Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in K-12 and the First Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Paper ID #29057The Design and Impact of a Combined Makerspace, Wet Lab, andInstructional Design Studio for Chemical Engineering CurriculumProf. Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Associate Professor (Lecturer) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory, capstone laboratory, first year design laboratory, and the introduction to chemical engineering. His research interests focus

Conference Session

Work in Progress: Hands-on Activities

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ilhem F. Hakem, Carnegie Mellon University; Richard Tang, Carnegie Mellon University; Michael R. Bockstaller, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

of Materials Sci- ence Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) as Visiting Professor in 2005. Before joining CMU, Dr. Hakem made several short and long-term visits as a Visiting Professor at l’Institut Charles Sadron (Strasbourg, France), Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research (Mainz, Germany) and Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne, USA) where she worked on mean field theory applied to uncharged poly- mers and polyelectrolyte systems and small-angle neutron scattering of amphiphilic polymer systems in the presence of electrolytes, at the Intense Pulsed Neutron Source (IPNS). Dr. Ilhem F. Hakem joined the Colloids, Polymers and Surfaces (CPS) Program and the Department of Chemical Engineering at

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in the Junior and Senior Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sarah A Wilson, University of Kentucky; Samira M. Azarin Azarin, University of Minnesota; Christopher Barr, University of Michigan; Janie Brennan, Washington University in St. Louis; Tracy L. Carter, Northeastern University; Amy J Karlsson, University of Maryland

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum.Prof. Samira M. Azarin Azarin, University of Minnesota Samira Azarin is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at the University of Minnesota. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from the

Conference Session

Work in Progress: Assessment, Evaluation and Hands-on Activities

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University; Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Joana Marques Melo, Purdue University; Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

experts in teaching and research directly related to the light hydrocarbon industry and shalefuel conversion. Second, we will send the survey to our list of 26 industrial partners. Thesepartners range from multinational oil and gas companies to boutique consulting and advisoryfirms focusing on oil and gas, energy, and chemicals. This list also includes national laboratories(i.e., Argonne, Oak Ridge, Pacific Northwest, and Sandia), international universities, andfoundations. The list will also be distributed through networks of the CISTAR faculty to expertsin the field. Together, this list encompasses a wide range of experts across a number of divisions.If the first survey reveals a lack of input from a particular sector, purposeful sampling will

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in the Sophomore Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky; Sarah A Wilson, University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

(Taxol) through the use of plant cell cultures from the Taxus Yew Tree. Throughout her time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Student Performance in an Online Chemical Engineering

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in K-12 and the First Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Robert P. Hesketh, Rowan University; Martha Grover, Georgia Institute of Technology; David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

faculty (59%) compared to a required course outside of chemical engineering (24%). In the comments to this question there were many departments that taught statistics in a laboratory course such as unit operations (25 out of 93). What was not ascertained in this survey was the statistics topics that were taught in these courses. Perhaps a future survey on this subject should be conducted to determine what is taught in universities and what topics are used by industry. 50 45 40 Percent Response 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in K-12 and the First Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ashlee N Ford Versypt, Oklahoma State University; Daria Khvostichenko, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

such as EngineeringWithout Borders6, and collegiate engineering design and laboratory courses7-12. Engineering-related curricula about water have been developed for use in K-12 classrooms and outreachevents13-15. We sought to develop inexpensive activities using household materials that coulddemonstrate chemical engineering separations concepts connected to our teaching and researchinterests in fluid mechanics, mass transfer, and biomedical engineering. Additionally, wedeveloped a physical game as an analogy for particle motions through pores of different sizeswith various surface properties. We have not seen documentation of a similar game in any of thefiltration educational materials published or distributed elsewhere. The lesson plan

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in the Sophomore Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tracy Q Gardner, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

systems and the like tostudents’ homes. The Unit Operations Laboratory course at Mines is an outlier in many ways(number of experiments run, way in which it is administered) amongst Unit Ops coursesnationally [7] and has a longstanding history of being the most highly touted part of our degree,by alumni, faculty, and recruiters alike. [7]-[11] Safely operating equipment, learning how totroubleshoot a set-up when it is not functioning as expected, hearing and feeling what happenswhen a pump cavitates or a fluid system experiences water hammer are just a few examples oflearning outcomes students would mostly or entirely miss with only virtual labs in place ofhands-on labs. Gaining the confidence in their own ability as engineers through turning

Conference Session

Work in Progress: Hands-on Activities

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Negar Beheshti Pour, University of California - Berkeley; David B. Thiessen, Washington State University; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University; Kitana Kaiphanliam, Washington State University; Aminul Islam Khan, Washington State University; Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University; Olivia Reynolds, Washington State University; Katelyn Dahlke, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Olufunso Oje, Washington State University; Jacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Campbell University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

things: Simple experiments in the thermal and fluid sciences, in 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Austin, Texas.7. Moor, S., and Piergiovanni, P., Experiments in the classroom: Examples of inductive learning with classroom friendly laboratory kits, in 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Nashville, Tennessee.8. Connor, J., Goff, R., Assessment of providing in-class, hands-on, activities to Virginia Tech’s first year engineering students, in 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings. Albuquerque, New Mexico.9. Garrison, L., Garrison, T., A demo every day: Bringing fluid mechanics to life, in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Seattle, Washington.10

Conference Session

Work in Progress: Hands-on Activities

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Katelyn Dahlke, Washington State University; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University; Jacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Campbell University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University; David B. Thiessen, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

a specific laboratory environment.These later interventions do not help their understanding when they are initially taught theseconcepts. To address this, miniaturized hands-on modules have been developed to compelstudent engagement in sophomore and junior level engineering classes, specifically within theheat transfer and fluid mechanics classroom context. These highly visual low-cost desktoplearning modules (LC-DLMs) have been shown to improve student understanding compared topassive lectures, especially at higher Bloom’s levels such as evaluation and creation [4-5].Even with significant data to support the fact that active learning leads to more cognitive gainscompared to traditional lecture-based teaching, there are still perceived

Conference Session

Course Design, Course Projects, and Student Perceptions in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University; Amy F. Golightly, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 210-216.5. Leroy, N., and P. Bressoux. 2016. Does amotivation matter more than motivation in predicting mathematics learning gains? A longitudinal study of sixth-grade students in France. Contemporary Educational Psychology 44-45: 41-53.6. Vigeant, M., D. Silverstein, K. Dahm, L. Ford, J. Cole, and L. Landherr. 2018. How we teach: Unit Operations Laboratory. Proceedings of American Association for Engineering Education.7. Vigeant, M., M. Prince, K. Nottis, and A. Golightly. 2018. Curious about student curiosity: Implications of pedagogical approach for students’ mindset. Proceedings of American Association for Engineering

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in the Sophomore Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matthew W Liberatore, The University of Toledo; Megan Davidson, The University of Toledo; Kayla Chapman

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

size of buttons or ads on ascreen has been thoroughly studied and optimized – in many cases to increase revenues [2]. Ingeneral, big data comes from interactivity, i.e., either a person clicking or scrolling on a webpageor sensors in either a home or chemical plant. In the same vein, combining interactivity withtextbooks has begun to create big data in the engineering classroom.Student-centered teaching techniques are commonly called active learning [3-8]. This type ofpedagogy focuses on students learning by doing in many cases. Despite the large body of evidencesupporting these best practices of teaching, adoption is not the norm. While not adopting the newstandard techniques in laboratory research leaves faculty behind, the same expectation

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in K-12 and the First Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laura P Ford, The University of Tulsa; Janie Brennan, Washington University in St. Louis; Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Marnie V Jamieson, University of Alberta; Lucas James Landherr, Northeastern University; David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky; Bruce K Vaughen P.E., American Institute of Chemical Engineers; Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University; Stephen Ward Thiel P.E., University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

% 0% 1-20 20-50 50-75 75-100 100+ Number of students in section Figure 12. Section sizes in a given courseThe most common section size is 20 to 50 students for both type of introduction courses, but theytend to use different classroom types (Figure 13). Large lecture halls are the most commonclassroom for both course types. Higher fractions of the introduction to engineering courses usesmall classrooms and small group tables, and a higher fraction of the introduction to disciplinecourses use large lecture halls, smart classrooms (multimedia-enhanced), and laboratories. Theinterpretation of the different types of

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in the Sophomore Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matheus Oliveira Cassol, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Jonathan Verrett P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

material chemistry (general) water/wastewater process thinking optimization physical chemistry pulp & paper presenting efficiency organic chemistry mining/metallurgy creativity stakeholders inorganic chemistry materials engineering professionalism computers biological/biology pharmaceuticals/medicine brainstorming upscaling fluid mechanics/statics healthcare analysis policy compliance/laws laboratory petroleum products technology manufacturing Interaction with other computers

Conference Session

Perceptions, Reflections, Collaborations, and Student Support in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University; Nicholas Tymvios, Bucknell University; Eliana Christou, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Benjamin B Wheatley, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Laboratory at Bucknell, where they use computational and experimental techniques to better understand the mechanics of musculoskeletal soft tissues and human movement. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Pre and Post Tenure: Perceptions of Requirements and Impediments for Chemical Engineering FacultyAbstractThe tenure process has been both applauded and criticized since its inception in 1915. Whilesome institutions have chosen to move away from the tenure process, it is still prevalent in theUS higher education system. The title of tenured professor is a sought after prize by untenuredfaculty, and those in chemical engineering are no exception. Anecdotally, faculty know that

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in the Junior and Senior Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michael David Mau Barankin, Colorado School of Mines; Kevin J Cash, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

University of Applied Sciences in Groningen, where he taught both in Dutch and in English. During this time his primary teaching and course develop- ment responsibilities were wide-ranging, but included running the Unit Operations laboratory, introducing Aspen Plus software to the curriculum, and developing a course for a new M.S. program on Renewable Energy (EUREC). In conjunction with his teaching appointment, he supervised dozens of internships (a part of the curriculum at the Hanze), and a number of undergraduate research projects with the Energy Knowledge Center (EKC) as well as a master’s thesis. In 2016, Dr. Barankin returned to the US to teach at the Colorado School of Mines. His primary teaching and course

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in the Junior and Senior Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jeffrey Stransky, Rowan University; Landon Bassett, University of Connecticut; Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Engineering Education - History and Results.” AIChE.vol. 28, no.2. DOI 10.1002/prs.10315. [Accessed April 13, 2009].[17] US Chemical Safety Board, "T2 Laboratories, Inc. Runaway Reaction," InvestigationReport. No. 2008-3-I-FL. Sept. 2009.[18] B. Vaughen, "An Approach to Help Departments Meet the New ABET Process SafetyRequirements," Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 129-134. 2012.[19] ABET. (2018). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018 – 2019. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3 [Accessed Jan 9 2020].[20] S. Dee, "Process Safety in the classroom: The current state of chemical engineeringprograms at US universities," American