size of buttons or ads on ascreen has been thoroughly studied and optimized – in many cases to increase revenues [2]. Ingeneral, big data comes from interactivity, i.e., either a person clicking or scrolling on a webpageor sensors in either a home or chemical plant. In the same vein, combining interactivity withtextbooks has begun to create big data in the engineering classroom.Student-centered teaching techniques are commonly called active learning [3-8]. This type ofpedagogy focuses on students learning by doing in many cases. Despite the large body of evidencesupporting these best practices of teaching, adoption is not the norm. While not adopting the newstandard techniques in laboratory research leaves faculty behind, the same expectation
Page 12.381.2only for the majority of them, their size relegatesthem to laboratory space. To address this wedeveloped Desktop Learning Modules (DLMs), the Fig. 1 – DLM design. One gallon reservoirs for hot & cold water feed to interchangeable see-through fluids and heat transfer cartridges with digital display of flow rates, temperatures and pressures.prototype of which was completed during the spring 2006 semester. The DLM in Figure 1 consists of a1 ft x 1 ft x 1 ft apparatus containing hot and cold fluid
retrieval in the second half of the semester, where students are expected to applysimilar ideas in team settings as they conduct experiments of their own design. Each week of labbrings feedback from the previous week and a new assignment for more practice building onexperimental design, statistical analysis, and communication skills. These skills are further testedin the senior level laboratory and design courses, which require the same reference texts.Clemson University is a medium-sized, Southeastern, public land-grant state institution with aunique governance system: of the 13 members on the Board of Trustees, seven are life trusteeswho select their successors, and six are appointed by the State Legislature. The overall studentpopulation is 54
situation that provoked their prediction. These situations are designed so that the predictions based upon the most common misconceptions fail to explain what is observed. Students are allowed and encouraged to “mess with” the experiment to verify that the surprising result isn’t a trick. Finally a series of follow-‐up and reflection questions encourages students to incorporate the new information into their existing understanding. Each activity is designed to take about 15 minutes and use materials found commonly in chemical engineering laboratories or available at Wal-‐Mart. These activities have been shown to improve students’ concept
videowas the thermodynamics of elastomers and the video for this stage is yet in production. The coreelement of this material is the recording of a laboratory experiment that produces a³FRXQWHULQWXLWLYH´RXWSXW. For the first task, the video of the experiment stops short of showingthe result and students have to predict that result and provide an explanation associated with theirprediction. Then the video shows the actual results and students move to an application of thedescribed phenomenon and asked to solve it with a minimal support from the instructor. Page 22.891.6Instructional Materials for the Raw VideoWith the purpose of the video
important than one might think. The underlyingquestion for any interview interaction is "Why should we hire you?" Since the student is likelyto be asked this question, a short, prepared answer modeled on the STAR method is in order.11Questionnaire Results Showing Student FeedbackTo determine if students’ attitudes toward the assignment were as positive as I thought, I used aquestionnaire to gather their anonymous assessment of using the STAR method in my classes.The respondents were 35 of 38 seniors in two sections of a technical communication class as partof the senior chemical engineering laboratory. The main part of the questionnaire consisted of13 items that the students rated on a scale from 1 to 5 with 5 being the highest rating. There
Ph.D. work under the guidance of Dr. David Bayless at Ohio University, developing novel catalysts for the efficient production of electricity by solid oxide fuel cells. After receiving his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering in 2008, Dr. Cooper moved to the Raleigh area to serve as a research chemical engineer for RTI International, focusing on energy research. In January 2011, Dr. Cooper joined the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University, where he currently teaches Transport Phenomena and the Unit Operations I and II laboratory sequence. Page 23.878.1
. Liberatore, M.W. Liberatore Rheology Laboratory Home Page. 2010 [cited 2010 August 16]; Available from: http://rheology.mines.edu.10. Sledding failure. [cited 2010 August 16]; Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqLWb0DK1wc11. Windmill/Wind Turbine Explosion. [cited 2010 August 16]; Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nSB1SdVHqQ.12. Flaming Bacon Lance of Death, from Theo Gray's book "Mad Science" [cited 2010 August 16]; Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9dskxN10N0.13. Mythbusters water heater [cited 2010 August 16]; Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmJoyuUJj2Q.14. Water Phase Change - Water to ice in 90 seconds using vacuum [cited 2010 August 16
Willamette Valley (currently a waste product); and 4) A non-woven wool productcurrently sold as a disaster-relief blanket. Activities were developed for a wide range of skill levels todemonstrate the effectiveness of the different technologies, as well as the economics and efficacy ofdeployment of these technologies in the Gulf Coast region (e.g., could the current fishing fleet bedeployed to use these technologies, and how could that be done).Material Presented in this PaperThe format we have chosen to present the material is in the form of two laboratory experiments (oractivities as they are called in K-12) for two distinct grade levels. One is an activity that has been used inthe First Year Engineering Orientation course at Oregon State
in lecture and recognize that these concepts are notsolely academic and can be used in their daily lives. Feedback from the students indicated that in Page 22.1551.14addition to learning the course curriculum, they developed their abilities in teamwork, timemanagement and communication skills, skills crucial to a professional engineer, but oftenunderemphasized in academic settings.References1. Aronson, M.T., R.W. Deitcher, Y. Xi, and R.J. Davis, “New Laboratory Course for Senior-Level ChemicalEngineering Students, Chem. Eng. Educ., 43, 104 (2009)2. Cussler, E.L. “A Different Chemical Industry”, Chem. Eng. Educ., 40, 114 (2006)3. Varma, A
4.11 304 1.58Finally, the researchers examined how the Reversibility activities were implemented, todetermine whether the activities had been carried out as intended and to discern whether thiscould provide further insight into the small effect size. It was found that engineering instructorsimplemented the Reversibility activities in a number of different ways. Some had conducted theactivities during a laboratory or class period, where faculty or TAs were available to directlycoach students (as intended); some assigned the activities instead as homework which wascompleted either in student teams or individually. There was also a group for which there wasno specific information on how the
2021. She has been a part of Dr. Ashlee N Ford Versypt’s research lab in the department of chemical engineering since May 2019. Her interests include biomedical computations, mathematical models, and 3D modeling and printing.Mr. Troy Lamarr Adkins II, Oklahoma State University Troy Adkins graduated in 2021 from Oklahoma State University with a bachelor’s degree in Microbiology & Molecular Biology with an option in Medical Laboratory Sciences. Troy has decided to further his academic career and obtain a masters in Public Health.Mr. Ted Anderson Sperry, Oklahoma State University Ted Sperry graduated with a bachelor’s degree in from Oklahoma State University in 2019, and has since pursued a PhD in Chemical
learning is thetopic of this study. A number of journal articles are available that address teaching core engineering courses,and this situation is true for the teaching of Process Control and Automatic Control. Mostpublished papers (e.g., Edgar et. al., 2006; Khier, et. al., 1996; and Seborg et.al, 2003) addressthe course content and issues like whether frequency response should be included in the course,the proper role of dynamic simulation, and design of physical laboratories. Recently, a fewstudies have addressed teaching and learning methods that could be applied to any appropriatecontrol course content. Rossiter (2014) describes blended learning using YouTube videosdeveloped for students to prepare before class. The class was large
capstone design (72%). Other course types believed to include ESI educationwere: sophomore/junior engineering science/ engineering courses (49%), design-focused coursesin sophomore to senior year (non-capstone; 45%), first-year introductory courses (43%),humanities and/or social science courses (35%), first-year design focused courses (26%),professional issues courses (24%), full course on ethics (15%), or “other” courses/co-curricularactivities (13%). Course types written in as “other” included: laboratory courses, safety course,inter-professional team project course, and “students are required to take a "Technology inSociety" course chosen from a list of ~15 courses that meet this category”.There was a median of three different course types that
other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Dr. Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida Director of Undergraduate Laboratories, Faculty Lecturer, Department of Materials Science and Engi- neeringDr. Amber L. Genau, University of Alabama at Birmingham Dr. Amber Genau is an assistant professor in the Materials Science and Engineering Department at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. She received her BS and MS from Iowa State University and PhD from Northwestern University, all in materials engineering. Before coming to UAB, Dr. Genau spent two years as a
% 0% 1-20 20-50 50-75 75-100 100+ Number of students in section Figure 12. Section sizes in a given courseThe most common section size is 20 to 50 students for both type of introduction courses, but theytend to use different classroom types (Figure 13). Large lecture halls are the most commonclassroom for both course types. Higher fractions of the introduction to engineering courses usesmall classrooms and small group tables, and a higher fraction of the introduction to disciplinecourses use large lecture halls, smart classrooms (multimedia-enhanced), and laboratories. Theinterpretation of the different types of
Gilbuena, Oregon State University Debra Gilbuena is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State University. She currently has research focused on student learning in virtual laboratories. Gilbuena has an M.B.A., an M.S., and four years of industrial experience, including a po- sition in sensor development, an area in which she holds a patent. Her dissertation is focused on the characterization and analysis of feedback in engineering education. She also has interests in the diffusion of effective educational interventions and practices.Dr. John L. Falconer, University of Colorado, BoulderDr. David L. Silverstein, University of Kentucky David L. Silverstein is
collaborative NSF-funded Gender in Science and Engineering project investigating persistence of women in engineering undergraduate programs. Dr. Lord’s industrial experience includes AT&T Bell Laboratories, General Motors Laboratories, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, and SPAWAR Systems Center. She served as the President of the IEEE Education Society in 2009 and 2010.Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has de- grees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active
Hassan, Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaMohammad Zamry Jamaludin, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Mohammad Zamry is a tutor at the Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineer- ing,Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), since 2007. He is one of the class facilitators for a third-year chemical engineering course, Process Control and Dynamics, that employs cooperative problem-based learning (CPBL) as the teaching and learning methodology. He also implements CPBL lab for Process Control Laboratory, a lab course for the final year students. Mohammad Zamry is an active member of engineering education research team in UTM. The team is now very progressive in doing research re- lated to cooperative
cover (2008). She is an active mentor of undergraduate researchers and served as co-PI on an NSF REU site. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activi- ties in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne has been an active member of ASEE’s WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams since 2003 and during this time has contributed to numerous ASEE conference proceedings articles and educational journal publications. Page 23.1061.1
Engineering for last seventeen years. His research interests include Environmental and Surface Chemistry, Catalysis, Advanced Materials, Biomedical Research, Capillary Electrophoresis, Advanced Electrochemistry and Sensors.Jewel Gomes, Lamar University Dr. Gomes currently serves as Postdoctoral Researcher at the Department of Chemical Engineering of Lamar University under Dr. Cocke. His research interests are Atmospheric Chemistry, Matrix Isolation Spectroscopy, Gaussian Simulation, Wastewater Management, Materials Characterization, and Electrochemistry. He is also actively involved with Problem Based Learning (PBL) laboratory of Lamar.Hector Casillas, Lamar University Mr. Moreno is currently
Page 26.1276.14slippery outside surface. When trying to mix something in the bowl it is very important to have atowel underneath it or some sticky rubbery surface otherwise the bowl and the doe usually end upon the floor.INTEGRATE: During our other ENCH course we are not too involved with safety and figuring outdifferent permutations that can happen during a process. This table gives a good starting point tobrainstorm a system so as to make it as safe as possible. One of the previous’ SPITS dealt with anexperimental apparatus that is used in ENCH 225 laboratory. A HazOp table could have beenconstructed to figure out all the possible adverse events that could happen during that laboratory.THINK: Periodically I compete in different sport events
, just focus on the analyzer. time constant for flow control loop on feed stream: τv = 2 s specified mass flow rate to reactor: Fspec = 0.9 kg/s volume of each reactor: Vrxtor = 10 L feed concentration to process: CA0 = 1.0 gmol/L density of all streams: ρ = 0.96 kg/L rate constant for reaction: k = 0.04 L/gmol·s deadtime for analyzer to measure CA exiting second reactor: θA= 300 s Explain the implications of the time it takes the reactors to reach steady state as it compares to the deadtime of the analyzer.Process Safety Example In the laboratory, it is important that cylinders of compressed gas are securely anchored so as to be immovable. If a pressurized cylinder were to fall over, it’s quite likely that the valve
(accessed April 5, 2016).11. McGee, S.; Davis, V. A.: Auburn Abalone Msp. Youtube, 2013.12. TAPPI Nanocellulose Video - Rethink Paper. Youtube, 2011.13. In the News - USDA Forest Products Laboratory Nanocellulose Facility Grand Opening. http://umaine.edu/pdc/in-the-news/fpl-nanocellulose-facility-grand-opening/ (accessed June 15, 2014.
material chemistry (general) water/wastewater process thinking optimization physical chemistry pulp & paper presenting efficiency organic chemistry mining/metallurgy creativity stakeholders inorganic chemistry materials engineering professionalism computers biological/biology pharmaceuticals/medicine brainstorming upscaling fluid mechanics/statics healthcare analysis policy compliance/laws laboratory petroleum products technology manufacturing Interaction with other computers
Laboratory at Bucknell, where they use computational and experimental techniques to better understand the mechanics of musculoskeletal soft tissues and human movement. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Pre and Post Tenure: Perceptions of Requirements and Impediments for Chemical Engineering FacultyAbstractThe tenure process has been both applauded and criticized since its inception in 1915. Whilesome institutions have chosen to move away from the tenure process, it is still prevalent in theUS higher education system. The title of tenured professor is a sought after prize by untenuredfaculty, and those in chemical engineering are no exception. Anecdotally, faculty know that
speciesin a macroscale model. Scaling permits identifying the various reaction regimes and domains thatcan occur on both the micro- and macroscale.2e. Process ModelingScaling analysis is used in teaching a course in process modeling to facilitate the following: toassess what approximations can be made in developing a tractable model for the process; todetermine the appropriate values of the process parameters in designing either numerical,laboratory, or pilot-scale testing of a process; and in determining the optimal minimumparametric representation of the describing equations for the process in order to correlatenumerical or experimental data.3. The Scaling Analysis TechniqueThe ○(1) scaling analysis technique of interest here has been described
and Reading Project guidebook (Rev. ed.). Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.9. Darmofal, D. L., Soderholm, D. H., Brodeur, D. R. (2002). Using Concept Maps and Concept Questions to Enhance Conceptual Understanding. Proceedings, Frontiers in Education Conference, Retrieved from http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2002/index.htm, 16 January 2007 Page 12.153.12
students into chemical engineering over chemistry.Some marginal effects were identified for students majoring in chemistry in terms of scienceclassroom practice. They more often worked on labs and projects, were given the conceptsbefore equations, and worked on small group activities (all p<0.05). These students also had astronger desire to be an expert in a single field (p<0.01) and were less rigid than their chemicalengineering counterparts in their attitudes (p<0.05). Chemistry students' confidence in a scienceclassroom or laboratory may explain why some students who would succeed in chemicalengineering choose chemistry as their major.Chemical engineering students showed a significantly higher interest and confidence in theirphysics
developed an educational module consisting of a demonstration/ laboratory experiment,a transient modeling exercise, and a design exercise of the wort (unfermented beer) cooling stepin the overall home brewing process. In this paper we describe a typical home brewing operation, outline the objectives andconstraints of the wort cooling step, and describe the apparatus we use in the demonstration orlab. The governing model equations are given, and we show how these are used as a theoreticalmodeling exercise for the cooling step, where results can be compared with experimental valuesusing different model assumptions and simplifications. We show how non-dimensional versionof the model equations are used to show how the magnitude of different