, it is theadvisor’s responsibility to provide research funding and student funding when students are notsupported by other scholarship/fellowship funding. The funding is therefore, a big driver for thework the students perform and learn about. While the structure has been in place for many years,any person who has obtained a degree in chemical engineering can tell you that outside of theclasses, the quality of the experience varies. Every advisor stresses different skills or takes adifferent approach to teaching. However, when the degree is awarded, all students are expectedto be able to lead projects, manage teams, have strong oral and written communication,teamwork, problem-solving skills, economic skills, and be aware of their professional
Engineering at the University of California, Davis. Dr. White has been a faculty member at UC Davis since 2015, and he teaches process design and economics, process safety, bioseparations, and senior laboratory courses. He has helped lead the creation of the CHEM E CAD and Industrial Automation club at UC Davis, and he has sought to develop authentic, project-based learning experiences for his students in his courses. Dr. White also serves as the accreditation lead for the chemical engineering program at UC Davis. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Impact of The Design of Coffee, A General Education Chemical Engineering Course, on Students’ Decisions to Major in STEM
students to ask questions about course-related material [6, 17-20]. Themost common interventions to increase SB in engineering majors are related to the technicaldiscipline. Not surprisingly, most engineering education interventions reported in the literaturetarget first-year engineering women and first-generation/low-income students to increase theirSB and engineering identity. Some intervention examples to retain this population of studentsinclude faculty and peer-mentoring, participation in internships with local STEM companies[21], interviewing a person of color in STEM [22], use of makerspaces for completing designprojects [23], summer bridge programs [24], first-year engineering student success course [25],and sociotechnical design projects
when possible. When possible, based on theresearch interests of the students and faculty, CCLSRM students were paired with REU studentsin the same lab, otherwise the CCLSRM students were grouped together in the same lab. Studentswere also placed in the same lab as faculty with similar backgrounds when appropriate. Afterassigning the students an advisor it was left to the advisor to develop a project for the student thatfit their background and research interests. The program remained involved outside the lab byengaging with the students weekly for weekly research meetings, hosting an industry visit, andconnecting students to professional development dinner and dialogue sessions offered by theUniversity of Arkansas for all REU programs on
). Project Leader (1987-92). Principal Researcher (1992-95). Specialty Products Business Leader (1995-99)Hseen BaledMichael McMahon ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Team Building Games to Reinforce the Training of Chemical Engineering Students in Team Skills Based on Collaboration LeadershipIntroductionTeam building games or activities are popular at work [1] - [3], and college [4]. Team games arecreative activities that simulate team performance at relatively simple and engaging tasks butoffering practice and reflections to apply to real job situations. They can be used when starting anew team project or sometimes later to address conflicts, to encourage positive attitudes, or tounveil new
of giving agency to students to offerfeedback to each other throughout the life of a project. However, it can be hard to abstractindividual contributions to team progress in project-based learning. The more complex theproject, the more functions the team performs, resulting in overlapping roles andresponsibilities [25]. A key factor here is allowing sufficient time between assessments forfeedback to be implemented, allowing members the chance to revise their strategies [16].Some of these challenges can be addressed through the use of templates, such as IDEALS[26], that provides a comprehensive assessment schema for team activities. The involvementof facilitators and teachers also needs to be considered, particularly the amount ofintervention
semi-controlled learning environment thuspracticing critical thinking, knowledge integration, and application skills.Laboratory teaching is resource intensive, especially in chemical engineering Unit Ops Lab(UOL) courses where projects, equipment and expectations often resemble industrial operationalenvironments. The Unit Operations Laboratory is a place where students gain hands-onexperience while applying fundamental chemical engineering concepts and principles to solveand investigate problems associated with pipe, pump and valve systems, chemical reactorsystems, heat and refrigeration management, water treatment, solid-liquid/vapour-liquidseparation, and process equilibrium. Due to large size and complexity in design, there are usuallyonly
students easy, perhaps even commonplace, making faculty rethink globalcooperation in higher education [19, 20].The unique nature of capstone engineering courses resulted in additional challenges towardeffective delivery during the pandemic, with one faculty member commenting “lack of in-persondiscussions, team collaboration and time spent in the lab all have negative impacts on the project”[21]. Many adaptations were made during the pandemic to allow students to effectively work onchemical engineering capstone projects as part of a team, such as focusing on design tasks usingsimulation tools (e.g. ASPEN) and managing group meetings through video conferencing software(e.g. Google Meet) [22]. It is possible that knowledge of these practices
Swapana Subbarao Jerpoth, Rowan University Swapana S. Jerpoth received her B.Tech degree in Chemical Engineering from Priyadarshini Institute of Engineering and Technology, India in 2017, and her M.Tech degree in Petrochemical Engineering from Laxminarayan Institute of Technology, India in 2019. SMr. David Anthony Theuma, Rowan University I am a recent chemical engineering graduate of Rowan University looking for employment in the chemical manufacturing, project engineering, or engineering consulting industries. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #43351Sean Curtis, Rowan
all the errors) a long and complex program that I had written, and make it work7. I can find ways of overcoming the problem if I get stuck at a point while working on a programming project.8. I can come up with a suitable strategy for a given programming project in a short time.9. I can mentally trace through the execution of a long, complex, multi-file program given to me.10. I can rewrite lengthy confusing portions of code to be more readable and clear.Figure 1: Survey given to undergraduate students at the beginning of each semester afterwards(semesters 5,6,7).Part 2: These questions are here to help me see how much you remember, as well as guide yourlearning about how you can use knowledge for ChE2216 in your current course. This
40,000 undergraduate students enrolled inChE that year[1]. Despite these numbers, ChE undergraduate enrollment has been described ascyclic. The projected forecast is a new decline in enrollment for the next couple of years as aconsequence of factors including the dominant industry, job offer and demand, and a processcontrol-related oscillatory response influenced by graduation times, complex curricula, andsalary reward[2].Additionally, ChE freshmen matriculation has declined due to students leaving their major toother perceived “less pollutant” engineering disciplines such as those of civil, biomedical, andenvironmental. This poses a challenge for student retention, and it may be the result ofmisconceptions that chemical engineers will end up
Washington State University since 1994. His research interests include fluid physics, acoustics, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: Glucose Analyzer Learning Module for the Classroom Fosbre, RJ, Dutta, P, Thiessen, DB, Van Wie, BJ Washington State University Violand School of Chemical Engineering and BioengineeringFosbre, RJ, Dutta, P, Thiessen, DB, Van Wie, BJ, Work in Progress: Glucose Analyzer LearningModule for the Classroom, American Society for Engineering Education, June 23-26, 2024,Portland, OR The goal of the greater project is to provide students with hands-on learning experienceswhile
heightened students' awarenessof real-world scenarios. They recognized that real-world problems often begin in an undefinedstate and require working backwards to find solutions. This realization underscored the practicalvalue of the training they received through PSS.Table 2. Summary of selected students’ responses (10 out of 12 students responded). Q1: What was the most important information you learned from the not-well-defined or open-ending problem-solving session? A1: Student A: Get creative and think outside the box. Student B: The importance of conducting research before starting a project. Student C: You must establish some parameters and make some assumptions to proceed. Student D: These types of problems
successful in the course. The constraints of the class itself need to be carefullyconsidered. Specifically, there were CMs that were difficult for students to complete within a 50-minute quiz.SBG has the potential to place each individual metric (or skill) into its own individual silowithout giving students the opportunities to synthesize material from different areas of the class.Considering both the time constraints for quizzes and the potential of ‘siloing’ metrics, it may bebeneficial to develop metrics that can be completed outside of the class, potentially in the formof a project. This project could serve to integrate concepts from multiple areas of the class sostudents are not learning specific skills in a vacuum. Finally, as early-career
,troubleshooting, data analysis, written and oral communication, and teaming [6]. As it wasperceived based on interactions with students in the laboratory course, the Chemical Engineeringlaboratory sequence at a small midwestern institution needed intentional scaffolding toencourage students to practice the various skills associated with the laboratory course.Part of this curricular revision involved reviewing the structure of the introductory laboratorycourse. The original course had students completing a laboratory project that lasted an entireacademic term while also attending a largely disconnected laboratory lecture course. The revisedcourse converted the lecture course into a series of weekly topical modules, with in-laboratoryactivities being
. 2013 2023 100 90 80 70 % Departments 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Courses Figure 4. Percent of departments offering different categories of electives over the past two years, 70 respondentsAt the 42 institutions offering advanced core electives, the most popular electives were advancedtransport and research/projects, as shown in Figure 5. The “other” category included 7% whooffered engineering math/statistics as an advanced core elective
Education where she has also served in key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, received the College of Engineering Graduate Student Mentor Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for
projects.This learning theory emphasizes how students can be agents of their own learning [18], [19]. Constructivismstates that knowledge is acquired through four assumptions. ● Learning involves active cognitive processing. ● Learning is adaptive. ● Learning is subjective and not objective and ● Learning involves both social and individual processes.In this project, constructivist learning theory was used.Constructivist Learning Theory Using the 5E Model.The 5E model is built around a structured sequence, and it is designed as a functional way for teachers toimplement constructivist theory. The 5Es serve as an aid for instructors to structure a new learning experiencein a systematic way that is consistent with a constructivist view [20
CTCs with ~1CTC for every 100,000 red blood cells (RBCs). This topic was selected because of the strongclinical significance, but also because some of the technologies in development to separate cancercells from other cells (e.g., RBCs and other healthy cells found in the vasculature) use a size- orshape-based separation approach which nicely links to one of the areas of expertise of chemicalengineers (which is highlighted in the lecture).Figure 1. Organization and lecture materials for Bioengineering 101. (A) Organization of theactivity included six days of in-class instruction by the author with each day having a specificfocus. (B) Design project statement and criteria the student teams needed to follow. (C) Summaryof the allowed materials
sought to develop authentic, project-based learning experiences for his students in his courses. Dr. White also serves as the accreditation lead for the chemical engineering program at UC Davis.Sara Sweeney, University of California, Davis Undergraduate Program Coordinator ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Wellness Course for Engineering StudentsAbstractEngineering programs are often rigorous, with high expectations and workload. As a result, poorself-care habits might be perceived as part of the engineering identity, where rigor, stress, andsuffering are considered norms of being an engineer. This perception has been studied byscientists, and literature data suggests
regenerate human tissues [2]. Basedon these important benefits to human health, biomaterials are projected to have global revenues of$348.4 billion by 2027 [3] and the employment of bioengineers is projected to increase by 6% by2030 [4]. To satisfy these increasing societal and economic demands for biomaterials, we mustengage students at a young age to join the field of biomaterials.Bioadhesives are an important class of biomaterials, designed to adhere biological componentstogether for tissue repair [5]. In a clinical setting, bioadhesives are used to stop internal fluid leaks[6] and aid in healing surgical wounds [7]. Additionally, scientists and engineers have designedexperimental bioadhesives to seal soft tissue defects and repair orthopaedic
identityWith the evolution and expansion of the chemical industry, the gap between academia andindustry is broadened. The skills that the workforce expected from practicing engineers are nottaught in the typical chemical engineering undergraduate core curriculum. Students become lessengaged and less motivated by not seeing the applications of course content in their courses.Therefore, they struggle to identify with the field and develop skills necessary for the workplace.This NSF PFE: RIEF project aims to bridge the gap by implementing industry-relevantcontemporary problems into a sophomore chemical engineering course.The project’s main goal is to understand how the implementation impacts students’ engineeringidentity and self-efficacy development. We
Paper ID #39388Board 32: Work in Progress: A Laboratory Platform for Learning forChemical EngineeringBenjamin Miles Phillips, Baylor University Ben Phillips is a PhD Candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University, working as a Research Assistant in the Baylor Energy And Renewable Systems (BEARS) Lab. His research interests are in Energy Storage and Renewable Systems, with projects focused in Concentrated Solar Thermal Energy Storage. He aspires to become a lecturer in the field of Chemical or Mechanical Engineering.Dr. Anne Marie Spence, Baylor University Clinical Professor Mechanical
periods of flexibility in deadlines may be aneffective choice to deal with these circumstances. Too much flexibility can lead to students nevercompleting work at all: students without enough scaffolding working through projects andcourses can easily procrastinate significant chunks of work for so long that it is impossible tosufficiently complete work by the end of the semester. Having regular deadlines is a “small-teaching intervention” that can in part help students to avoid academic procrastination. Researchalso shows correlations between assignment submission times and final grades (generally, thosewho submit earlier perform better in a course than those who submit at the deadline or later) andbetween assignment submission times and self
Paper ID #42224Leveraging a token economy system to motivate concept practice in a fluiddynamics classroom.Mr. Sanha Kim, University of Virginia Sanha Kim is a 4th-year chemical engineering Ph.D. student in the Ford Group at University of Virginia. His current research project revolves around modeling the mobility and growth of pathogenic bacteria in porous media. His educational scholarship interests are focused around instructional strategies that enhance the quality and quantity of student engagement with class material.Steven R Caliari, University of VirginiaDr. Roseanne M Ford, University of Virginia Roseanne M. Ford
engineering topics across the curriculum. • Pick a file from our set of templates. Play with the interface and reflect on how to adapt for your purposes: lecture/in-class activity, homework, group projects, other.Conclusions and reflections for the futureThe workshop and materials described in this paper were developed to provide faculty withresources for incorporating modern computational tools and computational thinking into theirclassrooms through lecture materials, interactive textbook-like content, case studies, in-classactivities, homework, and course projects. We focused on instructing and equipping chemicalengineering faculty rather than students to scale our efforts to reach the target student audiencefor the overall goal of
could make fair comparisons when evaluating the demonstrations’ efficacy.DiscussionIn implementing this intervention, we observed some areas we can improve upon in the future.Because few students had Wolfram Player, the software that runs these demonstrations, alreadyinstalled on their computers, some recitation time was spent on the installation and downloadingprocess. In future semesters, we would ask students to download the software ahead of time.Once the demonstrations are finalized, we can also contribute them to the WolframDemonstrations Project library [5] for online access through web browsers.In addition, these recitations were not directly overseen by the instructor, to give students timewith their peers and student TA to explore
course for 43 chemical engineering students. One of theauthors (Visco) was the sole instructor for the course.In this course, students were placed in teams of four (one group had only three students) at thebeginning of the semester using default settings from CATME. [9] These teams sat together inclass (at tables of four) and worked together on course projects, group-specific homeworkproblems and in-class problems. The course had three in-class exams as well as a final exam.Data was collected over the first two exams only due to project time constraints.Data CollectionThe University of Akron Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the use of questionnairesfor this study. Students were able to opt out of answering any of the questionnaires used
submitting a knowledge inventory and remediation plan. Students create a glossary of termsand concepts from the class and rank them by their level of understanding. Recent iterations ofthe remediation plan also include reflections on emotions and support networks.In February 2023, the project team will scale the interventions to freshman-level IntroductoryProgramming, which has 400 students and the college’s highest fail/withdrawal rate. The largesample size will enable more robust statistics to correlate exam scores, intervention rubric items,and surveys on assignment effectiveness. Piloting interventions in various environments andclasses will establish best pedagogical practices that minimize instructors’ workload and decisionfatigue. The
involves the contribution of studentsand faculty from chemical engineering, electrical engineering, and computer sciences, as a partof a Capstone design project looking for innovations on undergraduate engineering education.The chemical engineering lab-on-a-kit will contribute to modernize unit operations laboratoriesand provide opportunities for K-12 experimental demonstrations and outreach initiatives.IntroductionLaboratory-based courses provide engineering students with important skills including hands-onexperimentation, team dynamics, troubleshooting, and communications. These and other skillshave been recognized as well-defined pillars supporting the relevance of practical work inengineering majors[1], [2]. Unit operations laboratories (UOLs