and fundamental engineering concepts.AcknowledgmentsWe are extremely grateful for the contributions of our colleagues to this book, especially KarenChristman, Adam Engler, Noah Goshi, Craig Simmons, Wujing Xian, and Peter Zandstra.References1. Bell, E., B. Ivarsson, and C. Merrill. 1979. Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76 (3):1274-8.2. Davey, R. E., K. Onishi, A. Mahdavi, and P. W. Zandstra. 2007. LIF-mediated control of embryonic stem cell self-renewal emerges due to an autoregulatory loop. FASEB J 21 (9):2020-32.3. DeQuach, J. A., V. Mezzano, A. Miglani, S. Lange, G. M. Keller, F. Sheikh, and K
attainment of the program’s learning outcomes and thesenior design projects.Bibliography1. Altuger-Genc, G. and Chassapis, C. Fostering Lifelong Learning in a Capstone Design Environment: An Implementation assessment. 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 20112. Beyerlein, S., Davis, D., Trevisan, M., Thomson, Ph, Harrison, K. Assessment Framework for Capstone Design Courses. Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 20063. Bloom, B.S. and Krathwohl, D.R. “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.” Handbook 1. Cognitive Domain. New York., Addison-Wesley, 19844. Cooley, W.L. Individual Students Assessment in Team-Based Capstone Design Projects. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in
worker in this packaging process. Theresulting designs incorporate a number of the universal design principles, providing studentsvaluable knowledge they can use in evaluating the usability of their designs for their capstonedesign projects and beyond.References[1] D. Culver and S. Fellows. Using Assistive Devices for the Disabled to Teach Design in a Freshman Engineering Course, Proceeding of the 1998 Annual ASEE Conference, June 1998, Seattle, WA.[2] B. Ankenman, J. Colgate, P. Jacob, R. Elliot, and S. Benjamin. Leveraging Rehabilitation Needs into Freshman Engineering Design Projects. Proceeding of the 2006 Annual ASEE Conference, June 2006, Chicago, IL.[3] L. S. Baczkowski, J. D. Enderle, D. J. Krause, and J. L
, G., Liu, S. Q., Smith, H. D., & Hirsch, P. (2006). Educational Modules in Tissue Engineering Based on the “How People Learn” Framework. BEE-j , 7.4. Birol, G., McKenna, A. F., Smith, H. D., Giorgio, T. D., & Brophy, S. P. (2002). Integration of the "How People Learn" Framework into Educational Module Development and Implementation in Biotechnology. Second Joint EMBS/BMES Conference (pp. 2640-2641). Houston: IEEE.5. Barr, R, Pandy, M, Petrosino, A, Austin, B and Goldberg, E. (2004). Classroom Testing of VaNTH Biomechanics Learning Modules. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Session 1109: 20 pages (2004).6. Greenberg, J.E., Smith, N.T. and Newman, J.H. Instructional Module
Brook, NY: State University of New York.2. Hancock, M. P., & Russel, S. H. (2008). Research experiences for undergraduates (REU) in the directorate for engineering (ENG) 2003–2006 participant survey. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.3. National Science Foundation (2013). Research experiences for undergraduate (REU) program solication (Document Number: NSF 12-569). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2012/nsf12569/nsf12569.htm4. Russell, S. H., Ailes, C.P, Hancock, M.P., McCullough, J., Rosesner, J.D., & Storey, C. (2004). Evaluation of NSF support for undergraduate research opportunities: 2003 NSF-program participant survey. Menlo, CA: SRI International.5. Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P
. Teaching Design Skills in the Freshman Engineering Curriculum, Proceedings of the 1996 Annual ASEE Conference, June 1996, Washington, DC.3. S. Chattopadhyay. Freshman Design Course at IPFW, Proceedings of the 2004 Annual ASEE Conference, June 2004, Salt Lake City, UT.4. R. E. Musiak, E. W. Haffner, S. Schreiner, A. K. Karplus, M. B. Vollaro, and R. A. Grabiec. Forging New Links: Integrating the Freshman Engineering Curriculum, Proceedings of the 2001 Annual ASEE Conference, June 2001, Albuquerque, NM.5. L. S. Baczkowski, J. D. Enderle, D. J. Krause, and J. L. Rawson. NDSU Undergraduate Design Projects for the Disabled, Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, volume 26, pp. 95-99, 1990.6. S. M. Blanchard and R. P. Rohrbach
. By maintaining a challenge-focused structure, the relevance ofeach lesson is more apparent to learners.The curriculum unit begins with a grand challenge that is then divided into five challenges,starting students with the basics of magnets and magnetic fields, covering how MR images arecreated, and examining general image properties. By completing the five modules, students are Page 13.379.2equipped to answer the following grand challenge question:Claire, a lawyer in her early 30's, has been experiencing dizziness and numbness in her legs.She has also had trouble seeing clearly while driving and can't seem to remember the details ofher cases
underrepresented minorities.References[1] Puccinelli, TJ, Fitzpatrick, M., Masters, G., Murphy, JG, The Evolution of the Freshman Engineering Experience to Increase Active Learning, Retention, and Diversity--Work in Progress. American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.[2] B. M. Olds and R. L. Miller, "The effect of a first-year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, p. 23, 2004.[3] S. S. Courter, S. B. Millar, and L. Lyons, "From the students' point of view: Experiences in a freshman engineering design course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, pp. 283-288, 1998.[4] D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and
from the assessments. Other programs can verify the difference in skills andlearning outcomes of students who did and did not participate in an international SDE. This is avery exciting collaboration with many positive aspects to explore and share.Bibliography1. Laguette, Stephen W. Development of a Capstone Design Program for Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.2. Dieter, George E. and Linda C. Schmidt. Engineering Design. Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill.3. Davis, Denny and S. Beyerlein, P. Thompson, K. Gentili, L. McKenzie. How Universal are Capstone Design Course Outcomes? Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.4. Beyerlein, Steven and D. Davis, M
needed to support the positive effectsof concept mapping and determine the best implementation method.References[1] Abel, Willie Mae, and Martha Freeze. "Evaluation of Concept Mapping in an Associate Degree NursingProgram." Journal of Nursing Education 45.9 (2006): n. pag. Web.[2] Bar-Lavie, Ben. "Enhancing Meaningful Learning in an Environmental Education Program: A Case Study of aClass Empowered Through the Use of Novak's and Gowin's Principles of Learning How to Learn, ConceptMapping, Interviewing, and Education." Cornell University, n.d. Web.[3] Brown, David S. "High School Biology: A Group Approach to Concept Mapping." The American BiologyTeacher 65.3 (2003): 192-97. Web.[4] Karpicke, J. D., and J. R. Blunt. "Retrieval Practice Produces
these projects, as well as Dr. Caren Sax for her assistance in designing the survey,A.J. de Ruyter for his efforts to help advise some of the student teams, and Michael Rondelli forhis guidance through the technology transfer process.Bibliography1. Marin, J. A., Armstrong Jr., J. E., and Kays, J. L., "Elements of an optimal capstone designexperience," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 19-22, 1999.2. Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., Sorensen, C. D., Swan, B. R., and Anthony, D. K., "A survey ofcapstone engineering courses in North America," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, no. Page 12.1269.54, pp. 165-174, 1995.3
development, testing and preproduction, introduction and productionand life cycle management. Elements that were not specific to any one stage were then groupedinto a sixth “on-going” stage.The model is delineated as follows:≠ Stage one involves conceptualization of the product/technology, the identification of a potential target market, and competitor benchmarking. The project scope is then defined, resources are allocated, and technical feasibility and financial evaluations are conducted.≠ Stage two involves the design and physical development of the technology. A critical activity is an assessment of customers’ needs and specifications. Finally, a detailed design is created and a prototype(s) is developed.≠ The third stage ensured
Page 15.680.10of this field – to use these concept and techniques to positively affect human health. By the timethese students become juniors and seniors, we must remind them of this ultimate goal.Incorporating real-world examples and having students tackle more abstract problems on theirown is one way to do so.1. E. Jansen, A. Mahadevan-Jansen, W. Lin, S. Brophy and M. Mackanos. Development and Implementationof an Interactive Instructional Module of Light Distribution in Tissue. 2001.2. J. Bransford, National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning.and National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice., How peoplelearn : brain, mind, experience, and
for upper-division undergraduates and serves as a mechanism for just-in-timeteaching. Moreover, preliminary analysis of student attitude and persistence data both supportthat this instructional paradigm is an effective pedagogy for teaching and learning in the flippedclassroom.AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge the support of this work from NSF Grant #1226325. Page 24.614.14Works Cited1. McKeachie, W. J. Student-centered versus instructor-centered instruction. J. Educ. Psychol. 45, 143–150 (1954).2. Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R. & Cook, K. E. Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inverted Classroom to a Traditional Classroom
AC 2011-2054: SIGNIFICANT FACTORS IN SUCCESSFULLY MATCH-ING STUDENTS TO BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABO-RATORIESJonathan Sanghoon Lee, University of Virginia Jonathan S. Lee is currently an undergraduate in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia.Mr. Shing Wai YamWilliam H Guilford, University of Virginia Will Guilford is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia, and the current Undergraduate Program Director. He received his B.S. in Biology and Chemistry from St. Francis College in Ft. Wayne, Indiana and his Ph.D. in Physiology from the University of Arizona. Will did his postdoctoral training in Molecular Biophysics at the University of Vermont under David
Page 13.756.4Figur e 2. Setting for integr ated lectur e and labor ator y in the same r oom Page 13.756.5Figur e 3. NI ELVIS wor kstation vs tr aditional set of instr uments. Same cir cuit is used on each pr ototyping boar d and same gr aph appear s on both oscilloscopes Figur e 4. Bode plots obtained with the ELVIS softwar e for the RCL filter cir cuit being Page 13.756.6 tested Figur e 5. Students wor king on lab pr actice on individual ELVIS wor kstationsThis initial experience with a small group of five
actualassignments.Introductory ProjectFollowing a class visit by a cancer-surviving individual who provided an in-depth, personaloverview of his cancer experience, the students were tasked with exploring distinctly the diseasepathway, intervention/ device treatment pathway, and the patient pathway for either breast orprostate cancer. Each student selected which of the two types of cancer s/he would explore.Overall, this introductory project had several underlying goals that aimed to lay a foundation forthe entire course. First, this introductory project was to provide opportunities for the students tobuild skills in examining the disease, device, and patient pathways of cancer. In subsequentprojects, students would further refine their skills and apply them to other
scaffolding roleof reflection. Preliminary results indicate that these efforts improve student engagement in theAutumn seminar and overall program, and promote success in the design and implementation ofyear-long team service projects.Bibliography 1. Ambrose, S. A. (2013). Undergraduate engineering curriculum: The ultimate design challenge. The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, 43(2). 2. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 3. Kaplan, M., Silver, N., LaVaque-Manty, D., & Meizlish, D. (Eds.). (2013). Using Metacognition and Reflection to Improve Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing. 4. D.G
. (2013, October 17). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2013 – 2014 [Online]. http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3149[2] E. Rushton et al., “Infusing Engineering into Public Schools” in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2002 © American Society for Engineering Education[3] A. Bandura. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997.[4] “The Condition of Education.” United States Department of Education: National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 2006.[5] S. Peirce-Cottler et al. (2007). “Designing a Medical Device to Extract Foreign Bodies from the Ear”. [Online
. Ramos, R. F., “Introduction of Active Learning Techniques Increases Student Learning in a Systems Physiology Laboratory Course,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.4. Sieving, A. L., M. Pool, S. A. Jewett, T. Eustaquio, R. Madangopal, A. Panitch, K. Stuart, A. E. Rundell, “Development of Verification and Validation Engineering Design Skills through a Multi-year Cognitive Apprenticeship Laboratory Experience,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013.5. Kirschner, P. A. “The laboratory in higher science education, problems, premises, and objectives,” Higher Education, vol. 17, pp. 81-90, 1988.6. Litzinger, T., L. R. Lattuca, R. Hadgraft, W. Newstetter, “Engineering
emphasized the ease ofholding the device, while the team on the right focused on miniaturization, using figure 2’s PCB.While both these groups used non-inverting buffer amplifiers for signal conditioning, others usedlevel-shifted inverting op-amp circuits.Student feedback is positive, with students valuing the project highly for its contribution to theirunderstanding. Student performance (as assessed via overall grades) has remained stable throughthe introduction of this project. Work is ongoing to determine the impact of this course moreprecisely, and to determine the best sequence of lecture content to complement the project.[1] Sheppard, S. D. and Jenison, R. (1997). “Freshman engineering design experiences: An or-ganizational framework
describes reflection activities implemented in twobioengineering courses for the development of specific leadership competencies. The poster willinclude preliminary assessment data on the activities. Bibliography 1. Ambrose, S. A. (2013). Undergraduate engineering curriculum: The ultimate design challenge. The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, 43(2).2. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.3. Kaplan, M., Silver, N., LaVaque-Manty, D., & Meizlish, D. (Eds.). (2013). Using Metacognition and Reflection to Improve Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.4. Seemiller, C. (2014). The Student
, interactive activities and assignments.In summary, although there are universally favored resources, there are differencesdepending on course type and assignment category (learning concept vs.programming/software assignment). Therefore, it is important to determine and developthe most appropriate resource for the student need.AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge the support of this work from NSF Grant #1226325.References[1] Krause, S., Baker, D., Carberry, A., Alford, T., Ankeny, C., Brooks, B., Gibbons, B. (n.d.). The Impact of Two-way Formative Feedback and Web-enabled Resources on Student Resource Use and Performance in Materials Courses. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings.[2] Pego, J. (2013). Peer
Page 23.1400.31 U.S. Department of Education, International and Foreign Language Education Service,http://www2.ed.gov/programs/fipsenortham/index.html2 http://www.nareti.com/host institution(s), forwarding applications for which they recommend travel awards. The hostinstitution determines final acceptance. Accepted students then work with international officestaff and NARETI faculty at the host institution regarding travel logistics, curriculum options,and specific research/internship opportunities.Program assessment: An evaluation plan and specific assessment tools were identified so as toassess the program objectives (Table 2). These assessment tools include: (1) a healthcareawareness survey, (2) two case study reports, (3) a global
theirgraduate student or post-doctoral mentor than with their faculty mentors, although satisfactionwith both was generally high (Table 2). Participants felt like a welcome member of the universityand the department, the program left them with a positive impression of research, and they allwould recommend the program to a friend (Table 2). Participant Survey Results Ave ± SD My grad student and/or post-doc mentor(s)... was available to assist me 4.7 ± 0.7 had a positive impact on my experience 4.7 ± 0.7 My faculty mentor... Was available to assist me 4.0 ± 1.4
., Merle, D., Jackson, C., Lannin, J., & Nair, S. S. (2010). Professional skills in the engineering curriculum. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(4), 562-571. 9. O’Leary, S. (2014). Incorporating employability into degree programmes by using consultancy projects as a form of international internship. In Proceedings of the Global Internship Conference 8th Annual Conference (pp. 173-176). 10. Rajala, S. A. (2012). Beyond 2020: Preparing engineers for the future. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(Special Centennial Issue), 1376-1383. 11. Sargent Jr, J. F. (2013). The US science and engineering workforce: Recent, current, and projected employment, wages, and unemployment. 12. Stiwne, E. E., & Jungert, T. (2010
Engineering, 34(2), p. 200-2085 Enderle JD. (1999) “An Overview of the National Science Foundation Program on SeniorDesign Projects to Aid Persons with Disabilities.” Intl J. of Engineering Education, 15(4), p.288-2976 Kotche, D. (2016) “Clinical Immersion Internship Introduces Students to NeedsAssessment.”ASEE Annual Conf. #155937 Przestrzelski, B, DesJardins, J, Brewer, C, (2016) “Year Two - The DeFINE Program: AClinical and Technology Transfer Immersion Program for Biomedical Needs Identification andValuation,” ASEE Annual Conf. #171218 Kadlowec J, Merrill T, Hirsh R, Sood S. (2015) “Work-In-Progress: Clinical Immersion andTeam-Based Engineering Design,” ASEE Annual Conf., Seattle, WA9 Sood S
. Oakes, and Monica E. Cardella. “Students’ Ways of ExperiencingHuman-Centered Design,” Journal of Engineering Education,” 101(1), 28-59, 2012.[3] Privitera, Mary Beth, M. Design and Dale, L. Murray. “Applied Ergonomics: Determining UserNeeds in Medical Device Design,” in 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS,Minneapolis, MN, 2009.[4] Gertner, Michael. “Biomedical Innovation, Surgical Innovation, and Beyond,” in 9th Annual NationalCollegiate Inventors and Innovators, San Diego, CA, 2005.[5] Walker, M. & Churchwell, A.L. “Clinical Immersion and Biomedical Engineering Design Education:Engineering Grand Rounds.” Cardiovasc Eng Tech (2016) 7: 1. doi:10.1007/s13239-016-0257-y[6] Stephens, J. S., & Rooney, S. I., & Arch, E
through guided activities and assignments. After class, assignments are completed andstudents prepare for the next class. Table 2: Typical Inverted Class Day ScheduleBefore Class In Class After Class• Preparation activity: Reading, • Short lecture • Finish application assignments, • Activities Page 24.1389.3 video, tutorial, or problem(s) open lab• Evaluation: online quiz or turned • Application assignments or lab • Prepare for next class in solutionThe