focus on how the data was obtained and prepared, how the different algorithmswere utilized, how the algorithms performed in the classification tests, what the results indicateabout our implementation of MEAs and how the results will be informing the next stages of theresearch project.Introduction Peer review is a cornerstone of the modern scientific process. It is meant to act as a gateway, allowing good research through, while filtering out junk science; to separate the wheat from the proverbial chaff. Yet many scientists, academics, and even the US Supreme Court agree that peer review, while essential to the scientific process, is far from a perfect system1. The problem
participating in their learning process—not simply observing what their Page 24.574.3neighbors are doing and copying answers. This means that the exercises cannot be identical foreach student, but should be similar enough to encourage collaboration and peer teaching.Both of the above issues were addressed by the integration of technology. The Moodle coursemanagement system was used to deliver active learning exercises, provide automated assessmentof student responses and immediate feedback, and allow easy faculty access to class performancedata. Rather than simply being a delivery mechanism, Moodle became the focal point of courseactivities. The course
. Page 24.1387.2The AIChE Concept Warehouse was designed to lower one of the biggest barriers that preventsinstructors from using concept-based instruction: access to high quality conceptquestions. Construction of good concept questions is often difficult and time-intensive4. TheConcept Warehouse alleviates this barrier by giving instructors access to a variety of conceptquestions in the core chemical engineering curriculum along with providing a variety of ways toutilize these questions in their courses. Instructors can either assign these questions as homeworkor use them in class as part of active learning pedagogies (e.g. peer instruction). If using conceptquestions in class, the instructor can have students respond using their clickers
received a number of awards including the ACS Award for Achievement in Research on Teaching and Learning 2014, the Norris award for Outstanding Achievement in teaching of chemistry in 2013, and the 2010-2011 Outstanding Undergraduate Science Teacher Award from the Society for College Science Teaching.Dr. Kevin C Haudek, Michigan State University Kevin Haudek is a Research Specialist in the Center for Engineering Education Research at Michigan State University. He is a member of the AACR research group. His research interests are in student understanding and application of chemistry in biological contexts and strategies to increase student writing in undergraduate STEM courses.Jennifer Julia Kaplan, University of Georgia
,the course gets started with three one hour lectures, with examples, on the basics ofArduino programming. These three lectures can be broken down as follows:1.) Getting Started with Arduino - Outlines basics of Arduino hardware, software, and robotics programming2.) Arduino Programming Language - Details sketch structure, programming syntax notes, and pin functionality3.) Starting Arduino Examples - Demonstrates integrated analog and digital writing and reading examplesTeams of two are formed, which stay together for both the lab exercises and the project.These can be self-formed by the students or assigned as they would be in industry.Beginning week 2, each week of classes for the next 8 weeks consists of two one
Engineering) from Ok- lahoma State University in 1986. He has published 60+ abstracts and articles in journals and contributed chapters to four books. Dr. Yuan continues to serve as peer reviewer for state, private grant programs and different professional journals and magazines. He is the board member of USEPA Monitoring Group, Gulf of Mexico Program. He is also council member of Mississippi Citizen Crops, Mississippi Office of Homeland Security. Dr. Yuan is the recipient, 2002 Outstanding Mentor of the Year, The Alliance for Graduate Education in Mississippi. 2004 recipient of Recycler of the year, presented by Mississippi Recycling Coalition. Professor Yuan is the JSU/Hinds County/MDEQ Computer Recycling Program di
her B.S. in Engineering from Brown University, her M.S.E.E. from the University of Southern California, and her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California in 1999. Her area of research is centered around the concept of humanized intelligence, the process of embedding human cognitive capability into the control path of autonomous systems. This work, which addresses issues of autonomous control as well as aspects of interaction with humans and the surrounding environment, has resulted in over 130 peer-reviewed pub- lications in a number of projects – from scientific rover navigation in glacier environments to assistive robots for the home. To date, her unique accomplishments have been
Science at Ohio Northern University. He received his MS and PhD degrees in computer science from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, and his BS in computer science and engineering from The University of Toledo. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process, first-year engineering instruction, and the pedagogical aspects of writing computer games. John currently serves as Chair of the Computers in Education Division and was one of the principal authors of the Best Paper Rubric used for determining the Best Overall Conference Paper and Best Professional Interest Council (PIC) Papers for the ASEE Annual Conference. He is a past recipient of Best Paper awards from the Computers in
. The forums ofMOOCs represent a possible focal point for learners, providing a venue for tens of thousands ofindividuals to share ideas and insights around a common topic. In terms of learner intent, somelearners might be motivated solely by the availability of thousands of peers in a singlecommunity, and have no intentions to complete any of the course assignments. While thisappears to be a plausible reason to enroll in a MOOC, very little is known about how forumswith up to 100,000 students provide value to learners.To date, most research examining MOOC forums focus on the frequency of use and studentresponses to survey questions about the experience of using MOOC forums. One study
verification, and teaching with new educational methods, including peer instruction, personal response systems, video games, and state- of-the-art CAD tools.Dr. Krista M Hill, University of Hartford Dr. Krista M. Hill is an associate professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Hartford in Connecticut. PhD and MSEE from Worcester Polytechnic Inst. in Worcester MA, and previ- ously a project engineer at Digital Equipment Corp. She instructs graduate and undergraduate computer engineering computer courses, directs graduate research, and performs research involving embedded mi- croprocessor based systems. Her current projects involve small system design, signal processing, and intelligent
each combination of events throughout both tests (S=slow, A=average, F=fast, C=correct, I=incorrect, O=on-task, O’=off-task). (b) On-task vs. off-task events. (c) Speed of responses throughout test. (d) Correct vs. incorrect responses.D. Eye GazeThe eye gaze and head pose technique had an average of a 24.2% error for the 6th grade test, a32.1% error for the 7th grade test, and a 34.8% error for the 8th grade test. However, for thestudents who scored considerably higher than their peers, they exhibited up to a 65% error. Fig. 3shows the relationship between the subject’s test score and the amount of time his or her gaze iselsewhere in the room
Page 24.1332.3learning7-11. Scaffolding12 was suggested as a strategy to help students through difficulties withimportant aspects of the domain that seem easy or obvious to “experts” like the instructor. Keyscaffolding strategies include breaking a large task into smaller parts, working in peer groups and prompting13-16; as students gain confidence and competency in a topic, the instructor removes thescaffolding. The efficacy of scaffolding combined with team-based learning principles isinvestigated in several studies9-11, 16 17. Employing the use of computing tools (such as spreadsheets, MATLAB or MathCAD) toillustrate key course concepts is
maintenance and support (such as battery life, easily broken, etc.) It issimple to take notes in the print version, but it can be a bit more difficult to write notes on theeTextbook although that is also a desirable capability that we wish to expand for the students. Inthis paper, we focus on the feasibility and technology readiness level for bringing an eTextbookwith embedded simulations to fruition.ApproachEngineering field needsEngineers often want to experiment and to be able to receive immediate feedback or response pertheir inputs. They want interactive analysis tools. Engineers want to perform trial-and-errorexperiments with a realistic system, with which they can interact, even if it is a simulation of areal system.Many current engineering
regulation in higher education courses.Their efforts are discussed next.Contemplative practices in higher educationThe Center for Contemplative Mind in Society has spearheaded the inclusion of attentiontraining techniques in education. A book published in December 2013 103 explains the methodsused to teach attention regulation and aims to empower educators to adopt and teach them tostudents. The authors present arguments about the importance of learning how to self-regulateattention and explains that this can be facilitated by the sustained practice of introspective andcontemplative activities such as mindfulness meditation, contemplative reading writing, andlistening, mindful movement, and compassion practices. They present research about