSymposium, and the finalist for 2005 ASME manufacturing design competition. Theeffort of integrating the existing campus manufacturing resources and those availablefrom industries to provide manufacturing experiences for students can be adapted at otherinstitutions that have
expansionof global regulations, and innovative technologies that breed new or changing regulations, arehaving a significant impact on the innovation-to-commercialization process and timelines. This Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Organized by The University of Texas at Dallas Copyright © 2017, American Society for Engineering Education 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conferenceimpacts efforts in research, as well as in academic and industry environments. The NationalInstitute of Health (NIH) and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have drawn the sameconclusions.The NIH National Center for Advancing Translational
-practice, student-centered learning methods could be established, sustained, and improvedin future offerings. The initiative provided financial assistance, additional administrative support,course relief, and travel funding as necessary to facilitate the course restructuring. The goal wasto enhance courses that would have a substantial, wide-ranging, and enduring effect on studentlearning for the majority of students in one or more engineering programs, at both theundergraduate and graduate level. The ESCL@Te program provided funding to accomplish thedeliverables of this innovative course project.4. Service Learning based Subtractive Manufacturing CourseIn the fall of 2022, the Junior level course, CNC Machining Practices offered for the
has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for introductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conduct- ing research on a large scale NSF faculty development project. His team is studying how workshops on strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect faculty be- liefs, classroom practice, and development of disciplinary communities of practice and associated student achievement. He was a coauthor for the best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013 and this year has received the Michael Ashby Outstanding Materials Educator Award from the
graduate students to select and pursue a major in an Engineering or STEM discipline, and find scholarships to fund their studies • faculty to survive the tenure process and thrive in an academic environment • academic administrators to get training in academic administration • professionals to thrive and stay viable, competitive and current in their professional life • researchers who want to study, publish and get funding for research in pedagogy and diversityBy collecting links in one place that are helpful throughout the lifetime of a minority or womeninterested in a career in engineering, it is hoped that this gives the reader a lifelong perspective ofconsidering the entire career and short and long term opportunities
learning and field trip experiences through engineering design Danielle B. Harlow1, Ron K. Skinner1,2, Alexandria Muller11 Department of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-94902 MOXI, The Wolf Museum of Exploration + Innovation, Santa Barbara, CA, 93101AbstractInteractive science centers are in a unique position to provide opportunities for engineeringeducation through K-12 field trip programs. However, field trip programs are often disconnectedfrom students’ classroom learning, and many K-12 teachers lack the engineering educationbackground to make that connection. Engineering Explorations is a 3-year project funded by theNational Science Foundation (NSF) program Research in the