making, technology, and games can be used to improve student engagement.Dr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University Dr. Michael Prince is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University and co-director of the National Effective Teaching Institute. His research examines a range of engineering education topics, including how to assess and repair student misconceptions and how to increase the adoption of research- based instructional strategies by college instructors and corporate trainers. He is actively engaged in presenting workshops on instructional design to both academic and corporate instructors.Dr. Amy Frances Golightly, Bucknell UniversityMs. Carrine Megan Gadoury, Bucknell University Carrine Gadoury
Paper ID #19104BYOE-Cold BoilingDr. Kristen Ann Thompson, Loras College Dr. Kristen Thompson is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering at Loras College. She teaches Thermodynamics, Fluid Mechanics, Dynamics Systems, and Introductory Physics courses. She earned her Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin - Madison and her B.S. from Michigan Technological Uni- versity both in Chemical Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Cold BoilingThe goal of this experiment is to help students overcome misconceptions about the
Paper ID #25565Identifying Challenging Spreadsheet Skills Using Reading and HomeworkAnalytics from an Interactive TextbookProf. Matthew W. Liberatore, University of Toledo Matthew W. Liberatore is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Toledo. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. His current research involves the rheology of complex fluids as well as active learning, reverse engineering online videos, and interactive textbooks. His website is: http://www.utoledo.edu
tomitogenic and chemotactic stimuli.References 1. Saltzman W. Drug Delivery. Oxford University Press, 2001. 2. Wispelwey J. “Drug Delivery and Chemical Engineering.” Chemical Engineering Progress, March 2013. 3. Santini J. “Introduction to Drug Delivery Technology.” Chemical Engineering Progress, March 2013. 4. Kim S. et al. “Engineered Polymers for Advanced Drug Delivery.” European Journal Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics.” 2009, 71(3): 420-430. 5. Gombotz W. et al. “Protein Release from Alginate Matrices,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1998, 31 (3): 267-285. 6. Gu F. et al. “Sustained Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor with Alginate Beads,” Journal of Controlled Release, 2004, 96(3): 463-472. 7
Paper ID #11522Comparing Pedagogical Strategies for Inquiry-Based Learning Tasks in aFlipped ClassroomDr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly
Paper ID #15090Using Time More Efficiently: Converting an Interview Protocol to a SurveyDr. Paul B. Golter, Washington State University Paul B. Golter obtained an M.S. and Ph.D. from Washington State University and made the switch from Instructional Laboratory Supervisor to Post-Doctoral Research Associate on an engineering education project. His research area has been engineering education, specifically around the development and as- sessment of technologies to bring fluid mechanics and heat transfer laboratory experiences into the class- room.Dr. Olusola Adesope, Washington State University Dr. Olusola O. Adesope is
the Manufacturing Excellence group as a Process Engineer for the Paper Machines.Dr. Ashlee Nicole Ford Versypt, Oklahoma State University Dr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt is an assistant professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in ChE at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign and her B.S. at the University of Oklahoma. She also conducted postdoctoral research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on developing computational models for systems biomedicine & pharmaceutics and using computing and reflection in the classroom. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
, "What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments?", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 655-675, 2000.[32] B. Hanson et al., "Remote laboratories in the curriculum", IASTED Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, vol. 29 , 2008.[33] M. Prince and R. Felder, "Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123-138, 2006.[34] J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “Motivational beliefs, values, and goals”, Annual review of psychology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 109-132, 2002.[35] E. Mayor, “Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia
in the ways hands-on activities such as making, technology, and games can be used to improve student engagement.Dr. Amy F. Golightly, Bucknell University Amy Golightly is an associate professor of education at Bucknell University. She earned her B. A. in psychology from the University of Saint Thomas, and her Ph.D. in school psychology from the University of Iowa. Her main research interests lie in understanding factors that facilitate or hinder learning and conceptual change in undergraduate students, and in development of assistive technology to help college students with disabilities. She is currently involved in collaborative research projects focused on these topics in chemical and electrical engineering
) developedby the Washington State University (WSU) Center for Teaching, Learning, and Technology (CTLT).The CTR assesses four categories (problem identification, solution method, assumption quality andsolution quality) on a 6 point scale. The students in the CHAPL section appear to show more growth incritical thinking than those in the other section.IntroductionInstructors in the science and engineering disciplines are beginning to show enthusiasm forincorporating novel learning pedagogies into their classrooms and are seeing significant results. Someexamples of this include POGIL[1], developed in chemistry, and Hi-Pele[2], developed in chemicalengineering.These pedagogies are playing an important role in a Chemical Engineering Fluid Mechanics and
Virginia University Richard Turton received his B.S. degree from the University of Nottingham and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Oregon State University. His research interests are include fluidization and particle technology and their application to particle coating for pharmaceutical applications. Dick is a co-author of the text Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes (2nd ed.), published by Prentice Hall in 2003. Page 13.1388.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Visual Basic Software for Design and Performance ProblemsIntroduction Most chemical
component is involved. Chemical engineering students benefit from the analyticalstrategies not typically taught in an engineering economics course, while business students areexposed to technologies they may not normally encounter. Interdisciplinary interactions such asthese not only have potential to benefit your institution, but help expand the skill set of thestudents who participate.Future Work With the knowledge of which biodiesel products are most feasible, a plan for actionneeds to be determined. In terms of the 1050 gallons of biodiesel that will be produced to act asheating oil for the generators, a few decisions need to be made. The major decision is todetermine where the biodiesel will be stored when it is not being used, and
AC 2011-737: STUDENT LED DEVELOPMENT OF ENGINEERING ES-TIMATE PROBLEMS BASED ON YOUTUBE VIDEOSMatthew W Liberatore, Colorado School of Mines Matthew W. Liberatore is as an assistant professor of chemical engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. In addition to creating and applying active learning in his courses, his current research involves the rheology of complex fluids especially traditional and renewable energy fluids, entangled polymer solutions and polymer films.Charles Russell Vestal, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Vestal is retired
technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels. Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful for support provided by the National Science Foundation’s Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement Program, under Phase 2 grant DUE-0717905. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation
sustainability, green chemistry, biofuels and appropriate technology for underdeveloped regions.Dr. David L. Silverstein, University of Kentucky Dr. David L. Silverstein is the PJC Engineering professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Kentucky and director of the College of Engineering’s Extended Campus Programs in Paducah, Kentucky where he has taught for 13 years. His Ph.D. and M.S. studies in Chemical Engineering were completed at Vanderbilt University. Dr. Silverstein earned his B.S. in Chemical Engineering at the University of Alabama. Dr. Silverstein’s research interests include conceptual learning tools and training, and he has particular interests in faculty development. He is the recipient of several
he has served since 2007.Jim Pfaendtner, University of Washington Prof. Pfaendtner’s research group focuses on multiscale modeling of biophysical systems. His group develops and applies new computational methodologies for a wide range of problems of chemical en- gineering interest including biomaterials and biocatalysis. Prof. Pfaendtner earned his B.S. from the Georgia Institute of Technology and his Ph.D. from Northwestern University. After serving a two year post-doc at ETH Zurich in Switzerland, he joined the faculty of Chemical Engineering at the University of Washington in 2009.Marvi A. Matos, University of Washington Marvi A. Matos is naturally from Puerto Rico. She obtained her BS in Chemical Engineering
Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Mississippi State University. She received her PhD and M.S. from the University of Notre Dame and B.S. from Michigan Technological University. Since joining MSU, Dr. Minerick has taught the graduate Chemical Engineering Math, Process Controls, Introduction to Chemical Engineering Freshman Seminar, and Heat Transfer Courses. In addition, she is an NSF CAREER Awaredee, has served as co-PI on an NSF REU site, PI on grants from NSF and DOE, and is the faculty advisor for MSU’s chapter of the National Organization for the Professional Advancement of Black Chemists and Chemical Engineers (NOBCChE). Her research is in medical microdevice
reinforce engineering principles, and to emphasize engineers’ ultimateresponsibility in the development of future technologies. The department has various goals thatrelate to the National Science Foundation (NSF) engineering education project grants. Theseparticular goals include increasing retention rates of engineering students, reinforcing societalresponsibilities, building networking skills through teamwork and community relations, andcreating a general excitement for engineering. Service learning has been the staple methodologyof reaching these goals, as projects have been implemented in the introductory material andenergy balances courses from the fall of 2006.The service learning projects assigned to the introductory classes have focused on
calculations on the process. Likewise, the writing of the abstractthat describes the context and relevance of the problem are also skills that are important for anystudent who will be called upon to explain the value of a technology to colleagues in a Page 14.1086.3workplace. The aspects of the problem involving the wording of the problem or associating 2learning objectives with a problem are less critical to the education of the students, and theseparts were not included in the grading of the problems.Students in the upper division elective course, Introduction to Biochemical Engineering (CHE192
):63–85, 2000. [2] D. H. Jonassen. Learning to Solve Problems: An Instructional Design Guide. Instructional Technology and Training Series. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA, 2004. [3] D. H. Jonassen. Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem-solving Learning Environment. Routhledge, New York, NY, 2011. [4] D. R. Woods, A. N. Hrymak, R. R. Marshall, P. E. Woods, C. M. Crowe, T. W. Hoffman, J. D. Wright, P. A. Taylor, K. A. Woodhouse, and C. G. K. Bouchard. Developing problem solving skills: The McMaster problem solving program. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2):75–91, 1997. [5] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz. Teaching Engineering. Purdue University Press, 2nd edition, 2015. [6] D. R. Woods. An evidence-based
Paper ID #16806Data Analytics for Interactive Virtual LaboratoriesJessie Keeler Jessie Keeler is a graduate student in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. She received her B.E. from the Youngstown State University in chemical engineering and is pursuing her M.S. also in chemical engineering with an emphasis on engineering education.Mr. Thomas W Ekstedt, Oregon State University Thomas Ekstedt is a software developer in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State University. He is involved in the development of technology
helped create the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. His current interests are learning and faculty development.Charles Glover, Texas A&M University Charles Glover is Associate Head for Undergraduate Studies in the Artie McFerrin Dept. of Chemical Engineering where he has served on the faculty since 1977. Previous educational efforts included development of a sophomore year engineering program founded on the integrating principles of the conservation laws framework. Page 12.662.1© American Society for
-based polymers and fuels, applying microchannel technology to achieve process intensification, studying agglomerate dispersion, and processing polymers for packaging applications.Dr. Daina Briedis, Michigan State University Dr. Daina Briedis is a faculty member in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University and Assistant Dean for Student Advancement and Program Assessment in the College of Engineering. Dr. Briedis has been involved in several areas of education research including student retention, curriculum redesign, and the use of technology in the classroom. She is a co-PI on two NSF grants in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in
undergraduate level and courses in aquatic chemistry and physical/chemical treatment processes at the graduate level.Bill J. Brooks, Oregon State University Bill Brooks is a PhD student in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering. He is the primary programmer for the WISE learning tool. As an undergraduate student, he studied hardware engineering, software engineering, and chemical engineering. His thesis research involves investigating the interplay of content, pedagogy, and technology in student learning.Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He cur- rently has research activity in areas related to thin film
Materials Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. His research and teaching interests include transport phenom- ena, biomedical engineering, surfactants, and modification of surfaces by admicellar polymerization with over 130 archival publication and patents. He has served in a variety of administrative positions including NSF Program Director, Associate Dean for Research, and Director of the Bioengineering Program.Gary Robert Brown, Office of Assessment and Innovation Dr. Brown has been in higher education for more than 30 years. He has an interdisciplinary PhD and been working with colleagues in almost every discipline. His expertise is in educational assessment with a strong background in technology and innovations
effectively utilize advanced technology to solve complex problems. Goal 3 - Develop students who gain a perspective on the role of engineering in a global society including the importance of ethics, professional responsibility, diversity and culture, lifelong learning, safety, sustainability and the environment. Goal 4 - Develop students who communicate their ideas effectively in various formats to both technical and non-technical audiences.There are 15 objectives related to these goals, as summarized in Appendix A. In mostcases, there is a straightforward, one-to-one mapping between the program’s objectives(e.g., graduates will be able to do X) and measurable outcomes (e.g., students willdemonstrate during the
of active learning and engagement.[5]Advantages and disadvantages exist for different teaching modalities. Therefore, it is imperativeto maintain students’ engagement during their learning experiences, regardless of the teachingmodality. In this work-in-progress study, the authors share examples implementing active learningtechniques for asynchronous teaching, synchronous online teaching and hyflex teaching ofchemical engineering courses delivered to junior-level students. The authors also provide insightsinto using open-source technology to produce high-quality video recordings for asynchronousteaching with Open Broadcaster Software (OBS)—an open software for video production.[6]The goal of this work is to facilitate simple tools and
Paper ID #30547Work-in-Progress: Fostering a Chemical Engineering Mind-set throughHands-on ActivitiesDr. Julianne Vernon, Vanderbilt University Assistant Dean Vernon works in the field of STEM educational research; some areas of focus include stu- dent retention and implementation of innovative pedagogy and technology. She is currently the Assistant Dean of Academic programs overseeing the First Year Courses, Study Abroad Programs, and Interna- tional Initiatives at Vanderbilt University. She received her Bachelors in Chemical Engineering from the City College of New York and her Doctorate degree at University of Florida in
Educational Psychology and a Boeing Distinguished Profes- sor of STEM Education at Washington State University, Pullman. His research is at the intersection of educational psychology, learning sciences, and instructional design and technology. His recent research focuses on the cognitive and pedagogical underpinnings of learning with computer-based multimedia re- sources; knowledge representation through interactive concept maps; meta-analysis of empirical research, and investigation of instructional principles and assessments in STEM. He is currently a Senior Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education.Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie received his B.S., M.S. and
education and multimedia learning. He has a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering and a deep background in computing and software programming.Dr. Olusola Adesope, Washington State University Dr. Olusola O. Adesope is a Professor of Educational Psychology and a Boeing Distinguished Profes- sor of STEM Education at Washington State University, Pullman. His research is at the intersection of educational psychology, learning sciences, and instructional design and technology. His recent research focuses on the cognitive and pedagogical underpinnings of learning with computer-based multimedia re- sources; knowledge representation through interactive concept maps; meta-analysis of empirical research, and investigation