design, the modified courses include those in our general educationcore curriculum, such as calculus, history, literature, communication, and the sciences. As such,this course modification process involves more than 50 faculty members from multipledepartments and colleges. The process entails intensive week-long workshops, report-backaccountability sessions, closing-the-loop sessions, support teams of faculty from related contentareas, coordinators, peer-reviewers, and a leadership team of university administrators, facultyand staff.This paper will explain the reason and objectives for the course modifications and will detail theprocess to modify many diverse courses including faculty evaluation of the program. The paperwill discuss the impact
learn best design practices6-8. It is worth to remember, thatan engineer is a problem solver - designing large or not so systems, operating engineering systems likecommunication services, power systems, or managing systems and services. Therefore, an engineershould be a designer, a thinker, and a systems integrator. Hence, the education should inculcate intostudents various aspects such as engineering principles, standards and practices, design methods,modeling and optimization skills, systems analysis, integration techniques and new technologies. Anengineer can become a thinker or an innovator only if he or she is allowed to independently put togetherall applied science concepts to solve a practical problem, by considering every alternative
Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s
University of Maryland (at Mtech, Maryland Technology Enterprise Institute) and at Johns Hop- kins University (at the Center for Leadership Education), where he researched and delivered processes for creative and innovative problem solving. For his unique contributions, he received the prestigious Distin- guished Teacher of the Year Award, the Faculty Talon Award, the University Researcher of the Year AEA Abacus Award, and the President’s Leadership Award. Raviv has published in the areas of vision-based driverless cars, green innovation, and innovative thinking. He is a Co-holder of a Guinness World Record. Raviv received his Ph.D. degree from Case Western Reserve University in 1987 and M.Sc. and B.Sc. degrees from the
academic interests include change management, change model validation, and mindset evolution. He may be reached at pilkang@unm.eduDr. Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico Abhaya Datye has been on the faculty at the University of New Mexico after receiving his PhD in Chem- ical Engineering at the University of Michigan in 1984. He is presently Chair of the department and Distinguished Regents Professor of Chemical & Biological Engineering. From 1994-2014 he served as Director of the Center for Microengineered Materials, a strategic research center at UNM that reports to the Vice President for Research. He is also the founding director of the graduate interdisciplinary program in Nanoscience and Microsystems
Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for introductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conduct- ing research on a large scale NSF faculty development project. His team is studying how workshops on strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect faculty be- liefs, classroom practice, and development of disciplinary communities of practice and associated student achievement. He was a coauthor for the best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013 and this year has received the Michael Ashby Outstanding Materials Educator Award from the Materials Division of ASEE.Dr. Keith D
and directives to move courses entirely online createdchaos in the higher education ecosystem and collapsed many of the support structures studentshad taken for granted, such as campus communities, study groups, and regular routines. As aresult, this research project conducted during the initial months of the pandemic reflects notmerely the challenges of working online, but rather working online under social isolation.MethodsOur study was based on utilizing semi-structured interviews from a broad spectrum of subjects.The interviews I conducted were part of a paired study design: a postdoctoral fellow to theproject, later joined by a graduate research assistant to the project, interviewed engineeringeducators, ed tech executives, and
testimony, case studies and role play, we've created the opportunity forinnovation and for students better understanding themselves through applied entrepreneurialethics. Our next section presents an outline of the curriculum.A Practical Approach to the Seven Layers of Integrity™Neither business nor engineering curricula offer much opportunity to explore self-knowledge. Inviewing themselves as present team members or future business partners, entrepreneurshipstudents must begin to explore their own intentions and values while understanding thatstandards exist outside themselves. While striving to create innovations, students also encounterself-creation and the use of a tool to aid them in decision making.In a workshop environment composed of part
his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Fiber Optic Communications, Faculty Development, Nanotechnology, Application of Telecommunications Technologies in Distance Education, and impact of Technology on Society. He teaches Wireless Engineering, Network Engineering, Fiber Optic Communications, Technology and Society, and Project Management. He also advises students on their senior design projects. He is the author of “The Telecommunications Fact Book, 2E” and co-author of “Technology and Society: Crossroads to the 21st Century,” “Technology and Society: A Bridge to the 21st Century,” and “Technology and Society: Issues for the 21st Century and Beyond.” He is
) technology. Thestudents were mentored by a graduate student and supervised by a dedicated faculty member incharge of the research project.Utilizing STT-MRAM for logic design requires the use of lookup table memories design bySTT-MRAM. The students were tasked to investigate various methods of STT-LUT mapping oflogic gates in a 4-bit adder benchmark and compare with the traditional all custom CMOSimplementation. After characterizing the impact of mapping one gate at a time on the adderperformance, multiple gate LUT mapping was performed. For multiple gate LUT mapping, thegates were selected using three algorithms: independent selection, dependent selection, andparametric-aware dependent selection. In terms of delay and power consumption
AC 2008-1766: SMALL INTERVENTIONS, BIG IMPACTS: HOWMODIFICATION OF DELIVERY PROCESS OF IN-CLASS ACTIVITIES FORFRESHMEN CAN DRAMATICALLY IMPROVE LEARNINGAly Tawfik, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Aly Tawfik is the VTSTA President and a Graduate Teaching Fellow in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech. He is a doctoral student in the Charles E. Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. His research is in the area of transportation systems. He is currently a workshop leader for freshmen courses at Virginia Tech.Janis Terpenny, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Janis Terpenny is an Associate Professor in Engineering Education and Mechanical
) : education driven by compelling or complexsocio-scientific problems or topics, where learners apply knowledge and skills using a blendedapproach across multiple disciplines to create and innovate new solution.This definition provides a common way to discuss practices that align with the cross disciplinarynature of many existing and emerging STEM fields.Using responses from a 2020 FC-STEM Request for Information (RFI) and relevant research, theIWG-CL finalized its guiding definition of computational literacy in 2022.Definition 4.2 (computational literacy) : the ability to use information, information processingagents, digital assets, networking components, and applications and systems that, combined,allow people and organizations to interact in a
’ expectations of each other and creates ethical dilemmas where they have tochoose between pursuing collective collaborative goals versus niche innovative goals. Weconclude with a discussion on how the sociomaterial outcomes of technology infrastructure aredriven by its unpredictable complexity rather than specific functionality. In the following section,we discuss the meaning of collaboration and compare collaboration technologies (i.e.,information and communication technologies designed explicitly to support interdependent, task-based work) with technology infrastructure that motivates collaboration (i.e., technologiesnecessary for teams to conduct interdependent work). In doing so, we center the role of problem-solving practices as one of key
Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on an NSF faculty development program based on evidence-based teaching practices. The overall goal is to develop dis- ciplinary communities of practice across the college of engineering. The approach is being promoted through semester-long faculty workshops and then through a semester of supported implementation of faculty classroom innovations. Changes in faculty beliefs and classroom practice should positively im- pact student performance and retention. He was a coauthor for the best paper award at the FIE convention in 2009 and the
Paper ID #45077Full Paper: Supporting Students’ Educational Robotics Experiences throughGenerative AI ChatbotsDr. Ethan E Danahy, Tufts University Dr. Ethan Danahy is a Research Associate Professor at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) with secondary appointment in the Department of Computer Science within the School of Engineering at Tufts University. Having received his graduate degrees in Computer Science and Electrical Engineering from Tufts University, he continues research in the design, implementation, and evaluation of different educational technologies. With particular attention to engaging
concepts are taught with passive lecturesand “recipe” labs. A balance must be provided between engineering science andengineering practice to prepare students for the real world. This preparation is alreadyunderway in the architectural engineering (AE) field at some universities. To build onthis foundation, in the electrical and lighting option within AE, developing a relationshipbetween the academic community and the electrical construction industry will helpbridge the gap between fundamental engineering principles and practical installationexperience. This relationship is currently being implemented between the NationalElectrical Contractors Association (NECA), its research foundation ELECTRIInternational (EI), and AE students at the University
Chemical Technology & Management for industry-based students taught by distance learning on a part time basis. The MEng course is a first-degree course extended to provide depth beyond BEng level and requires a higher level of qualifications at entry from school leavers. The MSc courses are post-graduate level and normally require a good first degree for entry. It is the strength of this post-graduate Masters programme in terms of its industrial contacts, development of relevant and new course material bound in industrial practice that has had a significant impact on our undergraduate teaching programme. The existing BEng & MEng course material has always provided underlining teaching and the development of Core
twenty-five peer-reviewed publications. She has recently begun the Human Social Dimensions PhD program in Arizona State University’s School for the Future of Innovation and Technology in Society (Fall 2020).Caroline VanIngen-Dunn, Arizona State University Caroline VanIngen-Dunn is Director of the Science Foundation Arizona Center for STEM at Arizona State University, providing services for Maximizing the Educational and Economic Impact of STEM. VanIngen-Dunn is the inspiration behind the programs and resources designed to assist community col- leges, particularly rural and Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs), through a rigorous process leading to improvements in their capacity building, infrastructure, and proposal
would introduce are the same that graduates of these programs would encounter on the job, on a daily basis. By exposing students to these concepts within the context of CAD instruction, they will be seeing a practical example of Lean Manufacturing at work. They will be receiving advanced preparation for the classes where they will be studying this Page 26.656.13 topic in depth, and will begin appropriating Lean Manufacturing concepts as a way of looking at the world.6.0 ConclusionBlended learning is changing the mode of instruction and learning in classrooms andlaboratories. For a subject like CAD, that is centered around the
to analyze the interaction students hadwhile working in the team, to understand better their cognitive design process when faced withother lenses of expertise and developing best practices to design such challenges in the classroom.Future studies will aim to understand the interdisciplinary design process to understand theeffectiveness of student´s contribution as interdisciplinary work, and its connection to sustainabledesign traits. Furthermore, the researchers will aim to understand how to apply suchinterdisciplinary experiences into other experiences of the majors both within specific courses andbetween majors.References[1] E. J. Power y J. Handley, «A best-practice model for integrating interdisciplinarity into the higher education
Research Center at Northwestern University for three years. Yalvac’s research is in STEM education, 21st century skills, and design and evaluation of learning environments informed by the How People Learn framework.Dr. Deniz Eseryel, North Carolina State University Deniz Eseryel joined North Carolina State University as a Chancellor’s Faculty Excellence Program clus- ter hire in the Digital Transformation of Education. She is an Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum, Instruction, and Counselor Education specializing in Digital Learning and Teaching. She is also a Senior Research Fellow at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. The important but little understood question that has motivated her
AC 2012-4210: THE FOUR PILLARS OF MANUFACTURING ENGINEER-ING: WHAT ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY GRADUATES SHOULDKNOW ABOUT MANUFACTURINGProf. Robert L. Mott, University of Dayton Robert L. Mott is Professor Emeritus of engineering technology at the University of Dayton, member of the Steering Committee of the SME Manufacturing Education & Research Community, Senior Staff of the NSF-sponsored National Center for Manufacturing Education, author of four textbooks in the mechanical engineering technology field, and a Fellow of ASEE.Prof. Ronald J. Bennett Ph.D., Univeristy of Saint Thomas Ronald J. Bennett holds the Honeywell Chair in Global Technology Management in the School of Engi- neering at the University of St
collaborative writing skills; and (d)feedback from the instructional team guiding continuous improvement in the course.BackgroundCollaboration and communication impact engineering practice in profound ways. Engineers needto be creative, innovative problem solvers, often under time constraints. As a result, effectiveteamwork and communication are paramount. To equip students with the teamwork andcommunication skills necessary for engineering practice, educators have developed variousapproaches including writing across the curriculum, cooperative project-based learning, andintegrated communication instruction. For more than ten years, we have integrated teamwork andcommunication (oral and written) instruction into the freshman and senior
AC 2009-2369: TECHNIQUES TO ENHANCE CONCEPT GENERATION ANDDEVELOP CREATIVITYDaniel Jensen, United States Air Force Academy Dr. Dan Jensen is a Professor of Engineering Mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy where he has been since 1997. He received his B.S. (Mechanical Engineering), M.S. (Applied Mechanics) and Ph.D. (Aerospace Engineering Science) from the University of Colorado at Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and MacNeal-Schwendler Corp. His research includes development of innovative design methodologies and enhancement of engineering education.Jason Weaver, University of Texas, Austin
current focus of Dr. Wood’s research includes the development of robotic ground and air vehicle systems using innovative design techniques using cur- rent technology implementations, as well as futuristic projections. Dr Wood also publishes research on advances in the methodology for creative electromechanical systems design.Brock U Dunlap, University of Texas, Austin Brock Dunlap is currently a graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin studying active learning and prototyping methodology. He plans to graduate in May 2014 with a master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in design and manufacturing. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University.Ella
technical issues. Furthermore, R&D manager'scomments regarding new PhD hires from the university indicated a need for training andexperience in team work, market and business related issues, and formulating problems in amanner relevant to the metrics of a market driven enterprise.The process culminated in a successful $2.5 million National Science Foundation (NSF)Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) grant proposal by Thursby asthe PI, and Professors Warren H. Stevenson (Purdue Mechanical Engineering) Louis A. Sherman(Purdue Department of Biology), William R. Woodson (Purdue School of Agriculture) as Co-PIs.The key parameter for the program’s design was that it truly "add-on" to the PhD and MBAstudents' educational
the pieces ofeducating the whole engineer within the first-year engineering experience. Thus, we attempted toprovide a unique way to establish an interdisciplinary module which includes the liberal arts,character development, and human-centered understanding as students discover whatengineering means to them. Specifically, in this paper, we describe a semester-long modulewithin one of our required, first-year engineering courses that was co-designed by aninterdisciplinary team to embody a strong liberal arts connection with engineering.WFU Engineering First Year Course ExperienceWhile it is a best practice and a common practice across many engineering programs to haveprojects within first year engineering courses, it is not common practice
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 (WIP) Caring Means Clear Explanations: The Epistemic Value of Engineering Students’ Descriptions of Good TeachingIntroduction and BackgroundThis work in progress paper explores engineering students’ beliefs about teaching and learning in the context ofongoing efforts at educational innovation. Within the literature on education, there is a clear consensus on theprinciples that increase learning. At the core is a shift in principle from the post-positivism of ‘instructor-centered’teaching practices to the constructivism of ‘student-centered’ ones, often implemented via ‘Research BasedInstructional Practices’ (RBIS) [1,2]. Efforts to improve engineering
participated in the SPARK-ENG project at the Centre for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (CMASTE).Dr. Marnie V Jamieson, University of Alberta Marnie V. Jamieson, M. Sc., Ph.D., P.Eng. is a Teaching Professor in Chemical Process Design in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta and holds an M.Sc. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering. She is currently the William and Elizabeth Magee Chair in Chemical Engineering Design and leads the process design teaching team. Her current research focuses on engineering design and leadership, engineering culture, the engineering graduate attributes and their intersection with sustainability, learning culture, and continuous course and
recently developed and implemented in the3rd semester of the computer engineering program at DigiPen Institute of Technology forembedded systems design. The main objectives of the course are for students to identifyauthentic engineering problems, select one and characterize it to propose a solution through thedesign, implementation and testing of an embedded system of their own. They are expected toapply knowledge from prerequisite and concurrent courses, learn how to do research anddocument all their work via written technical reports. Furthermore, they acquire practice andtheoretical understanding through design and implementation.In this course students are required for the first time to complete a full design for a project oftheir own instead