. 157-174, 2010.3.Cunado D., Nash M.J., Nixon S. M., Carter N. J., "Gait Extraction and Description by Evidence- Gathering," inProceedings of the Second International Conference on Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication,1999, pp. 43-48.4.Moeslund T.,Granum E., "A Survey of Computer Vision-Based Human Motion Capture," Computer Vision andImage Understanding, vol. 81, pp. 231-268, 2001.5.Habibi M., Ulseth R., “Time allocation Scaffolding in Project-Based Learning” Proceedings 2012 ASEE AnnualConference, AC 2012-4180.6.Ewart D., et al, “Entrepreneurship in the Iron Range Engineering (IRE) Model,” Proceedings 2012ASEE Annual Conference, AC 2011-974.7.Kilpatrick E., Stage E., “Self-motivated Learning for Professionalism in an
Accreditation. Engineering Accreditation Commission, ABET, Inc. www.abet.org2. Shuman, L.J., M. Besterfield-Sacre, and J. McGourty. 2005. “The ABET ‘professional skills’ – Can they be taught? Can they be assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education. 94(1):41-55.3. Howe, S. and J. Wilbarger. 2006. “National survey of engineering capstone design courses.” Proceedings for the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.4. McKenzie, L.J., M.S. Trevisan, D.C. Davis, and S.W. Beyerlein. 2004. “Capstone design courses and Page 13.278.9 assessment: a national study.” Proceedings for the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and
“explorationactivities” in section 2 revealed students’ appreciation for connecting in-class discussions andtextbook readings to current events and to research in physiology and biomedical engineering.Although we did not measure student motivation, we hypothesize that student motivation wouldbe increased when provided with opportunities for engagement with authentic biomedicalproblems [13]. Thus, retention/recall and comprehension may not be the only relevant metrics oflearning [14].Literature Cited[1] P. Black and D. Wiliam, “Developing the theory of formative assessment,” Educ. Assess. Eval. Account., vol. 21, no. 1, 2009.[2] K. E. Dunn and S. W. Mulvenon, “A Critical Review of Research on Formative Assessment: The Limited Scientific Evidence of the
of the rubric willimprove inter-grader variation, TA confidence in assignment evaluations, and studentperceptions of grading fairness. Ongoing studies will explore the validity of these findings byexpanding the cohort of TAs and student reports evaluated.References1. Franey, S., A. Gregerson, and M.T. Braun. Playing the TA Lottery A Study of How Teaching Assistants Impact Grades in Engineering Courses. in American Society for Engineering Education. 2012. American Society for Engineering Education.2. Powe, A. and J. Moorhead. Grading lab reports effectively: using rubrics developed collaboratively by ECE and technical writing instructors. in
classroom such as knowledgeprobe, minute paper, misconception check, attention quiz, etc. 7. One of the most widely knownclassroom assessment techniques is known as muddy points, in which the students are asked towrite down the concept(s) that they found most confusing during that class period.Many large lecture courses use muddy points as an instructional assessment technique that allowsthe instructor to gather information at the end of the class about the topics which are not clear tothe students. Using this information, the amount of lecture time allocated to a specific topic canbe increased or decreased to match students’ feedback and emphasize the areas where thestudents need more support 8. This technique offers a two-way feedback mechanism
; instead all courses are pass/fail. Therationale for this is slightly different, as it is intended to let students acclimate to college lifewithout the stress of maintaining a GPA before they enter into the sophomore year where there ismore intelectual rigor.More research is necessary to determine how best to measure student academic success. Thisstudy merely indicates that what is currently accepted as an indicator for student ability mayhave limited utility and alternative options should be explored. Page 26.589.11 References1 Bloom, B. S., College, C. o. & Examiners, U. Taxonomy of educational
experiences indicate that MDS is apromising educational program, as well as inform future evaluations of learning outcomes. Nextsteps will include true pre-post student surveys, evaluations of students’ creative process usingthe AAC&U VALUE rubric on creativity, and a comparative analysis of students’interdisciplinary attitudes by comparing students and medical learners who participate in MDSversus students and medical professionals who have not participated in MDS.Works Cited1. Hall L, Scott S, Cox K, Gosbee JW, et al. Effectiveness of patient safety training in equipping medical students to recognize safety hazards and propose robust interventions. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2010;19:3-8.2. Gosbee JW, Anderson T. Human factors
courses described herein serves tointegrate the student’s theoretical studies with practical experiences in an environment that isboth supportive and professional as well as well designed to prepare students for the next phaseof their career.Bibliography1. King, Paul H., and Fries, Richard C., Design of Biomedical Devices and Systems, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 20032. Enderle, J., Gassert, J., Blanchard, S., King, P., Beasley, D., Hale, P. Jr., Aldridge, D., “The ABCs of preparing for ABET,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, v22.4, 122-132 (2003)3. Enderle, J.D., Ropella, K.M., Kelso, D.M., and Hallowell, B., “Ensuring that biomedical engineers are ready for the real world,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine
- Page 12.1268.11 Friendly Intervention for improving Upper-Extremity Function. Archives of Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2005, Vol. 86 (4): 837-844.5. Ann-Christin Eliasson, Lena Sundholm, Karin Shaw, and Chen Wang. Effects of Constraint Induced movement therapy in young children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: an adapted model. Med and Child Neurology. 2005, 47 (4): 266-275.6. S. C. DeLuca, K. Echols, and S. L. Ramey, and E. Taub. Pediatric Constraint-Induced movement therapy for a young child with cerebral palsy: two episodes of care. Physical Therapy. 2003, 83(11):1003-1013.7. Amy Bodkin, Ronda Baxter, and Carolyn Heriza. Treadmill Training for an Infant Born Preterm With a Grade III Intraventricular
). Page 15.232.6 Table 1: Most Important Activities 1 Customer Needs Analysis and Feedback 2 Brainstorming 3 Analysis, Evaluation and Reporting of Test Data 4 Alpha/In-house Testing 5 Prototype Testing 6 Design Review(s) 7 Design/Prototype Review(s) 8 Product Design Selection from Multiple Alternatives 9 Reliability Testing, Test to Failure, Limit Testing 10 Test Method Definition 11 Customer Feedback Evaluation 12 Refine Tests and Models 13
the ‘autosave’ feature.The LabArchives development team implemented this feature into the ELN on request. At theend of the semester both the students and the faculty were surveyed. All surveys wereanonymous and consent to use the anonymous data was obtained for IRB approval. Since themajority of the students used paper notebooks either in their freshman design course, perviousBME design course(s), and/or during their employment (i.e. internship or co-op) they couldmake a direct comparison. They were asked to rate a number of criteria, on a scale of 1-3 (where1 is poorly, 2 is moderately, and 3 is very), related to logistics and the engineering outcomesused to grade the notebooks for both paper and electronic notebooks. Environment plots
. Page 22.1342.918. Marceglia S, Bonacina S, Mazzola L, Pinciroli F. Education in biomedical informatics: learning by doing bioimage archiving. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:5924-5928.19. Newstetter WC. Fostering integrative problem solving in biomedical engineering: the PBL approach. Ann Biomed Eng. Feb 2006;34(2):217-225.20. Sachdeva AK. Surgical education to improve the quality of patient care: the role of practice-based learning and improvement. J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 2007;11(11):1379-1383.21. Van Ginneken CJ, Vanthourout G. Rethinking the learning and evaluation environment of a veterinary course in gross anatomy: the implementation of an assessment and development center and an E-learning
were made in Indonesia, and a screen designed in Korea). It made me realize how interconnected everything is now. One of my favorite books is called “The World is Flat,” and it was at that moment that the world truly felt flat and so small. No accomplishment, advancement, product, or anything can be claimed by a single country now. Everything humanity does now is a global effort in every sense.The CURE students appreciated the universally positive work relationships that they shared withtheir PKU graduate student mentors but did not develop social relationships with them thatextended outside of the lab or their shared work. The mentors made the effort to make theirCURE colleague(s) comfortable in the labs by sharing
labincludes a 50-minute lecture (attended by all students in the class) and a four-hour lab session(held three times a week to reduce the number of students in lab at any one time).Lab lecture: At the beginning of each week throughout both semesters of the IDEAS coursesequence, students attend a 50-minute lecture in which the following three pieces of informationare presented: 1) The motivation and BME context for the particular lab technique(s) and/oranalysis method(s) the students will experience later in the week; 2) A detailed review of thecore concepts relating to the week’s lab; and 3) A brief preview of what is expected in the labthat week. These lectures are critically important not only for providing students with theknowledge base necessary
able to share their own experiences inengineering design and provide guidance to individual projects. Hands-on workshops inelectronics and CAD software were performed to enhance student’s prototyping skills and/oraddress deficiencies among students without an engineering background. Lastly, significant timewas made available for hands-on prototyping and proof of concept testing in the laboratory.Topic (s) BEFORE DURING AFTERNeeds Finding Videos Active Learning Team Project:Problem Definition and Need Update DHF,Statement
Conference. Page 12.331.106. Manuel-Dupont S, “Writing Across the Curriculum in an Engineering Program,” J of Eng Ed 1996 p. 35-40 Building Engineering Communication Skills 107. Morello, J, “Comparing Speaking Across the Curriculum and Writing Across the Curriculum Programs,” Communication Education. January 20008. McNair LD, Norback JS, Miller B, “Integrating Discipline-Specific Communication Instruction based on Workforce Data into Technical Communication Courses, “ Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Conference.9. Norback JS, McNair LD, Laughter MJ, Forehand GA, Sutley-Fish, B, “Teaching Workplace
interpersonal skills? Economics of Education Review 2011, 30 (6), 1516-1526.2 Lerner, A.L., Kenknight, B.H., Rosenthal, A. et al. Design in BME: Challenges, Issues, andOpportunities. Ann Biomed Eng 2006, 34 (2): 200-208.3 Jennifer H. Choi. Work in Progress: The Incorporation of Hands-on, team-based designchallenges in a large enrollment introductory biomedical engineering course. ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana 2016.4 Okudan, G.; Ogot, M.; Gupta, S. Assessment of Learning and its Retention in the EngineeringDesign Classroom Part A: Instrument Development. American Society for EngineeringEducation Conference Proceedings 2007, AC 2007-2261.5 Mulford, D. R.; Robinson, W. R., An Inventory for Alternate Conceptions among
Page 26.1774.5used to document student experiences.References:[1] E. Litzler and J. Young, “Understanding the risk of attrition in undergraduate engineering: Results from the project to assess climate in engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, issue 2, pp. 319–345, April 2012.[2] J. D. Karpicke, "Retrieval-based learning: Active retrieval promotes meaningful learning," Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 21, issue 3, pp. 157–163, 2012.[3] E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni, “Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study,” Science Education, vol. 88, issue 4, 493–534, July 2004.Acknowledgement
AC 2007-1712: "WHAT WORKS" IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION? AMETA-ANALYSIS OF VANTH/ERC BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING MODULESDavid Cordray, Vanderbilt University David S. Cordray PhD is Professor of Psychology and Public Policy at Vanderbilt University. He is currently the Thrust Leader in Assessment and Evaluation for the VaNTH ERC. Professor Cordray has written extensively on research and evaluation methodology in education and human services areas. He has conducted experimental, quasi-experimental and meta-analytic assessments of intervention effectiveness in education, health, welfare, and other human service areas.Thomas Harris, Vanderbilt University Jennifer Gilbert is graduate student in the Department of
-Harvard/MIT) Engineering Research Center in BioengineeringEducational Technologies, which can be accessed electronically and has several learningadvantages, which are discussed below. Table 1. Selection of books containing quantitative physiology problems Problem Books Michael, JA and Rovick, AA Problem Solving in Physiology Prentice Hall 1999 Problem solving strategies; conceptual problems; some relatively simple quantitative problems Tiger, S, Kirk, JK, and Mathematical Concepts in Clinical Science Prentice Hall 2000 Solomon, RJ Very simple mathematical concepts with which engineering students should
twosemesters. The course integrated a number of lectures on specific nanoscale and biotechnologyconcepts, included fairly inexpensive “NanoLab” modules that required limited resources withadditional reading and homework material. The students also worked in teams to address someof engineering and/or design challenges facing bionanotechnology in the areas of nanomedicine,diagnostics, and other areas of their interest. The course with its flexible structure can be easilyadopted by other biomedical or bioengineering programs.AcknowledgementsWe are grateful to the National Science Foundation though the Nanotechnology UndergraduateEducation Award (award # EEC-0634230) for the support.References1. Irvine DJ, Stachowiak A, Jain S. “Engineering biomaterials
senior capstone experience, and in the long-term fortheir career as professional engineers.AcknowledgementsI would like to thank Daniel Cavanagh for the many insightful conversations andcomments.References[1] J Enderle, S Blanchard, J Bronzino. “Introduction to Biomedical Engineering” Academic Press, New York. 2000.[2] N Ozkaya, M Nordin. “Fundamentals of Biomechanics: Equilibrium, Motion and Deformation.” Springer. New York. 1999.[3] A Van Heuvelen. “Overview, Case-Study Physics,” Am. J. Phys 59, 898-907. 1991. Page 11.1056.7
College-Wide Engineering Outreach Event. Proceedings of theAnnual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, New Orleans, LA, 2016.Hidi, S and Renninger, KA. The Four Phase Model of Interest Development. EducationalPsychologist, 41, 111–127, 2006.Knogler, M, Harackiewicz, JM, Gegenfurtner, A, Lewalter, D. How Situational is SituationalInterest? Investigating the Longitudinal Structure of Situational Interest. ContemporaryEducational Psychology, 43, 39-50, 2015.Michaelis, JE and Nathan, MJ. The Four-Phase Interest Development in Engineering Survey.Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, Seattle,WA, 2015.National Science Foundation. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in
design thinking, teaching, and learning,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2005.[2] S. Kuznetsov and E. Paulos, “Rise of the Expert Amateur: DIY Projects, Communities, and Cultures,” in Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, New York, NY, USA, 2010, pp. 295–304.[3] O. Hoilett, “#FunTimesWithTheTA,” GitHub. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/FunTimesWithTheTA. [Accessed: 30-Apr-2017].[4] O. Hoilett, “PulseSim - Photoplethysmograph (Heartbeat) Analog Simulator,” Instructables.com. [Online]. Available: http://www.instructables.com/id/PulseSim- Photoplethysmograph-Heartbeat-Analog-Simu/. [Accessed: 23-Mar-2017].[5] J. Allen, “Photoplethysmography and its
, including biomaterials. She was awarded the 2012 ASEE NCS Outstanding Teacher Award, 2013 Gannon University Distinguished Faculty Award and 2013-2014 Gannon University Faculty Award for Excellence in Service-Learning. Vernaza does research in the area of alternative fuels (biodiesel), engineering education (active learning techniques), and high-strain deformation of materials. She is currently the PI of an NSF S-STEM and ADVANCE-PAID grants.Dr. Davide Piovesan, Gannon University Davide Piovesan was born in Venice, Italy on October 10 , 1978. He is currently Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Gannon University and the director of the Biomedical Engi- neering Program. He received his M.S.M.E in
Paper ID #16068Improving Scientific Writing Capability in an Undergraduate Population Us-ing a Fading Paradigm Scaffolding ApproachAmelia Spencer Lanier, University of Delaware Ameila S. Lanier is a Ph.D. candidate in the Biomechanics & Movement Science department at the Uni- versity of Delaware. She received her M.S. (2012) also in Biomechanics & Movement from the University of Delaware. She recieved her B.S. (2009) in Biomedical Engineering from Washington State University.Ashutosh Khandha, University of Delaware Ashutosh Khandha is a Ph.D. candidate in the Biomedical Engineering program at the University of
cards. The program sent all thecards together in a package ahead of the riders, so they would receive them when they stoppedfor lodging.Social media interactions between BME CUReS REU participants and current Texas 4000 ridersThe Texas 4000 students on the bike ride post photos and notes to the Texas 4000’s websitethrough a social media aggregator. Similarly, the BME CUReS REU participants post to theREU program’s website through a blog with photos and commentary. Blog post content variesfrom reflections on research and the impact of cancer, to letters to the Texas 4000 student riders,to fun photos from local social trips. The program shares this blog and relevant postings with theTexas 4000 throughout the 10 weeks.Adoption of Texas 4000
AC 2010-1661: A TEAM-BASED NERVE CUFF SIMULATION PROJECT IN ATHIRD YEAR FOUNDATIONS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING COURSEPurvis Bedenbaugh, East Carolina University Purvis Bedenbaugh is the director of the biomedical engineering concentration within the newly ABET-accredited general engineering program at East Carolina University. He obtained the B. S. E. degree in biomedical engineering from Duke University, the M. S. degree in bioengineering from Clemson University, the Ph. D. degree in bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania, and was a postdoctoral fellow at the Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience and Department of Otolaryngology of the University of California, San Francisco
determinedwith respect to the topics identified in the first three rounds4.This work was supported primarily by the Engineering Research Centers program of theNational Science Foundation under grant EEC-9876363.1. VaNTH refers to a collaboration between Vanderbilt University, Northwestern University, University of Texas,Austin and the Health Sciences and Technology Program between Harvard University and MIT.2. R.A. Linsenmeier, T.R. Harris, and S. A. Olds. “The VaNTH Bioengineering Curriculum Project”. Proceedings ofthe Second Joint EMBS/BMES Conference (CD-ROM, Omnipress): 2644-2645, 2002.3. R.A. Linsenmeier. "What Makes a Biomedical Engineer? Defining the Undergraduate Biomedical EngineeringCurriculum". IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Vol