Paper ID #19543Student Interns Work to Activate First Floor SpacesProf. Charlie Setterfield, Sinclair Community College Charlie Setterfield is a Professor of Architectural Technology at Sinclair Community College in Dayton, Ohio. With more than 20 years experience in the architectural and construction industries, including responsibilities in all aspects of architectural project delivery and construction management, Setterfield brings real-world experience to the classroom. Setterfield’s courses focus on BIM, IPD, materials and means of construction, ”green building”, professional practice and building codes. As a Plans
describes the unique aspects of theARCE capstone projects model, identifies sources that assist students in successfully teamingwith industry partners and uses case studies to demonstrate the benefits and limitations of thiscapstone project model.Student Led Capstone Project ModelAll ARCE undergraduate students are required to complete a capstone senior project. TheARCE program is somewhat unique since students complete three capstone design courses, onecourse in each of the major structural building materials (concrete, steel, wood and masonry) inaddition to their capstone senior project. The performance of the capstone senior project occursduring one academic quarter (11 weeks). However, students are required to complete theirproject planning and
projects by working in plan only.Students quickly learned via the graphical method whether their initial design ideas werefeasible. They could also compare their design proposals with their peers by evaluating the forcepolygons of similar systems drawn to the same scale. Another benefit of the graphical method isits usefulness in revising proposed forms for structures. The students can use the force polygonsgenerated to increase the efficiency of their designs by manipulating the form diagrams and Page 15.616.4corresponding force polygon. Arches and/or trusses that were too shallow had extremely highforces in their members as was evident in their
one of the few ABET accredited engineering programs in the United States thatexists outside a college of engineering. Housed in the College of Architecture andEnvironmental Design, ARCE resides with the departments of Architecture (ARCH),Construction Management (CM), Landscape Architecture, and City and Regional Planning. Thecollege has a 60 year tradition of collaboration between the engineering, architecture andconstruction disciplines. Several decades ago, all students in the college took a common twoyear curriculum prior to separating into their respective disciplines. Although that model nolonger exists, there is a commitment to interdisciplinary collaboration at the lower division level.ARCE students take three architecture studios side
faculty typically establish the design process or work plan for students, by default, they setthe framework for what to assess. The second question of how to assess is more problematic andrepresents the very nature of the dilemma. This is because design assessment is based on severalfactors including: past experience with this type of problem, comparing several projects incontext and measuring particular aspects of performance. All of these factors are usually verylimited or unknown in independent student design competitions where only one solution isproduced. This paper will offer a case study on these two important issues of what and how toassess from the experience of competing in an independent student design competition. It willmap out a
Elements Page 11.161.4 Group 3: Exterior Façade Group 4: Roof Group 5: Interior Plan Upon returning to the classroom, the groups shared their data. The instructor thenlectured on how to create a set of as-built working drawings from the data collected on site. As-built details and a wall section of the existing structure were developed by the students tographically record the site data and to serve as a bench mark for future renovations. Thisexercise was also intended to introduce the students to commercial construction methods andmaterials and methods of documenting this information graphically. Each student created
collaborativework between design disciplines (as at the University of Illinois, where an annual joint studio forEast St. Louis pulls together landscape, urban planning, and architecture students) or betweenengineering students (for instance Drexel’s Geometric and Intelligent Computing Laboratory) arecommon, the difficult boundary between design and engineering is a difficult one to cross. Wesought to introduce students to both the creative friction that naturally arises between the two,and to offer opportunities to understand the potential for overcoming this and working as abroadly-based team.As we developed the class in more detail, the project became a vehicle to promote additionalcritical working skills. It became apparent that the first two learning
subject matter, and the related student assignments are: Page 11.836.2Architectural Graphic Communication SeriesCase Study 1 – Introduction to drawing types and their purposes, illustrated by the drawingsutilized by the New York architect Richard Meier in the design and communication of the GettyCenter complex in Los Angeles, California.Getty Center Rotunda Sketch Getty Center Rotunda Axonometric Getty Center Rotunda PerspectiveThe major communicative drawings – 2D orthographic projections such as plans, elevations, andsections, and 3D drawings such as paralines and perspectives – are part of a presentation packagewhose purpose is to
include (1) technology and collaboration strategies for green building design and construction, (2) global virtual teams, (3) applications of BIM and COBie in operations and (4) bringing BIM to the construction site via mobile. She has received funding from the National Science Foundation, U.S. Army, U.S. Department of Education, Mechanical Contractors Association of Western Washington, University of Washington Royalty Research Fund, University of Washington Capital Projects, the College of Built Environments’ BE Lab and was awarded the College of Architecture and Urban Planning 2007 Dean’s Development Fund.Anne K Anderson, Washington State University Anne Anderson is an Assistant Professor in the School of Design
AC 2009-2143: A SIMULATION APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT EDUCATIONMuhammad Ghatala, Gulf States Inc. Muhammad Imran Ghatala is a project controls engineer at Gulf States Inc., a general contractor in heavy industrial construction arena. He is involved in the lean construction and six-sigma based strategic planning efforts and is a continuous improvement leader at Gulf States Inc. He was a graduate assistant at University of Houston where he assisted in teaching Construction Estimation, Construction Planning and Scheduling and Reinforced Concrete Construction courses offered at under-graduate level. He was a Student Ambassador at College of Technology, University of Houston and a recipient of the
primary force behind the work of various leaders in the ecological design community[1]. Gravity and the second law of thermodynamics set the stage for disseminating a vast arrayof scientific principles. Energy is plotted. Solar angles are graphed. Thermal flows are mapped.These science-based principles are fundamental to producing new green technologies andvarious shades of green in the plans and sections of our buildings [2]. And the science behindthe environment continues to prosper. The challenge in architectural education however hasbeen the development of more inclusive, creative, even conflictive understandings of ecologyand environmental design that expand beyond the germane integration of environmental scienceprinciples and new green
graduates to meet evolving demands of the buildingsector and societal expectations for the built environment.The entire process included three critical phases, aided by strong industry consultation: - Validation of need for architectural engineers - Definition of skills and competencies - Rubric design & curriculum mappingOver the course of the program’s development, industry input and engagement was sought andsecured through surveys, interviews, and half-day workshops. The end state was thedevelopment of an Industry Advisory Panel, whose members are now fully engaged in thecurriculum content and delivery, with scheduled plans on collaborative projects, site visits, andinternships. Historically, industry engagement in engineering
entitled Introduction to StructuralSystems and Introduction to Structural Design. In Introduction to Structural Systems the focusshifts from structural elements to building structural systems. Building on the skills learned inStructures I and Structures II, students develop the skills to analyze simple buildings composedof axial and bending members. They learn about structural stability, gravity and lateral loads, thedevelopment of framing plans, the behavior and comparison of structural building systems,framing schemes and building configuration related to vertical and lateral loads. Introduction toStructural Design introduces material specific content for timber, structural steel and reinforcedconcrete structures. Students learn the
Page 12.1086.4members are resized until the entire building frame meets both AISC and IBC code requirementsusing economical sizes, resulting in the final design sizes for the structural steel framing. Thefinal process in the course is to produce construction documents for the building structure. Theseinclude general structural notes, plans, schedules and details. The details include typical detailsalong with specific connection details for both simple and moment frame connections. Thoughcondensed to classroom content, this course enables the students to experience the completedesign process for a multi-story steel structure.Since each student is expected to design and document an entire multi-story steel structure, someconcessions had to be
understanding of architectural planning and conceptual design,interior and exterior feel, and the aesthetic appeal of construction compared to the typical “paperbased models” currently used by most architectural students.Introduction and Background“Animation/visualization techniques provide virtual experiential learning when combined withinteractive design animation and virtual design navigation. These activities are self-directed,experiential, and personalized for the autonomous self-directed distance learner. Web basedteaching and learning has potential advantages compared to traditional education since it is lessexpensive, easy-to-access, easy-to-update and platform independent. Although multimedia isgenerally considered as an individual pursuit
Page 22.1145.4 FIGURE 2IMAGES FROM PRECEDENT ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 3IMAGES FROM PRECEDENT ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT Page 22.1145.5The second assignment was site analysis. In engineering courses all too often the contextof a problem right down to the boundary conditions is given to students. In thisassignment the students had to pick a site and figure out the constraints and conditions itpresented by themselves. At this point the students formed into six groups of three. Mostgroups chose a site they had some familiarity with, either from their hometowns, a citythey had visited, or a site they had used in a previous design studio project. The reportcreated included: a plan
American Institute of Architects (AIA). Invite professionals to campus to discuss the CM industry.ObjectiveWe hope to develop three track options for our AET students within a program accredited byboth the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) and the NationalArchitectural Accreditation Board (NAAB). The three tracks would include a General Studies(GS) Track, a Construction Management (CM) Track and an Architectural Design (AD) Track.Our approach has always been to prepare our students for all aspects of the construction industry.We plan to continue this, but add an emphasis on specific aspects of the construction industry tobetter prepare our graduates for a very competitive industry.The CM track is an intensive track
notions have been introduced to undergraduatestudents through an undergraduate design course. Two case studies from building engineeringare presented: thermal comfort and indoor air quality (sick building syndrome) taken fromundergraduate design courses. A flow chart is presented and discussed for both cases.We discuss the design program from students’ point of view, and the experience earned indesign, experimentation, and also in written and oral communication skills. Future plans toevaluate the effectiveness of the case studies in terms of learning outcomes, as well as plans toevaluate it in undergraduate architectural engineering training are also presented. 1. Introduction:Teaching a design course is challenging and differentiates from
II, is a course entitled Structural Systems. This course isfor ARCH and CM students only. This is the course in which the focus shifts from elements tobuilding structural systems. Building on the skills learned in Structures I and Structures II,students develop the skills to analyze simple buildings composed of axial and bending members.They learn about structural stability, gravity and lateral loads, the development of framing plans,the behavior and comparison of structural building systems, framing schemes and buildingconfiguration related to vertical and lateral loads.Following the Structural Systems course, the ARCH and CM students take a Small ScaleStructures and then a Large Scale Structures course. While the Structural Systems course
aspects will be presented and discussed.The argument of the paper will be based on the International Building Code (IBC 2012) which is issuedby the International Code Council (ICC) and considered as the most comprehensive and coordinatednational model code in the US and is currently commonly used and enforced in 44 states. The paper willalso examine and report on the purpose, types, interpretation, understanding and use of building codesapplied in the United States.We discuss the courses from students’ point of view, and the experience earned in design, codedevelopment, and also in written and oral communication skills. Future plans to evaluate the effectivenessof these courses in term of learning outcomes. 1. Introduction:Architecture design
, it became an outlet for the above forces to materialize. Thecontext for our project, however, was regulated by Rwanda’s ambitious housing policies.Housing in RwandaThe Kigali City Masterplan was a collaborative effort between US-based companies includingOZ Architecture and Engineers Without Borders. 9 Surbana from Singapore developed it andRwanda’s Ministry of Infrastructure is implementing it. The award winning plan was funded by Page 24.670.6the African Development Corporation and the World Bank. As part of Vision 2020, Rwanda’sofficial development guideline that reaches all areas of life, the masterplan has been radicallyaltering the
. Signal Source Channel Recipient Figure 1: Simple Framework for Communication Model (Robinson and Petchenik (1976)Process and MethodologyProject Description and Studio ActivitiesThe project is to design a prototype floor plan with ADA accessibility in kitchen and bathroomfor Habitat for Humanity. The project fits into the curriculum very well. The learning objectivesof this sophomore studio course are bath and kitchen design and ADA clearance requirements.The project not only provides the opportunity for students to apply the knowledge that theylearned from class, but also engages students in community service activities. In the project, ahandicap lavatory, toilet seat and roll-in
thefirst capstone course. The course contents include design development, construction documents,senior project report, and senior show preparation. Graphic presentation skills and digital 3-Dmodel creation skills are further developed. Both capstone courses were offered in thecurriculum the second time since the B.S. in Interior Design started in fall, 2006. The capstone collaborative studio is the demonstration of students’ ability to synthesizeand apply their knowledge and skills learned in all their professional coursework. Studentsdemonstrate the synthesis project with the application of the interior design process, timemanagement, programming, space planning, interior constructions and technical skills.Purpose of the Study A
teaching. There is a need for flexibility, adaptability andpreparation for unexpected situations not common in the traditional classroom space.Online instruction has to connect with the student even though the student and faculty arenot physically present in the same place. Faculty must be prepared to change theirapproach if the connections are not made or broken, as in the case of technology failureor passive student behavior. Faculty should have a contingency plan with ready madealternative methods of communication and instruction in the event of failure. Thisapproach requires additional time and should be factored when planning to teach anonline course (Young, 2003). Cell phones, chat rooms, emailed PowerPointpresentations, voice over IP
structure basedon a simplified set up plans and a quick site visit. At this stage in their education (UG Seniorsclose to graduation) they have taken a matrix structural analysis course, an introductorystructural dynamics course, and at least two design courses. Thus they can rapidly model thesmall structure and predict the natural frequencies and mode shapes within a few hours work. Itis however in the subsequent physical testing of the structure, the students learn of the maturityof the their modeling skillsUltra-Low Forced Vibration TestingThe authors have developed and implemented5,6,7 a new concept in Forced Vibration Testing(FVT) for low-rise building structures using ultra-low force amplitudes. Using low-costequipment (
the material or the building’s structural components. The software selectedfor completing the drawings were AutoCAD and Revit.AutoCAD/ Revit ArchitectureAutoCAD was used to produce 2-D representations of the floor plans, also known as top views,as well as elevations or front and end views and construction details. These construction details,or working drawings, were included because they typically show how the parts of the buildingscan be built. The plans and elevations were imported into Revit Architecture and then used tocreate an outline to generate the general layout of the building as it would have been placed insitu. These plans specifically provided the thickness of walls, location and width of doors as wellas windows. Alternately, the
AC 2009-628: ENHANCEMENT OF WRITTEN COMMUNICATION ONSTRUCTURAL SYSTEMS USING CALIBRATED PEER REVIEWAnne Nichols, Texas A&M University Dr. Nichols is an Assistant Professor of Architecture at Texas A&M University. She teaches structural analysis, design, and planning at the undergraduate and graduate level. She is a civil engineer with research interests in the structural mechanics and modeling of masonry and cement materials. Page 14.565.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Enhancement of Written Communication on Structural Systems Using Calibrated Peer
the support of FEMA,funded the development of a number of modules of a slide show directed toarchitects, predominantly related to the FEMA publications on the NEHRPProvisions for New Buildings and the publication on the Seismic Rehabilitation ofExisting Buildings. These presentations have been given to a number of AIAcontinuing education classes but have had limited reach into the required curriculain schools of architecture.In 1995, following the great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, NSF funded a team fromthe American Institute of Architects (AIA), in cooperation with the Japan Instituteof Architects (JIA), to visit Kobe to focus on architecture and planning issues ofreconstruction. Subsequently, in 1996 a joint AIA/JIA workshop was held
-rise hostels.The problem in the body of the case is then described more thoroughly by readdressing the landuse problem and outlining the options of action: building more older-style sprawling dormitoriesand therefore ignoring the land use problem, renovating older dormitories to add more rooms, orbuilding more high-rise hostels to meet land use restraints. This section gives information aboutthe planned enrollment expansion data, campus trends on social life and building use, as well asrenovation ideas and constraints. An overview of the high-rise hostels, similar to the onedescribing the older hostels, is given to help the student realize the differences and establish prosand cons of the two designs.The problem as it exists has now been
the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental and societal context.(i) a recognition of the need for, and the ability to engage in life-long learning(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues”5On a micro scale, it was planned that the students would gain basic knowledge of a building withintegrated design by viewing working examples of the following: the positioning of a buildingon its site to maximize passive solar gain, how recycled building materials can be used, and howthe following “green” construction methods work: green roofs, composting toilets, permeablepaving, biotopes, bioswales and “green” systems such as: geothermal rain water catchment,photovoltaic, solar thermal, and grey water. It was also anticipated