project tools made available to them to overcome logistical barriers. Freeresponse answers and direct observations show that freshmen gained valuable insights into theiracademic and professional trajectory from the seniors. Seniors gained an appreciation for how anemployer might regard their resume, and for methods of management of “employees”, whereas,up to this point in their academic careers, they had only experienced team dynamics on teams ofequals. This method of inter-cohort project development has led to significant returns for seniorsand freshmen alike.IntroductionIn general, developing a connected, communicative, and active society of students and facultywithin a department is an important aim for college educators. Several lines of
Paper ID #29424Evaluating a new second-year introduction to chemical engineering designcourse using concept mappingMatheus Oliveira Cassol, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Matheus is an undergraduate student in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at The University of British Columbia. His work focuses on improving engineering education using technol- ogy and innovative analysis methods. Matheus’ goal is to follow a research career, using engineering knowledge to move society towards a greener future.Dr. Jonathan Verrett, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Jonathan Verrett is an Instructor in
Paper ID #29170Pre and Post Tenure: Perceptions of Requirements and Impediments forChemical Engineering FacultyDr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskio˘glu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa State University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University. Her early Ph.D. work focused on the development of bacterial biosensors capable of screening pesticides for specifically targeting the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. As a result, her diverse background also includes
. ‘Non-persisting’ students are those leaving engineering because of the academic climate, grades, self-efficacy, high school preparation, career goals, and gender or race [20]. Moreover, students leave STEM because of a lack of belonging [3], [24], “chilly” climate [25], microaggressions [26], conflicting identities [26]–[28], and not identifying with the field [29]–[31]. This literature on student perceptions highlights how their decisions are influenced by how they see themselves as being capable. This suggests how students’ perceptions affect their decisions which can be influenced by several cognitive and non-cognitive factors. Therefore, students’ observations in school inform the actions they take, and what they see as
students who answered individual questions correctly on pre/post-test assessments.Survey questions were written to understand how the students' attitudes towards math, science,and careers in STEM may have changed as a result of completing the at-home experiment. Thecomplete list of questions can be found in Table 2. Survey question 1 (SQ1) and SQ2ascertained whether students felt they used science and math in their everyday lives,respectively. At baseline, approximately 45% of students felt they used science always or often,and approximately 75% of students felt they used math always or often (Figure 3). There waslittle change in these percentages in the post-survey. SQ3 assessed whether students wouldcontinue
this course. Page 13.678.2A major goal of the course, as it is a freshman course, should be to cultivate studentinterest in engineering2 and motivate students to pursue an engineering career. Thiscourse can have a wide variety of formats, depending upon the number of credits andobjectives of the course for a particular institution. For example, Brigham YoungUniversity has a three-credit course which introduces (via an integrated design problem)all of the aspects of the chemical engineering curriculum3, while TennesseeTechnological University has a one-credit course that focuses more on hands-onexperiments and information exchange4. Whatever the course
higher levels of career advancement[4] andsurveys indicate that practicing engineers spend a large portion of their work time writing orspeaking; however, feedback from industry indicates a lack of communication skills in manyengineering graduates.[5] Therefore, so-called “soft” skills, recently redefined as “professional”skills, need to be learned within the engineering curricula and be transferable to the engineeringworkforce. As expected, communication is recognized as a core transferable professionalskill,[2] which is reflected in current ABET criteria[6] and publications such as The engineer of2020,[7] prompting pedagogical changes in engineering curricula.[8, 9] At the author’sinstitution, feedback from alumni surveys and the departmental
is taught inschool so students have very little idea of what it entails until they formally start studying it atuniversity. Students can enter a variety of chemical industries, such as food and drink,biotechnology and environmental engineering, although a historical survey of internationalchemical engineering students has also revealed an interest in financial services, especiallyamong male students studying in the UK [9]. As a discipline, chemical engineering seems tosuffer from having too large a scope in terms of a future career pathway as opposed to toonarrow a one.ConclusionsAs this paper is a work-in-progress, we are unable to put forward concrete conclusions at thisstage. However, we are in a position to present some insights based on
past 22 years has focused on innovative pedagogy research as well as technical research in biotechnology. His 2007-2008 Fulbright exchange to Nigeria set the stage for him to receive the Marian Smith Award given annually to the most innovative teacher at WSU. He was also the recent recipient of the inaugural 2016 Innovation in Teaching Award given to one WSU faculty member per year. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Work-in-Progress: Improving Undergraduate Engineering Education Through Writing:Implementation in the Classroom Alongside a Hands-on Learning PedagogyAbstractAs undergraduate engineering students graduate and advance in their careers, they are facedwith multiple tasks
social networking tools can be used to stay intouch with alumni. This connection can help lead to a dialogue between the currentunderclassmen and alumni to initiate discussions on internships and career options at their placeof employment.Introduction The ubiquity of online social networking, especially among college students, has made ita candidate for scholarly research. Most of the early work on this phenomenon has focused on auser’s presentation of identity, and privacy concerns 1. However, a growing body of knowledgehas focused on their role within a college or university setting 2, 3, 4. This work examines the useand role of online social networking towards facilitating the high school to college transition, aswell as a tool for
chemical engineering undergraduates.An important motivator for student’s participation in the workshops is the possibility to becomepart of the Chemical Engineering Design Team that will compete for the first time at AIChEnational conference.Quantitative assessment of student’s attitudesTo explore students’ attitudes toward chemical engineering, students were asked to complete amodified version of the PFEAS (Pittsburgh Freshman Engineering Attitude Survey) developedby Besterfield- Sacre et al. [12]. It was necessary to reword the original questions as appropriatedfor the context of chemical engineering students. For example, “I expect that engineering will bea rewarding career” was reworded as “I expect that chemical engineering will be a
Paper ID #29382Student Confidence and Metacognitive Reflection with Correlations toExam Performance in a FE Review Course in Chemical EngineeringSheima J. Khatib, Texas Tech University Sheima J. Khatib is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Texas Tech University. She received her Ph.D. in Chemistry in the area of heterogeneous catalysis from the Au- tonomous University of Madrid. Apart from her interests in chemical engineering and finding sustainable paths for production of fuels and chemicals (for we she has received several grants including the NSF CAREER award), she is passionate
(Taxol) through the use of plant cell cultures from the Taxus Yew Tree. Throughout her time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Student Performance in an Online Chemical Engineering
of the course, group work,discussions, development of professional skills, and suggestions. The differences were striking andclear. In the full CHAPL course 80% of the students felt they had learned the material compared to50% of the active, problem-based group. Similarly, 60% of student in the full CHAPL course felt theskills they gained applied to an engineering career compared to 15% in the second group. The lattergroup reported they felt lost, rushed, and unprepared whereas the student in the full CHAPL sectionrose to the challenge. “We weren’t prepared at first, but that was the point.” Those in the full CHAPLsection were confident in their knowledge and stated they were able to integrate knowledge frommultiple sources. Meanwhile those
of the course is to introduce chemical engineering students to the professionearly in their academic careers. The course includes content ranging from informationabout chemical engineering career opportunities to simple chemical engineeringcalculations. One component of the multi-faceted course is the discussion of pertinentcurrent events. The Gulf Coast Oil Spill was deemed the highest priority current eventand discussed during the Fall 2010 semester. It is also planned to be discussed during theSpring 2011 semester.For the oil spill assignment, CENG 0110 students were asked to develop a three minutepresentation focused on one of the following six topics: timeline, root causes, methodsfor control/containment, environmental impact, economic
. Consequently, a successful career forbio/chemical engineers will require an adequate functional knowledge of RC guidelines. Anexposure to RC guidelines and its implementation can help chemical engineering students tobecome more marketable and get a head start with their careers.It is important to prepare chemical engineering graduates who will grow to become goodcorporate citizens. Recent industrial disasters (such as Deepwater Horizon spill, Imperial SugarRefinery explosion, Alumia plant accident in Hungary, etc.) have all pointed to a breach in RCand the possibility of engineering personnel’s involvement in making the wrong decisions cannotbe ignored. Thus it is important to cultivate chemical engineers with strong ethics and
% of all drugs will be biologics by 2014 has persuaded many biologistand chemical engineers to migrate towards a career in biotechnology2. This migration is evidentfrom the fact that employment of chemical engineers in biotech/pharmaceutical industryincreased from 5.7% in 1996 to 11.3% in 2007 while employment in conventional chemicalindustries dropped from 33.3% to 25.5% during the same time period1.To satisfy needs of the interdisciplinary biotechnology profession, several undergraduatechemical engineering programs have added at least one biology course to their curriculum.However, biology programs in the United States have yet to include a course of engineeringnature to their curriculum. Nevertheless, several biologists work in the
an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Educa- tion / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions, specifically on design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Prof. Eva Chi, University of New Mexico Eva Chi is a Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological
research engineering position at Shell Westhollow Technology Center he returned to the University of Dayton to pursue an academic career. His research interests are in fluid flow and heat transfer and he has taught the Unit Operations Laboratory for 11 years.Danilo Pozzo, University of Washington Prof. Pozzo’s research interests are in the area of soft materials and nanotechnology. His group focuses on developing structure-function relationships for a variety of nano-structured materials having applica- tions in materials, alternative energy and separations. Prof. Pozzo obtained his B.S. from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagez and his PhD in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh PA
explosion, ABET was advised to adapttheir accreditation requirements to incorporate process safety [13], [20]. This adaptation isevident in ABET’s student outcome that states that a student will demonstrate “an ability torecognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informedjudgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic,environmental, and societal contexts” [6]. Ever since, process safety in undergraduate curriculahas been a key component in training today’s engineers for their future careers [7]. However, forstudents who have only seen process safety situations through coursework, it may be challengingto pivot to more complex situations in a professional setting
kinds of organizational changes are needed at the institutional level to betterincorporate students both into their university and the organizational change process, students’perceptions of their own position and role must be known and understood. The purpose of thisqualitative investigation is to investigate how first- and second-year engineering students at alarge public Mid-Atlantic university describe their position and role within their university andprogram. Data for this study are drawn from semi-structured interviews conducted with tenstudents in Chemical Engineering. This selection of students from each of the first two years oftheir undergraduate careers provides a means for comparing how students’ views vary as theygather more
paperwork) and prepare them for future professional careers (e.g. writing aCV or cover letter). After the community workshop, we worked with the professionaldevelopment seminar coordinator to determine when time would be devoted to pedagogicaldevelopment. Originally pedagogical development was not part of the professional developmentseminar series but the developers of the seminar series were open to providing some guidance onteaching and learning practices for all graduate students, regardless if they were a GTA. Wedesigned and facilitated each pedagogical development session and chose topics that addressedthe issues that emerged from the interviewed and observed GTAs, as well as those that addressedthe desired learning goals for the pedagogical
preparefor and acquire their current jobs. Course materials are available upon request from the instructor.Introduction According to a survey conducted by the American Institute of Chemical Engineers(AIChE) in 2015, a significant fraction of chemical engineering (ChE) graduates pursue careers inbiotechnology and/or pharmaceuticals (see Figure 1).[1] Specifically, of the 48.9% of ChEgraduates that go into industry, ~12% are initially placed in biotechnology and pharmaceuticals,9% in food and consumer products, and 3% in environmental engineering. If other non-biologicalfields are excluded (e.g. fuels, chemicals, etc.) to specifically analyze the initial placement ofbiochemical engineering (BioChE) students, it is revealed that
engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and her B.S. at the University of Oklahoma. She did postdoctoral research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on developing computational models for multiscale tissue physiology and pharmacology including the kidneys and lungs as key organs of interest. Her teaching interests focus on chemical reaction kinetics and computational science and engineering. She received an NSF CAREER Award in 2019. She is the 2020-2021 Chair of the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division.Samantha Lyn Carpenter, Oklahoma State University Samantha Carpenter received her B.S. in mechanical engineering from Oklahoma State University cum laude in the spring of
ofcardboard, wedging pieces of soap into slits in the boats as they saw fit. The boats were thenplaced into bins filled with water and allowed to traverse the bins. The task was to create a boatwhich travelled both the farthest and fastest using nothing but the force generated by differencesin surface tension of the liquid caused by the dissolution of the soap. The activity wassummarized by an open discussion of basic surface tension phenomena, explaining why oilinhibited paperclip flotation and how dissolution of soap could generate enough force to propel aboat. Finally, ties to chemical engineering were shown by highlighting career areas wheresurface tension effects are paramount (inter alia: crude oil recovery, paint design andmanufacturing, food
of opportunity to utilize their skills in projects involving thelife sciences and medical field, yet the misconception that this is not the case is prevalent amongstlower-division undergraduates. It is often seen that potential chemical engineering students whoare interested in careers in medicine take a pre-medical route or switch to bioengineering as amajor. Core classes such as transport phenomena and separations in the chemical engineeringcurriculum, though, teach students a number of invaluable concepts and fundamentals that can beapplied to projects involving the life sciences.To address the misconceptions of chemical engineering as a major and its importance in themedical field, we propose to use a hands-on, interactive learning tool
results suggest that more instruction on opportunities forprocess and utility water recycling should be incorporated into the Design II curriculum.SummaryLess than a quarter of our students avail themselves of any industrial internship opportunityduring their undergraduate career at TAMUK; an industrial internship is not a requirement in ourundergraduate degree program. Additionally, roughly one half of the students in our chemicalengineering curriculum come from parts of our state where there are numerous refineries andchemical process plants, while the remainder come from nearby areas of our state where there isno refinery or chemical process industry whatsoever. Based on this information, only a smallfraction of our students may have been
at NC State since 2000, Dr. Bullard has won numerous awards for both teaching and advising, including the ASEE Raymond W. Fahien Award, the John Wi- ley Premier Award for Engineering Education Courseware, NC State Faculty Advising Award, National Effective Teaching Institute Fellow, NC State Alumni Outstanding Teacher Award, George H. Blessis Out- standing Undergraduate Advisor Award, and the ASEE Southeastern Section Mid-Career Teacher Award. She is a member of the editorial board for Chemical Engineering Education and serves a Director of the Chemical Engineering Division of ASEE. She will be a co-author, along with Dr. Richard Felder and Dr. Ronald Rousseau, of the 4th edition of Chemical Process Principles. Dr
will need not only in the material and energy balanceclass but throughout their careers as chemical engineers.Solution for the Observed Weakness Thus, after observing this first group of students, we felt that we needed todevelop some type of tool or procedure by which we could help students make thetransition from written material to visual material. This is not only a necessary skill butalso would allow students to continue learning using their preferred learning style. Ifstudents were able to master this skill they would be more successful in the material andenergy balance class and thus more likely to succeed in completing their educationalgoals. The difficult part of this task is to give the students enough guidance so that
material and energy balance class, butthroughout their careers as chemical engineers. Visual/Verbal 25 20 20 15 15 12 12 12 10 9 6 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 -11 -9 -7 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7 9 11 Figure 1. Scoring on Felder/Silverman Inventory of Learning Styles (Visual/Verbal