administered by the California Space Authority. The program is designed for degreedengineers who are currently employed, and who have a need and/or desire to enhance theirknowledge, skills, and competencies in Systems Engineering. There is a growing concern aboutthe decline of the US technical workforce in general, and especially in the field of SystemsEngineering.1 As projects and products become more complex, the need for Systems Engineeringexpertise is ever increasing. While statistical evidence quantifying the specific needs for SystemsEngineers is lacking, anecdotal stories clearly show that there is such a need. The targetaudience for this effort is companies and individuals who require better Systems Engineeringcapabilities, but lack the
Master’s Level specializations, such as the BiomedicalEngineering Master’s in Mechanical Engineering at San Diego State University. The currentMSE-BME program is by far the most popular option for both formal Master’s and blended Page 13.142.2(4+1) degrees within the college of engineering. There is currently a vibrant distance learningprogram at St. Jude Medical at two sites, Sylmar and Santa Clara. Additionally, there are othercompanies, such as Abbot, and Boston Scientific seeking to enroll their engineers in a distancelearning Master’s Program similar to that offered at St. Jude Medical. Currently, there areapproximately 90 students enrolled in
Engineering in Professional Practice (MEPP) program.MEPP is a two-year engineering leadership graduate program that serves as an engineering-focused alternative to a Master of Business Administration (MBA) degree, providing mid-careerprofessionals the technical, management, computer, and communications skills for today's globalbusiness environment [1]. Only 30 students are admitted each year to the MEPP program. Togain admission, students must have earned at least a B.S. in engineering, and must have at leastfour years of applied engineering experience.The MEPP program is cohort-based; the 30 students admitted each year progress through thefixed curriculum as a stable group. This cohort-based design facilitates close relationshipsamong students [2,3
Page 14.254.2Professor Howard Gardner introduced the theory of Multiple Intelligences The authorhas presented this at other conferences and he has reproduced the list below. (Narayanan,2007). Dr. Gardner suggested that the Intelligence Quotient, IQ alone should notbecome the primary basis for measuring human potential. He proposed that there areseven broad areas wherein children and adults can excel and listed them as follows(Armstrong, 1993). It should also be pointed out that there is a possibility of adding threemore to this list of seven (Naturalist Intelligence, Spatial Intelligence and ExistentialIntelligence).1. Word Smart: Linguistic Intelligence2. Number Smart: Mathematical Intelligence3. Picture Smart: Spatial Intelligence4. Body
.”1 Engineering technology faculty are a part of a field that must embracechange. However, this “built-in resistance” often stems from the reinvestment of the timerequired to master new technologies and maintain quality-learning environments in theclassroom. Therefore, increased value is placed upon the instructor’s technical expertise anddissemination as students become more technologically sophisticated.Is the mastery of contemporary technological theory and application alone enough to adequately Page 14.529.2prepare students for the workplace? Is there a fundamental disassociation between what is beingtaught and learned in the classroom
possible to capture alternate points of view easily.Software to host wiki’s is freely available 1 and easy to locate and install on any operating system.In addition there are many free and commercial wiki services than can be used 2. In the workdescribed in this paper the Wiki was hosted by the NSF funded National Center for Manufactur-ing Education. The site was used for a variety of purposes including hosting conference proceed-ings and the group development of a report.A Quick Tutorial on Wiki EditingWiki editing is often trivial. Editing may be open to anybody or only for permitted authors. In arestrictive Wiki only permitted users may edit the Wiki site. However open editing privileges tothe world is not an issue because changes can be
and its importance, was to educateengineers on how their decisions immediately affect other engineers’ activities. The secondobjective was that participants should gain entry level knowledge and application of CATIA,ENOVIA and DELMIA engineering software for 3D part design, change management and 3Dvirtual manufacturing in a PLM environment. The 10 week course utilized an online learningapproach for the delivery of the instructional content. Figure 1 is a diagram depicting thenetworking architecture of how the personnel and technologies within this online learningenvironment were connected. Each week consisted of a two-hour remote lab, which this paperfocuses on, and a two-hour remote lab. The classes were conducted by faculty at the Atlanta
, in contrast to the difficulty in attractingnew students and obtaining candidates interested in satisfying the Certificate requirements, bythe fall 2007 semester an additional three students had completed the Certificate program, twohad completed their MS degree (taking additional classes outside the USACE officeenvironment), and another five are on schedule to earn their MS degree in the spring 2009semester.Goals and Objectives of the ProjectThis paper assesses the impact of the GMU certificate program on HQUSACE and itsemployees. It attempts to answer the following questions: 1. Are USACE engineers better leaders, better communicators, and more professional as a result of the completion of the Certificate Program
instructor-centered to a student-centered teaching philosophy.One of the most important tools for implementing this philosophy is use of innovativetechnology. Gradually, although controversy does exists (some senior faculty members choose tostay with their traditional in-class lecture delivery), web-based online teaching becomes anintegrated part of the program. Research showed that the online teaching is one of mostinteresting teaching methods that is growing rapidly.1, 2, 3Based on the previously noted issues, NDSU has recently launched a fully online M. S. degree inConstruction Management. Meanwhile, some undergraduate courses were selected, as well, foronline lecture delivery in order to best utilize the online teaching resources in conjunction
Education of Scientists and Engineers states “A world ofwork that has become more interdisciplinary, collaborative, and global requires that we produceyoung people who are adaptable and flexible, as well as technically proficient”1. Today’sengineers must be integrators of knowledge, able to innovate and collaborate in aninterdisciplinary environment. Major change in the engineering education system is necessary ifit is to meet the needs of the nation and the world in the coming century. Recent national reportson engineering education 1,2,3,4,5 stress the need for flexible graduate programs focusing onadvanced practice and the world of work of the future. Bordogna5 puts it this way “There is agrowing consensus that professional engineers need an
industries (HPI/CPI) to heat hydrocarbon fluids that are being convertedinto fuels like gasoline and chemicals like ethylene. The John Zink Institute has been teaching acourse on process burners used in those heaters for many years. However, until fairly recently,relatively little consideration was given to adjusting the instructional methods to accommodatethe various learning styles of the students. This paper describes how multiple techniquesaddressing different learning styles are used to help explain a somewhat complicated, butcritically important concept in that course, for properly operating process heaters.IntroductionContinuing professional education is critical for graduate engineers because of rapid changes intechnology. 1 -4 This
improvements, products, process, andmarkets to evaluate their potential of profitable growth. Cultivating leadersdemands training, support and recognition. Our job as mentor is to prepare you tohandle an expanding range of responsibility with expertise, insight andexcellence.2Guiding Principles: The Red Gold Corporation 1. We will strive to consistently manufacture the highest quality products at the greatest efficiencies. 2. People are the company’s most valuable resource. Every person gives and receives respect, honesty and fairness; thereby building an environment of trust. 3. Timely, accurate and open communication in all directions is essential. We will work closely with each other and strive to achieve win/win
a feature of every recentASEE Conference as well as CIEC workshops1. The main features to address theindustry requirements are: 1. Design courses to meet industry needs and schedule for convenient times, locations, and course length. 2. Reduce overall engineering and manufacturing education training costs through pooled resources and best practice experience. 3. Enhance and extend the ongoing relationships with the State’s universities. 4. Build a network between high tech industries and state officials to have alignment on policies for education and economic development. 5. Develop a database of contextual industry cases that can be used by the
-person recitations, problem sessions or lab sessions. This formatcan minimize the amount of time students may need to spend on-campus while still providing alevel of personal interaction that many students appreciate. This format does not enable students Page 11.512.3to take a course completely at a distance.What Works and What Doesn’t WorkOne example of the educational technology development was for engineering science contentdeveloped for both engineering and engineering technology students through an NSF PlanningGrant (grant # EEC-0341842)1. Content was designed to appeal to a variety of student learningstyles. The various modes of instruction
evaluations are completed online voluntarily by the student before the grades are final.The evaluation questions vary from class to class, but every course has four required questionsand multiple other questions chosen by the faculty, department, and college. Students use arating scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) for all questions. For our analysis, weselected 12 questions that: (a) we believed measured the outcomes associated with the TeachingCircle and (b) had sufficient responses amongst all groups for use in the analysis. Thesequestions are listed in Table 1.We selected these 12 questions for the following reasons:• Question 1 gives an overview of what students thought of a course.• Question 2 is tied directly to our
Quality Matters and OLC Pillars. Along with this, a best practice syllabus templatewas developed as well. These were endorsed by the faculty participating in an ad-hoc onlinesteering committee at the university. While not formally endorsed by faculty governance, thesedocuments have been provided to all instructors teaching online since that time and thoseinstructors have indicated that both documents are helpful resources.The best practices tool provides faculty with guidance on online delivery and setting up theircourse site. It focuses on eight areas designed for faculty to check when developing or updatingtheir online course. The areas are: 1. Course Organization and Introduction 2. Syllabus and Schedule 3. Learning Competencies
ATI SC scores and RTOP scores.Correspondingly, no significant relationship existed between average ATI TC scores and overallRTOP scores. However, we did observe significant shifts in attitudes towards student-centeredpractices through pre- and post-ATI scores comparison. A discussion of the implications of thesefindings is presented.Background & PurposeThe traditional lecture format, or teacher-focused/content-oriented instruction, is the primaryteaching method used in undergraduate engineering education classrooms.1 Active learningtechniques, or student-centered instruction, involves pedagogical practices that directly engagestudent participation and activities in the classroom. Research has shown that student-centeredteaching strategies
many years and originally directed at the parents. The shooter had a history of reinforcement for violent actions. The incident was probably caused by a lack, or absence, of reinforcement at the present time. The shooting incident was a result of reasoned, if not rational decision making. The individual simply decided that people were the cause for his or her misery.Motivation may be defined as: “The willingness to exert high levels of energy towardorganizational goals, conditioned by the effort’s ability to satisfy some individual need” (1, p. 50).What motivates individuals to produce? Why is it that what seems to motivate one person doesnot necessarily motivate another? Does our motivation change over time? There are
distinctions between formal and informal learning,Jacobs and Park (2009) illustrate the problems inherent in that binary and point out its conceptualand analytical limitations of the approach. For example, informal, unplanned learning can and 1does take place inside what would be considered a formal training program, and theories whichreduce workplace learning to a binary choice cannot always account for such variation.Consequently, they developed a more nuanced framework that provides more complex variationsand thus more descriptive power when researching workplace learning.Jacobs and Park (2009) propose a framework, shown in Table 1, which defines
of the design; as well as, their experience indecision-making, are ample reasons why their expertise would enrich students’ learning andbrings them (the students) closer to the realities of the workplace. (1)Employers, by and large, are generally satisfied with the basic technical preparation of today’sgraduates, but find them largely unaware of the vital roles that engineers play in bringingproducts and services from a “concept stage” to the marketplace. An important reason for this“drawback” is that faculty members, today, often lack industrial experience and/ or any othertype of practical experience. This is particularly troubling when faculty members, straight out ofgraduate school and have absolutely no experience “under their belt
automated assessment software.Each of these must be bound by the requirements of the stakeholders and common objectives.Further, efficiency gains and subsequent cost reduction success will stem from capitalizing on acollective focus in STEM fee-based graduate education; this, something most tier 1 researchuniversities are working toward.Figure 1.0 depicts a macro sub-view of the distance education process. As suggested, thedistance education process is made up of multiple activities, where each activity has one or moreoutputs (products). Throughout, there exists process measurement points; which loop into acontinuous feedback and process activity modification sub-process. For example, a single pointmeasure for the effectiveness of our targeted
Institute of Technology, Shirpur (Maharashtra), India. He has 13 years of teaching experience. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Introducing research-based instructional strategies in a rural engineering college in IndiaIntroductionPromoting broader use of research-based instructional strategies (RBIS) is a critical challenge inundergraduate engineering education [1]. Marzano et al. [2] quote work of Sanders and colleaguesthat analyzed more than 100,000 students across 1,000 schools to conclude that teachers are theprincipal factors in students’ learning and also found that teachers can improve their effectivenessby using proven instructional strategies. In the
market.OverviewBefore unemployment rates were at historic lows, organizations were at a loss for employees,specifically qualified employees. In reviewing the unemployed, the question arises is there ashortage of jobs or a shortage of qualified workers? The qualities or attributes that employerslook at in job applicants is not a one size fits all nor is it a strict hard skills environment. Whilehard skills are quantifiable, soft skills are more subjective but according to a survey conductedby CareerBuilder in 2015, 77% of over 2,000 respondents claimed that soft skills were just asimportant as hard skills while 16% said that soft skills were actually more important than hardskills [1]. What does that mean for the workforce in terms of being qualified for
(CAM), and Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) [1]. The riseof digital manufacturing and the reliance on these technologies to reduce development timewhile improving product design and quality has been exponentially increasing over the past fewyear [2]. The reliance on digital manufacturing by industry has grown as high performancecomputing technology evolves. Recognizing the far reaching implications of this technology onresearch, several government programs in the 1980’s and 1990’s promoted the growth of highperformance computing. Today, programs such as XSEDE promote the use of high performancecomputing to conduct research in multiple fields such as engineering by supporting scholars andresearchers in using these computational resources [3
Institute. Mike is a registered professional engineer in Connecticut and held an electric Transmission System Op- erator certification from the North American Electric Reliability Council. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Universities and Industries: A Proactive Partnership Shaping the Future of WorkIntroduction and BackgroundThe U.S. Electric Power industry directly employs 2.7 million people; it is estimated that theindustry indirectly supports more than 7 million jobs and contributes $880 billion to the economyannually (roughly 5% of the GDP) [1]. Currently, a large percentage of the utility and electricitysector workforce is nearing retirement
demand by both students and industry [1].To address the increasing industry demand for workers to have advanced education and theaccompanying increase in undergraduate engineering enrollment, The Citadel developed newMS graduate degrees in three programs to meet demands.By employing a multi-disciplinary approach existing non-technical graduate degree courses,focusing on management and leadership, that can be taken to fulfill electives better preparegraduate students to meet employer and industry requirements. As a result, MS engineeringprograms have seen increased enrollments and partnerships with other departments and industryconnections. Various elective tracts provide the opportunity for students to earn graduatecertificates in soft skills in
CyberAmbassadors project(Award #1730137), which seeks to provide training in communications, teamwork, andleadership skills in order to advance multidisciplinary, computationally-intensive research inscience and engineering.The CyberAmbassadors project received 3 years of funding from the National ScienceFoundation to pursue the following objectives: Objective 1: Develop Curriculum. New training materials will be developed with a focus on professional skills (communications, teamwork, leadership) within the context of large scale, multi-disciplinary, computational research across science and engineering. The curriculum will be developed in consultation with an External Advisory Board of CI Professionals and domain experts
’ research and practice, which informs howthey teach a project management course for experienced, practicing engineers as part of theMaster of Engineering Management (MEM) program [1] at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.This paper significantly updates and expands upon a paper presented to the ASEE EngineeringManagement Division at the ASEE 2016 Conference [2]. Key features of the subject program follow: Students • All students are practicing engineers, working full-time, as they pursue their graduate studies. All entering students must have at least two years of professional practice. At present, students average about eight years of preceding professional experience, with some having
/aerospace engineering (11), civil and environ-mental engineering (12), and construction management (11). The cohort also included trainerswho were being trained to lead the next cohort: biomedical engineering (2), materials science (1),and chemical engineering (2). This group consisted of eight lecturers, nineteen assistant profes-sors, seven associate professors, and six professors. There were thirty males and nine females.Invitations to be a part of the grant were extended through unit heads and faculty leaders in thevarious departments. For example, one unit handpicked participants to include those being fairlynew to teaching along with those who were more experienced but might benefit from exposure tostudent-centered pedagogies. Most accepted
faculty change andorganizational change toward innovation through use of EBIS in teaching and learning.IntroductionTo achieve more effective teaching and learning in undergraduate engineering educationprofessional development needs to promote change toward innovation of use of evidence-basedinstructional strategies (EBIS) in faculty beliefs and practice as well as change in organizationalattitudes and norms [1-4]. To develop an effective program, strategies for change need to beutilized and assessed at the individual level and the organizational level. Rogers Diffusion ofInnovation (DOI) is an individual change model which consist of five step of a progression towardsadoption of change such as sports, business or teaching [5]. The steps necessary