) introduce students to foundational debates about transportation26 policymaking.27 AUTHOR KEYWORDS (OPTIONAL): Congestion, Engineering education, Threshold28 concepts, Highway capacity, Textbook analysis2930 INTRODUCTION:31 In 2022, our research team interviewed 16 instructors of transportation engineering classes to32 explore whether and how they explained induced travel, the phenomenon in which a wider33 roadway encourages more driving (see Background for more detail). These interviews revealed34 wide variation in coverage. Some instructors made induced travel central to their teaching and35 used the idea to challenge core tenets of the traditional predict-and-provide paradigm. Others36 omitted the topic for a host of
. Du, “Design of application-oriented computer projects in a probability and random processes course forElectrical Engineering majors,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL, June, 2006.[6] J. Ramos and C. Yokomoto, “Making probabilistic methods real, relevant, and interesting using MATLAB,” inProc. IEEE Frontiers in Education 1999 Conference.[7] C. Wang, “Incorporating Real World Examples in a Random Signal Analysis Course,” in Proc. Frontiers inEducation 2022, Uppsala, Sweden, October 2022[8] M. T. H. Chi & R. Wylie, “The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active LearningOutcomes,” Educational Psychologist, 49:4, 219-243, 2014.[9] J. M. Le Doux and A. A. Waller, “The Problem Solving Studio: An
research projects (surgical tool design, cell vibration analysis, vibration simulation in surgical drills and surgical skill assessment using motion quality). He lectured as a Sessional Faculty at Memorial University in 2013 and at the University of Calgary in 2015 and 2016 before joining the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Calgary, where he teaches courses in the areas of dynamics and vibrations. Dr. Ghasemloonia joined Office of Dean of the Schulich School of Engineering in March 2021 as the Assistant Dean – Academic Programs and Students. In June 2022, he was appointed to the Associate Dean – Student Success and Interdisciplinary Academic Programs. In this role, he is working on students
Creating an Accessible and Inclusive Environment for Synchronous Online Instruction’, 2022.[8] E. Rossi, ‘Inclusive Signs: A Teaching and Learning Toolkit to Generate Inclusive Meta‐Design Concepts’, Int. J. Art Des. Educ., 2023.[9] E. F. Churchill et al., ‘The future of HCI education: a flexible, global, living curriculum’, Interactions, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 70–73, Feb. 2016 [Online]. Available: 10.1145/2888574.[10] V. Svihla et al., ‘Broadening Dissemination Genres to Share Hidden Insight via Design Cases in Engineering Education Research’, in International Handbook of Engineering Education Research, 1st ed., New York: Routledge, 2023, pp. 617–637 [Online]. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003287483/chapters/10.4324
Impact of lecture recordings in a post-COVID environment Ji Ye Janet Lam, University of Toronto1 IntroductionThe recording of lectures that are given during in-person teaching of on-campus courses has beena growing topic of study since before the COVID-19 pandemic [1]–[3]. The explosion in onlinelearning and increased digitalization of teaching is clear to anyone involved in education through2020–2022. In response to the sudden need for online learning, many (if not most) post-secondaryinstitutions invested in online educational technology [4], [5].As post-secondary institutions returned to in-person learning, the option to attend class virtuallyremained an option for some institutions [6], [7
conclusions.Reference[1] Martin, M.J., S.J. Diem, D.M.A. Karwat, E.M. Krieger, C.C. Rittschof, B. Bayon, M.Aghazadeh, O. Asensio, T.J. Zeilkova, and M. Garcia-Cazarin, The climate is changing.Engineering education needs to change as well. Journal of Engineering Education, 111:740-746,2022.[2] Milovanovic, J., T. Shealy, and A. Godwin, Senior engineering students in the USA carrymisconceptions about climate change: Implications for engineering education. Journal ofCleaner Production, 345, 131129, 2022.[3] Sinatra, G.M., and P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), International Conceptual Change. Lawrence Erlbaum,Mahwah, NJ, 2003.[4] P. Molthan-Hill, L. Blaj-Ward, M. F. Mbah, and T. S. Ledley, “Climate Change Education atUniversities: Relevance and Strategies for Every Discipline
[2] Kumar, P., et al. "A Comparative Study of Ground-Based Sensors forarchitectures (AlexNet, ResNet), and the suggested VGG16 Wildfire Detection." IEEE Sensors Journal, 2022.model. Key Findings: The VGG16 model demonstrated an [3] Smith, J., et al. "Human-Centric Wildfire Detection and the Role of Fireaccuracy of 97.5%, surpassing alternative models. SVM (85%) Watch Towers." 2020. Natural Hazards. [4] Brown, R., et al. "Support Vector Machines for Wildfire Classification inand KNN (83%) exhibited diminished accuracy attributable to Remote Sensing Data." Journal of Machine Learning
intersecting factors on theaccessibility of educational resources, opportunities, accommodations, and support systems.In recent years, the pursuit of educational equity has increasingly intersected with advancementsin technology, particularly artificial intelligence (AI). Just as earlier legal and policy reformssought to address the systemic barriers faced by marginalized groups, technological innovationsare opening new pathways to equitable education. A pivotal moment in AI research occurred inMarch 2016, when AlphaGo defeated the world chess champion, capturing global attention andsparking global interest across numerous fields. In education, AI-driven tools have similarlyushered in a new era, with tools like ChatGPT. Introduced in November 2022
ASEE-GSW in 2022, and is an NSF Career Awardee in EPMD on Energy Harvesting. He has more than 120 journal publications and over 20 patents.Dr. Pil Kang, University of New Mexico Sung aˆ CœPilˆa C Kang is an assistant professor at the University of New Mexico. His academic interests include change management, change model validation, and mindset evolution. He may be reached at pilkang@unm.edu ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 1 Session XXXX Development of a Novel Graduate Pedagogy to Enhance Job Readiness in Semiconductor Education Based on Role
., & Duan, D., & Kubichek, R. (2022, August), A Remote Communication System Teaching Laboratory Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2—41257. [3] Scher, A., & Klopf, E. (2019, March), Development of Laboratory Assignments for Teaching Communication Systems Paper presented at 2019 ASEE PNW
incorporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) into theiraccreditation standards. This initiative aimed to evaluate how well engineering programsintegrate DEI principles into their curriculum (Criterion 5) and faculty awareness and skills(Criterion 6). The process for ABET to approve these optional pilot criteria involved extensiveconsultations with educational institutions, industry stakeholders, and DEI experts. The criteriawere approved by the ABET Engineering Area Delegation in October 2022 for the 2023-2024and 2024-2025 accreditation cycles [1].In the 2023-2024 accreditation cycle, the proposed modifications were piloted. Institutions couldopt to participate by submitting a Supplemental Self-Study Report (SSR) detailing theiradherence to the
problem.” We provide lessons in basic science, andguide students through a design experiment using these concepts (keeping an ice cube frommelting) to provide a grounded experience for students to fall back on when trying to design theirlunchboxes, and for use in understanding biological systems.Study Context and Participants: Due to COVID-19, the curriculum testing in the classroomwas delayed for multiple years. It was first pilot tested in two 9th grade engineering classroomsacross two schools during Spring 2022. We recruited two high school engineering teachers. Theteachers received two days of professional learning training, and on-going support throughweekly online meetings. While one teacher taught engineering for three years in the same
. Therefore, the authors lack a detailed history of the program’s origin and earlyyears in which it was offered. We believe the program originated in 2012 and was based on asimilar program elsewhere[11]. The information we do have about the legacy program isdescribed in later sections. In 10 years, the program has served about 60 graduate students andpostdocs.Given the focus of this paper on a program redesign that began in 2020, we will focus onparticipants in the 2020-2022 timeframe. Table 1 details participation in the teaching fellowshipprogram by disciplinary area. In this time frame all PhD programs offered in the school arerepresented except for one.Table 1. Program Participation (2020-2022) PhD
collected a total of 268 complete students’ responses to a voluntary survey instrument overtwo semesters in Spring and Fall 2022. The survey consisted of four parts -- EI, teamworkbehavior, disagreement, and psychological safety—all of which were asked on a five-pointLikert scale. The EI questions probed how much in general a student saw themself as an engineervia a unidimensional lens (Tonso, 2006) as well as a multidimensional lens of their engineeringidentities, namely performance/competence, interest, and recognition (Godwin 2016). Teamworkbehavior was assessed using survey questions from CATME, a toolbox developed and validatedby prior work (Ohland et al. 2012). Students rated themselves and their peers on five teamworkcriteria, including
energyresources, and many more [8]. The majority of schools that have a Master’s program for powerand energy systems, such as the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), have set the goal ofeducating the next generation of students that are entering the smart grid workforce [11].Professional organizations such as IEEE have also developed courses to grant their usersemerging smart grid technologies (IEEE 2022) [12]. These courses provide an overview ofelements within microgrid designs and provide hands-on applications of power distributionmodels. Discuss the necessary precautions for cyber security and the microgrid's stability. A fewprograms and concentrations for undergraduate students, like the University of Maine orClarkson University [13], offer a
of America (AGC), (2022). Worker Shortage Survey Analysis.Retrieved from: 2022_AGC_Workforce_Survey_Analysis.pdf[4] B. Neyestani, “Human Resource Development in Construction Industry”. Human ResourceDevelopment on Employee's Performance and Productivity in Selected Construction Companies(UE). UC Berkeley, 2014. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9xq0s3k6[5] Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), (2022). “Construction Managers”. Retrieved fromhttps://www.bls.gov/ooh/management/construction-managers.htm[6] B. W. Soemardi and K. S. Pribadi, “Developing Construction Industry Human Resources inIndonesia: Empowering the Informal Construction Sector Foreman for The Industry”, AsiaConstruct Conference:23rd Conference, Kuching, Malaysia, 2018
faculty member for the Scientista Foundation and ASEE student chapters at Binghamton University.Mr. Koenraad E. Gieskes, State University of New York, Binghamton Koen Gieskes currently serves as the Watson College Interim Assistant Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Interim Director of the Engineering Design Division. He is also director for LSAMP and co-director for STEP and UBMS. Koen first joined the Engineering Design Division at Binghamton Uni- versity as a graduate student in 2004, then, in 2009, he was hired on as a full-time lecturer, in 2017 he became the Assistant Director, and in 2022 began serving as the Interim Director. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
, goals, actions, andattainments. Figure 2 provides an overview of how Spire scaffolds the student experience topromote competency development and reflection. This structure is inspired by Kolb’s iterativemodel emphasizing experience, reflection, conceptualization of learning from the experience,and application of learnings to new experiences [13]-[16].Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the Spire platform.Beginning in the 2021-2022 academic year, Spire was introduced as part of incoming studentorientation and applied within a recently revised first-year course that covers the breadth ofopportunities available to engineers in both their education and their career. Students explore thefoundations of the field and its influence on themselves and the
technical skill sets, team sizes, and faculty input for creating constraints andcomputing assignment weights. In the next section, we explain our current assignment process,followed by a literature review of related work, and a description of our methodologicalapproach and mathematical model. The paper is finalized with a comparative analysis betweenour current optimization model and the original assignment method followed by discussions forfuture improvements.Current Assignment Process for Team SelectionPrior to the 2022-23 academic year, student-project assignment has landed in the hands of thesenior capstone course coordinator. They would collect student information including declaredmajor, grade point average (GPA), prior teammates, and prior
assessment,” in Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, Atlanta Georgia USA: ACM, Mar. 2014, pp. 301–306. doi: 10.1145/2538862.2538915.[6] A. M. Holland-Minkley and T. Lombardi, “Improving Engagement in Introductory Courses with Homework Resubmission,” in Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, Memphis Tennessee USA: ACM, Feb. 2016, pp. 534–539. doi: 10.1145/2839509.2844576.[7] J. Jay and D. Dodd, “Efficacy of the Dual-Submission Homework Method,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/efficacy-of-the-dual-submission-homework- method[8] P
lessons. Br. J. Educ.Technol. 51, 2034–2049. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13028[17] Cheng, K., & Tsai, C. (2020). Students’ motivational beliefs and strategies, perceivedimmersion, and attitudes towards science learning with immersive virtual reality: A partial leastsquares analysis. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 51, 2139–2158. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12956[18] Villena-Taranilla, R., Tirado-Olivares, S., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero, J.A.(2022). Effects of virtual reality on learning outcomes in K-6 education: A meta-analysis,Educational Research Review, Vol 35, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100434[19] Joo, H. (2017). A Study on Understanding of UI and UX and Understanding of DesignAccording to User Interface Change. International Journal
on conceptual understanding in core engineering courses, op- portunities to support engineering students’ professional development, and efforts to support underrepre- sented students in engineering. Her current work in faculty development focuses on supporting faculty members in incorporating research-based practices into their own classrooms. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Creatingand Sustaining InclusiveLearning Communities in Engineering Jessica M. Vaden1, April A. Dukes, Ph.D.1 ,Kristen Parrish, Ph.D.2 ,Amy Hermundstad Nave, Ph.D.3 , Amy Landis, Ph.D.3 , and Melissa M. Bilec, Ph.D.1 1University of Pittsburgh 2Arizona
rock strata, composition, and other geologicalbe appropriate for certain courses that do not require hands- processes may not be directly comprehensible or possible. Thison experience. Most educational institutions are well funded research paper will talk about the developments made by ourand thereby able to reside funds for purchasing equipment and research team to tackle the issues around immersive learningwork-spaces for specific courses. A 2022 report showed that through the use of virtual and virtual reality (VR) game-basedthe average revenue of colleges across Canada was $13.3 bil- technologies.lion (Statistics Canada, 2022). Equipment purchased for engin-eering courses may vary and can be
in Education, 2012.[19] K. C. Culver, N. A. Bowman, E. Youngerman, N. Jang and C. L. Just, "Promoting equitable achievement in STEM: lab report writing and online peer review," The Journal of experimental education, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 23-45, 2022.[20] L. Angrave, K. Jensen, Z. M. C. Zhang, D. Mussulman, C. D. Schmitz, R. Baird, H. Liu, R. Sui, M. Wu and R. Kooper, Improving Student Accessibility, Equity, Course Performance, and Lab Skills: How Introduction of ClassTranscribe Is Changing Engineering Education at the University of Illinois, 2020.[21] C. Harteveld, N. Javvaji, T. Machado, Y. B. V. Zastavker and AbdountT., "Gaming4all: reflecting on diversity, equity, and inclusion for game-based engineering education
-oneinstruction. The student would present weekly findings to his/her mentor, read scientific paperstogether, and plan future experiments. In addition to conducting research with mentors, menteesare required to attend three lunch meetings throughout the summer experience. These lunchmeetings focus on professional development and mentoring; providing an opportunity forstudents to discuss research progress with peers [12].The 2021-2022 SURE participants included 32 undergraduate students from various disciplinesacross campus. The participants were from the Civil and Construction Engineering Department,Mechanical Engineering Department, Electrical Engineering Department, MathematicsDepartment, Chemistry Department, Biology Department, Physics Department
a recommendation to use active learning as a way to meet this goal [8]. These Table 1: Enrollment per semester Semester n sections Spring 2020 70 2 Fall 2020 43 1 Spring 2021 70 2 Spring 2022 57 2 Fall 2022 29 1 Totals 269 8reports also indicate a disproportionately positive impact of active learning on under-representedminority students [7]. In a meta-analysis from 2004, Prince cautions faculty
Engineering Education: Practice and Policy. University of Dublin: IEEE Press, 2016.[2] T. Gorichanaz, “‘It made me feel like it was okay to be wrong’: Student experiences with ungrading,” Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. I-13, May 2022. [Online]. Available: Sage Journals, https://journals.sagepub.com. [Accessed Feb 23, 2023][3] A. R. Carberry, S. A. Atwood, M.T. Siniawski, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “A comparison and classification of grading approaches used in engineering education,” in Varietas Delectat... Complexity is the New Normality: Proceeding of the 47th SEFI Annual Conference, SEFI 2019, Budapest, Hungary, September 16- 19, 2019, Balazs Vince Nagy, Mike Murphy, Hannu-Matti Jarvinen, Aniko
theirbehavior. Note that the question does not ask about how behavior or thinking changed. Thisleaves room for some of the student participants to have already been positively oriented towardDEI thinking and behaviors, and therefore have not changed. For example, seventeen of thestudents said they thought about DEI either often or pretty regularly before the session.Figure 13: Number of summer programs (TEP) staff in summer 2022 responding no/yes to eachquestion about behavior and thought change, as recalled six months after trainingThe responses from the summer programs staff were considerably different from those of theNSO students. Sixty-one percent of the respondents said they had thought about DEI since thesession. Of those that said they had not
offers courses in technical graphicsprogramming, game development and 3D animation classes to prepare students for theentertainment graphics industry that includes video game development, virtual simulations,mixed reality application development and animation. One of the main objectives of this specialtopics course offered in Fall 2022, was to challenge students to critically look at their owncomputer graphics practices and speculate future scenarios [8], [9] for digital entertainment -situated in projected futures impacted by various social, economic, and environmental scenarios.Students were introduced to design research methodologies and speculative tools to prototype thefuture of entertainment practices and design strategies to create human
intelligence and machine learning. In 2022 International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Data Communication Systems (ICSCDS), pages 69–74. IEEE, 2022.[13] Niwat Srisawasdi and Patcharin Panjaburee. Implementation of game-transformed inquiry-based learning to promote the understanding of and motivation to learn chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28:152–164, 2019.[14] Lanlan Gao, Carlo Fabricatore, and Maria Ximena Lopez. Game features in inquiry game-based learning strategies: A systematic synthesis. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Gamesbased Learning, pages 854–62, 2019.[15] James Paul Gee. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in entertainment (CIE