Science Foundation CAREER Award. He is grateful to have been awarded the Weidman Pro- fessorship in Leadership and to have recently been recognized with BYU’s Technology Transfer Award.Dr. Ruth Ochia P.E., Temple University Ruth S. Ochia received the B.S. degree in biomedical engineering from The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, in 1992 and the Ph.D. degree in bioengineering from the University of Washington, Seat- tle, WA, in 2000. From 2000 to 2002, she was a Post-doctoral Fellow in the Center of Locomotion Studies, at The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA. From 2002 to 2006, she was a Post- doctoral Fellow and then Assistant Professor at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL. From 2006
faculty, the faculty is involved in the analysis of these data, andany changes made in response to the data are implemented by the faculty. The system’s course-centered approach aids in keeping the faculty engaged in the process and helps to measureoutcomes consistently even when the course changes hands. The system has been operating forthree years and has recently generated data to support a formal ABET review that has led to anaccredited status.References1. J.D. Enderle, J. Gassert, S. Blanchard, P. King, D. Beasley, P. Hale, and D. Aldridge. “The ABCs of Preparing for ABET.” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 21, pp. 59-66, 2002
especially if a project is outside the advisor’s technical expertise. • Evaluate technical progress and professional behavior of team members. • Provide analysis and associated grading to the course coordinator. • While it is the responsibility of the advisor to provide technical advice and suggestions, it is not his/her responsibility to make decisions for the team, provide answers to problems that a team is expected to solve, or tell a team when they have done enough work.Mentor(s) • Provide biomedical clinical and/or technical advice to a senior design team. • Provide an opportunity for teams to gain experience in a clinical or laboratory setting. • Commit to the project for nine (9) months. • Commit to
statistics must represent the actual results of calibration and the results should not be hidden by manipulating the numbers. Student Feedback: In general, the students seem to appreciate the course and what it is trying to teach. The hands-on nature of the course is well appreciated. This is the first opportunity that some of the students have gotten to use some of the equipment, such as an oscilloscope. One of the students felt that the text book(s) could be used more. I suspect that they do not see the value in using the texts as a reference and they therefore resent having to purchase the book and then not having homework problems assigned out of it. Reflection: The course seems to be well received by the students. I still feel that they learn
Electronics for Scientists, 3rd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill. 1977.2. Csete, Marie E. and Doyle, John C. “Reverse Engineering of Biological Complexity.” Science 295 (2002):1664-69.3. Tranchina, D. et. al. “Retinal light adaptation—evidence for a feedback mechanism.” Nature 310 (1984): 314-16.4. Koch, Christof. Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons. New York: OxfordUniversity Press, 1999.5. Hodgkin, A.L., and Huxley, A.F. “A Quantitative description of membrane current and its application toconduction and excitation in nerve.” J. Physiol 117 (1952): 500-544.6. Shadmehr, R., and Wise, S. The Computational Neurobiology of Reaching and Pointing. Cambridge: The MITPress, 2005.7. McMahon, Thomas A. Muscles, Reflexes, and
faculty members in an assessment process that is not onerous, weincrease the likelihood of having vigorous and productive discussions of curricular strengths andpotential areas of improvement, and subsequently developing and implementing curricularreforms, which are the desired end-results.Acknowledgements:The authors would like to acknowledge the important contributions of BME AssessmentCommittee members from 2006 to 2010: Walter Block, Pablo Irrarazaval, Wan-Ju Li, KristynMasters, William Murphy, Amit Nimunkar, Brenda Ogle, John Puccinelli, Paul Thompson,Mitch Tyler, John Webster, Justin Williams and Tom Yen.References:1. Website www.abet.org, accessed January 19, 2011.2. Enderle, J., Gassert, J., Blanchard, S., King, P., Beasley, P., Hale
cm Green di 0.19 cm 160 Settling Velocity [cm/s] 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
organizations, including co-investigators, federal and stateregulatory agencies, and the IRB(s) overseeing the research may receive yourinformation during the course of this study. Except when required by law, studyinformation shared with persons and organizations outside of Stevens will notidentify you by name, social security number, address, telephone number, or anyother direct personal identifier.Confidentiality of Your Study InformationYour study records include information that identifies you and that is kept inresearch files. We will try to keep this information confidential, but we cannotguarantee it. If data from this study are to be published or presented, we will firsttake out the information that identifies you.Retention of Your Study
semester surveys, students from both institutions wereenthusiastic about this idea and expressed no hesitation to travel to the other campus or a neutrallocation halfway in between. To alleviate scheduling problems, the joint meeting(s) will be heldin the evening. Previous experience in other classes shows that when the students have thisopportunity to interact informally, it facilitates interactions during videoconferencing classesthroughout the semester.Finally, changes to the NCSU curriculum will be implemented to provide better background toNCSU students, which will greatly ease the disparity between the two institutions. Page
courses and these results indicate that weneed to look at how lectures are delivered to study the impact of these approaches. Are there Page 14.129.9specific needs that DL students seek when it comes to instructional delivery, for example? Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2009 American Society for Engineering EducationAlso, some local students indicated that some characteristics of their course(s), e.g. courseorganization and class size, negatively impact their learning. Further investigation is required onwhat the better or worse
-health-care-is-digital-panelists- say.aspx4. http://www.intel.com/healthcare/5. http://www-03.ibm.com/industries/healthcare/us/index.html6. http://www.microsoft.com/industry/healthcare/default.mspx7. S. Patel, K. Lorincz, R. Hughes, N. Huggins, J. Growdon, M. Welsh, and P. Bonato, “Analysis of Feature Space for Monitoring Persons with Parkinson's Disease With Application to a Wireless Wearable Sensor System,” 29th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, August, 2007.8. O.A. Blanson Henkemans, K.E. Caine, W.A. Rogers, A.D. Fisk, M.A. Neerincx, and B. de Ruter, “Medical Monitoring for Independent Living: User-centered design of smart home technologies for older adults,” Proceedings of the Med-e-Tel
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2005.2. Markey, M.K., K.J. Schmidt, and S. Hays. Non-linear PowerPoint as an aid in learning probability, random processes, and statistics. in ASEE Gulf Southwest Section Meeting. 2006. Page 11.233.20
for the opportunity to be addressed. Describe the problem to be solved, objectives/goals, and assumptions. Design Process – Describe initial brainstorm options, selection criteria, refined options with detailed sketches/components, and selection of a built prototype. Always label (caption) any figures. As common practice, any figure in the report must be discussed somewhere in the text. Prototype Results – Include photographs of the device and testing. Show data to support or reject this design’s function. Description of Final Product – Include a comprehensive schematic(s) of your final design. Include details of all components. Be logical in your sequence of this section. Conclusion – Summarize
2006. Page 12.101.11 Biomedical Signals and Systems Design Course 11Appendix: Nuts and BoltsEach group had 24 hour access to the following equipment:Analog EquipmentMasterflex L/S pump (77200-60)Cole Palmer Rotameter (10850)Assorted Tubing and ConnectorsKeck Ramp Clamp (C-06835-07)Omega Pressure Gauges (DPG100B-15G)Cole Palmer Pulse Dampener (C-07596-20)Digital EquipmentGreylor Dynesco Pump (PW-12DC)McMillan 111 Flo-MetersAALBorg variable solenoid valve (PSV-5) and driver (PSV-D)Honeywell ASCX05DN pressure transducersLabview 8.0 with controls toolboxKeithley KPCMCIA-16AIAO-C DAQ CardKeithley STP-37 screw terminalAgilent 33120A
found high correlations between the two items about intelligence (0.74) and between the twoitems about programming (0.84). There was a low to negligible correlations among othercombinations, with the strongest (up to 0.3) being between attitudes about intelligence andprogramming items. We assessed the correlations between ratings on each LSI dimension andagreement with the six statements. We found most of the correlations were small. The highestcorrelation was between SEN/INT dimension and the first statement about programming skills.The more strongly a student scores as a “sensor”, the more s/he believes that her/hisprogramming aptitude cannot be changed.We did not uncover any clear evidence that students with different learning styles
, 2010. 3. Page, Ann (Ed.) (2004). Keeping Patients Safe: Transforming the Work Environment of Nurses. Committee on the Work Environment for Nurses and Patient Safety. National Academy Press: Washington, D.C. 4. Bogner, S. (1994). Human Error in Medicine. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. 5. Powell-Cope, G., Neslon, A.L., Patterson, E.S. Chapter 50: Patient care technology and safety in Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nurseshdbk/. Accessed December 21, 2010. 6. Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Ashgate Publishing: Farnham, UK. 7. Medical Device Use-Safety
. Sanders, M., et al., Assessing interdisciplinary engineering capstone project. Proceedings for the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.9. Latane, B., K. Williams, and S. Harkins, Many hands make light work: the causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979. 37(6): p. 822-832.10. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts, Economics, organization, and management. 1992, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.11. Strong, J.R. and R.E. Anderson, Free-riding in group projects: control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 1990. 12: p. 61-67
recognized "core"of material that has been relatively stable for at least ten years. It has evolved in the field withoutany agency or body attempting to specify such a core. Unfortunately, it is difficult to look backto the early 70’s when the first programs were created to see the evolution to this point.However, the data presented here will provide a point of reference for studying the evolution ofthe undergraduate bioengineering curriculum in the future. Our analyses have emphasized commonalities across BME, but there is clearly alsoconsiderable diversity in BME undergraduate curricula. If we were to investigate certain otherbranches of engineering, at least five or six topics would be expected to be nearly 100%consistent across programs
(s) that will becovered in that day’s readings and lesson, by adding lesson objectives the students gain insightabove and beyond the topic to be covered. As a primary example, consider one of the lessons inthe Biomaterials course that focuses on corrosion. Instead of telling the students that today’slesson will cover concepts simply related to corrosion, and that they should study the assignedreading prior to the lesson, the following lesson objectives are also listed: a. Explain the thermodynamic reason for corrosion and develop the Nernst Equation. b. Analyze Evans plots and polarization curves to better understand corrosion rates. c. Discuss the various types of corrosion, and understand the differences between them.Hopefully it is
biomedical engineering curricula", Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual: IEEE, 2001, pp. F3E-16-21 vol. 12.[16] Linsenmeier, R.A., T. Harris, and S. Olds, "The VaNTH bioengineering curriculum project", Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 2002. 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society EMBS/BMES Conference, 2002. Proceedings of the Second Joint: IEEE, 2002, pp. 2644-2645.[17] Linsenmeier, R.A., and D.W. Gatchell, "Core elements of an undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum–State of the art and recommendations", 9th International Conference on Engineering Education, 2006.[18] Martin, T., S.D. Rivale, and K.R. Diller
, S. (2015, June), Interdisciplinary Medical Product Development Senior CapstoneDesign Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24350[10] Hotaling, Nathan, Barbara Burks Fasse, Lewis F Bost, Christopher D Hermann, and Crain R Forest. “AQuantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course, “ Journal ofEngineering Education,” 101(4), 630-656, 2012.[11] ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2012-2013. ABET.http://www.abet.org/uploadedFiles/Accreditation/Accreditation_Process/Accreditation_Documents/Current/eac-criteria-2012-2013.pdf; Accessed 5/7/2013.
, Aldine: Chicago, 1967[13] Merriam, B. S., Qualitative research and case study applications in educa- tion, Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco, 1998 Page 11.58.24[14] Patton, Q. M., Qualitative evaluation and research methods, Second Edition, Sage Publications: London, 1990 Page 11.58.25
Page 15.561.12 (2008).2. P. Dawson, I. Han, M. Cox, C. Black, and L. Simmons, "Residence Time and Food Contact Time Effects on Transfer of Salmonella Typhimurium from Tile, Wood and Carpet: Testing the Five-Second Rule," Journal of Applied Microbiology, 102 [4] 945-53 (2007).3. J. Epstein, "Small Group Learning for 14,000 Undergrads" (2007) Inside Higher ED. Accessed on: August 1, 2007. Available at 4. B.I. Lee, S. Kaewgun, W. Kim, W. Choi, J.S. Lee, and E. Kim, "Visible Light Photocatalytic Properties of Polymorphic Brookite Titania," Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 1 [2] 023101 (2009).5. J.R. Wagner, "Embedding Creative Inquiry in the Undergraduate Geology," p. 218 in Vol. 38 2006
may “feel” less obvious; yet, RETs made strong connections between their summerresearch and their future goals. For example, one participant stated: “It has opened my mind upto a Masters, not in literacy. It’s possible that I would look for something in science education ormaybe even a particular science.” Yet another said: “There is a possibility of co-writing a grant. Iwould like to do more research at the community college.”Bibliography1. Kazerounian, K. & Foley S. (2007). Barriers to creativity in
analysis and statistical analysis were included as sections of the cell cytotoxicity report.BioethicsAlthough this has not been a major focus of our course, the cell culturing unit, particularly withthe use of HeLa cells offers a unique opportunity to initiate a course-wide dialog into the topic ofbioethics. A recent New York Times bestselling book, “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks”by Rebecca Skloot (13), documents the origins of the HeLa cells and traces the origins of somemodern day ethical standards in the medical field back to the 1950’s when the field of cellculturing was only beginning.The story and origins of HeLa cells provide a unique backdrop to modern day concepts of theHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA
course session that introduces the rest ofthe class to the topic. The students are told to consider • the areas of biomedicine discussed the first day of class, • the subject(s) of interest that they wrote on their index cards the first day of class (index cards are distributed to students so that they can provide the instructor with more details Page 25.1262.6 regarding their interests and activities than are provided in the KSU online database), • the discretionary topic that they chose for Homework 1 (a medical device search where each student pursues information about a device of interest to them), and • the
Reseachers Figure 9. small, especially for advancedcourses, and so self-publishing seems appropriate. For 50 years or more teachers haveself-published text material. In one of the author’s experience in 1960 one of his professors didan entire undergraduate service course in engineering on “dittos”, with hand writing, typing andhand sketches. The advent of the Xerox machine in the 60’s made it possible to incorporate partsof printed text material, especially figures, graphs and tables, and university reproduction centerscould use offset printing to provide alternative text material. Now Modern computer-generateddocuments using a word
. Page 15.482.14Bibliography1. Lai-Yuen S, Reeves K (2009) Active-learning experiences on medical devices for manufacturing and newproduct development. American Society for Engineering Education AC 2009-1549.2. Tranquillo J, Cavanagh C (2009) Preparing students for senior design with a rapid design challenge. AmericanSociety for Engineering Education AC 2009-1917.3. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2009) Y14.5: Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing.4. US Food and Drug Administration. Use of International Standard ISO-10993, ‘Biological Evaluation ofMedical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing’ <> Last accessed March 11, 2010.5. International Organization for Standardization (2009) ISO-10993 Biological Evaluation of Medical