. Faculty, Chairs, and Deans. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 193–219. 3. Ponton, M. K., Edmister, J. H., Ukeiley, L. S., & Seiner, J. M. (2001) Understanding the role of self‐efficacy in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education 90(2), 247-251. 4. Downey, G. L., & Lucena, J.C. (2004) Knowledge and professional identity in engineering: code‐switching and the metrics of progress. History and technology 20(4), 393-420. 5. Howard, P. (2009) Articulating the learning: Professional practice made explicit. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning 10(3),177. 6. Dehing, F., Jochems W., & Baartman, L. (2013) Development of an engineering identity in the engineering
Paper ID #19813What representations am I using in my courses? Here’s an ”app” for that!Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Elif Miskioglu is currently an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Bucknell University. She graduated from Ohio State University in 2015 with a PhD in Chemical Engineering, and is interested in student learning in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Title: What representations am I using in my courses? Here’s an “app” for that!AbstractAs engineering educators, we are equipping technical experts with the skills to succeed in theirprofession, as
Engineering Department hosts 48 junior and senior students, of which 6have taken ENGR 248. Our team believes that the population of students that have taken thecourse will give good baseline data on the tendencies of students writing technical reports whohave previously been enrolled in a dedicated technical communications course.Data collection is split into an evaluation of a student’s process of writing and a student’s finalwritten product. Evaluation of a students ‘Process’ is based on a novel method for time-dependent data analysis that will use screen capture technology [6]. Real-time data capture offersthe ability to capture all behaviors and activities and also allows for investigators to transcribeand code behaviors done by the subjects
engineering programs across the U.S. declined 34% between1997 and 20061 and The University of Tulsa (TU) has mirrored this trend. This same period oftime saw significant changes in the technology infrastructure at TU in the College of Engineeringand Natural Sciences. Every classroom was equipped with a computer console and display forinstruction. All engineering departments established computer laboratories for their students inaddition to the numerous facilities available to all students. WiFi was installed campus-wide.Two instructional laboratories were created with computers for 20 or 30 students.In 2007 and 2008, the public watched the price for a barrel of oil rise to unprecedented levels.Salaries for engineers prepared to work in the petroleum
Paper ID #23324Exploring Mind Maps for Assessment in an Introductory Chemical Engineer-ing CourseProf. Joshua A Enszer, University of Delaware Prof. Joshua Enszer is an assistant professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the Uni- versity of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control, capstone design, and math- ematical modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic portfolios as a means for assessment
Paper ID #15555Environmental Awareness in the Material and Energy Balances CourseMr. Connor Robert Bilchak, Columbia University Connor received his B.S. in chemical engineering from Manhattan College in 2014 and his M.S. from Columbia University in 2015. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D. at Columbia under the advisement of Sanat Kumar and Christopher Durning. His work involves the morphological control of polymer-grafted nanocomposites for increased flux and selectivity in vapor separations.Dr. J. Patrick Abulencia, Manhattan College J. Patrick Abulencia is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Manhattan College
has participated in service in several roles. He has chaired the UMN Senate Committee on Educational Policy, and he serves on the AIChE’s Education and Accreditation Committee, Chemical Engineering Technology Operating Council, and Executive Board of the Program Committee. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Chemical Engineering Product Designs for Sustainability- Rethinking Ammonia Synthesis for Sustainable Distributed Production SystemsAbstractWe are piloting undergraduate product design projects that address a chemical processvery familiar to students - ammonia synthesis - and that use process simulation tools thatthey are comfortable with (after
. Introduction Conducting undergraduate research (UR) has been shown to have a number of positiveoutcomes for the undergraduate researcher including increasing confidence and understanding,clarifying interests in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) careers and increasingthe anticipation of a Ph.D1. Russell et al. recently performed an extensive survey for theNational Science Foundation which included 3600 faculty, post doctoral and graduate studentmentors of undergraduate research1. These mentors were identified because they were funded byone or more of the eight NSF programs with an undergraduate research focus. Although thisstudy was comprehensive from the standpoint of NSF, mentors without funding from NSF mayhave been overlooked
2006-2521: A CONSTRUCTIVIST EXPERIMENT IN PARTICLE SETTLING ANDCENTRIFUGATIONBrian Lefebvre, Rowan University Brian G. Lefebvre is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.Ch.E. from the University of Minnesota in 1997 and his Ph.D. from the University of Delaware in 2002. Prior to joining Rowan, he performed postdoctoral research in protein structural biology at the University of Pennsylvania. His primary teaching interest is integrating biochemical and biomolecular engineering in the engineering curriculum. Page 11.35.1© American Society for
Engineering”. Chemical Engineering Progress, March 2013. 2. Saltzman W. Drug Delivery. Oxford University Press, 2001. 3. Truskey G. et al. Transport Phenomena in Biological Systems. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006. 4. Farrell S. et al. “Drug Delivery Education Using Microsphere Technology,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2011. 5. Gu F. et al. “Sustained Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor with Alginate Beads,” Journal of Controlled Release, 2004, 96(3): 463-472. 6. Gombotz W. et al. “Protein Release from Alginate Matrices,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1998, 31 (3): 267-285
Chemical Engineering from Oregon State University where he worked for Dr. Milo Koretsky developing the Interactive Virtual Laboratories. He is currently doing computational chemistry work under Juan de Pablo.Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly
Paper ID #6320A Comparison of Peer Evaluation Methods in Capstone DesignDr. Joshua A Enszer, University of Maryland Baltimore County Dr. Joshua Enszer is a full-time lecturer in Chemical Engineering at the University of Maryland Baltimore County. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control and modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic port- folios as a means for assessment and professional development, implementation
AC 2012-3180: USING STUDIOS AS A STRATEGY TO RESPOND TO IN-CREASING ENROLLMENTDr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a professor of chemical engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has re- search activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is inter- ested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels.Dr. Kenneth J. Williamson, Oregon State UniversityDr. Jeffrey A. Nason, Oregon State University
AC 2012-3985: PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT COURSE DEVEL-OPMENTMrs. Linda S. Davis, Purdue University, West Lafayette School of Chemical EngineeringMs. Deborah Lynn Grubbe P.E., Operations and Safety Solutions, LLC Deborah Grubbe is Owner and Principal of Operations and Safety Solutions, LLC, a consultancy that specializes in safety and operations troubleshooting and support. Deborah is the former Vice President of Group Safety for BP PLC, which had its two safest years ever during her tenure. She was trained in the characteristics of safe operations during her 27-year career at DuPont, where she held corporate director positions in engineering, operations and safety. Grubbe is a member of the NASA Aerospace Safety
engineering fields and explore findings from two focus groups withwomen chemical engineering majors to shed light on why these women chose the major.Literature ReviewExtensive research has been done on students’ motivations for choosing science, technology,mathematics, and technology (STEM) majors in college. 3,4,5 However, most studies focus onscience or combining women in science and engineering and as Wentling and Camacho3 say,“experiences unique to female students of engineering need further examination.”(p. 85) Thereare even fewer studies that focus on subdisciplines of engineering. Here we will summarize someresearch on factors influencing women’s choice to study engineering and highlight researchfocused on women in chemical engineering. Our
AC 2011-2265: ENGINEERING ETHICS CASE STUDIES IN SENIOR UNITOPERATIONS LABORATORYJames P Abulencia, Manhattan College Page 22.588.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Engineering Ethics Case Studies in Senior Unit Operations LaboratoryAbstract Placement of ethics in the Chemical Engineering curriculum has always been debated. Inthis project, the use of a real-world engineering ethics case study was integrated into the SeniorUnit Operations Laboratory course over two separate class years (i.e. Year 1 and Year 2). Themotivation behind this was twofold. First, the assignment provides the opportunity to develop
learning outcomes. Page 22.253.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Assessment of ABET Student Outcomes During Industrial InternshipsAbstractThe Paper Science and Engineering (PSEN) program at UW-Stevens Point has had a three-creditindustrial internship requirement since 1973. We assessed this requirement throughcomprehensive student papers covering the technology of the pulp and paper industry and theprocesses and products of the mills in which students worked. This assessment worked well untilroughly ten years ago, when mills began retaining
copies of the teaching materials and lectures. Page 22.286.6Bibliography1. Felder, R.M., and Silverman, L.K., “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,” Engineering Education, Vol. 78, No. 7, 1988, pp. 674–681.2. Woods, D.R., “An Evidence Based Strategy for Problem Solving,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 89, No. 4, 2000, pp. 443-459.3. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, McGraw Hill, electronic reference subscription continuously updated.4. Hill, D., “Process Simulation from the Ground Up,” Chemical Engineering Progress, April 2009, 50-53.5. Atherton J S, Learning and Teaching; Deep and Surface learning
thought, several aspects ofhuman body function, particularly those relating to physiology can be treated as transportphenomena problems. In fact in the last fifty years chemical engineers have contributedsignificantly to various innovations in physiology such as characterization of vascular fluidtransport, kidney dialysis machines, drug delivery vehicles, and artificial tissue constructs toname a few.Major reasons for applying transport phenomena principles to physiological systems are: (i) Tobetter understand the physiological functions of the human body, (ii) to diagnose pathologicalconditions which are typically reflected by changes in transport processes, and (iii) to developinstrumentation and intervention technologies for therapies. Due to
AC 2010-726: A MODULE FOR TEACHING BATCH OPERATIONSRichard Turton, West Virginia University Richard Turton received his B.S. degree from the University of Nottingham and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Oregon State University. His research interests are include particle technology and modeling of alternative energy processes. Dick is a co-author of the text Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes (3rd ed.), published by Prentice Hall in 2009.Joseph Shaeiwitz, West Virginia University Joseph A. Shaeiwitz received his B.S. degree from the University of Delaware and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Carnegie Mellon University. His professional interests are in design, design
. 3, pp. 1– 30, 1994. [9] W. G. Rieger, “Directions in Delphi developments: Dissertations and their quality,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 195–204, 1986, doi: 10.1016/0040-1625(86)90063-6. [10] W. L. Stitt-Gohdes and T. B. Crews, “The Delphi Technique: A Research Strategy for Career and Technical Education,” Journal of Career and Technical Education, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 55–67, 2004. [11] “AIChE CareerEngineer Job Board.” [Online]. Available: https://careerengineer.aiche.org/. [Accessed: 26-Jan-2020]. [12] “Chemical Engineering Magazine Job Board.” [Online]. Available: https://jobs.chemengonline.com/. [Accessed: 26-Jan-2020]. [13] “The Chemical
, “Flipping the classroom to improve learning with MOOCs technology,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 15–25, Nov. 2016.[8] E. J. Berger and E. Pan, “Video Resources and Peer Collaboration in Engineering Mechanics : Impact and Usage Across Learning Outcomes Video Resources and Peer Collaboration in Engineering,” in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015, p. 26.1700.1-26.1700.17.[9] Y. He, S. Swenson, and N. Lents, “Online Video Tutorials Increase Learning of Difficult Concepts in an Undergraduate Analytical Chemistry Course,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 1128–1132, Aug. 2012.[10] C. Johnson and A. D. Morken, “Asynchronous Use of Engineering (Materials
, S. & Mononen-Aaltonen, M. (2000), Towards Network-Based Education: A Multidimensional Model for Principles of Planning and Evaluation. In Tella, S. (ed.) Media, Mediation, Time and Communication: Emphases in Network-Based Media Education. Media Education Centre. Department of Teacher Education. University of Helsinki. Media Education Publications 9, 1-58. 20. Novak, J. D. (1965). A model for the interpretation and analysis of concept formation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3: 72-83. 21. Đnelmen, Erol, Re-inventing engineering education: a new challenge, World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 2002 UICEE,Vol.1, No.1, 2002
Enhancement Projects", Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Division of Undergraduate Education, National Science Foundation (NSF 98-108), 1998.7 Egger, W., Drogser, O., Eichberger, B., “Train the Trainer – technology Assistance for High Schools”, 12th International Power Electronics & Motion Control Conference, IEEE Cat. No. 06EX1282C), 2006.8 Hirsch, L. S., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R., and Bloom, J., “Using Pre-Engineering Curricula in High School Science and Mathematics: A Follow-up Study”, Frontiers in Education 36th Annual Conference, IEE Cat. No. 06CH37781C, 2006.9 Russ, G., Rice, J., Parker, C., Raczek, J., Jarrell, B., Bayles, T., Ross, J., “The Inspires Curriculum: Engaging Future
considering context, between the other elements of the assumptions, data, and evidence. problem, such as context, Objectively reflects upon the their implications, assumptions, or data own assertions. and evidence. Contexts for consideration Cultural/social Scientific Group, national, ethnic behavior/attitude Conceptual, basic science, scientific method Educational Economic Schooling, formal training Trade, business concerns costs Technological Ethical Applied science, engineering
, and to analysis of present daytensions between the US and North Korea. The multidisciplinary and unique nature of this projectrequired careful preparation and construction of the student assignment. Hence, the primary authorrecruited the help of colleagues with expertise in social science, humanities and arts, andinnovation/entrepreneurship to help design the entire assignment and the assessment. Kris Boudreau isHead of WPI’s Humanities and Arts Department, with a PhD in American Literature and current scholarlyinterests in infusing liberal arts into engineering education including developing our HumanitarianEngineering courses. Leslie Dodson, PhD in Technology, Society and Media, teaches HumanitarianEngineering and is involved with WPI’s
, technology, and games can be used to improve student engagement.Dr. Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University Jennifer Cole is the Assistant Chair in Chemical and Biological Engineering in the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University and the Associate Director of the Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research. Dr. Cole’s primary teaching is in capstone and freshman design, and her research interest are in engineering design education.Dr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He earned his BS from Worces- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub
Paper ID #25464An Interdisciplinary Elective Course to Build Computational Skills for Math-ematical Modeling in Science and EngineeringDr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt, Oklahoma State University Dr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt is an assistant professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Okla- homa State University. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in ChE at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and her B.S. at the University of Oklahoma. She did postdoctoral research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on developing computational models for multiscale tissue physiology and pharmacology
Engineering (CHBE 220), and how it affected students’perceptions of the field of chemical and biological engineering. CHBE 220, and the courses itreplaced, as well as the major topics of focus of these courses are outlined in Table 1.Table 1: Courses existing before and after curriculum changes including major topics covered Before curriculum changes After curriculum changes CHBE 243: Introduction to Chemical and CHBE 220: Foundations of Chemical and Biological Engineering Process and Biological Engineering I (4 credits) Technology (1 credit) Major topics: Major topics: Process design project definition Introduction to a variety
. al. of Texas A & M. This was developed and used byengineering programs in the Foundation Coalition. Students in mechanical engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology use a manuscript developed by Don Richards12. A relativelynew text, "Bioengineering Fundamentals" by Saterbak, et. al13,14, has been published for use inbiomedical engineering programs. We have adopted this book for use in EAS211. Althoughmuch of the content, examples and homework problems have a biological emphasis, thepresentation of the basic concepts aligns well with the philosophy of EAS211.It should be clearly understood that EAS211 is intended to provide an introduction to each of thetopical areas, with further understanding developed in courses which follow