development.contributions of each team member and teamwork process to At the first level of the proposed assessment framework, thedetermine their impact in the overall performance of the team. master rubrics are organized in areas of learning outcomes. In In technical disciplines such as engineering and information the second level, each learning outcome area includes severaltechnology, a literature review shows that students’ projects and core competencies/attitudes expected from students, and theseteamwork evaluations are commonly used for assessment of competencies/attitudes are operationalized by measurableprofessional skills [20-26]. The aim of this approach is to rubric items. The rationale and
. Completed ALBsReferences[1] V. Kambhammettu and J. Ziebarth, “Proposal for New Energy Laboratory in the Crothers Engineering Hall Addition”, SDSU College of Engineering, 2001.[2] T. Harrell, S. Horner, M. Jensen, and W. Ziegeldorf, “Automated Control of a 3Ф Water Rheostat”, EE-465 Final Design Report, SDSU, 1999.[3] J. Kautz, M. Karlgaard, and S. Hoberg, “Automated Load Bank”, EE-465 Final Design Report, SDSU, 2000.[4] A. Koob, J. Ziebarth, T. Metzger, “Automated Load Bank & Power Processing Station Upgrade”, EE-465 Final Design Report, SDSU, 2002.[5] V. Kambhammettu, “Design of New Energy Laboratory Power Processing System”, SDSU Masters of Science in Engineering Final Design Paper, 2003.[6] J. Morrill, “A
inconcentration mode, and they transform to diluted mode when their brain invents a new idea, orthinks of a different solution. The results of the study show that while participants were relaxing,their brain signal produced ± 200 µV, and that is considered an average voltage. When they areout of their comfort zone, the brain signal frequency increases to almost twice as high as thenormal status due to lack of confidence, frustration, or knowledge. However, when participantsgain some guidance and knowledge their chance of mastering their fear of a surprising situationwill escalate.Conclusions and Future DirectionsStudying brain signals in different modes helps us to understand the factors of procrastinationand the delay of taking action when thinking. It
be the master. Themovement of the robot will be based on the command string The working methodology of this robotic system issent by the remote controller using the robot’s built-in implemented in the below three modules :controller’s language. 1) Image capture Art is a universal language and has been essential to human 2) Image processinglife for centuries. In this project we apply a typical industrialrobot to produce picture portrait. This Table-Top robot is a 3) Dynamic control of the robotCartesian coordinate robot [1]. It has three prismatic jointswhose axes are mutually orthogonal, as shown in Figure 1.This Table-Top robot is IAI made with a
Paper ID #35773Development of Dynamic Modulus Predictive Model Using Artificial NeuralNetwork (ANN)Mr. Prashanta Kumar Acharjee, University of Texas at Tyler Prashanta Kumar Acharjee is currently working as a graduate research assistant at the University of Texas at Tyler. After graduating from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology he is perusing his Masters at UT Tyler. His research interest is broadly in transportation engineering. Currently, he is working on applying machine learning in transportation engineering.Dr. Mena Souliman, The University of Texas at Tyler Dr. Souliman is an Associate Professor in
1321and EET 3311, there were noticeable differences in performances in the final exams. The students saidwhen asked that the constant access to the filmed lectures strengthens their ability to master the coursematerials. But they are more positive about short videos about laboratory set up and preparation. Ithelped them a lot to complete the lab experiment with nearly clear understanding with a minimumintervention of the instructor and they feel very good about it. The magic is the short video. They saidalmost unanimously that any video more than 10 minutes is ineffective as they loss their interest andconcentration in it. The students in some other universities enjoyed ‘screencast’ method of deliveringthe course materials. A flipped classroom
Environmental Quality. Alain has a Master of Science in Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies with a focus on Environmental Engineering, Geophysics and Public Health. His research doing microbial risk assessment of import products from Mexico is published on the Journal of Food Safety. He is currently enrolled in the Master of Arts in Design and Innovation at Lyle. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Paper ID #35776Miss Kristine Reiley, SMU, Caruth Institute for Engineering Education Kristine R. Reiley currently serves as Program Specialist for K-12 Outreach
changes towards a more effective mathematicscurriculum, the SUMMIT-P team created observation, conversation and collaboration opportunitiesbetween the mathematics and engineering departments. A particularly effective observationopportunity was the “fishbowl” discussion [4], where the mathematics faculty observed and passivelylistened to the conversations among engineering faculty about the mathematics concepts that theywould like their engineering majors to master. This activity revealed that engineering andmathematics professors have vastly different expectations from their students and tend to focus ondifferent aspects of mathematics. Indeed, while a mathematics professor is bound by its calculuscurriculum to use three weeks in mastering limit
Semesters (Equivalent to 32 Weeks) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings228 2 and 3) provides a tabulation of the results, which summarizes the proposed instructional229 outcomes and goals, detailed in this section's remaining portions.230 • The enduring understanding is the development of work plans to complete day-to-231 day operations for a project that will be integrated into a comprehensive schedule232 to complete a project safely and economically. In developing the master builder,233 the ability to cultivate the knowledge base is found to be a work plan that is tangible234 and
have to matriculatethrough degree programs. There are certain socio-cultural and economic contextual realitiesenmeshed with recruiting undergraduate students into doctoral programs that are not easilyaddressed. “Students want to get out and earn a living.” To address this, the team is adjusting itsstrategy to include targeted marketing for undergraduate and masters students. Polls aboutinterest levels among these students will be a component of the marketing so communicationscan be directed to an interested pool of potential students. Additionally, the pandemic occurredduring the launch of the program such that recruiting efforts were stalled.Institutional Challenges. The leadership team collaborated with the Graduate School early on inthe
close. Therefore, in the course of of materials specialty, it is ofpositive significance for students to master a systems thinking approach and toconsider various factors such as moral, ethical and environmental factors and therelationship between materials and society in order to achieve sustainabledevelopment. The production, design, and development of materials will affect humandevelopment and needs from all angles, and a systems thinking approach will helpstudents gain insight into how the materials discipline interacts with other disciplinesand society[9]. In the past, the impact of the use of chemicals, resource consumptionand waste generation in the process of material preparation on human beings andecosystems has often been neglected in
sections. In the Fall 2022 semester, we piloted aself-paced, mastery-learning model for the online section, while the in-person sections continuedto follow a traditional format.Mastery LearningThe mastery learning approach was articulated in the 1960s by Bloom [1], who saw it asenabling nearly all students to achieve mastery of a subject, despite variations in aptitude andlearning styles. The essential idea, which derives from Carroll [2], is that variations in aptitudedo not imply differences in the capacity to master the material, only to differences in the timerequired to achieve mastery. Mastery learning is therefore closely linked to self-pacedinstruction.A review of prior work on mastery learning in computer science education is given in [3
Paper ID #38201Why IF I APPLY isn’t CRAAP: The evolution of source evaluation with PSUSTEM Libraries in the Engineering ClassroomMs. Denise Amanda Wetzel, Pennsylvania State University Denise A. Wetzel is a Science & Engineering Librarian at Pennsylvania State University Libraries. She is also the Patent and Trademark Resource Center Representative for the University Park PTRC. She holds a Masters in Library and Information Studies from the University of Alabama, a Masters in Aquatic Environmental Science from Florida State University, and a B.H. in Interdisciplinary Studies from the Pennsylvania State University. Before
what good teaching looks like and know that Ace had a plan from the verybeginning to guide their learning experience. Sometimes, the display of effort and willingness tobe vulnerable and risk your own reputation will help students relate to you. Once the students trustthe instructor’s intentions, knowing that the instructor is not a gatekeeper or guardian ofknowledge, but a similar human being with learned experiences to share, they can begin the long,difficult journey to master the engineering content… END OF STORY.SummaryThe preceding paper seeks to summarize a number of ideas the instructor and the cited referenceshave deemed effective in creating engaging engineering content for classrooms and videos.Overall, the following three topics are
4.00 ± 2.67 4. I feel able to meet the learning objectives of this course 4.43 ± 0.73 4.31 ± 1.56 5. I have positive experiences in this course 4.29 ± 1.03 3.95 ± 3.11 6. I participate in class discussions to improve my understanding in academic 4.43 ± 0.73 4.21 ± 1.73 7. I take personal responsibility for my academic learning 5.00 ± 0.00 4.67 ± 1.27 8. I seek out the information I need to master course objectives
. Researchers may use our work as a measure of biomedical engineer’s self-efficacy in their own clinical immersion programs. Appendix Label ItemGeneral Engineering Self Efficacy (GEN)GEN-1 I can master the content in the engineering-related courses I am taking this semester.GEN-2 I can master the content in even the most challenging engineering course if I try.GEN-3 I can do a good job on almost all my engineering coursework if I do not give up.GEN-4 I can do an excellent job on engineering-related problems and tasks assigned this semester.GEN-5 I can learn the content taught in my engineering-related
Paper ID #37056Early Integrating of Industry Certification Domains and Objectives intoa Modern a Cybersecurity Degree CurriculumDr. Mahmoud K. Quweider, The University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley M K Quweider is a Professor of Informatics and Engineering System (founding member of the Cyber Security Program) at the U. of Texas at RGV. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Science (Multime- dia and Imaging Specialty) and B.S. In Electrical Engineering, M.S. in Applied Mathematics, M.S. in Engineering Science, and M.S. in Biomedical Engineering all from the University of Toledo, Ohio. He also holds a Bachelor/Masters of English
obstacle to student success. This could be useful in preparingremedial material for non-native speakers. Since mastering engineering terminology is critical tostudents’ success in their careers, more care should be taken to strength the first three levels ofBloom’s taxonomy [7], before approaching problems involving analysis or design. Such materialcan bridge the opportunity gaps between non-native speakers of English and the rest. This will becrucial in the university’s mission to reduce opportunity gaps between different studentdemographics while producing career-ready graduates who master terminology in theirrespective fields.References:[1]. H. Friman, Y. Sitbon, I. Banner, Y. Einav, Y, Environmental Engineering EducationOversome the Language
Paper ID #36385An International Design Project for First Year Engineering Students atMultiple U.S. InstitutionsDr. Thomas J. Siller, Colorado State University Tom Siller is an Associate Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Colorado State University. He has been a faculty member at CSU since 1988.Ms. Erica J Marti, University of Nevada - Las Vegas Erica Marti completed her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV). She holds a Master of Science in Engineering and Master of Education from UNLV and a Bachelor of Science in chemistry from the University of
Pittsburg State University. She has a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from the University of Missouri-Rolla where she graduated Magna Cum Laude. She has worked as a software developer at IBM, BMC Software, and Textron. While at Textron, she received the Chairman's Award for Innovation for her work on Future Combat System. Donna was recently awarded a NASA scholarship through the Kansas Space Grant subaward and is pursuing a Master of Science in Mathematics.Kailash Chandra (Professor) Kailash Chandra is a Professor at Pittsburg State University in Kansas where he has taught Computer Science and Engineering Technology courses for forty years. His research interests include machine learning, programming languages
disagreement with thevarious statements of the Bateman-Donald questionnaire. It was observed that the students on theaverage were towards the relativity and commitment (within relativism) of their understanding ofthe world. The average percentage (%) of responses agreeing with the statements of dualism was48% while the % of responses disagreeing was 25%. The % responses that were neutral in thedualism dimension were 28%. The highest % of agreement in the dualism dimension was withthe statement that the job of the student is to master the facts as given by the professor. Thelargest percentage (35%) of unsure responses in the dualism domain were of question numberD17 which stated that “to get more out of the class, the instructor should just stick to
itidentifies a concept that they have not yet fully mastered, that on an exam, they won’t be able tomimic a solved problem so they should practice solving problems under exam-like conditions,etc.The second change is exposing expert thinking. Sometimes when expert instructors showlearners how to solve a problem, they very clearly demonstrate what to do and how to do it. If, atthe same time, the expert instructor does not explain how they knew what to do, that is, if theydon’t explain the reasoning that led them to do what they did, then when students try to solve asimilar problem, they won’t know how to begin or proceed. To address this, we added explicitinstruction to the course on how to identify and differentiate between different types of
Paper ID #36707Construction Management Education with Reality Capture:Enabling Communication and Teamwork in a Learner-centered ApproachShaghayegh Kurzinski (Ph.D. Candidate)Shayan Mirzabeigi Shayan Mirzabeigi is currently a PhD student in Sustainable Construction Management at the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY ESF). His master dissertation was about solar radiation and human comfort. His first degree was a bachelor’s degree in Architectural Engineering from the University of Tehran, Iran, in 2016. His current research interests cover energy efficiency in the built
Paper ID #36678Assessing Effectiveness of Different Teaching Modalities inLinear Circuits IZahrasadat Alavi (Assistant Professor) Dr. Zahrasadat Alavi, an Assistant Professor at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at California State University Chico, received her PhD in Electrical Engineering from University of Wiscon sin Milwaukee in May 2015. She received her B.Sc. and M.Sc. from Amirkabir University (Polytechnic of Tehran) with honors in 2007 and 2009 respectively, and another Master of Science from University of Wisconsin Milwaukee (UWM) in Electrical Engineering in 2012. She was an
navigate infusing argumentation into integrative STEM instruction.Jenna Menke I earned my B.A. in mathematics, secondary education, and theology from the University of Saint Thomas in Houston, Texas and my Masters in mathematics education from the University of Dayton in Dayton, Ohio. I taught high school mathematics in Cincinnati, Ohio before coming to the University of Georgia to complete my Ph.D. in mathematics education. My research focuses on teacher preparation programs and how we assess teachers' feelings of preparedness.Anna Gillespie-SchneiderJames Drimalla James Drimalla is a Ph.D. candidate in Mathematics Education at the University of Georgia in Athens, GA. He received a B.A. from Trinity International
; Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 33415. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33415.[17] A. F. McKenna et al., “Master Mentors: The Process of Developing a Mentoring Model at Scale,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Jan. 15, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/master-mentors-the-process-of-developing-a-mentoring- model-at-scale[18] S. Brunhaver, A. Carberry, & R. Renteria, "Junior Engineering Faculty's Perceptions of Effective Mentoring Practices," presented at the 2021 University of New Mexico Mentoring Institute Virtual Conference, Oct. 2021. Available upon request.[19] S. Bearman, S. Blake-Beard, L. Hunt, and F. J. Crosby, “New directions in mentoring,” in
forces and moments as vectors. For such a basic concept, there are many subtleaspects and decisions that go into drawing proper FBDs and it can be challenging for new learnersto master this skill. Cornwell and Danesh-Yazdi 1 identified errors and lack of clarity ininstruction on FBDs in physics and statics textbooks. Various instructional aids such asmnemonic devices 2 , and supplementary animations 3,4 have been developed. Ultimately, the onlyway for students to master FBDs is by practice with expert feedback. The difficulty of scaling upindividualized grading or feedback on FBDs to large enrollment courses has led to many effortsover the years to develop automated grading software. Some examples include: Newton’s Pen 5,6 ,which uses a stylus
Paper ID #37006Cloud Computing Based Plant Classifiers and Their Real-Life Research ApplicationsDeng Cao Dr. Deng Cao received his Ph.D. in Computer Science from West Virginia University in 2013. He also have two master degrees in Statistics and Physics, both from West Virginia University. Dr. Cao currently serves as an associate professor of Computer Science at Central State University. His research interests include Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Computer Vision and Biometrics. His research has been supported by US Department of Agriculture, National Science Foundation, and US Air Force Research
). In vivo coding. In Matthes, J. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0270AcknowledgementsThis project is generously funded by various supporting agencies including VentureWell, theASEE-Lemelson Foundation partnership, the Center for Energy Systems Research (CESR) atTennessee Technological University, and the Rural Reimagined Initiative (RRI) from TennesseeTechnological University.Author BiosDipendra WagleDipendra Wagle is currently a doctoral student in Chemical Engineering at the TennesseeTechnological University (TNTech). He holds a Master of Science in Chemical Engineering atTNTech and his dissertation
. in CE in 2009 and a Ph.D. in 2012. Dr.Michalaka is passionate about teaching in college and K-12 levels and conducting research inboth transportation engineering, focused on traffic operations, congestion pricing, and trafficsimulation, and engineering education. She also graduated with a Master of Science in ProjectManagement from The Citadel in December 2020.David Greenburg, Ph.D, PMPDavid Greenburg is an Associate Professor and Head of the Department of EngineeringLeadership and Program Management (ELPM) in the School of Engineering (SOE) at TheCitadel. He served over 20 years of active military service in the United States Marine Corps ina variety of command and staff and leadership positions. Upon completion of active militaryservice