Paper ID #38072The Impact of Short Mindfulness Practices on Student Attention and Focusin Upper-Level Civil Engineering Design ClassDr. Priyantha Wijesinghe, University of Vermont Priyantha Wijesinghe is a Senior Lecturer in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Director of Curric- ular Enrichment for the College of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences (CEMS) at the University of Vermont (UVM). Priyantha is a structural engineer and architect by education and is an engineering edu- cation and assessment expert. As the Director of curricular enrichment, she has organized and facilitated numerous teaching and assessment
to the oil and gas arena. Worked for Shell, Altura, and Oxy until December 2019. Areas of experience, water floods and CO2 floods field performance and development, hydrocarbon storage caverns, CO2 source fields. The type of work I enjoyed the most was the development and implementation of plans to either improve field performance or expand field production. Nack for working with teams/groups of different backgrounds to achieve a common goal. Since 2006, first as a part-time instructor and after 2019 as a full-time lecturer teaching in the Petroleum Engineering Department at Texas Tech, the goal of my classes both sophomore and senior levels is to prepare young minds to become strong engineers capable of working
– Life Sciences Education, vol. 20, ar 69, pp. 1-23, 2021. DOI:10.1187/cbe.21-05-0132[29] T.S. Samuel, S. Buttet, and Jared Warner, “‘I Can Math, Too!’: Reducing math anxiety in STEM-related courses using a combined mindfulness and growth mindset approach (MAGMA) in the classroom,” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 613-626, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/10668926.2022.2050843[30] I. Villanueva, L. Gelles, M. Di Stefano, B. Smith, R. Tull, S. Lord, L. Benson, A. Hunt, D. Riley, and G. Ryan, “What does hidden curriculum look like and how can it be explored?” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, paper 21884, 16 pp, 2018. DOI 10.18260/1
. Maibach, S. Rosenthal, J. Kotcher, J. Carman, X Wang, J Marlon, K Lacroix, & M. Goldberg,Climate Change in the American Mind, March 2021. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven,CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication[4] J. Cook, D. Nuccitelli, S.A. Green, M. Richardson, B. Winkler, R. Painting, R. Way, P. Jacobs, and A. Skuce,“Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature,” Environ. Res. Lett. 8(2):024024 (2013). DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.[5] Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) and National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) Design Group, “What makesgood design: A review of UK civil engineers’ experiences of design, based on the NIC’s design principles fornational
anticipated due to new infrastructure investments. Bycapturing the imagination of young minds and equipping them with a foundational understandingof civil engineering, the summer course is not just educating future students; it is contributing tothe development of the workforce that will shape tomorrow's infrastructure.Past students have gone on to enroll in civil engineering as well as other engineering programsin college. While further research and time is needed to assess post-graduation outcomes and thetypes of engineering careers these students ultimately enter, the initial indications are promising.These findings support the replication and adaptation of this model across other institutions,suggesting that such educational interventions can
David J.541 Therriault. 2013. “Indispensable Resource? A Phenomenological Study of Textbook Use542 in Engineering Problem Solving.” Journal of Engineering Education. John Wiley & Sons,543 Ltd. April 1, 2013. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jee.20011.544 Lucas, Bill, and Janet Hanson. 2016. “Thinking Like an Engineer: Using Engineering Habits of545 Mind and Signature Pedagogies to Redesign Engineering Education” 6 (2): 4–13.546 Meister, Erich C., Martin Willeke, Werner Angst, Antonio Togni, and Peter Walde. 2014.547 “Confusing Quantitative Descriptions of BrønstedLowry AcidBase Equilibria in548 Chemistry Textbooks – A Critical Review and Clarifications for Chemical
Paper ID #37250Preparing the Future Civil Engineer: ASCE’s Proposed Revision of theABET Civil Engineering Program Criteria – Implementation ToolsDr. David A. Dzombak, P.E., Carnegie Mellon University David Dzombak is Hamerschlag University Professor Emeritus in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Carnegie Mellon. His professional focus is on water quality engineering, environmental restoration, and energy-environment issues.Wayne R. Bergstrom Dr. Bergstrom is a Principal Engineer and Fellow at Bechtel Infrastructure and Power Corporation.Dr. Jay A. Puckett, P.E., University of Nebraska, LincolnDr. Stephen J. Ressler, P.E
merge both fields together (such as an urban planner, environmentalpolicy analyst, energy manager, and disaster planner) are discussed [36]. Differences in workingat various levels of government (federal, state, or local) versus the private sector are shared.Also, current roles of alumnae that have pursued these types of positions are provided to showexamples of possible pathways after graduating from Bucknell University. In general, exposingstudents to these unique civil and environmental engineering experiences opens their minds tonon-traditional careers and research related opportunities within the field.Reflection and Future Work Through review of engineering education guidance, there is an emphasis on infusingpolicy topics into the
When considering bias in engineering, social bias, like racial and gender bias, typicallycome to mind. Investigation into these biases are thorough (Eddy & Brownell, 2016; Ohland et al.,2011; Williams et al., 2016) and increasing awareness of them is warranted. But considered lessfrequently is the role that cognitive biases play in engineering design (Carmichael, 2020;McDermott et al., 2020; Mohanani et al., 2020). Cognitive bias refers to the variations in thinkingand decision-making that occurs between individuals when presented with the same information.Just some examples of cognitive bias in engineering include ownership bias: the preferencetowards one ideas over the ideas of others (Toh et al., 2016; Zheng & Miller, 2019
story, there has been action and adventure,as well as reflection and thoughtful application (of the engineering principles). Just as he reachesthe end of the lesson and is about to close with a thought-provoking question, one of the studentsin the back corner of the classroom nearest the door stands up. Ace pauses mid-sentence and staresfor one second, crestfallen that the student is about to walk out on him. While thoughts of failureand ways to improve race through his mind, a sudden “CLAP!” grabs his attention!Act V: Resolution (or Catastrophe)The clap is followed by another clap, and then another, as student after student begins to stand andapplaud his performance. While it certainly might not have been what they were expecting,students know
Paper ID #39820Board 44A: Work in Progress: Unannounced Frequent Examinations tocontribute student learning and building academic integrityMr. John Mario Bonilla, USFQ John Bonilla is an undergraduate student in the Polytechnic College of Science and Engineering at Univer- sidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ. John’s interests, in civil engineering include infrastructure develop- ment and transportation. Furthermore, John is interested in supporting the development of engineers who not only have strong technical and practical knowledge but also a strong ethical set of values. Currently John is working on his application to
defined to help students: 1. Understand wastewater treatment technologies and how they are perceived within cultural context. 2. Develop research skills and perspectives on water management and sustainability within cultural context, and 3. Develop into globally competent and interdisciplinary minded researchers.ParticipantsRecruitment. To recruit a diverse group of applicants, every year, advertisement materialswere designed by the four US faculty members and distributed widely across bothcampuses. Campus wide distribution was supported by the office of undergraduateresearch, the office of the Honors’ College, the Maximizing Engineering Potentialprogram, Department offices, and through different student societies like the Society
is defined later in the game description.This game follows a simple game model of a basic structure which consists of three keyelements: a challenge, a response, and feedback. During game play, hazards will continue tostrike the community and lead to newly damaged components, which is a challenge. Throughoutthe game, each team responds to the challenges by making decisions regarding repairing andretrofitting electric system components all while keeping the previously outlined objectives inmind. With two objectives formulated specifically for equity, teams are forced to maintainequity-minded objectives (i.e., Objs. 2 and 3) along with system performance objectives (i.e.,Objs. 1, 4, and 5) to simulate realistic decision constraints engineers
teaching approach becomes an implicit strategy recognisably when topics are not directlyrelated to sustainability. In this instance, a common approach was to position engagement withsustainability via a systems perspective that could influence any area of civil engineering. Oneeducator illustrated this indirect route as follows: In our unit, what we try to do is to embed not directly, but everything we talk about is closely related to sustainability. We want students to have this in mind when they design the roads and in the construction of the road. (Educator C, Australian University)Educators perceive sustainability could be connected to any engineering topic covered in thediscipline-based units. This was particularly visible
mind, butthey may be adapted to fit diverse age groups. Many of these students are not drivers and canalso have a hard time understanding the impacts of engineers and planners on their daily life.Each module includes: learning objectives, a short overview presentation slide deck, a series ofactivity-based learning tasks, and a closing/debrief handout, group activity, and/or presentation.With the different amounts of time allotted for each of the five modules, the outreach program isanticipated to be finished in 2.5 hours, e.g., an approximate morning or afternoon session for atypical summer camp program. A trial program was hosted in July 2022 with the participation of25 middle school girls. This work is considered Work-In-Progress, so this
the formation of the engineer in mind, the instructor has implemented a mastery basedapproach in an undergraduate reinforced concrete design course. In the course, students must showaptitude in key course learning objectives, separated into three skill sets: Required Skills, MajorSkills, and Minor Skills. To test students in the skills, the instructor adapted previous homework,in class assignments, and exam questions to meet the needs of the listed skill. For some skills, thestudents can submit more than once, whereas in others, the students might need to submit a newassignment problem. In all cases, students have the chance to be evaluated, receive correction, andthen be evaluated again. This cycle builds trust between students and
Paper ID #43619Board 38: Student-led Curriculum Development: Incorporating Mechanicsof Materials Students in the Design of Statics Curricula (Work in Progress)Dr. Matthew Stephen Barner, University of Portland Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at University of Portland Research interests include: curriculum and faculty developmentMr. Sean Lyle Gestson, University of Portland Sean Gestson graduated from the University of Portland (UP) in 2016 with a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering and received his M.S. and Ph.D. in civil engineering with a research emphasis in engineering education from Oregon State University
: - A brief history explanation for the need to cap the interstate, - The benefits of capping the interstate, - The plan you have for developing the cap, - A brief explanation of the impact the construction will have on the community, as well as the future impact of the project, - A brief explanation of your design.Keep in mind that this letter is geared towards an audience that might not fully graspengineering terms but can also be read by engineering members of the community. Make sureyour letter shows connection with the community on multiple levels (examples can include butnot restricted to societal, economic, artistic, historic and educational levels).”Grading Effort:This project was graded solely by the instructor
mindset toward innovation, societal focus, sustainability andsystems-thinking; a commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion; and the flexibility to pursuetheir passion [24]. Similarly, environmental engineering students need to: move towards systems-based solutions; become proactive in anticipating problems; and cultivate diversity and engagecollaboratively with stakeholders and other disciplines [25]. By developing EM, we supportengineering students’ “mindset toward innovation” and help them learn how to “proactivelyanticipate problems.” Many studies surrounding EM and Entrepreneurially Minded Learning(EML) have been conducted regarding classroom and curricular interventions [26]–[29], mindsetassessment [30]–[33], and alignment with ABET
evolves beyond graduation. They mayfeel frustrated when going through a course but appreciate the benefits when they use the skillsdeveloped at a later date [29]. Therefore, some quotes from alumni are worth sharing. “I often think of you when I am writing a technical document at work and I remember youradvice to always write with my reader’s (now client’s!) expectations and preferences in mind.”(class of ’17)“I wanted to thank you for the way you prepare students for working in the field. Specifically,the real-world oriented lab reports and technical writing portions of the senior design project. Istarted working as a forensic engineer
acknowledgesthat infrastructure design requires consideration of diverse settings and the needs of thecommunity as a whole rather than as a collection of individuals [32]. Too often, communityimpacts are only considered after the design has been developed according to the technicalcriteria. Through the use of CCD, the design can be developed from the start with both technicaland human criteria in mind. CCD emphasizes that both asking multiple community stakeholderswhat they need and observing how they interact with the system in question may be a better wayto ensure the community feels heard and the engineer understands where improvements can bemade to better fit the way people use a system [32].Another approach to addressing sociotechnical problems such
Paper ID #38663Board 35: Assessing Students’ Perspectives and Attitudes Toward SocialJustice and Compassion in Civil Engineering (Work in Progress) o˜Mr. Cristi´ n Eduardo Vargas-Ord´ nez, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) a o˜ Cristian Vargas-Ord´ nez is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests include arts and engineering integration for epistemic justice and multicultural engineering edu- cation. He has experience in teaching and designing curricula for various educational programs, including
Paper ID #39312A Near-Peer Mentoring Framework for a Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering CurriculumMarie Bond, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignProf. Ramez Hajj, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignProf. Jeffery R. Roesler, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Associate Head and Director of Graduate Studies and ResearchDr. Arthur R. Schmidt III, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignProf. Jacob Henschen, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Professor Henschen completed his B.S., M.S., and PhD. at the University of Illinois Urbana
Paper ID #43313Student Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Relevance for ProfessionalPreparation in Civil EngineeringDr. Mary Kay Camarillo P.E., University of the Pacific Mary Kay Camarillo is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific in Stockton. She specializes in environmental engineering and has worked on research in the areas of water reclamation, biomass energy, geothermal energy, oil and gas production, watershed modeling, environmental monitoring, and engineering education.Dr. Luke S. Lee P.E., University of the Pacific Luke Lee is Professor of Civil Engineering at
Paper ID #38224Flipping the Classroom to Create a Student-Centered Learning Environmentin Three Undergraduate Civil Engineering CoursesDr. Amie Baisley, University of Florida I am currently an Instructional Assistant Professor at the University of Florida teaching primarily 2nd year mechanics courses. My teaching and research interests are alternative pedagogies, mastery-based learning and assessment, student persistence in their first two years, and faculty development.Prof. Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Keith D. Hjelmstad is President’s Professor of Civil Engineering in the School of
Paper ID #41153Incorporating Evidence-based Teaching Practices in an Engineering Courseto Improve LearningJulie Anne Wildschut, Calvin University Julie Anne Wildschut is an assistant professor in the Engineering Department. She teaches undergraduate classes related to water resources, hydraulics, sustainability, and environmental engineering. Her research interests include stream stabilization to reduce sedimentation, improving access to clean drinking water, reducing human impacts to waterways, and designing a more sustainable built environment. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
massive engineering projects created in the 1970s had to run through a highly populated area, it would follow the path of least resistance through low-income minority neighborhoods displacing those without the social influence to do anything about it. With the shortcomings of past infrastructure in mind, the new infrastructure bill allows current civil engineers to design and construct more effective national infrastructure that models the values of equity and greatness that America was created to represent. This opportunity for growth and reconstruction inspires me the most to become a civil engineer.” Male URM student, 2022 “Another reason I am interested in engineering is because I want to play a role in combatting the gender
Paper ID #40265Too Much Focus Leads to Success or Stress?Dr. Anuja Kamat, Wentworth Institute of Technology Anuja Kamat is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston. Prof. Kamat received her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Arizona, Tucson and MS in Civil Engineering from the UnivDr. Tugba Arsava My background includes both structural and transportation engineering expertise of civil engineering. I am particularly interested in projects on engineering systems analysis, structural analysis, civil engineer- ing materials, system
Paper ID #41120Fostering Student Ownership and Active Learning through Student-Led GroupLectures in a Civil Engineering Materials CourseDr. Shenghua Wu, University of South Alabama Dr. Shenghua Wu is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Coastal, and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Alabama. His research areas include civil engineering materials characterization, pavement performance evaluation and modeling, design, and maintenance, multidisciplinary approach to address complex engineering issues, as well as STEM education. He is the Director for the Solid Waste Sustainability Hub
established.Literature ReviewAs global demands on resources and the environment continue to increase due to such factors asincreasing population, the sustainability theme continues to grow in importance. Educators areregularly developing or updating courses to tackle related issues. More specifically, educators inengineering disciplines continue to weave sustainability themes into their respective curricula, ordevelop stand-alone courses, to inspire the next generation of engineers to develop creativesolutions to complex problems.As this issue continues to be a global in its nature, many programs in the United States seek tobuild their courses with international partners in mind. There are examples of programs atColorado State University that have partnered