implementationThe practice run element holds the space in the process where recruited university studentfacilitators receive training in the curriculum(s) for that month so they can be prepared to supportthe in-classroom activities. While student facilitators were not initially included in the NSFITEST proposal, their engagement in the classroom provides extra hands to support the activitieswhile serving as an engineering role model to the 6th grade students and teachers. All of thestudents volunteering for the program are pursuing degrees in engineering or science- andtechnology-related fields. As indicated by Figure 2, there is a loop from observations, reflections,and artifacts back to intervention design indicating a continuous improvement model
faculty lead would likely improve the likelihood of success of the project and courses. With the demands of research and other faculty obligations, it may be convenient for a faculty member to become dis-engaged. Similar to the roles of the students, a deliberate definition of this role clarifies the chain of command for both the faculty and students involved.References1. McKenzie, L. J., Trevisan, M. S., Davis, D. C. & Beyerlein, S. W. Capstone design courses and assessment: A national study. in Proceedings of the 2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition 1–14 (2004).2. ABET Board of Delegates. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. (2015).3. Miller, R. L
. West, "Toy Adaptation Program Workshop: Enriching First-Year Engineers by Teaching the Electronic Toy Adaptation Process," in American Society for Engineering Education, New Orleans, 2016.[8] M. West, R. L. Kajfez and E. Riter, "One Program’s Approach to Creating a Strong Network Paper," in American Society for Engineering Education, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[9] M. Y. Mollica, H. A. Feldner, S. Israel, A. Caspi, K. M. Steele and D. G. Hendricks, "Toy Adaptation as Engineering Outreach to Diverse High School Students," in American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[10] Toy Adaptation Program, "Ohio State University Toy Adaptation Program (TAP)," [Online]. Available: https
opportunity in the community for continuing the project.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis work was supported with a grant from MultiCare Health Systems, Spokane, WA, throughtheir Community Partnership Program.REFERENCES[1] J. Mroz, “Hand of a Superhero,” The New York Times, Feb. 16, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/17/science/hand-of-a-superhero.html. [Accessed Dec. 13, 2018].[2] http://enablingthefuture.org/[3] https://greaterallegheny.psu.edu/feature/students-learn-while-giving-gift-new-hands[4] S. Yagli and S. Hsieh, “MAKER: Designing and Building a Prosthetic Hand for a High School Engineering Design Course,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake
, to inform and assess culturally-relevant,hands-on, interactive activities focused on engineering broadly. Working closely with 10museum partners and educators in Ontario, Portland, Los Angeles, Fort Lauderdale, Detroit,Miami, Ann Arbor, Boston and Buenos Aires, kits were tested, feedback was collected, andevaluation results were used to continuously iterate on the kits to ensure they work well indiverse settings.Perspective(s) or theoretical framework A national crisis will emerge if the United States cannot amplify the number anddiversity of K-12 students who pursue degrees and careers in engineering. Many of society’schallenges impact a broad spectrum of peoples, communities, and systems. Addressing thesechallenges require
Paper ID #6720Implementing a service learning class for undergraduate engineers with littlerequired budgetDr. Joan B Schuman, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Joan Schuman is an assistant teaching professor in the Engineering Management at Missouri S&T. She has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Arkansas and completed her Ph.D. in Polymer Science and Engineering. Schuman teaches a variety of courses including several in Project Management. She has several years of industrial experience in the aerospace industry but is now focusing on engineering education with a special interest in
importantto recognize that first-year students do not yet have design skills to create major solutions to realdesign needs of clients, though they do have enthusiasm, creativity, and problem-solving skills.The author, a technical communication specialist, and other instructors of the course, also lackthe expertise in engineering design to effectively judge such projects.APSC 176’s team proposal project taps into the constant need for funding by not-for-profitorganizations and appeals to a wide variety of not-for-profit organizations. Many of theseorganizations often are highly enthusiastic simply to engage the students to promote awarenessof the organizations. Even if the organization does not come away with a concrete product, theyhave had 220
. Thomas and M. (National S. of B. E. Smith, “Technical Outreach Community Help : An Engineering Outreach-Mentoring Program For Minorities,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2010, vol. 7.[2] S. M. Brown and L. D. Thomas, “Technical Outreach Community Help : Initial Results,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2011, no. June.[3] “Building Effective Partnerships in Service-Learning | National Service-Learning Clearinghouse.” [Online]. Available: http://www.servicelearning.org/instant_info/fact_sheets/tribal_facts/partnerships. Page 23.1353.7 [Accessed: 07-Jan-2013].[4] R. G
2014 he was awarded by FAPESP with a post-doctoral research at the Centre for Ethics, Law and Public Affairs at the same university. His research focus relies on Engineering and Community Services; Socio-Legal Studies, Science and Technology Studies, Political philosophy, Sociology of Environment and Intellectual Property Rights.Dr. Cristiano Cordeiro Cruz, Aeronautics Technological Institute (Brazil) I currently develop a post-doctorate research at the Aeronautics Technological Institute (ITA) with a schol- arship from FAPESP (#2018/20563-3). I hold a PhD degree in Philosophy (University of S˜ao Paulo, 2017), a bachelor degree in Philosophy (Jesuit Faculty of Philosophy and Theology, 2008), a master degree in
existing models; creativity is evident in the design User friendly: 0-10 The design takes into account that users may be young or old, tech-proficient or not so tech-proficient? Can design be used by the average person? Mission: 0-10 Relates to the mission of the non-profit organization/ stakeholders? Feasibility: 0-10 Is it realistic to implement (consider design, skills, timeline)? Additional feature(s) useful to the stakeholder: 0-20 Does the
Entrepreneurship, 222–239.2 Dzombak, R., and Mehta, K. (2014). Scholarly Advances in Humanitarian Engineering and SocialEntrepreneurship: A Typology of Research Publications. International Journal for Service Learning inEngineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 98–116.3 Passino, K. M. (2009). Educating the Humanitarian Engineer. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(4), 577–600.4 Hill, S., and Miles, E. (2012). What do Students understand by the term ‘Humanitarian Engineering’?Innovation, Practice and Research in Engineering Education, September 2012.5 UC Engineering (n.d.) Diploma in Global Humanitarian Engineering,http://www.engf.canterbury.ac.nz/humanitarian/ last accessed January 1, 20166 Bielefeldt, A., Paterson, K., and Swan, C
quality of life B5: Identifies and addresses future community needs B6: Reflects social responsibility C1: Considers economic impacts of environmental design criterion C2: Considers economic impacts of a social design criterion C3: Considers trade-offs between social and environmental criteria Economic C4: Evaluates economic lifecycle costs and benefits C5: Considers affordability or demonstrates cost competitiveness or cost reduction X1: Uses and/or creates innovation(s) in its specific field to achieve
Partners: Service Learning as Route to Authority for Basic Writers,” Journal of Basic Writing (CUNY), 28(1), 50-70.Geisinger, B. and Raman, D. (2013). “Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 914-925.Gillis, C. (1994). “Writing Partners: Expanding Audiences for Student Writing,” The English Journal, 83(3); 64-67.Griffith, A. (2010). “Persistence of Women and Minorities in STEM Field Majors: Is it the School that Matters?” Economics of Education Review, 29, 911-922.Hayford, B., Blomstrom, S., and DeBoer B. (2014). “STEM and Service-Learning: Does Service- Learning Increase STEM Literacy.” International Journal of Research on
SDGs “… seek tobuild on the [previous] Millennium Development Goals and complete what they did not achieve(United Nations General Assembly 2015).” In launching the SDGs in 2015, the GeneralAssembly of the United Nations “recognize[s] that eradicating poverty in all its forms anddimensions (including extreme poverty) is the greatest global challenge and an indispensablerequirement for sustainable development (United Nations General Assembly 2015).” To thatend, the SDGs represent “a plan of action for people, planet, and prosperity,” which in additionto peace and partnership, define the five “P’s” of the mission of the SDGs. To accomplish thatmission, there needs to be a “balance [between] the three dimensions of sustainabledevelopment: the
GlobalEngineering Program for allowing him to take part in improving student learning. The authorwould also like to thank Dr. Robin Adams, Dr. Brent Jesiek, Dr. Junaid Siddiqui, and Mel Chuafor helping him with editing this paper.Bibliography1. Chabon, S. S., & Lee-Wilkerson, D. (2006). Use of Journal Writing in the Assessment of CSD Students' Learning About Diversity A Method Worthy of Reflection. Communication disorders quarterly, 27(3), 146-158.2. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D.C. Heath.3. Downey, G., & Beddoes, K. (2010). What is Global Engineering Education For? The Making of International Educators. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.4
, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Swan, C.W., J.J. Duffy, K. Paterson, A. Bielefeldt, O. Pierrakos. 2011. The EFELTS Project – EngineeringFaculty Engagement in Learning Through Service. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) AnnualConference Proceedings. Paper AC 2011-1324.2. Eyler, J., D. Giles. 1999. Where’s the Learning in Service-Learning? Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.3. Coyle, E. J., L. H. Jamieson and W.C. Oakes, EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service, InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, 21 (1), 2005, pp. 139-150.4. Duffy, J., E. Tsang, S. Lord. 2000. Service-Learning in
domains. J Res Personal. 2003;37:504–28.17. Litchfield K, Javernick-Will A. Investigating Gains from EWB-USA Involvement. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 2013;140(1).18. Sheppard S, Gilmartin S, Chen HL, Donaldson K, Lichtenstein G, Eris O, et al. Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES). Seattle, WA: Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education; 2010 Sep. Report No.: TR- 10-01. Page 24.439.1319. Shiarella AH, McCarthy AM, Tucker ML. Development and Construct Validity of Scores on the Community Service
-learning reflection for engineering. In E. Tsang & American Association for Higher Education (Eds.), Projects that matter (pp. 64-75). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.6. Reynaud, E., Duffy, J. J., Barrington, L., Kazmer, D. O., Tucker, B. G., & Rhoads, J. L. (2012, June). Engineering faculty attitudes towards service-learning. Paper presented at the 119th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX.7. Pierrakos, O., Bielefeldt, A. R., Duffy, J. J., Mcvay, S., Paterson, K., Swan, C. W., & Zilberberg, A. (2012, June). Faculty survey on learning through service: Development and initial findings. Paper presented at the
://www.wpi.edu/Academics/GPP/ , 2012b Page 25.72.159. S. McCahan, P.E. Weiss, K. Woodhouse, R. Andrews, P. Anderson, M. Kortschot, S. Romas, “Engineering Strategies and Practice: Team Teaching a Service Learning Course for a Large Class” Alan Blizzard Award paper, McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2007. Published as a special booklet by McGraw-Hill Ryerson. Available on-line at: http://www.stlhe.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/2007-Blizzard-Paper.pdf10. Rogers, B., Pugliese, M., Henderson, M., The Twig Light: Ultra Low-Cost Lighting in Ghana, NCIIA Conference, San Francisco, March 25-27, 2010.11. Rogers, B., Henderson, M., Gintz, J., Danielson, S., The
: Another notable theme that emerged was related to the purpose(s) ofstudent learning, albeit with notable differences between how the project partners and otherparticipants saw EPICS influencing students’ careers. Most of the project partners described theEPICS experience as a way for students to learn practical lessons and skill sets that will helpthem function as an engineer. Describing his motivation for promoting educational outcomes,one participant explained: “The academic world is a lot different than the outside world, and I tryto get that point across to them. When you go out into the outside world your boss is going to tellyou that the bottom line is the dollar.” And as another participant stated, “I want [the students] to,at the end of
spring of 2017. The Historical Society director wanted to show the shift from flour milling topaper milling on the Fox River that occurred at that time. So, the class was ‘hired’ to makeinteractive exhibits that demonstrated how an 1870’s flour mill worked.It was a unique opportunity for the class, because they were able to interact with a client,including touring the space, creating prototypes, having the client request design changes, andfinally building the exhibit. Partnering with the students also helped the Historical Societyreceive two local community grants to support the exhibit. At the end of the semester, thedirector of the Historical Society reviewed the student projects and accepted 4 of the 5 projectsfor inclusion in the exhibit
Experiments. MIT,Harvard and Princeton University.Funtowicz S. and J. Ravetz. 1999. Post-normal science: Environmental policy under conditionsof complexity. Ispra: NUSAP. Available at http://www.nusap.netHilson, Gavin, C.J Hilson, and Sandra Pardie. 2007. "Improving awareness of mercury pollutionin small-scale gold mining communities: Challenges and ways forward in rural Ghana."Environmental Research 103 275-287.Hilson, Gavin, and Rickford Vieira. 2007. "Challenges with Minimising Mercury Pollution inthe Small-Scale Gold Mining Sector: Experiences from the Guianas." International Journal ofEnvironmental Health Research 17 429-441.Hilson G. and J. McQuilken. 2014. Four decades of support for artisanal and small-scalemining in sub-Saharan Africa: a
communicated through multiple channels: impact memories, digital platforms, amongothers.4. Partial results of the Cluster in the implementation of CBL.As it was mentioned before, the Cluster is born as an idea at the beginning of 2016, but it’s onlyuntil the second semester of 2017 (2017- II) that its value proposal is defined as a model ofsocial business, where universities are consolidated as its clients by a membership payment.Here is some of the statistics of the Cluster´s participants. PERIOD 2016 - II 2017 - I 2017 - II NUMBER OF 2 4 14CHALLENGES
N° 5151 del 26 de marzo de 2014. De Agencia Espacial del Paraguay. (2014, March 27). Retrieved from http://www.bacn.gov.py/NDY1Mg&ley-n-5151 [2] Nayak A., Sreejith A.G., Safonova M., Murthy J., (2013) High-altitude ballooning programme at the Indian Institute of Astrophysics. Current Science, 104: 708-713 [3] Fuke H., Akita D., Iijima I., Izutsu N., Kato Y., Kawada J., Matsuzaka Y., Mizuta E., Namiki M., Nonaka N., Ohta S., Saito Y., Seo M., Takada A., Tamura K., Toriumi M., Yamada K., Yamagami T. and Yoshida T. (2010) A new balloon base in Japan. Advances in Space Research, 45: 490-497 [4] Smith I.S. (2002) The NASA balloon program: an overview. Advances in Space Research, 30: 1087-1094 [5
or satisfiedwith the STEM modules delivered by the CET. The participants expressed the need tobreakdown the 3D modeling modules into smaller sub modules and start with simple models.Since this is a work in progress paper, and the authors are limited to four pages, the readers areencouraged to contact the authors for detailed survey instruments, assessment results, andparticipant comments. Figure 3. Overall satisfaction with different modules for Students (S), Teachers (T), and those who did not identify themselves (NI).Conclusions and Next StepsAMIA participants were exposed to a large number of concepts in mechanics, electronics,controls, programming, 3D modeling, 3D printing, and computer aided machining. The
insophistication of stakeholders also results in higher confidence. 13Bibliography[1] T. D. Sadler, “Situated Learning in Science Education: Socio-scientific Issues as Contexts for Practice,” Stud Sci Educ, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–42, 2009.[2] A. Johri and B. Olds, “Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences,” J Eng Educ, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 151–185, 2011.[3] B. Jesiek, Q. Zhu, S. Woo, J. Thompson, and A. Mazzurco, “Global Engineering Competency in Context: Situations and Behaviors,” Online J. Glob. Eng. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2014.[4] G. Downey, “Are Engineers Losing Control of Technology
don't always think about the implications the work I am doing may have on other people. The experiential aspects of this course forced me to rethink how I learn in order to put human life into my thought process.”References: 1. Cohen, C. C. D., & Deterding, N. (2009). Widening the net: National estimates of gender disparities in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 211-226. 2. Brainard, S. G. and Carlin, L. (1998). A Six-Year Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 369–375. 3. Reichert, M. and Absher, M. (1997). Taking Another Look at Educating African American Engineers: The Importance of Undergraduate Retention
energy through sustainable means.The curriculum is also intended to question who is doing engineering, where engineering is done,and whose knowledge is valued. Primarily, the ultimate goal of future research is to use theseframeworks and reconceptualization of engineering to work together with communities and formlong-term relationships to validate and recognize indigenous knowledge in engineering spaces.AcknowledgementsThis work would not have been possible without the financial contributions of the University ofSan Diego International Center and the Mbyá-Guaraní community. Gracias por contribuir a esteproyecto con todos sus conocimientos.References[1] M. Bonomo, R. C. Angrizani, E. Apolinaire, and F. S. Noelli, "A model for the Guaraní