AC 2011-2787: A COMBINED CURRICULUM IN AEROSPACE AND OCEANENGINEERING38 YEARS LATERLeigh S McCue, Virginia TechJoseph A Schetz, Virginia Tech Dr. Joseph A. Schetz is currently the Holder of the Fred D. Durham Chair in Aerospace and Ocean Engineering at Virginia Tech, in Blacksburg, Virginia. Dr. Schetz was born and raised in New Jersey and then attended Webb Institute of Naval Architecture in New York receiving a BS in 1958. The launch of Sputnik in 1957 caused him to change directions and enter the aerospace field. He went on to receive his MSE (1960), MA (1961) and PhD (1962) in Mechanical Engineering from Princeton University. He started his professional career at General Applied Science Lab. in New York in 1961
AC 2011-2656: EXTROVERT: HELPING AES DEVELOP ADVANCED CON-CEPTSNarayanan M. Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor, Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace EngineeringMarilyn Smith, Georgia Institute of TechnologyBrian German, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDolores S. Krausche, Florida Center for Engineering Education Dr. Dolores S. Krausche Program Director, Florida Center for Engineering Education, Gainesville, Florida 32601 dsk@atlantic.net Dolores Krausche came to academe with an experiential background in research and development in the areas of military engineering and astrophysics. For more than fifteen years she worked with such organizations as the Naval Coastal Systems Center, David W. Taylor
range of 35 ft/s ~ 40 ft/s, slow enough to allow the wireless video system to stream video. The aircraft should have good dynamic stability in all axes, and the neutral point should be far enough aft of the CG to facilitate a large static margin for good longitudinal static stability.The students decided that a flying wing configuration would satisfy these basic design criteria.The flying wing configuration allowed simplified analysis, design and fabrication as well asproviding a lightweight and aerodynamically efficient platform. A flying wing produces liftmore efficiently than a conventional aircraft configuration of wings, fuselage, and tail. Sinceweight is one of the primary concerns in the aircraft design, the flying
summative assessment scheme, in which some of the work could be subject tointerpretation of the ethical theory when applied to case studies, rather than assessment ofempirical facts and procedures which may be constrained to a teacher‟s implicit development,interpretation and assessment of the syllabus content.The assessment procedure was redesigned in 2008 for classes of 150 plus, comprising aformative assessment and feedback through essays, a formative feedback by the in-class case-studies and summative assessment by examining the major case studies and theirunderstanding of the course material in a final examination.IntroductionTo receive accreditation of undergraduate engineering degrees the Institute of ProfessionalEngineers of New Zealand
theory. An exampleis given by permission [4]. This student also used supercritical airfoil sections for the sweptwings. Problem statement, from Acierno [4] The drag of the equivalent body of revolution can be computed using Von Karman’s formula: (3.1) Where S(x) is the function describing the equivalent body of revolution in terms of normal cross-sectional area vs. location along the x axis. S can be derived from the oblique cross sections obtained by the intersection of Mach planes with the wing-body combination through (3.2) Where s is defined as the area intersected by the oblique Mach planes. As detailed in reference 5, S’(x
of Chief State Offices, 2005, vol. 10 issue 3. 4. T. Boe, The next step for educators and the technology industry: Investing in teachers. Educational Technology, 1989, 29(3), 39-44. 5. Bureau of Labor Statistics http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos027.htm 6. C. Czerniak, .& M. Schriver, An examination of preservice science teachers' beliefs and behaviors as related to self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1994, Volume 5, Number 3, 77-86. 7. N. Fisher, K. Gerdes., T. Logue, L. Smith & I Zimmerman, Improving students' knowledge and attitudes of science through use of hands-on activities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 436 352).1998 8. J. Harvey, & S. Purnell, S
place on 9 November1961 with the SUMPA (Southampton University´s Man Powered Aircraft). Perhaps the best-known achievements of human-powered flights were crossing the English Channel (35.8 km) byBryan Allen pedaling the Gossamer Albatross on June 12, 1979, and later on April 23, 1988Kanellos Kanellopoulos established a distance record pedaling the Daedalus 88 from Crete toSantorini (119 km). Implementation of the herein suggested inflatable structure would reducethe weight of these competition aircrafts. The Gossamer Albatross weighed 32 kilograms and theDaedalus 88 weighed 31 kilograms.Currently the UK Royal Aeronautical Society organizes two human-powered flight competitionswith prizes of £50,000 and £100,000, see reference [12]. The first
, 2007.[11] Bandura, A., “Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales,” in F. Pajares and T. Urdan (ed.), Adolescence andeducation, Vol. 5, pp. 307-337. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.[12] Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T. and Mckeachie, W., “Reliability and Predictive Validity of the MotivatedStrategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 53, No. 3, 1993.[13] Yasar, S., Discourse in freshman engineering teams: The relationship between verbal persuasions, self-efficacyand achievement. (Ph.D. dissertation), 2008.[14] Yasar, S., Robinson-Kurpius, S., Baker, D., Roberts, C. and Krause, S., “An intervention to address genderissues in a course on design, engineering and technology for science
CubeSats to be morethan limited-functioning “ BeepSats” . In addition to NSF CubeSat missions, the other eightwill ride on ESA ’s first V ega flight; their results will be very indicative of the potentialscientific benefits of university-class CubeSats, and CubeSats in general.References1 Gruntman, M, Brodsky. R, Erwin. D, Kunc. J, “Workforce Development for Space Industry”, AIAA Space 2003Conference and Exposition, AIAA-2003-6309, Sep. 23-25, 2003.2 Gruntman. M, “The Time for Academic Departments in Astronautical Engineering”, AIAA SPACE 2007Conference & Exposition, AIAA 2007-6042, 18 - 20 September 2007.3 Guerra L.A., Fowler. W, “Space Systems Engineering for Aerospace Undergraduates”, 46th AIAA AerospaceSciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA
AC 2011-1064: TOWARDS MORE EFFECTIVE TEACHING STRATEGIESOF ITERATION AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT IN SPACECRAFT DE-SIGNHadi Ali, Purdue University Hadi Ali is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He holds a B.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University and a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Jordan. He earned his Masters degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University majoring in aerospace systems design. He is also pursuing a Masters degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue. Hadi is a student member of AIAA, IEEE, ASME, and SAE.Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Robin S. Adams is an Assistant Professor in
information andinstructions for completing the questionnaire.4.2. Project Assessment Data Collection: Monitor the 2+2+2 program & collect assessment data;Facilitate research on improving utilization of on-line forum on pedagogyskillsObjective 5. Institutionalize and disseminate both the products and the partnership process tomaximize the impact both regionally and nationally.Performance Objective--By the conclusion of this grant cycle, activities of the CREATEConsortium will be self-sustaining, institutionalized and widely disseminated. Dissemination willfocus on presentations and web activities. The campuses will fold costs into existing budgets orsecure needed funding locally.5.1 Web Communication: Webmaster for CREATE web site/s. Check and
skills to conduct their projects, core topics werecovered in formalized lectures and assignments conducted towards the beginning of thesemester. Topics covered included: • Familiarity with NI LabView (implemented during the laboratory period) o Taught in four lectures with an application orientation. o Students learned LabView by writing an acquisition code for an ATI 6- component platform type balance. o Teaching approach was minimalistic such that students would need to explore the numerous menu options to find suitable VIs to perform a desired task. Note that a suggested approach to implementing the VI(s) was presented
. 1, 2003, pp. 85-90.4. M.I. Hoit, and M.W. Ohland, "The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 87, No. 1, 1998, pp. 79-86.5. D. Woods, R Felder, A. Rugarcia, and J. Stice, “The Future of Engineering Education. III. Developing Critical Skills,” Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2000, pp. 108–117.6. S. Sheppard, and R. Jenison, “Examples of Freshman Design Education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1997, pp. 248-261.7. M. Prince, “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, No. 3, 2004, pp. 223-231
, TR-83-3048, Oct. 1960 (Revised 1978).13. Husman, J., Lynch, C., Hilpert, J., and Duggan, M. A., "Validating measures of future time perspective for engineering students: Steps toward improving engineering education", presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.14. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. , “Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1993, 53(3), 80115. Yasar, S., “Discourse in freshman engineering teams: The relationship between verbal persuasions, self-efficacy, and achievement”, 200816. Bandura, A., “Guide for