both engi- neering education and design thinking, her research focuses on how Latinx students develop an identity as an engineer, methods for enhancing student motivation, approaches for faculty leadership develop- ment, and methods for involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Shaping the Engineering Leadership Research Agenda: Results of a 2022 Special SessionAbstractEngineering leadership (EL) research publication has seen significant growth coinciding with the ever-increasing recognition thatleadership development is an essential component of undergraduate engineering student
are shown in Figure 4. Interms of quality assessment, all of the studies were proposing something different and relevantfor literature of OR in HEIs contexts. All studies considered in Figure 4 were added to thedataset. Number of databases Title Authors Year where the study was found from Leading in the eye of a storm: Fernandez, F; Coulson, how one team of administrators 2022 9 H
, SSC paved the way for a rewarding academic journey for future engineers. Through extensive recruitment efforts, the overall first-year student enrollment has substantially increased in the past two years and is projected to increase further in the next academic year, as presented in Figure 1. 1,000 First-Year Students 900 800 700 600 500 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Fall
advertising but did hear ofthe program through either a co-worker or simply by searching on the internet for onlineuniversity MSEM degree programs, and landing on the university’s website. Exhibit 6. Predicted verses Actual enrollment for the first eight (8) semesters Actual, begins at F20 start Enroll Predicted, starting at F20 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 F20 SP21 SU21 F21 SP22 SU22 F22 SP23The EMGT 6900 course first offering was delayed from Summer 2022 to Fall 2022, to allow aslightly larger initial enrollment in the section. This Professional
stayed online); managers andleaders are facing challenges such as lack of employee engagement, high turnovers, and more.According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, over the month of November 2022, there hadbeen 5.9 million cases of workplace separations, including 4.2 million quits, 1.4 million layoffsand discharges, and 0.35 million of other types of separations in the country. On the other side,there had been 6.1 million hires [1]. Although the pandemic did not start the resignations, itdefinitely spurred the “Great Resignation”, also known as the “Big Quit” or the “GreatReshuffle” [2], where people exited their current positions in a massive amount due to variousreasons like relocation, reconsideration, reshuffling, etc. as described in
[39], forming a mature and knowledgeable supportive network to foster an inclusive,diverse, and equitable workspace [40].2. Nurturing student-initiated interest groups (SIGs)Since the center commenced operations in 2020, it has been hosting the Student-Initiated InterestGroup (SIG) program [41], which aims to onboard project teams that are both student-initiatedand student-led to the center. This initiative integrates the project team into the center'sframework, enabling them to leverage its resources for technology exploration and development.Figure 4 illustrates the growth in the number of SIGs, with 24 established SIGs in the center as of2022/23. Figure 5 showcases the diversity of student interests within the SIGs in 2022/23,highlighting
Isabella Zuccaroli for conducting the focus groups. 11 Works Cited[1] ABET, "How ABET Helps STEM Programs Adapt to Industry’s Evolving Needs," Spring 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/.. [Accessed January 2023].[2] ABET, "Engineering Change: Lessons from Leaders on Modernizing Higher Education Engineering Curriculum," An ABET Issue Brief, Fall 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2022-2023
, 1992.[3] R. L. D. Komarek, “In search of a definition and frameworks for engineering leadership development,” New Directions in Student Leadership, Wiley, vol. 2022, no. 173, pp. 33–41, Mar. 2022, http://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20477[4] E. Godfrey, “A Theoretical Model of The Engineering Education Culture: A Tool For Change,” in 2003 Annual Conference Proceedings, Nashville, Tennessee, Jun. 2003, p. 8.133.1-8.133.15. http://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--11770[5] E. H. Schein and P. A. Schein, Organizational Culture and Leadership. Wiley, 2016.[6] G. Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. SAGE Publications, 2001[7] M. Handley, D. Lang, P. Mittan, and A. Ragonese, “The
discipline. 36 of the 45 references for this paper represent academic journal articles,conference papers, dissertations or thesis, and books. The remaining 9 references were builtenvironment organizations that support the facility engineering profession. Facility Engineering Literature Type (1993-2022) 7 Journal 1 Conference Paper 2 21 Industry/Organization Standard or 5
Criteria and Procedures 2017.” Engineers Canada, 2017. Accessed: Feb. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/accreditation-criteria-procedures-2017.pdf[3] M. R. Kendall, D. Chachra, K. Gipson, and K. Roach, “Motivating the need for an engineering-specific approach to student leadership development,” New Directions for Student Leadership, vol. 2022, no. 173, pp. 13–21, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1002/yd.20475.[4] R. Paul, A. Sen, and E. Wyatt, “What is Engineering Leadership? A Proposed Definition,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, Jun. 2018. doi: 10.18260/1-2--30137.[5] J. V. Farr and D. M. Brazil, “Leadership Skills Development for Engineers,” Engineering
for those goals could provide a framework if possible.Currently, the literature does not have a proper number of studies proposing any type offramework. Finally, and although is recursive to mention, future work should include a clearfuture research agenda in it. This is considering the low number of studies in the datasetincluding future research agenda. In terms of Engineering Education, future work for this studycan include further analysis for year 2022, which considering the trend, could have morepublications in the topic than 2020, and 2021. Furthermore, future work could consider couldinclude the evaluation for the better platforms to include in the review protocol, which couldenhance the bibliographic results, and thus, posterior
extended abstract describes a pilot study of AdVentures in which there was an averageimprovement of 10% in student performance in a group of engineering management master’sstudents. Further research is needed to confirm this finding; should it hold, this AI-enablediterative approach offers an effective and scalable solution to negotiation/management education.Theoretical FoundationAdVentures is rooted in research on negotiation strategies, artificial intelligence, and experientiallearning. The use of AI technology in negotiation is an active topic for negotiation, management,and computer science researchers [2]–[4]. With the release of chatGPT in November 2022,interest has skyrocketed; over 100 million users signed up within the first two months
2016. [Online]. Available: https://learninginnovation.duke.edu/blog/2016/01/teammates/. [Accessed 3 February 2024].[6] J. Stoner, D. Finn and K. Fairfield, "Twelve Steps to Effective Classroom Teams ... and Beyond," Journal of the Academy of Business Education, vol. 16, no. Spring, pp. 34-53, 2015.[7] P. Jewsbury, R. Finnegan, N. Xi, Y. Jia, K. Rust and S. Burg, "2017 NAEP Transition to Digitally Based Assessments," NAEP, 2020.[8] A. J. Aubin, "An Empirical Investigation into the Impact of Automated Grading," UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones, 2022.[9] "Managing Assessment Security in Canvas," University of Pitssburgh Center for Teaching and Learning, [Online]. Available
. Aiming at achieving greater gender parity in entrepreneurial career choices for womenstudying STEM, we conducted a large-scale field experiment in which students are exposed torelatable role models sharing their experiences as entrepreneurs in short videos. The fieldexperiment involved over 1,400 incoming first-year students at a large Carnegie R1 universityfrom June to July 2022 who participated in student orientation. Male and female students wererandomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions: the relatable role model condition orthe unrelatable role model condition. In the relatable role model condition, role models in thevideos were young, recent alumnae from the same university. They talked about their journey toentrepreneurship
academic year, the EMprogram supported one to two students per year in the study-abroad program. This has increasedto four to five students per year in the 2022/23 academic year. With a fifty-five student EMcohort annually, this represents about 9% share of each junior year class.The SE123, Research Project in Systems Engineering/Engineering Management course is theenabling course in the EM program of study which creates opportunity for study-abroad researchwhen ET credit is assessed. Up to 3 ET hours can be approved by the program director based ona thorough review of complexity of engineering research problem, and application of appropriateengineering design given constraint considerations. This review and approval process isconsistent with the
Master's Engineering Management ProgramAbstractMany graduates with strong engineering management skills enter the workforce, yet they oftenlack the soft skills our industry needs. Middle Tennessee State University's (MTSU) Master ofScience in Professional Science (MSPS) program in Engineering Management has incorporatedthese desired soft skills into its core curriculum. This cross-disciplinary program providesMiddle Tennessee with the best-educated and well-trained scientific workforce. The program wasawarded the U.S. Department of Education's Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need(GAANN) grant for Engineering Management (2019-2022), which supported nine students witha stipend, full tuition, and fees.In 2023, the MSPS program completed a
Engineering Management from the Classroom to the Workplace at the ASEE National Conference June 6, 2023. He was also recognized with the Johns Hopkins Engineering for Professionals Distinguished Instructor Award for 2022-2023.Mr. Stanislaw Tarchalski, The Johns Hopkins University ˚ Tarchalski is a retired senior executive with more than 30 years of progressive responsibility and StaA experience in leading strategic business planning and execution, large/complex program development and management, technical leadership and systems e ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 PREPARING FUTURE GENERATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP ROLES IN TECHNICAL ORGANIZATIONS
occupations,” PLOS ONE, vol. 17, no. 11, p. e0277280, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277280.[13] B. D. Mittelstadt, P. Allo, M. Taddeo, S. Wachter, and L. Floridi, “The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate,” Big Data Soc., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 2053951716679679, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2053951716679679.[14] A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, “The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines,” Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 389–399, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.[15] Y.-H. Kwak and others, “A brief history of project management,” Story Manag. Proj., vol. 9, 2005.[16] D. A. Patel, S. Aggrawal, and K. Dittman, “Navigating the Transition from Project Management to Product Management,” PM World J., vol. 12, no. 10