difficultto navigate through the app and complained about designs and other minor issues. Ultimately, theproject was temporarily halted and a new application is currently being designed and developedwith the same objectives. It will only have a different framework and personnel on theproject.The new path for the project includes switching to React Native for cross-platform mobiledevelopment and a goal to create a functional product for evaluation for final exam review.Thischange also follows best practices in app development as described by Wardynski1 and wouldserve all students with a mobile phone 1 . Future plans would include creating a Professorfunctionality that helps the professor see the efforts made by the students and assign grades basedon
with better features.”“I have learned a great deal of things from the contest: technical, mathematical, and theexperience of the contest itself, the presentation of our work in front of such an exclusiveaudience”.“I learned a lot about complex system’s planning and verification”.Several students’ comments refer to the job offers or scholarships that they received afterparticipating in this competition and meeting industry representatives:“It helped me get a job in the embedded design”.“For me, the 4th edition of the Diligent Design Contest was a career-changer... literally... At theend of my 3rd year at TUCN, I was looking for a job... and I found it thanks to the DesignContest”.“The fact that I won a prestigious European contest contributed
AC 2008-2360: UTILIZING ROBOTICS TO FACILITATE PROJECT-BASEDLEARNING: A STUDENT PERSPECTIVEAnthony Reed, Louisiana Tech University Anthony Reed is a sophomore at Louisiana Tech University majoring in biomedical engineering. He graduated from a residential high school in Louisiana and plans to pursue a career in medicine after graduating.Taylor Creekbaum, Louisiana Tech University Taylor Creekbaum is a sophomore at Louisiana Tech University majoring in biomedical engineering. He graduated from the same residential high school as Anthony Reed, and he has a special interest in computer applications.Matthew Elliott, Louisiana Tech University Matthew Elliott is a freshman at Louisiana Tech
Page 11.1394.2read and modify, if needed, any exported global variables and data structures. The ability toread the kernel’s global data makes them ideal for student projects that examine global datastructures to more closely observe the behavior of the operating system. These projects typicallyonly read the data, so the stability of the system is maintained.With the introduction of the bachelor degree in Computer Systems Technology, Kansas StateUniversity at Salina offered an operating systems class for the first time in the fall 2004semester. From the initial planning of the class, the laboratory programming projects were aprimary concern. It was felt that programming projects using real operating systems would beperceived as more relevant
from an engineeringperspective is sparse. Based on the information that is available, two distinct possibleconstruction methods have been developed to describe the creation of St. George’s Church:MEOI (Measure, Excavate, Outside, Inside) and MSOI (Measure, Simultaneous excavation,Outside, Inside) [1]. The MEOI construction method begins with measuring out, on the surfaceof the rock, the plan dimensions which the 12 meter x 12 meter church and the 25-meter squaretrench that surrounds the church. Once the measurements were taken, the soft volcanic tufa couldbe carefully marked or scored such that the outline of the trench and the church were clearlydelineated. After the plan view was “drawn” on the surface of the soft volcanic rock
was spring break) to completetheir projects. These five specific deliverables enabled assessment of both technical and soft-skills inalignment with ABET accreditation criteria. For example, the preliminary proposal required: self-organization into groups, description of problem context, a proposed approach (plan), the definition of done/ measures of success, and relevant prior-work and references. The midterm report and final report bothclosely followed a typical conference paper outline – instructions for the presentation of these results wasintentionally limited, though the instructor provided a LaTX template. Some of the sections containedwithin the template included: an executive summary, an introduction with relevant references, a
collaborative learning) enabled. Another sectionwas given access to the website with all of these features disabled. In the other two sections, onlygamification and only social interaction were enabled, respectively.The sequence of LOs assigned throughout these sections were: Hand Tracing Sequential Code,Pair Programming, Statement Coverage, Hand Tracing Method Calls, Debugging, ProgrammingCoding Standards, Introduction to Software Testing - 1, 2, and 3, Introduction to UML, and CS1Unit Testing-1. This sequence was designed to align the LO with the material covered in class atthe time. About half of these LOs were directly related to course material, so SEP-CyLEintegrated well into the curriculum. In future semesters, we plan to develop more LOs to
. However, due to alack of emphasis on Computer Science, current instructors are not adequately equipped to teach suchcourses. Creating engaging lesson plans requires a comprehensive understanding of Computer Sciencetopics. Crucial to the success of legislative efforts like SF29, training K-12 teachers to understand theseconcepts and teach them effectively necessitates appropriate outreach from experienced institutions. Given the widespread use of technology, students have a basic understanding of Computer Science,but need refined programming skills to leverage this technology in their future professions. Waitingfor higher education to expose students to these concepts inhibits their potential and stunts theiracademic growth. Our summer outreach
requirementsand design development and the required skills for planning, analysis, and design of softwaresystem. Similarly, Requirements Engineering course focuses especially on requirementdevelopment tasks and technique along with requirement inspection technique. Both the coursesrequired the students to learn about software inspections and their impact on the software qualityimprovement. Students in both the courses had an average of two years of software developmentexperience in past (i.e. classroom projects, assignments, and industry).Artifact: Two externally developed industrial strength requirement documents (Table I), LoanArranger System (LAS) and Parking Garage Control System (PGCS), were inspected by eachparticipant during two inspection cycles
technology project had a high impact in the areas oftime management, engineering career awareness and planning, research methods and techniques,critical thinking concepts, and unit systems and conversions. From previous research we haveconfirmed the fact that engineering students with the demographics of The University of Texas atEl Paso prefer a class that uses technology.Finally, from the attitudinal survey, as a whole, the majority of the students were actively engagedin the different activities required to do the 3D technology project. Comments like the followingwere written on the open-ended questions of the survey: • Question 48. What new technical and engineering concepts did you learn from this project? o “I learned how to use
creation of a wide variety of objects.Learning Environments Department has embarked on a project to incorporate the Maker Campstrategy into a more formal process that includes creating sessions using learning blockswhich utilize a Project Based Learning (PBL) model at their core. This type ofstrategy could support the hands-on components of a Maker Camp combined with theinstructional strategies of Active and Project Based Learning in a simplified planning tool. Thedesign could then become a template moving forward. Our research explores what impact usingsuch a strategy had on our Tech-E Camp hosted at The University of Texas at El Paso –Undergraduate Learning Center as well as the impact of the technology challenges as theypertained to the
showed higher increase in the post-test score for thecontrol group (that did not have the team collaboration) as compared to the experiment group(that included team collaboration). The result from paired t-test showed that the increase wasstatistically significant (at p < 0.001) for both groups.We had expected that ability to collaborate and earn extra virtual points when working withpeers would motivate students to perform better, however the results seem to indicate otherwise.Based on the feedback from instructors, it was found that teams were formed randomly (size of3 students) which limited the engagement and that could have resulted with less team-basedcollaboration within SEP-CyLE. In future work, we plan to evaluate the impact of
June), with the first undergraduate course held in fall 2007. Thisfour-semester-hour undergraduate course would meet from three to five in the afternoon onMondays and Wednesdays. Yaprak planned to hold lecture sessions on some Mondays, with lab Page 13.1024.5time on Wednesdays and Mondays when no lecture was scheduled. Thus, the spring/summercourse would allow graduate students to pursue individualized study and the fall course wouldteach about a wider range of topics to all students.During the winter term, faculty began to meet on a biweekly basis and one of Mahmud’sgraduate student agreed to help with lab development as an independent study
suggest that thesample size is too small to be useful.Future WorkA number of efforts are underway to enhance the effectiveness of the ECE497 course. Atextbook is under development which will support the theoretical core of the fixed point materialas well as incorporating a set of homework problems and example labs. The planned text outlinewill include material emphasizing both processor and FPGA implementation. The intent of thetext is to allow faculty with minimal expertise in fixed point to offer this material in an electivecourse. Schools interested in using a draft of the text will be considered as “beta testers.” Asnoted in the list of advance topics above, great potential exists to expand the planned textbook toinclude material on many
account numbers. Methods plan – creating Create a Objects books and BookInventory customers of class and/or their choice AccountInventory class.Credit Card Create a class to represent Classes Each student Add error-** a credit card for a credit Instance produces a detection to credit card company Variables different test card numbers
cognitive levels: Lexical and Syntactic, Semantic, Schematic, and Conceptual 15. The Lexical and Syntactic levels are self-explanatory. Syntax refers to mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and the order of words in a program. Syntax errors are frequently identified by the compiler, but the error messages may not give the students the information needed to fix the code. The Semantic level (as adapted to the programming domain) deals with the semantics of individual statements. The Schematic level, through the use of programming plans, allows multiple statements to be grouped into semantically meaningful knowledge units. The Conceptual level deals with definable functions within the problem domain of the
multiple approaches to problems by discussing our problem solving methods with others.Electronic ExaminationsPart of the planned course evolution was the introduction of electronic examinations. In the Fall2012 offering, the final examination was conducted electronically using Moodle as the deliveryvehicle. Starting in Spring 2013, all examinations (two midterm and the final) were conductedelectronically. Most exam questions use randomized parameter values to minimize the potentialfor copying. Furthermore, during exams the WisCEL space is converted from a collaborativeenvironment into a proctored electronic exam environment by using inexpensive cardboardcarrels to visually separate each student’s table space from the others’. The carrels
Cyber Defense and Exploitation IThis course discusses the hardware/software tools and techniques associated with the protectionand exploitation of computer systems and networks. Students learn how to design and build asecure network including numerous networking services offered by most organizations inpreparation for the CDX, which is described in more detail in Section 3. Emphasis is placed onthe planning and designing of the services and infrastructure. Course topics include the DoD andUSAF policy and doctrine associated with the protection of communication resources, intrusiondetection systems, firewalls, honeypots and honeynets, span of control and accessibility, and use
open sourcelibraries to control the robot from a variety of high level programming languages, such as C,C++, Python, or MATLAB. In particular, the authors have had many years of experience usingMATLAB as the development environment of choice in their classes. MATLAB has beenespecially useful since robots are rarely stand alone systems. As such, they are frequentlyinterfaced with existing image processing or path planning routines, which may likely have beenwritten in one of these higher level languages.In contrast, the latest Scorbot model, the ER 4u, is no longer controlled through an RS232 typeserial link. The new interface requires connecting a PC to the control box via a Universal SerialBus (USB). This provides superior data transfer rates
, where previousversions of an exam are listed. An additional add-on feature, Packrat, will keep an unlimited Page 22.709.4 Figure 3 Sample Dropbox version history.number of deleted files and old versions of the data from your directory. Thus, it is possible topotentially never lose an item of work.9Dropbox also supports file sharing, webhosting, and online access as well.Dropbox has a distinct advantage of being easy and inexpensive to install and use. The softwareis freely available, including both desktop and mobile applications. A basic plan, which allows auser to synchronize and store up to 2 GB of data
thing to offer in a class tobetter cater to every learning style.” Researchers plan to create a library of tutorials to bedistributed throughout the course rather than the few that are currently available for topicscovered early in the semester. This will also allow for future implementation in subsequentcourses in the curriculum. In addition, the researchers plan to automatically document studentuse of worksheets instead of having them self-report time spent and then track the performanceof students in the class based on this usage. These will be important parameters to gauge successof the project.Bibliography1. Danielson, S.G., & Danielson, E.B. (1992). Problem Solving: Improving a Critical Component of Engineering Education. In
and plans for future work. Motivation and Related Work Systems and Control Courses in Mechanical Engineering expose students to core courseconcepts in which the relationships between the mathematical underpinnings, practical designprocedures and subsequent implementation are considered abstract for a considerable percentageof students; thus, there are often considerable disconnects between theoretical course concepts,computational solution techniques and relevance in real-world systems. Related discipline-based education research (DBER)2 has identified three key insightsregarding STEM education challenges that might address these disconnects: student-centered learning strategies (including team-based learning) can enhance
primarily done for the interviewer to get a better understanding of the student population.After a brief introduction from the interviewer about the study, students were directed to sign uponline for a 45 minute time slot if interested. A scheduling conflict caused this presentation to begiven on different class days in the Fall and Spring semesters. However, all interviews occurredafter students had been exposed to the iteration module and before the post-quiz wasadministered.In the fall semester, all time slots were filled before the second section had a chance to sign up. Tomitigate this in the spring semester, a different plan was implemented. Two different sign-upsheets were created: one for each section of the class. In the case students from
(putting the elements together to form a coherent or functional whole; reorganizing elements into a new pattern or structure through generating, planning or producing10): a. Media production - (Movie maker, iMovie, Adobe premier elements, online tools, etc.). b. Presentation (presentation tools - PowerPoint, Keynote, Impress, Zoho presentation tool, Photostory, Google present. Comic creation tools, Prezi, voicethread, Office Mix, etc.). c. Story (Word Processing or web publishing, DTP, Presentation, podcasting, photostory, voicethread, Comic creation tools, etc.). d. Programming - Visual Studio, Marvin, Lego Mindstorms, Scratch, Alice, Aspen, LabView, etc
Engineering Educator (Ing-Paed IGIP).J. Lane Thames, Georgia Institute of Technology Lane Thames is a Ph.D. candidate (ABD) in electrical and computer engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He obtained his B.S. in computer engineering with Highest Honors in Dec. 2003 followed by his M.S. in electrical and computer engineering in May 2006, both from Georgia Tech. Thames is currently planning to defend his dissertation during the Fall of 2011. His core research is centered around three primary thrusts: distributed active-response firewall systems and architectures enabling globalized Internet security, detection of computer and network attacks using computational intelligence and hybrid intelligence systems, and
CFD code enable undergraduate engineering students toperform CFD analysis of heat and fluid flow problems providing better understanding of heatand fluid properties, and their phenomenon. Using CFD simulation tool in undergraduateresearch can significantly improve the understanding of various fluid flow phenomena asstudents are able to visualize the flow domains using the simulation for different boundaryconditions. We describe an innovative plan for the development, implementation, and evaluationof an effective curriculum of CFD intended as an elective course for undergraduate andintroductory course for graduate level students. The curriculum includes learning objectives,applications, conditions, exercise notes with a proposed course
ofminterms (1-producing input terms) and maxterms (0-producing input terms). PETGUI providesa view of the minterms and maxterms of the function in a traditional KMAP view, howeverreduction steps of the KMAP are not integrated directly into the interface currently (planned forfuture work). Figure 3 shows the KMAP of the circuit function in Figure 1 as an example andillustrates how the minterm information (010, 100, 101) could be reduced into smaller forms(prime and essential prime implicants) with don’t care conditions (010, 10X). In practice,students could use the KMAP view as a basis to apply reductions and then check work usingessential prime implicants. Through third-party tool integration such as ABC and Espresso,PETGUI can also produce several
learneddramatically shifted towards the above average and well above average categories after theimplementation of the 3D technology project. Another set of questions in which the majority of the students agree on their perceivedlearning is shown in Figure 6 for the first year and Figure 8 for year two. In this set of questions theagreement of the students was higher than 60% and lower than 70% for year one and between 80%and 82.6% for year two. Here we can see that the 3D technology project had a high impact in theareas of time management, engineering career awareness and planning, research methods andtechniques, critical thinking concepts, and unit systems and conversions. From previous research wehave confirmed the fact that engineering students
discussion that her group memberswent through in arriving at their final positions and the evolution of her own thinking as the dis-cussion progressed, possibly in preparation for the final exam in the course; andd) Allowing the instructor to assess how effective the initial multiple-choice question was in en-abling the formation of heterogeneous groups as well as how effective the discussions in the groupswere in helping students develop deep understanding of the underlying concepts by looking at thesummaries of the discussions submitted by the various students in the class.We conclude with a mention of our plans for future work. We are currently implementing therevised version of the CONSIDER tool. Once it is complete, we plan to test it in a
Resistor SetC. Implementation Plan and DiscussionThe assignments have been made a permanent part of the circuit analysis laboratory in ECE atMissouri University of Science and Technology14. Student performance, student comments, andinstructor observations will be used to modify the assignments for effectiveness. In particular,the laboratory reports have been selected as measures for the department assessment planregarding ABET outcomes b) and k). For instance, the student grades on the Resistive Networksreports will address the criteria for outcome b) to organize and interpret laboratory data with agoal of having a median score on this selected assignment of 80 percent or more.This laboratory implementation provides an early basic introduction to