. in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include engi- neering design education (especially in regards to the design of complex systems), faculty development, career pathways (both academic and industry), approaches for supporting education research-to-practice.Dr. Courtney S. Smith-Orr, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Courtney S. Smith,PhD is a Teaching Assistant Professor and Undergraduar Director at UNC Char- lotte. Her research interests span the mentoring experiences of African American women in engineer- ing,minority recruitment and retention, and best practices for diversity and inclusion in the Engineering classroom.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl
Paper ID #35294Incorporation of Best Practices in Environmental Engineering Educationto Maximize Student Engagement and Instructor EfficiencyChelsea Q Linvill, United States Military Academy Department of Geography & Environmental Engineer-ingDr. Benjamin Michael Wallen P.E., United States Military Academy Benjamin Wallen is a Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army and an Associate Professor in the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering at the United States Military Academy. He is also the Dean’s Fellow for Remote Teaching and Distance Learning - Best Practices. He is a 1996 graduate of the United
Criteria.1 This proposal defines the educational objectives as “statements thatdescribe the expected accomplishments of graduates during the first few years after graduation.”The survey responses for Penn State alumni two to three years following graduation show thatdifferent kinds of achievement and measures of accomplishment apply to the different early-career paths. This raises questions that may need to be considered for curriculum design. Forinstance: What actions should we be taking to prepare our students for the broader aspects oftheir professional careers? What competencies and abilities should we emphasize in acurriculum constrained by a limited time frame? Examining the data from our surveys of recentgraduates, which include information
Paper ID #15171The inGEAR Program: Recruiting International Graduate Students throughUndergraduate Research InternshipsDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engi- neering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing
design andimplement a new model of advanced professional graduate education for the nation’s engineers inindustry that fosters ‘lifelong learning’ and professionally-oriented, practice-centered engineeringgraduate education that supports: All nine levels of engineering practice for the purposeful generation, development, and innovation of useful technology for competitive advantage to the engineer’s company or to meet meaningful societal needs ─ from the beginning growth levels of entry-level engineering at project level through the senior engineering growth levels of chief engineer responsible for corporate technology policy making, leadership and execution. The modern paradigm of the practice of
engineering students atWWU University in Fall 2019. The course was designed to highlight the relationship betweenengineering, design, and society and to create inseparable connections between those threeelements. ENGR 101 is a graduation requirement for the ID, PME, and MFGE programs and ishighly suggested for EECE students. Students take the course during their first year of study,typically during the first or second quarter. The class is 2 credits and meets twice per week for 50minutes. It does not have any prerequisite requirements and is open to any student interested inengineering as a major. The objectives of the course are to 1. introduce students to the field ofengineering and design, 2. center social justice as integral to the profession, 3
both equity-centered content and pedagogy (e.g., [20], [24]) in a range of courses. We describe the first phase of research to build a curricular and instructional changeframework to support educators who seek to revise or develop engineering courses to centerequity. Our emerging framework acknowledges that instructors – including tenure-track, contractfaculty, and graduate teaching assistants – will typically require professional development tosupport them as they design and teach these courses. We also acknowledge that for engineeringto move beyond siloed discussions of equity, academic programs need to revise multiple requiredcourses, including technical/ engineering science courses. In the following sections, we provide aproject
initiative’s visionthat all graduates of the institute—a majority of whom will graduate with engineeringdegrees—are able to contribute to the creation of sustainable communities and tounderstand the impact of their professional practice on the communities in which theywork. The work-in-progress paper is organized with the following content (i)Introduction to “Center for Serve-Learn-Sustain” and freshman engineering course (ii) adescription of pedagogical approaches to socio-technical learning, (iii) description ofSocio-technical Project-based Learning Model and Assessment methods (iv)development database of socio-technical projects for engineering courses, (v) additionalModels and resources from “Center for Serve-Learn-Sustain” and
improvement and shared best practice (3) Build on the formidable strengths of a combined teaching faculty from regional universities and from experts in regional industry across the nation (4) Build on the silent successes / attributes of high-quality programs for working professionals which have been already proven across the United States (Council of Graduate Schools) (5) Build on the strengths of an experienced student body of practitioners who are growing as innovators and engineering leaders at the cutting edge of technology development to sustain U.S. preeminence (6) Build the Graduate Centers in partnership with regional industry and the practicing profession in engineering for success and continuous
engaged inScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) with the ultimate goal of havingthese students join the STEM workforce after a two-year degree, a 2 (AS) + 2 (BS) pathway or afour-year degree. Building upon previous cooperation among these institutions, Best Practicemethods have been identified and are being implemented to bring about a cultural change thatwill lead to a sustained increase in the production of STEM-trained graduates needed by localhigh-tech businesses. In order to expand the diameter of the STEM pipeline, new non-traditionalstudent populations must be recruited, encouraged and not traditionally “weeded-out.” Ourresearch and Best Practices center on two specific populations: females and non-top 15%students that
children or elderlyparents and working in industries that have been affected negatively by the pandemic [21].Virtual research allows UREP STEM students to continue to participate in a paid experience thatpositively influences their interactions with faculty and peers, and promotes STEM identity,community, and sense of belonging, while juggling many responsibilities outside of school.Virtual Research Experiences and OutcomesInstitutional Context The site for this program is a predominately White private research-intensive universitylocated in the Northeast of the United States. Infused with a strong entrepreneurial culture, theUniversity is home to over 40 research centers and institutes spanning disciplines fromperformance, design, fine
theirprograms and moved forward with implementation into their broader curriculum.Coaching as a Tool for Facilitating Change in Pedagogy and the Entrepreneurial MindsetConsidering the available research on active learning and promise of more well-roundedengineering graduates available through the introduction of EM, the need for quality facultyprofessional development on these topics is a natural next step. Professional development is afundamental part of educational innovation as it allows faculty to learn about changes inpedagogy and receive instruction on implementing best practices into the classroom. Researchshows that faculty respond to professional development in different ways, progressing at variedrates and requiring additional assistance to
EngineeringEducation[14], and the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education[15] — arespecifically focused on engineering and technology education.In 2002, the National Academy of Engineering opened the Center for the Advancement of Page 13.863.3Scholarship on Engineering Education[16]. CASEE represents a collaborative effort to improvethe alignment of the knowledge and skills possessed by future and current engineers with theknowledge and skills sought by various stakeholders of engineering education. This effort ispursued through programs for engineering education research and innovation as well as activitiesto translate promising practices
stakeholders have supported and implementededucational initiatives in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) in thestate of Connecticut and the New England region. The focus of the COT’s Regional Center is topromote manufacturing education through pathway programs, student recruitment and retention,as well as faculty and curriculum development.One of the major goals of the COT- RCNGM is student recruitment and retention. The COT-RCNGM Center has created a robust marketing outreach initiative that presents manufacturingcareer pathways using innovative and immersive experiences for high school students and theirteachers. The objective of the COT-RCNGM marketing initiatives is to provide information tohigh school students on
. The results benefit our students and the ET community.5. Scholarly activities place the ET faculty within our various institutions in a competitive position as the effect of the applied, practice-oriented, and student centered flavor of ET scholarship positively impacts our students.6. Scholarly activity enhances and promotes the reputation and visibility of our faculty, programs and institutions. It gives ET faculty regional and national recognition, necessary for promotion to full professor at most institutions.7. Scholarly activity by ET faculty demonstrates academic leadership that is necessary for promotion to full professor at most universities.8. Scholarly activities provide opportunity for collaboration among ET faculty
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Integrating The Charrette Process into Engineering Education: A Case Study on a Civil Engineering Capstone CourseABSTRACTAs engineering educators rethink the structure and value of capstone courses, many have turnedto practical applications. In order to reflect the recent approaches within engineering, capstonecourses can be enhanced through the integration of charrettes. Charrettes are hands-on,collaborative sessions where stakeholders come to a design consensus. These sessions provideopportunities for students to improve communication, technical evaluation, teamwork, peerevaluation and professionalism skills. This research provides a framework for adapting thecharrette
providing a value-added component for technology-oriented universities toextend the curriculum experience by providing both undergraduate and graduate students aresearch experience3 with real-world problems, opportunities and applications. The authors of this paper present a comparative analysis of technology and innovation-oriented centers. To gain an understanding of such centers, the authors focused on recognizedcenters to examine their mission, goals and objectives, research focus, business model,competitive perspectives, growth anomalies, principles of specialization, and innovationcapabilities. Based on this comparative analysis, the authors developed a set of relevantconclusions and recommendations for technology innovation centers
’ self-confidence. Infact, without self-confidence, it is difficult for a person to do any of these things.While there are all of these positive impacts of a high level of self-confidence, it is also possible tobecome over-confident, or to have a false confidence or bravado that is not based on truecompetence or mastery of one’s profession. If self-confidence becomes over-confidence, theengineer may lose the ability to accept criticism that improves the design or product. Thisbehavior may occur in design team meetings when engineers, in their zeal to promote and selltheir innovation, blind themselves to valid concerns or valuable modifications regarding theconcept or product that could make it even better. For recent engineering graduates, who
Page 8.715.8 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationtechnology platforms. We are staying abreast of current standards for sharable learningobjects and will support our faculty as sharing digital content becomes a greater priority.Teaching is an evolving process and the FIC is staying current with regards toeducational research and to promoting good teaching practice. Along with otherinstitutions and organizations, the FIC is participating in a Faculty Innovation ProfileProject sponsored by Vanderbilt’s Office of Innovation through Technology. The FIPPInitiative, consisting of design studio events
position, Ms. Rawlings worked at the University of Maryland Medical Center and the University of Maryland School of Public Affairs where she was did financial/policy analysis and research. At the Robert H. Smith School where she pursued a PhD degree, Ms. Rawlings taught both introductory and advanced finance courses. She was nominated for the 2001 Parents' Association Teaching Award. Prior to her return to academia, Ms. Rawlings was a financial manager for Procter & Gamble for eight years. Ms. Rawlings received a BSE in Systems Engineering from Princeton University and an MBA in Finance from the University of Michigan where she was a Consortium for the Graduate Study of
AC 2012-4351: ENGINEERING FACULTY ENGAGEMENT IN LEARN-ING THROUGH SERVICE SUMMIT: BEST PRACTICES AND AFFINITYMAPPINGDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt has been a professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, & Architectural Engi- neering at the University of Colorado, Boulder, since 1996. She has taught first-year introductory courses, senior capstone design, and specialty senior-level/graduate courses in environmental engineering. Her research interests in engineering education have focused on service learning, sustainability, and ethics.Prof. Kurt Paterson P.E., Michigan Technological University Kurt Paterson, Associate Professor of civil and environmental
researchers may have looked at pedagogy in other areas of CS, the specific challenges related to computer systems research have not been addressed much. Yet the problem is real and acute – single-digit participation from women, negligible numbers from other underrepresented groups. Thus, focusing on techniques that work well for those traditionally put-off by systems is imperative since systems are ubiquitous in every important aspect of CS today (artificial intelligence, cloud computing, security, etc.). This report describes a large diverse undergraduate research group in computer systems and the results of a study utilizing a conceptual framework, High Impact Practices, to understand how the design of the research group is perceived by students
Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 2010.[9] Chien, Yu-Hung, Chia-Yu Liu, Shaio-Chung Chan, and Yu-Shan Chang, "Engineering Design Learning for High school and College First-year Students in a STEM Battlebot Design Project," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2023.[10] Tenenbaum, Laura S., Margery K. Anderson, Swati B. Ramadorai, and Debra L. Yourick., "High school students' experience with near-peer mentorship and laboratory-based learning: In their own words," Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, vol. 18, 2017.[11] Price, M., Kallam, M., & Love, J., "The learning styles of Native American students and implications for classroom practice," In Eighth Native American
engineeringby making them visible, examinable, and discussable. However, the model was also useful forus, as program designers, in that it guided our design of instructional supports and participationopportunities for each of the practices. Engineering design is a complex task requiring highlevels of general engineering and specific PV knowledge and practices, and also the ability toreflect on the quality of one’s own participation in the practices. Our model, seen in Figure 1,reflects this complexity, showing engineering to be composed of two sub-processes (i.e.,innovation and communication) linked through metacognitive reflection.Figure 1. The engineering research model (ERM) as enacted through key community practicesEngineering innovation practices
79Sample Questions Submitted by Participating Planning Grant PIs Category Sample Question Center Design and Does NSF prefer to fund ERCs that serve the needs of existing Vision industries, or those that can serve as a platform to develop science and engineering for future technologies (or to push existing industry in new directions that they do not have the scientific knowledge base to move into at this point)? Research How do you best determine whether a given ERC thrust is timely or competitive? Workforce Do we need to think about doing research in
cannot guarantee a successful transition in the crucial years after students graduate. While96 percent of educators believe that they are delivering workforce-ready students, only 11percent of U.S. employers believe this to be the case3. The President’s Council of Advisors onScience and Technology emphasizes the importance of producing an adequate STEM workforcein the U.S.; Economic projections point to a need for approximately one million more STEMprofessionals than the U.S. will produce at the current rate over the next decade if the country isto retain its historical preeminence in science and technology1.There are non-technical factors that affect the potential of STEM students. Researchers from theNational Center for Labor Statistics have
nexus of entrepreneurial programs, activities and thinking, a placefor all students from across campus to learn and experience entrepreneurship.An interdisciplinary and independent organization, the Center for Leadership, Entrepreneurship,and Innovation reports to the Provost and helps undergraduate and graduate students developentrepreneurial skills by offering experiential learning opportunities and fostering relationshipsbetween the University and the global business community. Students have opportunities toengage in classroom activity; interact with business owners, corporate executives, professionals,university faculty, and entrepreneurs; and travel domestically and abroad to gain a globalperspective and ignite ideas for creative
campus and be of financial benefit to the offering institutions.In the context of these guiding principles, considerable effort was spent developing the strategicgoals and objectives for the academic programs offered at RELLIS. Following is a statement ofeach of the strategic goals for academics at RELLIS. Goal 1–State of the Art Campus: Develop a state-of -the-art campus supporting the collaborative mission of the RELLIS Initiative. The RELLIS Campus is envisaged to be a premier high-tech, high-impact innovative research and education campus integrating smart campus and state-of-the-art technologies, practices, and processes to effectively and efficiently manage shared campus resources and assets, and to
. EPICSstudents create engineering-based design solutions tailored to the needs of community partnersusing a human-centered design process that is meant to include partners throughout thedevelopment, design and support of the projects. Partnerships are formed by the program withpartners signing an MOU with EPICS to work for at least five years. The agreements coverexpectations, communication and liability of delivered projects. Students register for differentdivisions of the course that are paired with one or more of the partners. Each section forms alarge team with 8-24 students who meet for two hours each week with a graduate teachingassistant and a faculty, industry or staff advisor who serves as a mentor. The large teams aretypically broken into
sustainability were alsoconsidered. From the professional review, one practicing engineer wrote “best overall design,well thought out, all via a Skype connection to the client in Vermont.”One particularly challenging building project was a two-story restaurant with a wrap-arounddeck on top of a mountain at Sunday River ski center in Newry, Maine. The team had to learnbasic architecture, analyze the structure, design key structural members, design a water andwastewater system, analyze rock samples from the site location, and compare costs between thedifferent design options. In addition to the extreme structural loading aspects on top of amountain, the water and wastewater system designs were particularly daunting because of thelarge elevation