Paper ID #48111BOARD # 51: Fostering Engineering Enthusiasm and Inspiration: EngagingThrough Collaborative Mind-MappingXiaofeng Wu, Georgia Institute of Technology Xiaofeng Wu is a Ph.D. student in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology, working under the supervision of Dr. David Frost. She holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Irvine, and an M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley. She recently obtained her Tech to Teaching certificate from Georgia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL), and was
Paper ID #46788Civil Engineering and the Entrepreneurial Mindset – Cultivating TeachingPractices that Enhance Entrepreneurial Minded LearningDr. Matthew D. Lovell P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Matthew Lovell is a Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and he currently serves as the Senior Director of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment. He received his Ph.D. from Purdue University, and he holds his PE license in Indiana. Matt is very active with respect to experimentation in the classroom. He greatly enjoys problem-based learning
Paper ID #47514Assessing Student Learning in Collaborative First-Year Engineering ProjectsThrough Mind MapsDr. Elin Jensen, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Elin Jensen is professor and chair of the Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering at Lawrence Technological University (LTU). Her educational research interests include the advancement of sustainability and entrepreneurial minded learning in engineering education. Her technical research includes analytical and experimental investigations in the area of structural material performance in building and infrastructure applications
Paper ID #38072The Impact of Short Mindfulness Practices on Student Attention and Focusin Upper-Level Civil Engineering Design ClassDr. Priyantha Wijesinghe, University of Vermont Priyantha Wijesinghe is a Senior Lecturer in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Director of Curric- ular Enrichment for the College of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences (CEMS) at the University of Vermont (UVM). Priyantha is a structural engineer and architect by education and is an engineering edu- cation and assessment expert. As the Director of curricular enrichment, she has organized and facilitated numerous teaching and assessment
tointegrate the values of individuals into a net aggregate public value [14].In this current article, we report on the use of nursing theory to help to inform the engineeringdefinition of “health”. In particular, we explore the interface of “human” and “natural” andconsider health as a complex concept that includes the body, mind, and spirit of people as well asthe breadth of natural ecosystems upon which humanity depends.An existing module in an existing course was modified to include two theories from nursing. Thecourse, “Introduction to Environmental Engineering” is part of the degree requirements forstudents of civil engineering, architectural engineering, and environmental engineering at theMissouri University of Science and Technology, a large
earned his B.Sc., M.Sc., and Ph.D. degrees in Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering. Prior to joining ODU, he was a Senior Researcher at the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) and a Research Assistant Professor at the Advanced Research Institute (ARI) at Virginia Tech. His research interests include cyber-physical systems, artificial intelligence (AI), trustworthy AI, next-generation networks, and engineering education.Charles Lowe, Old Dominion UniversityDr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her engineering education research interests include entrepreneurially minded learning, energy education, interdisciplinary education, and faculty
to the oil and gas arena. Worked for Shell, Altura, and Oxy until December 2019. Areas of experience, water floods and CO2 floods field performance and development, hydrocarbon storage caverns, CO2 source fields. The type of work I enjoyed the most was the development and implementation of plans to either improve field performance or expand field production. Nack for working with teams/groups of different backgrounds to achieve a common goal. Since 2006, first as a part-time instructor and after 2019 as a full-time lecturer teaching in the Petroleum Engineering Department at Texas Tech, the goal of my classes both sophomore and senior levels is to prepare young minds to become strong engineers capable of working
– Life Sciences Education, vol. 20, ar 69, pp. 1-23, 2021. DOI:10.1187/cbe.21-05-0132[29] T.S. Samuel, S. Buttet, and Jared Warner, “‘I Can Math, Too!’: Reducing math anxiety in STEM-related courses using a combined mindfulness and growth mindset approach (MAGMA) in the classroom,” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 613-626, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/10668926.2022.2050843[30] I. Villanueva, L. Gelles, M. Di Stefano, B. Smith, R. Tull, S. Lord, L. Benson, A. Hunt, D. Riley, and G. Ryan, “What does hidden curriculum look like and how can it be explored?” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, paper 21884, 16 pp, 2018. DOI 10.18260/1
. Maibach, S. Rosenthal, J. Kotcher, J. Carman, X Wang, J Marlon, K Lacroix, & M. Goldberg,Climate Change in the American Mind, March 2021. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven,CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication[4] J. Cook, D. Nuccitelli, S.A. Green, M. Richardson, B. Winkler, R. Painting, R. Way, P. Jacobs, and A. Skuce,“Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature,” Environ. Res. Lett. 8(2):024024 (2013). DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.[5] Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) and National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) Design Group, “What makesgood design: A review of UK civil engineers’ experiences of design, based on the NIC’s design principles fornational
anticipated due to new infrastructure investments. Bycapturing the imagination of young minds and equipping them with a foundational understandingof civil engineering, the summer course is not just educating future students; it is contributing tothe development of the workforce that will shape tomorrow's infrastructure.Past students have gone on to enroll in civil engineering as well as other engineering programsin college. While further research and time is needed to assess post-graduation outcomes and thetypes of engineering careers these students ultimately enter, the initial indications are promising.These findings support the replication and adaptation of this model across other institutions,suggesting that such educational interventions can
,including mindfulness and support services, helps to improve student outcomes and reduce dropoutrisks [9]. The emotional challenges from the high level of stress due to the rigorous coursework inthe early engineering curriculum can be mitigated when students feel supported. Another studysuggests that helping students obtain a growth mindset can also help with their resilience to viewchallenges and setbacks as opportunities for growth are more likely to persevere [10]. In 2018, the CEE program identified that approximately 50% of the students who initiallyenrolled in the major as first semester freshman completed their degrees within CEE. The studentswho left the program switched their majors to other degree programs at the institute during
that helped them form their academicmajor decision. Many of those students spoke about experiences in high school, a handful spokeabout middle school experiences, and one student even claimed to have made up his mind on thecivil engineering major as early as elementary school. The student with the elementary schooldecision stated: “My initial exposure to civil engineering, and likely my main motivation for choosing it began in elementary school. My mother (who works for the NCDOT) would come to my school’s career days and set up her North Carolina Department of Transportation booth, where she would bring asphalt and concrete samples and talk about what she did. I used to be proud to have her there, and I looked up
published between 2007 and2024. The literature reviewed by this subgroup included discussions of the rapidly evolving roleof artificial intelligence in civil engineering, nanotechnologies, innovative materials, andsustainability in a rapidly changing environment.Literature EvaluationEach task committee sub-group approached their critical review of published papers, reports, andother documents with the following series of questions in mind: ● Does the source affirm aspects of the ASCE BOK3? Is so, what and how? ● Does the source suggest things that may need to be revised or clarified in the BOK? Is so, what, why, and how? ● Does the source suggest things that are missing and should be considered for addition? If so, what, why, and how
David J.541 Therriault. 2013. “Indispensable Resource? A Phenomenological Study of Textbook Use542 in Engineering Problem Solving.” Journal of Engineering Education. John Wiley & Sons,543 Ltd. April 1, 2013. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jee.20011.544 Lucas, Bill, and Janet Hanson. 2016. “Thinking Like an Engineer: Using Engineering Habits of545 Mind and Signature Pedagogies to Redesign Engineering Education” 6 (2): 4–13.546 Meister, Erich C., Martin Willeke, Werner Angst, Antonio Togni, and Peter Walde. 2014.547 “Confusing Quantitative Descriptions of BrønstedLowry AcidBase Equilibria in548 Chemistry Textbooks – A Critical Review and Clarifications for Chemical
Paper ID #48745Enhancing self-efficacy among civil engineering undergraduates using hand-onpedagogyMr. Michael Oluwafemi Ige, Morgan State University Michael Ige is a Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Morgan State University, Maryland, where he is pursuing his M.Sc. in Civil and Environmental Engineering with a concentration in Construction Management and Transportation Engineering. He earned his B.Tech. in Building Structure from the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria. Michael has extensive professional experience managing large-scale heavy
Paper ID #47376CE for Good: Equity, Justice, and Inclusion in a Highway Design and ConstructionCourse (Case Study)Dr. Bin (Brenda) Zhou, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Bin (Brenda) Zhou is a Professor in the Engineering Department at Central Connecticut State University. Her research enthusiasm lies in quantitative analyses and modeling techniques, and her field of expertise is transportation planning and engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 CE for Good: Equity, Justice, and Inclusion in a Highway Design and Construction Course (Case
Paper ID #47583Work in Progress: Supporting Better Conversations in Senior Design TeamsDr. Charles Riley, Oregon Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work In Progress: Supporting Better Conversations in Senior Design TeamsAbstractEffective interpersonal communication in senior design teams can be the key to their success orthe reason for their failure. The high-risk, high-reward nature of senior project courses can leadto challenging team environments where miscommunication between even just two members canhave significant consequences for the whole team. While team member assessment tools
Paper ID #37250Preparing the Future Civil Engineer: ASCE’s Proposed Revision of theABET Civil Engineering Program Criteria – Implementation ToolsDr. David A. Dzombak, P.E., Carnegie Mellon University David Dzombak is Hamerschlag University Professor Emeritus in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Carnegie Mellon. His professional focus is on water quality engineering, environmental restoration, and energy-environment issues.Wayne R. Bergstrom Dr. Bergstrom is a Principal Engineer and Fellow at Bechtel Infrastructure and Power Corporation.Dr. Jay A. Puckett, P.E., University of Nebraska, LincolnDr. Stephen J. Ressler, P.E
merge both fields together (such as an urban planner, environmentalpolicy analyst, energy manager, and disaster planner) are discussed [36]. Differences in workingat various levels of government (federal, state, or local) versus the private sector are shared.Also, current roles of alumnae that have pursued these types of positions are provided to showexamples of possible pathways after graduating from Bucknell University. In general, exposingstudents to these unique civil and environmental engineering experiences opens their minds tonon-traditional careers and research related opportunities within the field.Reflection and Future Work Through review of engineering education guidance, there is an emphasis on infusingpolicy topics into the
forms, allowing the authors toinclude their work in the qualitative analysis. While the authors reviewed all submissions for abroader context, quotes and excerpts were taken only from students who provided consent.Twenty-six students submitted Assignment 1. Of these, 65% had a steel structure in mind andused GenAI for the write-up, while the remaining students relied on GenAI to select a structurefor them. As a result, 19% of the submissions focused on the Sydney Harbor Bridge, which mayreflect a bias in the AI’s suggestions. Authors also noticed that 42% of students engineered theirprompts while the rest copied the assignment to a single prompt. Additionally, 73% of studentsrewrote and edited the AI output, while the rest did not correct any
female role models through narratives and interviews, studentscan connect with the experiences of women in the industry, fostering inspiration and encouragingmore female participation in engineering disciplines. This approach helps break down genderbarriers and promotes a more inclusive learning environment while highlighting women whoplayed significant roles in the past.References[1] K. Egan, The educated mind how cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago Univ. OfChicago Press [20]10, 1997.[2] K. Egan, An imaginative approach to teaching. San Francisco, Ca: Jossey-Bass, 2005.[1] A.Urmeneta and M. Romero, “Creative Application of Artificial Intelligence in Education,”Creative Application of Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 3–16
-civil-engineering-education-case-study[33] H. VELÁSQUEZ, M. A. GUERRA, and E. CERVANTES, “SDG LENS TO ASSESS INTERDISCIPLINARY SUSTAINABLE DESIGNS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS,” Proc. Int. Struct. Eng. Constr., vol. 11, p. 1, 2024.[34] I. Guerra, “WIP: Utilizing Mind-Mapping to Connect the Skillsets of Architecture Students for Both Hands-On and Lecture-Oriented Teaching Approaches,” in 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2024. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/wip-utilizing-mind-mapping-to-connect-the-skillsets- of-architecture-students-for-both-hands-on-and-lecture-oriented-teaching-approaches[35] S. E. Paucarina, J. D. Batallas, M. A. Guerra, and V. Guerra
story, there has been action and adventure,as well as reflection and thoughtful application (of the engineering principles). Just as he reachesthe end of the lesson and is about to close with a thought-provoking question, one of the studentsin the back corner of the classroom nearest the door stands up. Ace pauses mid-sentence and staresfor one second, crestfallen that the student is about to walk out on him. While thoughts of failureand ways to improve race through his mind, a sudden “CLAP!” grabs his attention!Act V: Resolution (or Catastrophe)The clap is followed by another clap, and then another, as student after student begins to stand andapplaud his performance. While it certainly might not have been what they were expecting,students know
When considering bias in engineering, social bias, like racial and gender bias, typicallycome to mind. Investigation into these biases are thorough (Eddy & Brownell, 2016; Ohland et al.,2011; Williams et al., 2016) and increasing awareness of them is warranted. But considered lessfrequently is the role that cognitive biases play in engineering design (Carmichael, 2020;McDermott et al., 2020; Mohanani et al., 2020). Cognitive bias refers to the variations in thinkingand decision-making that occurs between individuals when presented with the same information.Just some examples of cognitive bias in engineering include ownership bias: the preferencetowards one ideas over the ideas of others (Toh et al., 2016; Zheng & Miller, 2019
teaching approach becomes an implicit strategy recognisably when topics are not directlyrelated to sustainability. In this instance, a common approach was to position engagement withsustainability via a systems perspective that could influence any area of civil engineering. Oneeducator illustrated this indirect route as follows: In our unit, what we try to do is to embed not directly, but everything we talk about is closely related to sustainability. We want students to have this in mind when they design the roads and in the construction of the road. (Educator C, Australian University)Educators perceive sustainability could be connected to any engineering topic covered in thediscipline-based units. This was particularly visible
Paper ID #39820Board 44A: Work in Progress: Unannounced Frequent Examinations tocontribute student learning and building academic integrityMr. John Mario Bonilla, USFQ John Bonilla is an undergraduate student in the Polytechnic College of Science and Engineering at Univer- sidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ. John’s interests, in civil engineering include infrastructure develop- ment and transportation. Furthermore, John is interested in supporting the development of engineers who not only have strong technical and practical knowledge but also a strong ethical set of values. Currently John is working on his application to
defined to help students: 1. Understand wastewater treatment technologies and how they are perceived within cultural context. 2. Develop research skills and perspectives on water management and sustainability within cultural context, and 3. Develop into globally competent and interdisciplinary minded researchers.ParticipantsRecruitment. To recruit a diverse group of applicants, every year, advertisement materialswere designed by the four US faculty members and distributed widely across bothcampuses. Campus wide distribution was supported by the office of undergraduateresearch, the office of the Honors’ College, the Maximizing Engineering Potentialprogram, Department offices, and through different student societies like the Society
is defined later in the game description.This game follows a simple game model of a basic structure which consists of three keyelements: a challenge, a response, and feedback. During game play, hazards will continue tostrike the community and lead to newly damaged components, which is a challenge. Throughoutthe game, each team responds to the challenges by making decisions regarding repairing andretrofitting electric system components all while keeping the previously outlined objectives inmind. With two objectives formulated specifically for equity, teams are forced to maintainequity-minded objectives (i.e., Objs. 2 and 3) along with system performance objectives (i.e.,Objs. 1, 4, and 5) to simulate realistic decision constraints engineers
workshops for engineers that teach structural systems [15]. While these workshops are valuable for the instructors and allow for overlap of ideas, the audience is still separated and we imagine a workshop that intends to overcome disciplinary barriers. o Cooperative experiences, student design organizations, and fellowships: Design- oriented out-of-classroom experiences enable integration of students from different disciplinary areas to work on a shared design challenge, with mentors from different departments (e.g., NASA Minds Challenge). LimitationsAlthough the authors attempted to acquire syllabi from a variety of teaching sources, thisassessment is limited
Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering Education and Practice, Vol. 135, No. 1.NRC, National Research Council (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, andSchool: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Sutterer, K., Aidoo, J., Hanson, J., Kershaw, K., Lovell, M., Marincel Payne, M., Mueller, J., andRobinson, M. (2019) “A Collaborative Process Leading to Adoption of ASCE BOK3 Consistentwith ABET,” Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,June 2019, Salt Lake City, NV.Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (1998) Understanding by Design, Association for Supervision andCurriculum Development (ASCD), Alexandria, VA.