capacity of transmission lines, six- sigma, Design for Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, QFD, Statistics, project management, consulting, and holding workshops on team building, leadership, and creativity and innovation. Presently teaching en- gineering design methods, and coordinating/ co supervising, and instructing senor design classes and projects.Dr. Okenwa I Okoli, Florida A&M University/Florida State UniversitySungmoon Jung Ph.D., FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Dr. Jung joined the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering in August 2008, after working at Caterpillar Champaign Simulation Center as a staff engineer for two and half years. Dr. Jung’s research interests
established clubs that are focused onseveral activities during the academic year. These activities are designed to illustrate the STEM fields andthe interdependence of multiple professions, while offering opportunities for students to participate inindividual and team events. Specifically, academic year activities for NCJETS high school clubs involve: 1. Applied mechanical engineering principles through the design, analysis, simulation, construction, fabrication and testing of trebuchets, culminating in a competition on the university campus. 2. A career exploration contest which promotes student research of career / educational opportunities in STEM fields by addressing a specified open-ended problem with a specified
shared practice: Design engineers’ learning at work. Jyvaskyla Studies inEducation, Psychology and Social Research, Jyvaskyla.22. ibid., p. 12.23. ibid., p. 27.24. ibid., p. 28.25. Schrage, Michael. (2000). Serious Play: How the World’s Best Companies Simulate to Innovate. HarvardBusiness School Press, Boston MA.26. Trevelyan, J. (2007). Technical coordination in engineering practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 96 (3),p. 191.27. ibid., p. 191.28. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., Lee, C., B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: lessons for engineeringeducators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95 (2), pp. 139-151.29. Korte, R., Sheppard, S., & Jordan, W. (2008). A qualitative study of the early work experiences of
traditionally held in person, provide K-12STEM teachers and community college STEM faculty with the following: 1) engineeringresearch experiences in center research labs, 2) guidance in developing engineering contentcurricula based on center research, and 3) follow-up support for translating research experiencesinto classroom practice [3]. Sustained follow-up with the teachers throughout the academic year,in addition to a plan for evaluating program impact are also included in the program.In K-12 classrooms, engineering education can prepare learners to use higher-order thinkingstrategies in order to solve ill-structured, real-world problems [4]. Engineering relies primarilyon problem solving; engineers seek to solve problems that present in many forms
contrarian point of viewwould note that the increase of more than 500,000 manufacturing jobs since 2010 pales incomparison to the over 5 million factory jobs that vanished between 2000 and 2009, according tothe Bureau of Labor Statistics, a loss of 31.2% of U.S. manufacturing jobs. There are manycontributing factors for this, but it indicates deep concerns that there are negative impacts to ourdomestic innovation and manufacturing capabilities as a result of decreased investments in theseareas.There are those who argue that the decline of manufacturing is the inevitable result of economicprogress, and that efforts to support domestic manufacturing are supporting inefficiencies. TheMIT Task Force on Production and Innovation, or Production in the
to build consensusaround a vision change that led to design becoming a major feature of the curriculum.Building Shared MeaningOur first goal was to explore the interests and priorities of those in the department and identifyareas of shared focus and those without. The change process started in a Fall 2013 ABET retreatwhere faculty and staff participated in two thought exercises. For the first exercise, each personwas asked to “write down the traits or behaviors you would look for if you were asked to identifya successful ... graduate five years after graduation.” Some example cards are shown in Figure 1.The second exercise asked each person to “describe the best undergraduate degree program inelectrical or computer engineering in the country
guide’ theme from the axial coding. These themesare mapped out to design an instructional scaffolding strategy model.More effective pedagogical practices to improve engineering students’ knowledge constructionin online learning have been the subject of much argument from researchers and deserve furtherinvestigation. It is important to understand the design process of an instructional scaffoldingstrategy. Designing instructional scaffolding strategies as a platform for metacognitivescaffolding approaches can help instructors to improve engineering graduates’ knowledgeconstruction in terms of higher order thinking.Keywords: Instructional scaffolding, knowledge construction, online learning1.0 INTRODUCTIONThere have been numerous technological
University. The competition, as it exists today, consists of an autonomous navigation challenge, a design competition, and an interoperability challenge. The IGVC offers a design experience that is at the very cutting edge of engineering education. It is multidisciplinary, theory-based, hands-on, team implemented, outcome assessed, and based on product realization. It encompasses the very latest technologies impacting industrial development and taps subjects of high interest to students. The competition practice team organization and leadership skill development, and there are even roles for team members from business and engineering management, language and graphic arts, and public relations. Students solicit and interact with
(b) improving graduate student technical and professional competencies as wellas preparation for a career at the high priority convergent research topic targeted by thetraineeship. Using a cohort-sequential design with retrospective and concurrent comparisongroups, the evaluation includes both formative and summative activities reflective of bestpractices per Patton [8], Kundin [9], Schwandt [10], as well as Hendricks, Plantz, and Pritchard[11]. These activities and mixed-methods data, collected across multiple stakeholders, fostercontinuous program improvement during the project timeline, establish an evidence base forsuccesses and lessons learned, and generate best practice resources.3.1. Transferable skills courseThe 15-week Transferable
engineering design spaces; research in solid freeform fabrication, including geometric processing, control, design tools, manufacturing applications; and design and development of energy harvesting systems. Crawford is co-founder of the DTEACh program, a Design Technology program for K-12, and is active on the faculty of the UTeachEngineering program that seeks to educate teachers of high school engineering.Dr. Leema Kuhn Berland, University of Texas, Austin Leema Berland is an Assistant Professor of science education at the University of Texas, Austin. She earned a Ph.D. in the learning sciences from Northwestern University in 2008 and was a Doctoral Fellow with the NSF-funded Center for Curriculum Materials in Science
Beyerlein, Texas A&M University Michael Beyerlein is a Professor in the Human Resource Development Graduate Program at Texas A&M University. Formerly, he was professor and department head of Organizational Leadership & Supervision at Purdue and prior to that Founding Director of the Center for Collaborative Organizations and Professor of Industrial/Organizational Psychology at the University of North Texas. His books, book chapters, and articles usually address the topics of teams and collaboration, creativity and innovation, knowledge management, and intangible capital. His research interests include: team creativity, emergence of virtual organizations, and innovation science. His most recent edited book is
and research, and a broad body of discipline-specific knowledge in standards, best practices, and lessons learned,2. Provide a testbed of validated knowledge and instrumented knowledge management tools to enable experiments that evaluate the effectiveness of the students and instructors using the collaboration environment in learning and applying software engineering knowledge,3. Conduct focused experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of these collaborative tools and knowledge objects in helping students meet learning objectives,4. Based on experiment results and further research, incrementally improve the collaboration tools, knowledge, testbed, and experiments toward creating and assessing innovative and effective
teachdesign methodology and to enable the students to practice and improve teamwork skills”.16 Sothe “cornerstone to capstone” model can work for some institutions.In addition, engineering learning spaces are also being built to support undergraduateengineering education, sometimes specifically for first year engineering students. At theUniversity of South Australia, a large new learning space called “Experience 1 Studio” opened in2009 to help students adapt to university life, develop peer networks, benefit from collaborativelearning and engage with their studies.19 In fact, this learning space was shown to help studentstransition to college, especially women and minorities. At Yale University, the new Center forEngineering Innovation and Design was
(Industrial Innovation and Partnerships). In 2006 and 2007, he won the Most Cited Journal Paper award from Computer-Aided Design and the Research Excellence award in the College of Engineering at Purdue University. In 2009, he won the Outstanding Commercialization award from Purdue University and the ASME Best Paper Award from technical committees twice at the IDETC. In 2012 his labs paper won the all conference best paper award from ASME-CIE for ”Handy Potter”. Page 24.683.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 IDEA-Pen: Interactive Design and Analysis through a Pen-based
Engineering from the highly ranked university in Iran (Shahid Beheshti University) in 2012.Dr. Simon R Goerger, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Dr. Simon R. Goerger is the Director for the Institute for Systems Engineering Research (ISER), US Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC). He received his BS from the United States Military Academy (USMA), his MS National Security Strategy from the National War College, and his MS in Computer Science and his PhD in Modeling and Simulation both from the Naval Postgraduate School. He is a Retired Colonel from the US Army, where his appointments included Director of the Operations Research Center of Excellence in the Department of Systems Engineering at
roles and responsibilities of professional engineers is better defined andthe need for graduate-level engineering education has received more comprehensive study.Consequently, it’s important to define certain terms and principles that are foundational for theconclusions presented herein.The term Professional EngineerThe term “Professional Engineer” is a legal term set in state statute, as only those engineerslicensed by a state or U.S. territory can refer to themselves as a Professional Engineer (or PE).The license allows PEs to practice engineering (defined by these same state statutes) involvingthe protection of public health, safety and welfare where non-licensed engineers cannot. Similarto other professions, licensing is granted state-by
have solid technical and practical knowledge, but also social understanding for, through infrastructure, address local and global challenges on humanitarian, environmental, social and equity issues. (iii) EDUCATION RESEARCH: Related to STEM education, Miguel Andrés is developing and applying contemporary pedagogies and tools for innovation and student empowerment to address climate change. Currently, Miguel Andrés is developing teaching and evaluation pedagogy that directs a philosophy of seeking excellence as a pillar to eradicate corruption. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Validating Guerra´s Blended Flexible
. Before joining San Francisco State University as an assistant professor, he worked for Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) LLP. As a licensed professional engineer in the states of Connecticut and California, Dr. Jiang has been involved in the design of a variety of low-rise and high-rise projects. His current research interests mainly focus on Smart Structures Technology, Structural Control and Health Monitoring and Innovative Engineering Education.Dr. Kwok Siong Teh, San Francisco State University Kwok Siong Teh received his B.S., M.S., Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the Univer- sity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, and University of California at Berkeley in 1997
math, science, computer science, and engineering teach- ing to frame his research on STEM teaching and learning. Nadelson brings a unique perspective of research, bridging experience with practice and theory to explore a range of interests in STEM teaching and learning.Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological
-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. Dr. Yazdanpour has received numerous awards and recogni- tions including ”The Best Paper Award in 15th IEEE Workshop on PBVS in conjunction with CVPR” in 2019, ”CEAT Dean’s Outstanding ECE Graduate Student Award” in 2018, ”The FGSH Research Award” in 2017, ”Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (CIE) Scholarship” in 2017, ”CEAT Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award” in 2016, and ”Calvin & Marilyn Vogt Endowed Scholarship Award” in 2016.Dr. Phil Lewis, Texas A&M University Dr. Lewis is an Associate Professor and Associate Department Head in the Department of Construction Science as Texas A&M University. He also serves as the Graduate Program
. Handelsman J, Ebert-May D, Beichner R, et al. Scientific Teaching. Science. 2004;304(5670):521-522.13. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Innovation with Impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education. Washington, DC: Author;2012.14. National Research Council. Discipline-Based Educational Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press;2012.15. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC2012.16. Hora MT
Callihan Linnes is the Marta E. Gross Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Director of the College of Engineering Honors Program at Purdue University. Her work advances pa- per microfluidics, molecular biosensors, and human-centered instrumentation design for translation into point-of-care diagnostics for global health and health disparities research. She teaches undergraduate design courses for first year engineering honors and capstone design, graduate level instrumentation mea- surement and point-of-care diagnostics, and human-centered design workshops to practitioners around the world. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A systematic review of pedagogical
resident assistants, andschedule of activities. Evidence-based practices built into programming for DISTINCTIONencourage engagement and exposure to engineering at the undergraduate level and a residentialand rural college experience at a predominantly and historically white institution. Students arepaired with roommates in a residence hall on campus to encourage socialization and makeconnections in a communal setting. Residence hall activities include group activities initiated byresidents and program assistants. Outside the residence halls, students connect with facultythrough discipline, research, and student support-centered talks, with opportunities to interactclosely with engineering faculty and graduate students. Lastly, an industry
. Senkpeil, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Ryan Senkpeil is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University who’s research is focused on non-cognitive factors that impact engineering student performance and developing interventions to improve students’ non-cognitive factors.Ms. Julianna Sun Ge, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Julianna Ge is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. At Purdue, she created and currently teaches a novel course for undergraduate engineering students to explore the intersections of wellbeing, leadership, diversity and inclusion. As an NSF Graduate Research Fellow, her research interests
[12] K. Tanyoung, and C. DiSalvo, "Speculative visualization: A new rhetoric for communicating public concerns," in Proceedings of the Design Research Society (DRS) international conference design & complexity. 2010. http://www.drs2010.umontreal.ca/data/PDF/066.pdf[13] B. T. Ladd, and R. E. Brown, “Broader Impacts of the Information Frontiers Integrated Education and Diversity Program,” National Alliance for Broader Impacts Summit, May 1, 2019.[14] Building the Future Investing in Innovation and Discovery: NSF Strategic Plan 2018-2022. [Online] https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf18045. Last accessed January 30, 2020.[15] Blue Waters Data Visualization Seminar Series, 2016. [Online
team. By capturing theseinner layers of the trajectory, even closer comparisons can be made between different design Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2014, American Society for Engineering Education 230trajectories for engineers. An analysis of the differences in the design trajectories can be viewedin the Overall Findings section. Figure. 1. Design team trajectory where the more obvious (outer) and less obvious (inner) parts of project #1 directly impacts a person’s trajectory to project #2.Research SettingThis exploratory study took place in
pedagogical techniques and best practices with fundamentals of howlearning occurs and participants’ personal experiences to respond to the needs of industrypersonnel as well as increasing enrollment and interest in NE.2. Course DesignSeveral factors guided the course design. One factor was the profile of the students who mightenroll in the course. Additional factors included the approach used by Virginia Tech for onlinecourse design. Next, considerations of students’ math skills led to the design of a refreshermodule on math to help those who needed additional help with these concepts. Finally, thetechnology available guided our course design.A. Profile of Students’ interested in online offering of Graduate Nuclear CertificateProgramResearch revealed
growing demands for students with integrated designand manufacturing experience and knowledge of advanced CAD software has resulted in manyuniversities developing some form of CAD curricula. For example, many universities includingPurdue have now eliminated traditional graphics course and replaced it with a CAD relatedcourse. Rapid design and prototyping laboratories have also been established in manyuniversities. The laboratories are integrated with CAD/CAM courses including teaching designfor automated assembly 4,5. Computer-aided design (CAD) tools, used in conjunction withpersonal workstations, have already brought about major changes in engineering practice. Web-based services supporting mechatronic systems design is described for a graduate
as the increasing number of advanced degree programs in engineeringeducation, recognition of engineering education research within a broader network ofresearchers, and the increasing number of funding opportunities in particular through NationalScience Foundation, and external factors such as changes in the ABET criteria. For example,considering the impact of the adopted ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000) within theUnited States, there is no surprise to see students' learning outcomes and learning process as oneof the major research areas between 2006 and 2010. Another major shift was the emphasis on theengineering design process that started along with the changes in ABET criteria and continuesthrough the early 20th century. Its impact
Teacher of the Year nomination in 2023. In the classroom, Saqib likes to challenge his students to tackle real-world engineering problems. He likes to use innovative pedagogical techniques and Entrepreneurial-Minded Learning (EML) to facilitate student learning. Beyond the classroom, he has a passion for mentoring students and helping them achieve their educational and professional goals.Marie Stettler Kleine, Colorado School of Mines Marie Stettler Kleine is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering, Design, & Society. She conducts research on engineering practice and pedagogy, exploring its origins, purposes, and potential futures. Marie is especially interested in the roles of values in engineers