Page 14.1024.2the obligation of professional engineers to attain competence in their discipline of practice—andto subsequently maintain and grow their knowledge to keep pace with advances in mathematics,science, technology, and engineering.Many in the engineering profession believe that this is about the very survival of engineering as alearned profession. The professional engineer is in jeopardy of being categorized as atechnologist or technician—led and managed by individuals external to the engineeringprofession. Several decades ago, almost all state DOT directors were P.E.’s. Now, only aboutone-third are P.E.’s. This is a continuing trend, and it is a trend that is contrary to the interest ofthe public health, safety, and welfare—as public
Society of Civil Engineers, where he currently chairs the Executive Committee of the ASCE Global Center of Excellence in Computing. He also serves as a corresponding member on the ASCE International Activities Committee, and on the ASCE Body of Knowledge II Committee. He holds the B.Sc., M.Sc., and Ph.D. degrees from the Warsaw University of Technology. In 2004 he received the ASCE Computing in Civil Engineering Award, and in 2006 he received the Intelligent Computing in Engineering Award from the European Group for Intelligent Computing in Civil Engineering.Michael Bronzini, George Mason University Michael S. Bronzini currently holds the Dewberry Chair in Civil, Environmental, and
online portion of the class easy to follow, and thought that the blended learning experiencewas helpful. Just over 90% stated that the course met the stated objectives. The survey alsoindicated that the workbook/textbook isn’t as useful as it could be.Question 7’s apparent low satisfaction by the students regarding future use of the BentleyLEARN Server may stem from two sources. First, during the initial registration for the onlinecourses there were a few problems with students signing up for the wrong course, something notdiscovered until the regular weekly reports was developed. Second, because the BentleyLEARN Server must track all student activities within an online course, there was not factility toallow the student to print out the course
others have noted5. Further use in CE492 will establish historical data that willassist in identifying the effectiveness of changes to address program shortcomings.References1. Meyer, K., Morris, M., Estes, A., and Ressler, S. “How to Kill Two Birds with One Stone – Assigning Grades and Assessing Program Goals at the Same Time.” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. American Society for Engineering Education. June 2005. Session 1834.2. Welch, R., Estes, A., Winget, D., “Assessment of Squishier Outcomes: Open-Ended Problem Solving through Client-Based Projects,” Proceedings of the 2005 ABET National Conference. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. November 2005.3. Farmer, D.W
Civil Engineer for the Future, First Edition. (2004) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA.30 Levels of Achievement Applicable to the Body of Knowledge Required for Entry into the Practice of Civil Engineering at the Professional Level. (2005) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA.31 Bloom, B. S., M. D. Englehart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company, New York, NY.32 Krathwohl, D. R., B. S. Bloom, and B. B. Masia. 1964. The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain, David McKay
andTeaching Sustainable Design and Construction,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006.6 ASCE. 2008. Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the CivilEngineer for the Future, Second Edition,https://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/Education_and_Careers/Body_of_Knowledge/Content_Pieces/body-of-knowledge.pdf, accessed January 2019.7 D. R. Lynch, W. E. Kelly, M. K. Jha, and R. S. Harichandran, “Implementing Sustainability inthe Engineering Curriculum: Realizing the ASCE Body of Knowledge,” Proceedings of the 2007American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2007.8 ABET, 2018, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019
are exacerbated by general fatigue experiencedby students enrolled in rigorous engineering programs, where there are high expectations forstudent work completed outside of instructional contact hours. Educators must thus be vigilantin monitoring the level of interest they engender in their students during lectures4.One solution as to how to maintain interest is to develop demonstrations to accompanytraditional lecture materials, thereby encouraging students to interact and engage in hands-onlearning. Hong5 noticed that many structural engineering students are too focused on “problem-solving procedure[s]” with limited attention to developing true understanding. In response,Hong proposes active learning techniques with emphasis on “visual
& Exposition, Seattle, WA, June.3. Stewart, J., Van Kirk, J., and Rowell, R. (1979). Concept maps: a tool for use in biology teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 41 (3), 171-175.4. Novak, J.D. (1998). Learning Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahway, NJ.5. Novak, J.D., and Canas, A. J. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Technical Report, IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 2008-01.6. Ingec, S. K. (2009). Analysing Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool in Teaching Physics and Comparison with Achievement Tests. International Journal of Science
.[8] P. S. Steif and J. A. Dantzler, "A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 363-371, 2005.[9] G. L. Gray, F. Costanzo, D. Evans, P. Cornwell, B. Self, and J. L. Lane, "The dynamics concept inventory assessment test: A progress report and some results," in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.[10] M. Hohenwarter and J. Preiner, "Dynamic Mathematics with GeoGebra," The Journal of Online Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. Volume 7, March 2007 2007.Appendix AFigure 2: Catalog of drop-down menus in the 2D Geometry view of Geogebra (image acquiredfrom http://www.jensilvermath.com/2013/08/07
course? (3) What are the characteristics of effective distant students and teachers? (4) How important is teacher-student and student-student interaction in the distance education process, and in what form(s) can this interaction most effectively take place? (5) How do we develop a GIS distance learning environment, e.g., web-GIS, to enhance the effectiveness? (6) How do we develop an empirical distance education module for different target groups and different purposes?The most frequent complaints from the students are web-based laboratory when the studentsused a modem-based home computer due to the too slow Internet transportation speed for largeimages. After 2004, we
, J. Flora, C. Pierce, A. Nichols, W. Graf, and B. Timmerman. Introducing theenvironments for fostering effective critical thinking (effects). Proceedings of the InternationalModal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL, February 4-8, 2008, 2008. Page 23.303.83. I.W. Wait. Solar Power System Design to Promote Critical Thinking in Freshman Engineering Students.Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13, 2012.4. F.L. Mannering and S.S. Washburn. Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic Analysis, 5th Edition. JohnWiley & Sons, 2012.5. A.H-S. Ang and W.H. Tang. Probability Concepts in
Kingdom recognizes three kinds of engineering competence12 including: Engineering Technician (EngTech); Incorporated Engineer (IEng); and Chartered Engineer (CENG).This program is administered by the United Kingdom’s Engineering Council.In the late 1990’s Great Britain increased the requirements for Chartered Engineer status toinclude “an accredited Bachelors degree with honours in engineering or technology plus either amaster’s degree accredited by a professional engineering institution, or appropriate furtherlearning to the master’s level”. Alternatively a candidate could complete an accreditedintegrated MEng degree. Previously Chartered Engineers were not required to completeadvanced education. Engineers not completing advanced
, "Development of an on‐line system to help students successfully solve statics problems," in American Society for Engineering Education, 2009. [4] DeVore, Statics Tutor, New Jersey: Prentice‐Hall, 2000. [5] J. Iano, Shaping Structures: Statics, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998. [6] ISDC, "BEST Statics," [Online]. Available: web.umr.edu/~bestmech/preview.html. [7] E. Anderson, R. Taraban and S. Roberstson, "M‐Model: A Mental Model based Online Homework Tool," Journal of Online Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 2, 2010. [8] J. Lux and B. Davidson, "Guildelines for the development of computer‐based instruction modules for science and engineering," Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 2003. [9] N. Hubing, D
and World Reports http://www.usnews.com/rankings, 2010.10 Lynch, D. R., Russell, J. S., Mason, J. M. and Evans, J. C. “Claims on the Foundation: Professionalism and its Liberal Base,” ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Volume 135, Issue 3, pp. 109-116 (July 2009).11 Lynch, D. R., Russell, J. S., Evans, J. C. and Sutterer, K. G. (2008), “Beyond the Cognitive: The Affective Domain, Values and Achievement of the Vision,” ASCE J. of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol.135, No.1, pp.47-56. (January 2009).12 The Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025, ASCE, 2007
Average Void Ratio 0.57 0.77 Average Relative Density (%) 76 12 Average Porosity 0.36 0.44The method used to prepare the soil specimen with the funnel required approximately 35 kg ofsand (Figure 3). The tank was filled by pouring sand slowly from the funnel at approximately25.4 mm (1 in.) above the base of the container. To ensure the sand was poured evenly in rows,the funnel was moved at a rate at approximately 15 cm/s (6 in/s). Once 25.4 mm of sand coveredthe entire base of the tank, the funnel was raised approximately 25.4 mm to allow for constantfalling distance. The funnel’s direction of motion was also positioned
engineering majors attended an SLS session.Bibliography1. Institute of Education Sciences (IES), Highlights from PISA 2006: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Science and Mathematics Literacy in an International Context, U.S. Department of Education NCES 2008- 016, December 2007.2. Fadali, M. S., Robinson, M., and McNichols, K., ‘‘Teaching Engineering to K–12 Students Using Role Playing Games,’’ Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO.3. Abbitt, J. D., III, and Carroll, B. F., ‘‘Applied Aerodynamics Experience for Secondary Science Teachers and Students,’’ Journal of Engineering Education, 1993 v.82 (3), 185–188.4. Jeffers, A., Safferman, A., and Safferman, S., “Understanding K-12 Engineering
evaluation plan over successiveyears to develop a model for trans-disciplinary design courses at SU and beyond.AcknowledgementsThis work was carried out with the support of NSF 08-610- Innovations in Page 15.746.10Engineering Education, Curriculum, and Infrastructure (IEECI) Award EEC-0935168,and the support of the Syracuse University School of Architecture and the L. C. SmithCollege of Engineering and Computer Science at Syracuse University.BibliographyAtman, C. J. Adams, R. S. Cardella, M. E. Turns, J. Mosborg, S. Saleem, J. 2007 Engineering DesignProcesses: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4)pg
include a review of published technicalliterature. The MS projects described herein utilized local, state, and national design codes ormanuals. The partnership based projects provide students with more code experience and moreagency/client interactions than MS project from other sources.Figure 6. Maximum live load envelope along entire span of bridge. Maximum moment is 1253kip-ft at support 2, minimum moment is -1312 kip-ft at 231.65 ft.Finally, there is a learning outcome to provide the ability to provide solution(s) to a real-worldcivil engineering problem in one of the following four recognized major civil engineering areas:environmental and water resources engineering, geotechnical engineering, structural engineering,and transportation
draft papers from the instructor.References1. American Society of Civil Engineers, (2008). Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century,Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, Second Edition, ASCE Press, Reston, VA.2. Nelson, S. (2003). “Engineering and Technology Student Perceptions of Collaborative Writing Practices,” IEEETransactions on Professional Communications, Vol. 46, No. 4, 265-276.3. FitzPatrick, K. A. (2004). “An Investigative Laboratory Course in Human Physiology Using ComputerTechnology and Collaborative Writing,” Adv Physiol Educ, 28: 112-119.4. Gragson, D. E. and Hagen, J. P. (2010). “Developing Technical Writing Skills in the Physical ChemistryLaboratory: A Progressive Approach Employing Peer Review,” Journal
alsoincreases. Equation 7 is the strain gauge model developed in this paper. This model shows therelationship between voltage and strain and is only applicable to elastic range. 𝑆 = 0.0099𝑉 − 0.0023 (7)Where ‘S’ is strain and ‘V’ is voltage. Voltage and Strain Relationship 0.00450 0.00400 0.00350 0.00300 Strain 0.00250 0.00200 0.00150 0.00100 0.00050 0.00000 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65
., Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Economy, D. R. and Kennedy, M. S. (2016), Measuring UndergraduateStudents' Engineering Self-Efficacy: A Validation Study. J. Eng. Educ., 105: 366–395.8 Burton, J. D. and White, D. M. (1999), Selecting a Model for Freshman Engineering Design. Journal ofEngineering Education, 88: 327–332.9 Gunn, C., & Somerton, C., An Engineering Laboratory Experience For A Freshman Engineering Class Paperpresented at 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2014 Salt Lake City, Utah.10 Alava, J.D. and Gardiner, K.M. The Development of the First Year Engineering Experience. Proceedings of Fall2010 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, October 15-16, 2010, Villanova University. (http://www.asee.org/documents/sections/middle
future. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2007.[14] NSF’s 10 Big Ideas - NSF 2026. https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/big_ideas/nsf2026.jsp [Accessed Jan. 15, 2018].[15] American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vision2030: Creating the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education. 16 pp. 2012.[16] C. Atman, S. Sheppard, L. Fleming, R. Miller, K. Smith, R. Stevens, R. Streveler, “Findings from the Academic Pathways Study of Engineering Undergraduates 2003-2008,” slides presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Austin TX, June 16, 2009.[17] C.B. Masters, S.T. Hunter, and G. Kremer, “Design Process Learning and Creative Processing Ability: Is there a Synergy?” in
Paper ID #15380A Scavenger Hunt to Connect the As-Built World to Structural EngineeringTheoryDr. Matthew Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation before obtaining his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech. He worked at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center in McClean, Virginia focusing on concrete bridge research prior to joining the faculty at the Vir- ginia Military Institute (VMI). He teaches engineering mechanics and
, plotting ofgraphs (when needed), and evaluation of the results associated with the lab.The mean and median lab scores of Control Group 2 and Experimental Group 2 are given inTable 5, along with values that assess the statistical significance of any improvement from 2013to 2014. As seen from the table, the mean and median scores for both groups are mostly in themiddle 90’s. The only exception is Experimental Group 2 scored in the middle 80’s for thetension test and Control Group 2 scored in the high 80’s for the beam deflection lab. There wasno improvement in the lab scores from 2013 to 2014, with the exception of the beam deflectionlab where the median score of Experimental Group 2 was statistically higher than Control Group2. Complete lab score
addressed modern structural analysis techniques covered in an introductorygraduate level course that qualified students may still take. The change also effectively reducedthe required track in structural engineering by one credit hour (from seven to six).The evolution of the junior structural design course that is the focus of this paper is summarizedin Table 1. Specific details regarding course structure such as enrollment, number of sections,and class meeting times are given to provide context for the discussions on specific componentsof the inverted classroom format that follow.Table 1 – Evolution of Structural Design Course Format(s) at Villanova University Semester < Spring Spring 2012 Spring 2013 Spring 2014
AC 2012-3084: INTEGRATING THE CHARRETTE PROCESS INTO EN-GINEERING EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY ON A CIVIL ENGINEER-ING DESIGN CAPSTONE COURSEDr. Michelle Renee Oswald, Bucknell University Michelle Oswald, a LEED AP, is an Assistant Professor at Bucknell University in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Her focus is in sustainable transportation planning and sustainable engi- neering education. She completed her doctoral degree in civil engineering at the University of Delaware, along with a master’s of civil engineering degree, and a master;s of arts in urban affairs and public policy. She received a bachelor of science in civil and environmental engineering from Lafayette College.Dr. Arthur D. Kney
. Nonetheless, the college levelis similar to the K–12 level in that “[s]tandards-based grading sets high standards for studentsand puts them in charge of their own learning by letting them set goals based on specific learningstandards.”4 Undoubtedly, that outcomes-based assessment can “communicate expectations”clearly and directly is something many students have found refreshing.In an article that defines four recommendations for implementing outcomes-based assessment,Marzano and Heflebower claim that by getting rid of all “omnibus grading,” students can betterunderstand their own knowledge of the subject, and can see the progress they are making or needto make. The authors also discussed student-generated assessments in which “the student ap-proaches
/hcp/non-us-settings/overview/index.html [Accessed March 6, 2021].[2] WHO, “Coronovirus,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/health- topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1 [Accessed March 1, 2021].[3] S., Parr, B. Wolshon, P. Murray-Tuite, and T. Lomax, "Multistate Assessment of Roadway Travel, Social Separation, and COVID-19 Cases," Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 147(5), 04021012. 2021.[4] J. Glanz, B. Carey, J. Holder, D. Watkins, J. Valentino-DeVries, R. Rojas, and L. Leatherby, "Where America didn't stay home even as the virus spread," The New York Times, April 2, 2020. Online. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/02/us/coronavirus-social
answers.Students who viewed video content were asked to answer multiple choice survey questions,including: “How much time did you spend watching the videos,” “How many different videosdid you watch,” “Which video topics were the most valuable to you,” and we asked for the gradereceived in the prerequisite course. Only students who did watch videos were asked furthersurvey questions which were Likert-scale questions asking about their level of agreement withthe following statements: “The videos helped me to better understand the topic(s) in the videos,”and “The videos created were relevant to me.” They were also asked to rate video quality asExcellent, Satisfactory, or Poor. Figure 1. Feedback on effectiveness of short video projects from students who