Paper ID #17877The CIT-E Model Introductory Infrastructure Course: Summary of the ”Fun-damentals” ModuleDr. Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville Philip Parker, Ph.D., P.E., is Program Coordinator for the Environmental Engineering program at the Uni- versity of Wisconsin-Platteville. He is co-author of the textbook ”Introduction to Infrastructure” published in 2012 by Wiley. He has helped lead the recent efforts by the UW-Platteville Civil and Environmental Engineering department to revitalize their curriculum by adding a sophomore-level infrastructure course and integrating infrastructure
,mentorship, and leadership opportunities. A number of these students receive fullscholarships.Over the past year, the honors program was expanded to include discipline specific scholarsprograms and small disciplinary cohorts in order to assist in the recruitment and retention ofexceptional students, specifically females and minorities in STEM (Science, Technology,Engineering, Mathematics). The STEM scholars program will launch in the Fall 2017, but haspotential for application at other schools.Current honors and other program data will be presented, analyzed, and best practicessummarized. These practices may be modified based on mathematics, science, andengineering departments working together to execute the first year of a STEM scholarsprogram that
, transportation planning, civil infrastructure management, and Lafayette’s introductory first year engineering course. Dr. Sanford Bernhardt serves on the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Committees on Education and Faculty Development and the Transportation Research Board Committee on Education and Training. She previously has served as vice-chair of the ASCE Infrastructure Systems Committee, chair of the ASEE’s Civil Engineering Division, and a member of the Transportation Research Board committees on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Computing, Asset Management, and Emerging Technology for Design and Construction. She received her Ph.D. and M.S. from Carnegie Mellon University, and her B.S.E. from Duke University.Dr
2005 and serves as its inaugural chairperson. Page 12.732.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Faculty Hiring Trends at Small- to Medium-Sized Research Intensive CEE Departments and Balancing the Needs of Research and PracticeAbstract Civil and environmental engineering (CEE) departments are embracing the use and devel-opment of new technological breakthroughs that are constantly taking place to address socialproblems in an increasingly complex, globally connected, and congested world. The develop-ment of new solutions requires a strong focus on fundamental and
assigned using a curve, some students may receivepassing grades without completely understanding basic underlying concepts andprinciples and/or without being able to apply concepts and principles to problems in thecourse. Thus, course grades may be used as necessary conditions for assuring studentsare functioning at a given cognitive level, but do not provide sufficient condition for thisassurance. When a student has passed a course utilizing The Proficiency Exam Protocoloutlined, one can have much more confidence that the student is functioning at theApplication level of cognitive development.The Proficiency Exam Protocol as an Assessment ToolThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology in its Criteria 3 specifies thatstudents meet the
physical world with the analytical world of engineering. And based on both student andalumni feedback, the models played a significant role in their learning process.It is the hope of the author that using models helps students better understand structures andbetter understand the role of the architectural engineer. There is no scientific method to proclaimthis is the answer for training young architectural engineering minds about structures andbuilding technology, but in all of the courses the students become engaged when they work withtheir hands and minds in a creative environment. And personally, this is the first hurdle tolearning. If these classes were taught in a pure lecture setting, topics such as tolerances andconcrete finishes could be
Paper ID #26499The Critical Pick: A Crane Rigging DemonstrationMajor David M. Flaherty, United States Military Academy Major David Flaherty is an instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He earned a M.S. in civil engineering from the University of Colorado, Boulder, in 2017. He is currently the course director for the Fundamentals of Engineering Mechanics and Design course, which is the largest course within the Civil and Mechanical Engineering Department. He can be contacted at david.flaherty@westpoint.edu. c American
authority or customary procedure that wastestime and resources. Rationals are often seen as cold and distant, absorbed in a drive to unlockthe secrets of nature and develop new technologies. Bill Gates and Steve Jobs are examplesof rationals.Survey Results and AnalysisClass Rank, Discipline of Interest, Temperament, and Level of EnthusiasmThe survey was given to students in several courses to capture all class levels. Of therespondents, 29% were freshmen, 10% were sophomores, 25% were juniors, and 36% wereseniors. Approximately 20% of civil engineering students at MSU are female.Some 29% of students expressed the highest interest in structures, the most of all disciplines.Interest in structures was followed by construction and environment at 24
Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, Geologist and Engineering Geologist. Page 26.67.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A METRIC FOR ASSESSMENT OF ABET ACCREDITATION STUDENT OUTCOME “b” – EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND ANALYZING THE RESULTS Allen L. Jones, PE, PhD South Dakota State UniversityIntroductionThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET) requires evaluation ofstudent outcomes (SOs) as part of the undergraduate engineering curricula accreditation process.Assessment
activities as well ashelping them be well rounded in life.Some trends in the data such as the reduction in the aid to understanding of their specializationwill need to continue to be monitored. There is also an apparent contradiction between if theirscience elective has aided them in understanding their chosen specialization compared to if theyhave been able to use the information gained in their science elective. These questions may needto be refined.References1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2008). 2008-2009 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Retrieved May 31, 2008 from http://www.abet.org/2. American Society of Civil Engineers (2008).COMMENTARY For Civil and Similarly Named Engineering Programs Draft
1. American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE) (2008). Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century. Reston, Virginia: ASCE.ABET 2. Accreditation Board for Engineering Technology, Inc, (ABET) (2010). “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Evaluations During the 2010-2011 Accreditation Cycles.” 3. National Academy of Engineering (NAE-2008). Grand Challenges for Engineering, NAE, Washington, DC. 4. Davidson, C. I., Hendrickson, C. T., and Matthews, H. S. (2007) “Sustainable Engineering: A Sequence of Courses at Carnegie Mellon.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 287-293. 5. Huntzinger, D. N., Hutchins, M. J., Gierke, J. S., and Sutherland, J. W. “Enabling
studentweaknesses to address. With current funding, we are now designing and piloting materials thataddress those weaknesses and analyzing the materials' impact on student writing.2. Overview of the ProjectThe project is based at Portland State University and also includes California State PolytechnicUniversity - Pomona, Howard University, Lawrence Technological University, and Angelo StateUniversity. The programs offer an ABET-accredited B.S. in Civil Engineering and seek to trainstudents to become effective practitioners. They differ in numerous other ways, including size ofprograms, university entrance requirements, and typical student academic and ethnicbackgrounds. They also differ in writing requirements for the degree; some require a
), whichoutlines the knowledge, skills and attitudes necessary to enter the professional practice of civilengineering. Civil engineers need experience both in the engineering and technology aspects oftheir chosen sub-discipline(s) as well as in common professional practice areas. Many of thecapabilities in these areas are attained primarily through engineering experience. The ASCEpolicy statement is presented below. The full policy, with a description of the issue andrationale, may be viewed at: http://www.asce.org/issues-and-advocacy/public-policy/policy-statement-547-engineering-experience-for-professional-licensure/ ASCE Policy Statement 547 ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE FOR PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE
. (2000). The future of engineering education III. Developing critical skills. change, 4, 48-52.9. Woods, D. R., Hrymak, A. N., Marshall, R. R., Wood, P. E., Crowe, C. M., Hoffman, T. W., ... & Bouchard, C. G. (1997). Developing problem solving skills: The McMaster problem solving program. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 75-91.10. Boyd, G., & Hassett, M. F. (2000). Developing critical writing skills in engineering and technology students. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(4), 409-41211. Ferris, T. L., Sitnikova, E., & Duff, A. H. (2010). Building graduate capabilities to communicate research and plans successfully. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 891.12. Jacquez, R., Gude, V. G
AC 2008-721: LET’S ROCK THE BOAT: EVALUATING THE CONCEPT OFSTABILITY IN FLUID MECHANICSTanya Kunberger, Florida Gulf Coast University TANYA KUNBERGER joined FGCU as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering in August, 2007. She graduated cum laude from the Georgia Institute of Technology with a Bachelor's of Civil Engineering and a certificate in geochemistry. Her MS in Civil Engineering, with a minor in Soil Science, and her Ph.D. were obtained at North Carolina State University. Dr. Kunberger was a recipient of the 2003 Center for Transportation and the Environment's Student of the Year Award and a 2007 recipient of NC State's UGSA Outstanding Teaching
. Additionally, the American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE) has published a number of reports on the Body of Knowledge that will berequired (in the immediate future) to practice civil engineering1, 2. One key conclusion ofthe work by ASCE (relating to the ASCE policy 465) is that the engineer of the futurewill need formal education beyond the Bachelor’s degree. NCEES in essence agreed withthis position when they incorporated this requirement into their model law for licensure,which will go into effect in 20155.A related document by NAE discusses the challenge of teaching the engineer of 20204.Other reports have raised concerns about science and technology education in the UnitedStates in general. Given this discussion in the engineering community, it
AC 2007-2257: A TECHNIQUE FOR PROGRAM-WIDE DIRECT ASSESSMENTOF STUDENT PERFORMANCEFred Meyer, U.S. Military Academy Colonel Karl F. (Fred) Meyer is an Associate Professor and Civil Engineering Program Director in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy (USMA) at West Point, NY. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia. COL Meyer received a B.S. degree from USMA in 1984, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1993 and 2002.Stephen Bert, U. S. Military Academy Major Steve Bert is an instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military
curriculum capstone courses in Civil and other engineering disciplines attempt tofulfill a host of objectives. Most notably, they incorporate design projects and teamwork tofulfill specific criteria of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET).They provide their students with an opportunity for synthesis, employing the technical skills theyhave learned in the program, and introducing elements of professional practice that will easetheir integration into industry after graduation.In order to meet the needs industry has for young engineers, many universities have incorporatedmock corporate environments and real-world clients into the capstone course. Besides familiaritywith a team work environment and real clients, preparation for
AC 2007-207: INTRODUCING CIVIL ENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATES TOTHE PREMATURE CRACKING OF CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKSAkhter Hossain, University of South Alabama Akhter B. Hossain, Ph.D. is an assistant professor of civil engineering at the University of South Alabama. He received his BS from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET); MS from the University of Cincinnati; and PhD from Purdue University. His research interests include early age shrinkage cracking of concrete, high performance concrete made with ultrafine pozzolans, and nondestructive testing of concrete structures. Dr. Hossain is actively involved in developing an undergraduate research program in concrete materials.Kevin
complete a comprehension model of those concepts. Studying historic and modern buildings which have distinctive structural elements as architectural expressions strongly connects them to the technological side of architecture. 7. Visualizing and experiencing 3-D structural behaviors help students realize the deviation between the textbook solutions and the real-world physical phenomena.References:Mourtos, N. et al. (2004). "Open-ended problem solving skills in thermal-fluids engineering"Global Journal of Egg Education, UICEEBlack, R and Duff, S. (1994). "A model for teaching structures: finite element analysis inarchitectural education" Journal of Architectural Education 48(1): 38-55Sobek, D and Jain V. (2004). "The Engineering
. Oglesby, T. Philpot, V. Yellamraju, R. Hall and R. Flori, "Interactive Learning Tools: Animating Statics," in American Society for Engineering Education, 2002. [10] S. W. St. Clair and N. Baker, "Pedagogy and Technology in Statics," in American Society for Engineering Education, 2003. [11] Capaldi, F.M., Burg, D. "Outcomes of Using an Infinitely Explorable Online Learning System" American Society for Engineering Education, 2013. [12] Prince, M.J. and Felder, R.M., “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases,” Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), pp. 123‐138, 2006. [13] Black, P., and Williams, D., “Assessment and classroom learning,” Assessment in Education, 5(1), pp. 7
AC 2010-1193: A REPEATED EXPOSURE EXPERIMENT TO IMPROVEKNOWLEDGE RETENTIONDeborah McAvoy, Ohio University Deborah McAvoy is an Assistant Professor in the Civil Engineering Department within the Russ College of Engineering and Technology at Ohio University. Her research interests are in the field of traffic engineering, specifically driver behaviors, human factors, highway safety and traffic operations. Page 15.81.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A Repeated Exposure Experiment to Improve Knowledge RetentionIntroduction and BackgroundImproving
AC 2010-1398: A HANDS-ON APPROACH TO GEOLOGY FOR ENGINEERSAndrea Welker, Villanova University Page 15.614.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Geology by touch: the first iteration of integrating overarching examples and laboratories into an introductory geology classAbstractAll civil engineering students at Villanova University are required to take geology in theirsophomore year. About one half of the course is devoted to historical geology and the other halfis devoted to physical geology. In the past, the class has been lecture-based with four laboratoriesthroughout the semester. In the fall of 2009, a plan was implemented to build upon the
schoolstudents participate in the program each year. As a part of this program, Civil Engineeringstudents go to each class participating in the program and teach the high school students simplestructural engineering concepts that can be used in the design of their bridges. These educationaloutreach programs have been a win-win situation. K-12 students respond very positively touniversity students in their classrooms and interest in engineering and technology is stimulated.Engineering students learn a great deal when they have to teach a complex concept to students Page 15.125.4with very little technical training.Since this large body of students is a
creative and imaginative would be stressed if not diminished. So this author suggests: keep the BOK2, keep it up to date. Continue the dialog. Ensure that the BOK is kept up to date, leave it as a moving target, do not allow it to become stationary, refine it as time, technology, and the demands of the profession change, and embrace an expectation that programs should be prepared to explain how they are or are not meeting those expectations, and where they are not, why. Healthy, informed dialogs are the way in which progress is made, in academia as well as everywhere else. Bibliography 3 1. ASCE Body of Knowledge Committee of CAP . 2004. Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the
AC 2011-1436: TODAY’S BSCE: A SURVEY OF CREDIT HOUR REQUIRE-MENTSKenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama Page 22.1531.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Today’s BSCE: A Survey of Credit Hour RequirementsAbstractThe purpose of this paper is to present the results of a survey and analysis of today’s civilengineering and closely related curricula in terms of credit hours required for degree. There hasbeen considerable discussion nationally about a trend to reduce credit hour requirements. Whilethis paper does not address any historical trends, it does provide a comprehensive description oftoday’s
, E. T., Gavrin, A., and Christian, W. (1999). Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Webtechnology. Prentice Hall series in educational innovation, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.2. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User's Manual. Prentice Hall series in educational innovation, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.3. Fagen, A., Crouch, C. H., and Mazur, E. (2002). “Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of Classrooms.” The Physics Teacher, 40(April), 206-209.4. Denton, N., and Cooper, H. (2006). “JiTT in an engineering technology class.” 113th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, 2006, June 18, 2006 - June 21, 2006, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
relating to bridges (the “bridge of the day” and the “bridgefailure of the day” have been used to enhance student learning, in particular with regardto outcome 11 of the ASCE BOK2. Based on student survey it would appear that studentsfeel the presentations have enhanced their learning in a number of ways. However, morerigorous measurement of student learning will be required in the future. Nonetheless, theresults suggest that presentations of this sort would be of value in helping studentsachieve outcome 11.Bibliographic Information1. “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century,” (2004) NationalAcademy of Engineering.2. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, (2008). Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology
draft papers from the instructor.References1. American Society of Civil Engineers, (2008). Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century,Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, Second Edition, ASCE Press, Reston, VA.2. Nelson, S. (2003). “Engineering and Technology Student Perceptions of Collaborative Writing Practices,” IEEETransactions on Professional Communications, Vol. 46, No. 4, 265-276.3. FitzPatrick, K. A. (2004). “An Investigative Laboratory Course in Human Physiology Using ComputerTechnology and Collaborative Writing,” Adv Physiol Educ, 28: 112-119.4. Gragson, D. E. and Hagen, J. P. (2010). “Developing Technical Writing Skills in the Physical ChemistryLaboratory: A Progressive Approach Employing Peer Review,” Journal
both Dick and Carey3 and Gagneet. al.14 Fig. 1 shows the various steps in the model and the order in which they occur. Theformalized process was developed to ensure critical steps in the creation of a curriculum are notskipped. The methodology has been part of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) teaching workshop curriculum since 1999.15 Figure 1: The Systematic Design of Instruction process3Course GoalsThe course goal is a short general statement of what students will be able to do when course iscompleted. This goal is often influenced by the reason for adding a new course to the curriculum.The new course might be in response to a change in technology, a mandate