agricultural storage warehouses. He is a licensed Certified Building Contractor in the State of Florida and a member of the USGBC of Oklahoma.Dr. Rachel Mosier P.E., Oklahoma State University Dr. Rachel Mosier is an Assistant Professor at Oklahoma State University. Her research interest is the cost of sustainable construction and sustainable infrastructure. Other research interests include technology in the classroom. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 “A survey of undergraduate students utilizing an interdisciplinary laboratory building”AbstractUniversities with graduate programs typically focus on graduate research assistants seekingmaster’s and
allocation and management.5. Understand and use tools to monitor the progress of construction projects in terms of both schedule and budget.Active Learning Techniques Used in the CourseA previous offering of the course involved techniques such as informal groups, case studies,guest lectures, and peer review. Laboratory sessions were an integral part of the course, and theyinvolved working through practice problems and creating schedules in Microsoft Project. Thestudents followed step-by-step in completing the exercises and they were given take-homeassignments. In-class exercises such as creating network diagrams and line of balance scheduleswere completed. The students work in groups on a real project to develop a constructionschedule. Students
Classroom 224 sq.ft. 2017-2018 Race to Zero Multi-Family House 800 sq.ft/unit. 2017-2018Project DescriptionsEmbarc/DOG House – Solar Powered Lab1The first multi-discipline design build projectwas the design and construction of a solarpowered portable laboratory, shown in Figure 1.Architecture students worked on the design ofthe project, with structural work being donewithin the Civil Engineering department. Theproject was constructed by team of architectureand construction management students. Theproject was named “Embarc” by the architectsworking on the project and the “DOG house” bythe Department of Geology students who nowuse the laboratory
each course focused on a specific construction topic.The department requires every student to take at least two of these topics courses prior tograduation. Previously, there was minimal BIM software or skills taught within the curriculum.After two years of course development and increased student interest, the BIM course became arequired course in 2015. The class meets four hours per week, for a ten-week quarter and istaught in a computer laboratory. This class is listed as an Activity, rather than a Lecture or aLaboratory. It is the goal of this course to introduce students to a number of BIM softwaresystems and tools used within the industry. The class covers eleven software systems in tenweeks. The software systems currently covered include
provides a laboratory ofcommon experience for development of language, logic, and problem-solving skills in theclassroom; 3. A democracy demands that its citizens make personal and community decisionsabout issues in which scientific information plays a fundamental role, and they hence need aknowledge of science as well as an understanding of scientific methodology; 4. For somestudents, it will become a lifelong vocation or avocation; and 5. The nation is dependent on thetechnical and scientific abilities of its citizens for its economic competitiveness and nationalneeds [12].Upon graduation from undergraduate construction programs, graduates are engaged in thedesign, planning, engineering, construction, estimating/budgeting, management
university grade pointaverage (GPA) and transfer credit as well. Their ACT scores and sectional scores were recorded alongwith the construction studios grades. A data model was created by compiling all data and grouping theminto two groups of students who 1) took or 2) did not take studios A and B in the summer. Studio A is atwelve hours laboratory which presents an introduction to construction materials and methods,construction drawing and modeling, building systems, project life cycles and management, andprofessional thinking and action. Studio B is also a twelve hours laboratory in which the development ofbuilding assemblies and construction sequencing, drawings and computer applications, projectmanagement skills, and professional thinking and
. The data showed that itpromoted increased metacognition and career formation, coursework engagement, classparticipation and a sense of belonging. Recommendations on further research are tohighlight specific cognitive aspects of peer teaching.Kim et al. (2014) were interested in understanding the impact of peer teaching on studentlearning in a theory based and laboratory Electric Circuits course. Their case study isdesigned to allow teams of two student Peer Assistants (PAs) to prepare and presentcourse materials for the week they are assigned. Each week a different team presents andby the end of the course each student has become a PA. The authors start the report withintroducing the concept of peer teaching, defining it and describing
ubiquitous technology, mobile devices, into construction managementcoursework shows much promise [9,10,11]. However, the literature only provides two specificexamples of how mobile devices have actually been incorporated [5,12]. Reyes et al. (2015) [5]describe the incorporation of iPads into an undergraduate blueprint reading course, and foundthat students were more efficient in completing the class exercise when able to familiarizethemselves with a hard set of blueprints ahead of working with the blueprints on a mobile device.Cline and Davis (2013) [12] describe the integration of iPads into a construction materials andmethods laboratory course. They stated that the incorporation of iPads (1) facilitatedcommunications between the student and the
courses for architecture and construction management students. Prior to joining the faculty at Cal Poly she worked in applied research at the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory in Champaign, Illinois. She is a member of the Education Committee of the ASCE Forensic Engineering Division. Her research is in the areas of engineering education, including engineering case studies in undergraduate education as well as early education to promote interest in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Implementing Bluebeam Software in Architectural Engineering Design CoursesAbstractA critical aspect of structural
learning outcomes, and study the impact of social ties gainedfrom classroom activities. In short, the SNA tool will contribute to the development andunderstanding of how classroom activities support and foster student social engagement whichsupports learning gains and an inclusive environment.2 Background2.1 Social EngagementStudent engagement with a college course can come in many forms and occur inside and outsideof the classroom. The classroom experience can range from entirely composed of lectures to thosehaving only interactive activities. Students may additionally attend laboratory, recitation, orcomparable sessions. Students may engage in a multitude of ways with class material outside ofthe classroom to include working in groups
class learn from each other through thesepresentations. This approach facilitates the development of communication, people, andcollaborative skills and in overall it contributes to the leadership development. The classroomenvironment turns into a laboratory where the desired leadership characteristics of today’sprojects are discussed. The recent dynamics in the construction industry bring the expectation of constructionprofessionals’ leadership starting from the early design phase and continuing through the post-construction phase which includes the “useful life” of a building. This expectation necessitatesconstruction professionals to handle
. Schmucker, "Models, Models, Models: The Use Of Physical Models To Enhance The Structural Engineering Experience," Seattle, Washington, 1998/06/28. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/7291.[4] K. F. Meyer, S. J. Ressler, and T. Lenox, "Visualizing Structural Behavior: Using Physical Models In Structural Engineering Education," Washington, District of Columbia, 1996/06/23. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/6397.[5] R. A. DeVries and D. C. Stahl, "Structural Engineering Workshop: A Curriculum Of Real And Virtual Experiments," St. Louis, Missouri, 2000/06/18. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/8713.[6] A. Estes, D. Sibert, and C. Conley, "Using A Realistic Hands On Laboratory
, 2, 34-42.[6] Pinter-Wollman, N., Penn, A., Theraulaz, G., & Fiore, S. M. (2018). Interdisciplinary approaches for uncovering the impacts of architecture on collective behaviour. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B37320170232[7] Self, J. A., & Baek, J. S. (2017). Interdisciplinarity in design education: Understanding the undergraduate student experience. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(3), 459-480.[8] Yocom, K., Proksch, G., Born, B., & Tyman, S. K. (2012). The built environments laboratory: An interdisciplinary framework for studio education in the planning and design disciplines. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 7(2), 8-25.
engineering, there were concerns about how social distancing, especially in laboratory exercises,would affect accreditation. The engineering and technology accrediting board, ABET, issued informationrelatively early about changes due to COVID-19. ABET determined short-term changes due to COVIDwould not need to be reported (ABET, 2020). In addition to concerns about having in-person classes andlab exercises, another concern expressed was how to communicate online in ways that are as effectiveas in person. Universities were prompted to provide additional faculty support for teaching and someeven identified some “hacks” that could be used for a graphical interface (University of Nevada Reno,2020). Other lessons learned include better ways to grade
contactat the same time. We plan to further investigate VR across several course iterations and areoptimistic that these immersive tools will help to better train young construction professionalsbefore they join the industry.Keywords - VR, Education, Construction, Hybrid learning, TechnologyIntroductionHistorically, educational methods during K-12 studies and beyond usually involve classroominstruction, field visits, and using equipment in laboratories. In order to keep up with the fast-pacedsociety, traditional methods have continually been supplemented with technology such ashandheld devices and/or computers. While involving these devices in an educational setting mayset the stage for some distractions and interruptions, the positive outcomes of
facility construction subgroup, thefacility services subgroup, and the site and infrastructure subgroup.It is important to point out that the construction materials and methods course is not thesame course as the civil engineering materials course offered in most civil engineeringprograms. The civil engineering materials course is concerned with compositions,engineering behaviors, and design methods of various civil engineering materials,including steel, timber, soil, aggregate, Portland cement concrete, and asphalt cementconcrete. The civil engineering materials course uses laboratory sections to providehands-on experience in material testing.A review of syllabi on construction materials and methods course presented below intable 3 indicate
quizand a survey immediately following the assignment. Following this, after a waiting period of twoweeks, all students will be given an unannounced pop quiz about the Dayanta, with the resultsbeing compared between the groups to look at the impact of the interactive system on both short-term and longer-term memory. Given this heuristic study, the authors believe this research willcontribute to a better understanding of the use of 3D models and interactive media containingthem in undergraduate instruction.7. AcknowledgmentsThis research is supported by the Construction Laboratory for Automation and SystemSimulation (CLASS) of The Ohio State University. The authors wish to thank the ASEEreviewers, whose comments have considerably improved this
the effectiveness ofthis model in the classroom environment by undergraduate and graduate students.AcknowledgementsThe authors of this paper sincerely thank the suggestions and support from members inConstruction Laboratory for Automation and System Simulation (CLASS) and thereviewers’ evaluation. The reviewers’ comments have greatly improved this paper. Theauthors wish to thank Avichal Sharma, a fellow graduate from the Construction Programat The Ohio State University, and Bruce Rogers for their help in proofreading this paper.References1. T. Sun, Y. Yang, D. Li, and Z. Yi, “Investigation and Study of Ancient Rivers andLocks in Shandong Section of Grand Canal & Reconstruction of Elevation of GrandCanal in Shandong Section of Qing Dynasty
and laboratories that willbe included as part of the academic preparation. The involved team is developing a targetedcurriculum to achieve these goals.To implement this initiative, the three university campuses established a collaborativeintercampus cooperation platform. This agreement will allow faculty from the campuses todevelop an integrated curriculum that will enhance the educational experience. Each of thesecampuses offers a different educational component relevant to the interaction required to trainstudents to provide integrated design solutions. One campus offers a bachelor’s degree onEnvironmental Design. Another one offers degrees in Civil, Electrical, and Materials Scienceand Engineering, among others. The third campus (the
X X X various aspects of a construction project 3. utilize computer methods, including X X X Excel, to carry out estimation. 4. prepare a complete bid submission for a X X X X typical construction project ABET program outcomes (a) utilize techniques that are appropriate to administer and evaluate construction contracts, documents, and codes; (b) estimate costs, estimate quantities, and evaluate materials for construction projects; (c) utilize measuring methods, hardware, and software that are appropriate for field, laboratory, and office processes related to construction; (d) apply
].[17]. 90.1 users manual: ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA standard 90.1-2001. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2002.[18]. “Minimum energy performance,” U.S. Green Building Council. [Online]. Available: https://www.usgbc.org/credits/existing-buildings-schools-existing-buildings-retail- existing-buildings-hospitality-exist-19?view=language. [Accessed: 30-Jan-2020].[19]. Kohler, C., Shukla, Y., & Rawal, R. (2017). Calculating the Effect of External Shading on the Solar Heat Gain Coefficient of Windows. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2769w7wr
the curriculum (Figure 1). Kuh [6] argues for high impact practices (HIPs)in the curriculum and advocates for one in the first year and one in the majors curriculum thatoccurs later. Although not in the first year due to the large core curriculum requirements, thedepartment offers one HIP at the start of the major, and one at the end of the senior year. The first HIP occurs during a three week period in the summer between the sophomoreand junior year, Civil Engineering 351: Civil Engineering Practices – Field Engineering. Thecourse is required for all civil engineering majors and is affectionately referred to as “FERL”since it is held at the department’s 50-acre Field Engineering and Readiness Laboratory (FERL)site. Although it may
of locating, discovering, and studying local, state, and federal regulations/codes. The curriculum is integrated with laboratory exercises that emphasize blueprint reading, quantity takeoff and learning software packages used in cost estimating and project scheduling and controls.”Table 1 summarizes major course parameters that may affect student engagement and learningfor falls 2017 and 2018. Except not using poll (2017) and using poll (2018), both semesters weresimilar for most of the parameters. The course content consisted of three parts: (i) projectmanagement concepts and cost estimating; (ii) project financial evaluation; and (iii) projectscheduling and controls. As the summative assessments of these three parts, three
problems in a timely andcost-effective fashion, with focus on safety, quality, and environmental impacts. Formaleducation experiences included construction courses, professors, peers, laboratory projects,designing, sketching, site observation projects, Building Information Modelling (BIM), class andvolunteer experience, and student organizations. Through these experiences, students gainedknowledge and understanding of the principles and practices that guide the successfuldevelopment of construction projects. The strong links between formal education and industrialexperience opportunities contributed to students’ competencies, performance, and self-efficacy.Virtual experiences: Respondents indicated that virtual experiences that influenced their
not thefocus of most construction programs and are not discussed to a satisfactory extent in constructionclassrooms and laboratories, some students do not even have the chance to seriously consider thoseroles and even decide if they would prefer to work in those roles in the future. Unfamiliarity andmisconceptions about professional roles brings conflicts during practice and also increasesstudents’ doubts about their level of knowledge and capabilities [4]. Construction graduates havefound themselves working on transportation and infrastructure projects, instead of the typicalcommercial construction building projects that they are mostly prepared for through typicalconstruction programs. It is not uncommon to find students who have graduated
learners to get involvedwith the actual process of work through a 3D simulation without being in danger. Users willhave a better understanding of storm drainage systems, which will help to prevent possibleincidents due the lack of knowledge. The next stage of research will involve a survey to obtainusers’ feedback concerning the utility of this tool by the users (trainees) and the migration ofthese 3D models into augmented reality and virtual reality environments. As the related researchprogresses, additional information and guidance will be presented in the future.AcknowledgmentsThe authors wish to acknowledge the reviewers for their comments that have greatly enhancedthis paper. Thanks also go to members of the Construction Laboratory for
programs haveparticipated in student meetings. NAHB student organization executives also participate in theHBCU’s open house where NAHB flyers are handed to interested persons. Fifty (50) high-schoolstudents participated in the 2018 SciTech Week with the College of Science and Technology andvisited the lead authors’ concrete laboratory, where they were informed about NAHBscholarships and other educational opportunities. Email messages have been sent to some highschool instructors and principals regarding potential collaborations, but response rates have beenlow. Consequently, telephone calls will be used as a follow up to initial emails. Lastly, a summercamp to introduce middle-school girls to STEM and residential construction careers has