structural engineering courses, en- joys working with the students on undergraduate research projects, and has research interests in concrete bridges, materials, and engineering education.Dr. Kacie Caple D’Alessandro, Washington & Lee University Kacie Caple D’Alessandro obtained her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering at Clemson University before obtaining her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech. Kacie is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics and Engineering at Washington and Lee University. She teaches engineering mechanics, engineering design, and materials science courses at W&L, and her research interests include ultra-high performance concrete, concrete structures, and
) Water quality, ground and surface; basic tests (e.g., water,Environmental 6–9 wastewater, air); environmental regulations; water supply andEngineering treatment; wastewater collection and treatment Construction documents; procurement methods (e.g., competitive bid, qualifications-based); project delivery methods (e.g., design- bid-build, design build, construction management, multiple prime); construction operations and methods (e.g., lifting, rigging,Construction 4–6 dewatering and pumping, equipment production
amnions, that they all once had a tail and webbed fingers and primitivegill slits. Next they worked as a group on an interactive activity from NOVA called “Guess theEmbryo”5 that allows them to see how similar various vertebrate embryos appear in early stagesof development. Finally they individually worked on a project where they attempt to alignimages of embryos according to species and stage of development (Figures 1-3). At the end ofthe last activity they were told that the reason it is so hard to align the images correctly isbecause all these species came from a common ancestral species that had DNA instructions forearly development that all the different vertebrate species still share, and that what makes thespecies different are the
AC 2012-3360: A HALF BRAIN IS GOOD: A WHOLE BRAIN IS MUCHBETTERDr. Stuart G. Walesh P.E., S. G. Walesh Consulting Stuart G. Walesh, Ph.D., P.E., Dist.M.ASCE, D.WRE, and F.NSPE, is an independent consultant provid- ing management, engineering, education/training, and marketing services. Prior to beginning his consul- tancy, he worked in the public, private, and academic sectors serving as a Project Engineer and Manager, Department Head, Discipline Manager, marketer, legal expert, professor, and Dean of an engineering college. Walesh authored or co-authored six books and many engineering and education publications and presentations. His most recent book is Engineering Your Future: The Professional Practice of En
Infras- tructure: An Introduction to Civil and Environmental Engineering.Dr. Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, Colorado State University Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez is an Associate Professor in the Department of Construction Management at Colorado State University. He is committed to advancing research and teaching in the sustainability of infrastructure projects. He believes that educating the next generation of professionals will play a pivotal role in making sustainability a standard practice.Dr. Frederick Paige, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Frederick (”Freddy”) Paige is the Assistant Director of the Virginia Center for Housing Research and an Assistant Professor at Virginia Tech in the Vecellio
variety of projects to enhance engineering education. Her most recent project included introducing the humanities into envi- ronmental engineering education through a National Endowment for the Humanities project. Dr. Bauer is an active member of ASEE and the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and currently serves as the Faculty Advisor for Rowan University’s Student Chapter of SWE.Prof. Cheng Zhu, Rowan University Dr. Cheng Zhu is an assistant professor of civil engineering at Rowan University. His research primar- ily concerns multi-scale geomaterial behavior under coupled processes across various time scales, with emphasis placed on microstructure characterization, constitutive model formulation, and computational
undergraduate elective at California State University,Sacramento that focuses on the design of steel structures for civil engineering majors. Thiscourse meets twice a week for 75 minutes and has 29 meetings over the 15 week semester. Oneclass period is spent on the midterm exam and another 2 hour time period beyond the 15 weeksemester is spent on the final exam. The course covers content regarding the analysis and designof tension members, compression members, beams, beam-columns, and connections in steelstructures. Students in both sections engage in an open-ended service learning project, completenine in-class conceptual quizzes, are provided with suggested homework problem sets andsolutions (not graded), and have access to examples with solutions
communication must be thoughtfully designed tohelp readers make meaning of data. Such visual design for readers requires our students tobecome metacognitive of their own experience as consumers of visual communication. Yet oftenengineering students are not prompted to think about or design visual data communication untilthey must present their own data, typically as part of a senior capstone project. Our students’ lackof experience leaves them without a solid foundation for critical thought about figures, and thuswith scant preparation to learn from the experience of creating and refining them. If capstonesare to be an opportunity to learn about visual communication rather than simply perform it,students are in need of a swift means to gain perspective
generally out-of-sync with this trend; we still rely primarily on a“push” approach. Recent research by the Pew Internet and American Life Project indicates thatthe current generation of high school and college students are dissatisfied with the “digitaldisconnect” between their lives and the classes they take in school1. Today’s students desireextensive control over how they get their information both in their courses and in their lives, andthe mixture of “life” and “work” information is complex. Many professors have begunproviding some content over the internet, experimenting with podcasting, vodcasting and othermodes2,3. The vast majority of this content is recordings of the conventional classroom lecturesthat students can then access at their
engineering technology. He teaches six credits per term, and because of his industrial experience, is actively involved in advising senior capstone design projects. A good working relationship between a full-time tenured faculty member and the engineers at the state transportation agency has resulted in retired engineers from the agency serving as adjunct faculty for specialized technical courses such as Transportation, Highway Surveying and Design, and Pavement Design and Management, while the full time faculty member was on a family medical leave absence.3. Provide office and administrative support for adjunct faculty For adjunct faculty to be successful, they need the support of the department.15 This
AC 2008-2415: TECHNOLOGY SKILL ASSESSMENT OF CONSTRUCTIONSTUDENTS AND PROFESSIONAL WORKERSThuy Nguyen, University of Texas at Austin Thuy Nguyen is a research assistant at the University of Texas at Austin. She is pursuing her PhD studies in the program of Construction Engineering and Project Management. Her research interests include project management, instructional design, human resource management and educational psychology.Kathy Schmidt, University of Texas at Austin KATHY J. SCHMIDT is the director of the Faculty Innovation Center for the College of Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. The FIC’s mission is to provide faculty with effective instructional tools and
Krathwohl’s taxonomy, rubrics have be-come a useful practice. A rubric is defined as a scoring tool that lists the criteria for judging or Page 14.213.6grading a piece of work. Generally, a rubric lists the information and elements the student must 5have included in a work product to receive a certain score, grade or rating. It is a set of criteriaand standards linked to learning objectives that is used to assess a student's performance on pa-pers, projects, essays, and other assignments. Rubrics allow for standardized evaluation accord-ing to specified
for over 28 years as a commissioned officer in the U.S Army Field Artillery in a variety of leadership positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Division. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Soci- ety of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President, Dr. Lenox led several educational
Categorical absences)? 12 How did you prepare for lecture? Multiple After lecture, you were assigned either homework, a project, or reading. 13 Multiple When do you typically complete this? If you were assigned homework problems that required multiple steps to 14 Multiple solve, how did you approach the problem? During lecture, are you able to take notes, keep up with the instructor, and 15
Paper ID #11245Using Isomorphic Questions, the Statics Concept Inventory, and Surveys toInvestigate the Benefits of and Student Satisfaction in a Hybrid Learning En-vironment (Civil Engineering Division)Mr. Eric Kjolsing P.E., University of California, San Diego Eric completed his B.S. degree in 2007 and his M.S. degree in 2008 in Structural Engineering from UC San Diego. In 2011, Eric earned his M.B.A. from San Diego State University with a coursework emphasis in finance and a thesis outlining a competitive framework for firms in the transportation industry pursuing Design-Build projects. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D
. During Fall 2013 he created IDEAS (Interdisciplinary Display for Engineering Analysis Statics) which is a project based learning activity designed specifically for promoting creativity, team-work, and presentation skills for undergraduate sophomore and junior students, as well as by exposing the students to the fascinating world of scientific/technological research based engineering. IDEAS is becoming the cor- nerstone event for the sophomore engineering students at UCF: from fall 2013 to fall 2018 approximately 3000 students have created, designed, presented, and defended around 900 projects and papers.Sudipta Dey Tirtha, University of Central Florida Sudipta Dey Tirtha is a doctoral student in the Department of Civil
inexpensive webcam out of herbackpack and plugs it into the machine. She clicks on the icon for her design team member whois working the dead afternoon shift at the student union and is on wirelessly. They chat briefly,with live video, about the objectives for that evening’s design, exchanging ideas verbally,nonverbally and with sketches. They shut down the video but not the text chat window and workon two aspects of the project, text chatting when needed and otherwise ignoring that the chatfunction is even open. A snag occurs and they are not sure how to proceed. Checking, they seethat the instructor is logged in (he is not always on, but they are in luck) and they ask a quickquestion. Using video, the professor explains to both students at the same
a sec- ond place award in the 2009 NCEES Engineering Competition for Connecting Professional Practice and Education. His latest award is the 2010 National James M. Robbins Excellence in Teaching Award from Chi Epsilon.Dr. Vinod K Lohani, Virginia Tech Dr. Vinod K Lohani is a professor in the Engineering Education Department and an adjunct faculty in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech. His research interests are in the areas of sustainability, computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, and water resources. In a major ($1M+, NSF) curriculum reform and engineering education research project from 2004 to 2009, he led a team of engineering and education faculty to reform
] For example, Wankat & Oreovicz [9] discuss preparation for aperformance in the classroom. They make vivid comparisons between stage directions andlecture notes, between a dress rehearsal and classroom preparation, between voice projection in atheatre and voice projection in a classroom, and the list goes on. Lowman[5] also draws similarparallels. In fact Lowman makes the statement that, “college classrooms are fundamentallydramatic arenas in which the teacher is the focal point, like the actor or orator on stage.” In hisjournal article titled “The Teacher as Actor,” Harris[10] explores speech, pantomime, andcharacterization and shows how these traditional acting concepts are applicable to college
, skills, and tools in engineering practice2.2 BOK IThe first committee on the BOK took a futuristic approach on infrastructure andenvironmental needs to develop a list of outcomes to elevate the depth and breadth ofknowledge, skills, and attitudes required of civil engineers desiring licensure. The firsteleven outcomes directly related to ABET’s eleven outcomes (3a-k). The twelfthoutcome called for “an ability to apply knowledge in a specialized area related to civilengineering.”1 Quickly all realized that this could not occur at the bachelor’s level. Theadditional outcomes were: • “an understanding of the elements of project management, construction, and asset management;” • “an understanding of business and public policy and
and include topics in structural engineering, earthquake engineering, construction man- agement, transportation engineering, and engineering education. She also advises the Student Chapters of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) at New Mexico Tech.Ms. Janille A. Smith-Colin, Southern Methodist University Janille Smith-Colin is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and a Fellow of Caruth Institute for Engineering Education at Southern Methodist University (SMU). She also leads the Infrastructure Projects and Organizations Research Group at SMU, whose mission is to advance sustainability and resilience goals through
– Synthesis), Outcome 8 (Problem Recognition and Problem Solving;Level 4 – Analysis), and Outcome 15 (Technical Specialization; Level 5 – Synthesis).The ten participating programs were asked to identify the various types of master-level programs Page 14.3.8they offer. Five different graduate level pathways were identified: a master of science (MS)with thesis, an MS without thesis but with a scholarly project, a master of engineering (MEng)with a scholarly project, an MEng with only coursework, and other options not listed. For eachmasters-level program offered, the ten programs were asked to assess the achievement level oftheir masters graduates
their teaching. Even though classes were taught in Dari, westill found that we were able to conduct an adequate assessment and provide useful instructorfeedback. Spending time in the classroom provided us with different ideas for our classroom andgave us some insight into what works and what does not work. Teaching the seminar and seeingthe new faculty members’ excitement and desire to do more inspired and reminded us to exudethe characteristics which make teachers great in our own classroom.Bringing Relevance into the ClassroomAnother great part of this experience was that in a developing country like Afghanistan,infrastructure development is a huge mission for the nation. At NMAA, there were numerousongoing construction projects on the
amount of active consulting that was reportedwas relatively small in relation to their academic responsibilities. Among those that wereactively performing consulting services, all reported that they are asked to join theprojects because of expertise they could provide to the project team. Furthermore, mostreported that as a means of continuous professional growth they were only willing toaccept challenging consulting projects. Several individuals discussed professionalpractice as a means for them to maintain connection with industry practices and a way tobring examples of actual projects into the classroom. The value of classroom discussionsrelated to actual projects that the faculty member had worked on was a repeated themeidentified in the
, because many engineering disciplines prefer not to require that master’s degree recipients in their disciplines also satisfy their Basic Level Program Criteria. • BOK Outcomes 1 through 11 are logically addressed in the basic level criteria, because of their direct association with ABET Criteria 3(a) through 3(k). BOK Outcome 12 is logically addressed in the advanced level criteria, because it requires advanced, specialized knowledge. BOK Outcomes 13 through 15, however, might reasonably be addressed at either the basic or advanced level. These professional practice topics— project management, construction management, asset management, business, public policy and administration, and leadership
these construction documents to determine the parameters (dimensions, sizes,designer constraints/notes) needed for homework. Voluntary tours of the construction site co-ledby the instructor and contractor/project manager have had student participation from 80-100%.Sample tour descriptions and photos are included on the course web page for reference. Idealconditions for the tours are when the steel is partially erected with connections in the process ofbeing completed, some floors placed but with other locations having shear studs and metal deckexposed (Figure 2). Personally seeing specific elements of the structure that are designed inassignments provides a palpable physical representation of the calculations. The tours servemany other purposes
from a five-point scale to three-point trichotomous variables.Responses of “now” or “10 years” were grouped as one variable (treated as “sooner”). Responsesof “25 years” or “50 years” were grouped as one variable (treated as "later"). Finally, responsesof “never” formed the third group.Next, with these three response options for each of the nine survey items, we performed a two-step process of (1) dimension reduction followed by (2) clustering. We used a uniform manifoldapproximation and projection (UMAP) algorithm [50] to reduce the data to a two-dimensionalembedding space. This step enabled more meaningful results for the clustering calculations.After projecting the data to the lower-dimensional embedding space, we then used
Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction and in the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, and an affiliate faculty of the Department of Engi- neering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She holds a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in civil engineering and a graduate certificate in engineering education – all from Clemson University. Un- til 2012, she was the director of the Savannah River Environmental Sciences Field Station. Dr. Simmons has nearly fourteen years of engineering and project management experience working with public util- ity companies, a project management consulting company, and a software
, computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, and water resources. In a major ($1M+, NSF) curriculum reform and engineering education research project from 2004 to 2009, he led a team of engineering and education faculty to reform engineering curriculum of an engineering department (Biological Systems Engineering) using Jerome Bruner’s spiral curriculum theory. Currently, Dr. Lohani leads an NSF/REU Site on ”interdisciplinary water sciences and engineering” which has already graduated 56 excellent undergraduate researchers since 2007. This Site is renewed for the third cycle which will be implemented during 2014-16. He also leads an NSF/TUES type I project in which a real-time environmental monitoring lab
Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Mary Lynn Brannon is the Instructional Support Specialist at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education, College of Engineering, at the Pennsylvania State University, USA. She has a master’s of arts degree in education and human development, specializing in educational technology leadership. Her work focuses on projects that measure and assess student perceptions of learning related to their experiences with engineering course innovations. She has worked extensively in the design of as- sessment tools for course methods and activities. She is a Faculty Development Consultant with previous experience in instructional design, and the instructor