Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering de- partment, with a specialty in structural engineering and bridge structures. She works closely with KU Engineering’s post-doctoral Teaching Fellow and oversees the overall Engaged Learning Initiative in the School of Engineering. Caroline is responsible for overseeing KU Engineering’s active-learning class- room design and usage, prioritizing course assignments in the active-learning classrooms, helping faculty to advance their pedagogy by incorporating best practices, and advancing implementation of student- centered, active-learning approaches in the School of Engineering. Caroline is also active in contributing to university-level discussions in the area of
Matlab was still being used to calculate and visualize results, the new lab activities motivate students to practice a variety of valuable research and communication skills. Regular homework and testing is also important to ensure that students retain theoretical material underlying the physical/virtual experiments. Lab activities are not meant to be a substitute for sample problems in lectures or homework, but rather a supplement. Students find that the analysis practice through calculations in assigned problems is critical to gaining a mastery of course concepts. In implementing physical experiments in a structural dynamics course, time management during lab instruction is critical. The
Engineering Department at the Uni- versity of Louisville where he has taught since 1981. He holds a Ph.D. in civil engineering from the University of Cincinnati. His area of research is non-destructive testing and evaluation of materials with a focus on concrete structures. He teaches courses and conducts research in the areas of design and con- struction of pavements. He is currently involved in conducting research in condition survey of bridge structures using remote sensing technology. He has also been actively involved the American Society of Civil Engineers, serving on the Educational Activities and Continuing Education committees as well as the Technical Council for Computing and Information Technology
same exam can be accomplished by usinggrading rubrics, grading the same question for all students at the same time, and giving similarquestions each semester. However, there are still natural tendencies and preferences that affecthow an individual professor grades. The objective of this research was to quantitatively assesshow professor grading biases influenced exam scores in the same upper level course offered atmultiple universities. The course selected for analysis was an introduction to the design of reinforced concretestructures, a common course in many civil engineering curricula. Three professors at threedifferent universities taught similar topics using their unique teaching styles and methods.During the semester, the same exam
construction safety, and in particular Prevention through Design. Upon graduation, he worked for four years as an Assistant Professor at UNC-Charlotte. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at Bucknell University (Lewisburg, PA, USA).Dr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskio˘glu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa State University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University. Her early Ph.D. work focused on the development of bacterial biosensors capable of screening pesticides for specifically targeting the malaria vector
chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids in coal-bed methane and regular oil and gas wells in Colorado. While in the middle of his master’s degree, he also spent a year as a graduate intern at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory studying renewable energy commercialization in Caribbean countries among other areas. He is currently completing is second master’s in engineering for developing communities in conjunction with his PhD Civil Systems Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. His trans-disciplinary research involves addressing global development issues from an engineering, political, and economic perspective.Dr. Bernard Amadei, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Amadei is Professor of Civil
learningoutcomes for this introductory transportation course. The goal of this paper is to report on thestatus of this effort and to stimulate conversation related to learning outcomes in the variety ofcivil engineering sub-disciplines.Building on existing literature, the group plans to identify and validate a set of key transportationconcepts. Following best practices in course design, we will also develop a set of outcomesrelated to these concepts around which a course could be developed. Further, we expect toidentify a minimum set of requirements that ought to be met by any introductory transportationcourse, as well as a larger set of outcomes and levels of achievement from which instructorswould select to be consistent with departmental and
Shashi Nambisan, PhD, PE, is Director of the Institute for Transportation and Professor of Civil En- gineering at Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. He enjoys working with students and he has taught undergraduate and graduate courses in the area of Transportation systems as well as undergraduate cap- stone design courses. Dr. Nambisan has led efforts on over 150 research projects. He has taught over a dozen undergraduate and graduate courses in various areas related to transportation systems as well as undergraduate capstone design courses. He also has been very active in leadership roles of several pro- fessional societies. Among the awards and honors Shashi has received is a proclamation by the Governor of Nevada
Page 12.200.2 1 This paper is extracted from the ASCE report Development of Civil Engineering Curricula Supporting theBody of Knowledge for Professional Practice, 2006.to provide thoughts and strategies for institutions when they implement their own uniquecompliant programs.FUNDAMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS As the committee conducted its tasks, several assumptions were made about the nature ofcivil engineering curricula to focus the process and to provide boundaries within which thecommittee could have an impact on the overall development of a civil engineer. Theseassumptions also provided the philosophy by which the curricula would be developed. Discussedbelow are the primary assumptions made by the committee and the rationale for
between conceptual and preliminary design. This as-pect of aesthetic design is not familiar to engineers, but its understanding is essential to success-ful collaboration. In practice engineers are typically not privy to this phase of the design and as aresult are lacking a basic understanding of the design vision, which impacts their ability to con-tribute to the subsequent design phases. Page 22.148.7Preliminary Design PhaseThis and the following phase of the project were set up to work as a progressive competition. Byforming the interdisciplinary teams for this phase based on students’ interest in a particular de-sign, our intention was to
roughly one quarter of the programssurveyed13. Thus, the median of these programs is near the 75th percentile in degree production.This suggests that larger programs, as can be seen from Table 2, may be more likely to have aDC-type IAB.Comparing IAB programs with Third-Party RankingsA stated goal of this study was to determine whether the presence and level of involvement of aprogram-oriented IAB has an impact on the success of the program. As previously stated,success can be difficult to measure because of perceived reputation, asymmetricundergraduate/graduate programs, and other factors. As a cursory comparison, the productivityand research expenditures per B.S. student for the IAB DC programs (Table 1) were comparedwith schools in the US News
liberal arts discipline, similar to the natural sciences, socialsciences, and humanities (and the trivium, quadrivium, and natural philosophy of earlier times),by imbedding it in the general education requirements of a college graduate for an increasinglytechnology-driven and -dependent society of the century ahead.5. To achieve far greater diversity among the participants in engineering, the roles and types ofengineers needed by our nation, and the programs engaged in preparing them for professionalpractice.As described on the University website, “the Millennium Project is a research center at theUniversity of Michigan concerned with the impact of technology on our society, ourcommunities, our institutions, and our planet.”The report advocates
learning, mentorship fromsenior engineers and practical experience, and involvement with the local community, groundedon a firm foundation in, and recognition of the importance of, the Humanities.The formal education process at the undergraduate level must include the humanities in orderfor the student to develop an appreciation of their importance in developing engineeringsolutions. All students cannot study all of the humanities; rather, students first must be able torecognize and identify factual information from more than one area of the humanities. Studentsshould be able to explain concepts in at least one area of humanities in order for them to explainhow this can inform and impact their engineering decisions. Students should be able to
, once it is widely disseminated, to generate awide range of reviews, including positive and negative comments. That input, drawing onthe ASCE experience, could be the basis for an improved second edition.Definition of Entry into Professional PracticeAs explained early in this paper, the EBOK is defined as the depth and breadth ofknowledge, skills, and attitudes appropriate to enter practice as a professional engineer,that is, licensed and in responsible charge of engineering activities that potentially impactpublic health, safety, and welfare.Responsible charge means activities such as carrying out assignments, making projectplans, directing engineering designs, writing specifications, preparing engineeringreports, or deciding methods of
involved in providing engineeringservices to communities who are in needs. Firstly, the benefit is for the community that is servedby students, and secondly, students are encouraged to connect and reflect how their educationconnects to their professional career. Through the experience students feel better about theiractions and understand the need and therefore the impact engineers have on a community. Thisencourages them to learn more about their chosen profession, and feel more confident about theirachievements. Also, students have a chance to practice and apply what they learn in class in areal project where they are exposed to the results of their design. The positive side of the servicelearning is at the end, the students are giving back to
. Page 11.207.14However, the real measure must take into consideration the start point of the participantsbefore ETW as shown in Figure 11. Upon comparison of the long-term results for each groupof participants, the delta between before and after for each category has been relativelyconsistent since the workshop started in 1999.The obvious result is that the exposure of ExCEEd participants to demonstrations ofexcellent teaching using physical models and practicing the use of physical models anddemonstrations by participants under the watchful gaze of a mentor is key. Some of thespecific comments by recent ExCEEd Teaching Workshop Graduates are: • Toys help me (the instructor) to see the concepts more clearly • I need one for every lesson
Paper ID #18253Weaving Entrepreneurially Minded Learning Throughout a Civil Engineer-ing CurriculumDr. Andrea L. Welker, Villanova University Dr. Andrea L. Welker, PE, is the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and a professor in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova University. Dr. Welker teaches a variety of geotechnical undergraduate and graduate classes. Her research focuses on the geotechnical aspects of stormwater control measures and the use of recycled materials in plastic pipes. In addition to teaching and performing research, she is the senior director of the Civil Engineering
his M.S and Ph.D. from the University of Michigan in 1975 and 1980 respectively. His teaching responsibilities are in the environmental engineering area. He has conducted research on solid waste, surface water quality, teaching methodology, and curriculum development. He serves as a consultant on potable water system design, stormwater management, and on-site wastewater treatment. Page 12.213.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 An Innovative Infrastructure Curriculum for 21st Century Civil EngineeringAbstractA new curriculum has been developed by the
dynamics, earthquake engineering, and engineering education.Dr. Debra Fowler, Texas A&M University Dr. Debra Fowler serves as the Director of the Center for Teaching Excellence at Texas A&M University. Following 16 years working in industry she completed a Ph.D. is in Interdisciplinary Engineering with a specific focus on engineering education from Texas A&M University. Her research areas of focus are faculty perspectives and growth through curriculum design and redesign, interdisciplinary teaching and learning, reflective eportfolios and professional development of graduate students related to teaching.Dr. James Michael Kaihatu, Texas A&M University Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at Texas A&M
, perhaps the only, pathway for enforcing and validating the attainment of the Bodyof Knowledge as a prerequisite for entry into the professional practice of engineering.Consequently, the exploratory committee addressed its charges from the licensure perspective orcontext and focused on the outcomes in the BOK2 with experience expectations.Still, irrespective of licensure considerations, the exploratory committee felt that in striving toattain the educational and experiential outcomes of the Body of Knowledge, the graduate civilengineer is investing in a successful and rewarding career in which progression is recognizedthrough licensure and promotion to positions of increasing responsibility.The exploratory committee’s conclusions acknowledged that
be it; but professional prestige has never been agoal of ASCE’s “Raise the Bar” initiative.6. “ASME believes that the typical scope of an ABET Accredited bachelor’s degree can and hasbeen demonstrated to accommodate technical breadth and flexibility and the intellectual skillsnecessary for engineering graduates to (1) pass the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE)Examination, (2) successfully complete a four-year internship under a licensed engineer and (3)go on to pass the final Principles and Practices Examination (PE) before being licensed as aProfessional Engineer.”In the position paper, this argument is presented as the first point of opposition to “a mandatory,across-the-board requirement of BS+30”, and then it is repeated nearly word-for
criticisms have been one of the motivating features behind the development ofstrategies that may use slide presentations more effectively to promote student learning, suchas the interactive slide presentations that are the focus of this study. A number of studiessupport the idea that modified slide design, well-developed handouts to accompany slides,and increased student note-taking can enhance student performance. For example, Alley et al.[2,3] studied how slide design impacts student performance. Traditional slide design containsa short phrase or keyword as the title, and bullet points which relate to the title phrase. Alleyet al. [2,3] proposed a new slide design approach, which employs a “succinct sentenceheadline … supported not by a bullet
programs accredited by ABET, Inc. He has advised more than 100 graduate students, including 26 Ph.D. students, and served as Principal or Co-principal investigator for more than $14 million of publicly and privately funded research. Russell is a respected researcher, author, and editor. He has published more than 200 technical papers in the areas of contractor failure, prequalification, surety bonds, constructability, automation, maintainability, warranties, and quality control/quality assurance. In addition, he has authored and published two books: Constructor Prequalification (1996) and Surety Bonds for Construction Contracts (2000). Russell served as Editor-in-Chief of the ASCE Journal of Manage- ment in Engineering
Paper ID #7638Assessment of a New Approach to Implement Life-Long Learning into Civiland Environmental Engineering CoursesDr. Claude Villiers, Florida Gulf Coast University Dr. Villiers is an associate professor in the U.A. Whitaker College of Engineering (WCOE) at Florida Gulf Coast University. He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with a concentration in Materials and Construction from the University of Florida in 2004. His areas of principal research interest are Civil Engineering Materials and Asphalt Technology, Highway and Pavement Design, Transportation, Specifications and Construction Variability of Pavement
rm focused on the evaluation of the use and deployment of technology assisted teaching and learning. Throughout her career, she has served as an external evaluator for a number of NSF-funded projects associated with faculty development, community building, peer review of learning materials, and dissemination of educational innovation. She was PI for the project ”Learning from the Best: How Award Winning Courseware has Impacted Engineering Education.” This research focuses on determining how high quality courseware is being disseminated and what impact it is having on the culture of engineering education as measured by changes in student learning, teaching practices, and the careers of the authors of these
their work, which requires design for safety aswell as the careful consideration of the needs of multiple stakeholders, potentialenvironmental effects, and various risks and uncertainties. It is difficult to fully educateengineering students on both the breadth and depth of complex information andrequirements that they will need to be ethical and effective practicing engineers within aBachelor’s degree. This is particularly true given that many Bachelor’s degree programs inengineering are decreasing the number of credits required for their program, largely due tooutside pressures related to college costs and helping students graduate within four years.This combination of forces led the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) topropose that a
issuesincluding the perceived value of licensure among faculty members, the relationshipbetween licensure and promotion/tenure, and the licensed faculty member as a role modelfor colleagues and future engineers.This paper details the research design, implementation of the study, and the resultingfindings. The findings and conclusions of this study will be of interest to a variety ofacademic and licensure stake-holders, including: civil engineering faculty members (bothlicensed and unlicensed), academic administrators, and licensing organizations such asthe National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES).A Review of the LiteratureIn the realm of academics, what is the value of experience as a practicing engineer andthe value of
engineering students. Dr. Watson is also interested in understanding and assessing students’ cognitive processes, especially development of cognitive flexibility and interactions with cognitive load. Dr. Watson is the proud recipient of seven teaching awards and six best paper awards. She was previously named the Young Civil Engineer of the Year by the South Carolina Section of ASCE and currently serves as a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Civil Engineering Education.Dr. Elise Barrella P.E., Wake Forest University Dr. Elise Barrella is the founder and CEO of DfX Consulting LLC which offers engineering education and design research, planning and consulting services. She is a registered Professional Engineer and was a
applying standard problem-solving procedures, butthey must also have passion, adaptability and an eagerness to learn. Successful graduates need tobe innovators, effective collaborators in interdisciplinary and multicultural environments,excellent communicators, leaders, and lifelong learners1. Engineering education is not alone inneeding to rethink the educational strategies that best prepare students for success. Based uponresearch emerging from the learning sciences, Sawyer’s description of a successful collegegraduate (in any field) has much in common with the National Science Board (NSB) report.Sawyer writes that to be successful in the knowledge age, graduates will need to develop a deepand integrated understanding of complex subjects
preparation required to prepare video contentand the challenges associated with implementation. In general, this study was designed toevaluate the impacts of increased active learning in the classroom, measure differences in studentperformance between the control and treatment groups, determine the potential for treatmentstudents to exhibit increased levels of learning from the PFC format, evaluate student perceptionsof the new model, and identify and overcome challenges associated with implementing a PFCmodel. While the full details of this research design are provided in a previous paper [41], thispaper will focus on select highlights of the quantitative and qualitative results. With the exception of the flipped lectures that were created