Paper ID #39701Examining an Equity-Focused Collective Impacted Project through the Lensof Alliance Members’ Prior ExperiencesRebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group Rebecca Zarch is an evaluator and a director of SageFox Consulting Group. She has spent almost 20 years evaluating and researching STEM education projects from K-12 through graduate programs.Dr. Monica McGill, CSEdResearch.org Monica McGill is President & CEO of CSEdResearch.org. Her area of scholarship is K-12 computer science and cybersecurity education research with a current focus on diversity and improving the quality of research
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Increasing contextualized social awareness through multidisciplinary teams in global service-learning projectsAbstractThis paper is for ongoing work in developing unique collaborations between engineering andnon-engineering students in a user-centered design course and humanitarian engineering projectwork. In this paper, the authors will review their integration of social and emotionalcompetencies into engineering design and practice through a credit-based engineering course inconjunction with an Engineers in Action (EIA) Bridge Project student chapter at a midwesternpublic university. Previous research has shown that many universities have limited engagementwith topics of
Paper ID #37278Mobilizing Resources in a Community of Practice: How Academic ChangeAgents Work Toward Equity in their Change Projects ¨Selen Guler, University of Washington Selen G¨uler is a PhD Candidate in Sociology at the University of Washington, and a research assistant at the University of Washington’s Center for Evaluation and Research for STEM Equity (CERSE). Selen’s research interests include institutional change, social movements, and the cultural foundations of policy- making.Dr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the director of the University of Washington Center for
one of its engineeringdepartments by increasing the number of instructors who are women and women of color. Thispaper examines the difference in teaching and student learning outcomes when this departmentreplaced the teaching team for two courses from Caucasian men to women and women of colorwith no instructions on how to deliver the courses. It was noted that women professors drawfrom their work experiences and bring a hands-on learning and a project-based approach. Thischange was noted in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering because previouslywhen the courses were taught by men, the course delivery remained consistent with a traditionallecture-based approach. It is important to note that instructors are not given a guide on
improve salary-related policies, perceptions, leadership skills, and communityengagement. The workshops prepare the partner institutions to engage in salary equity effortsand demonstrate best practices in teamwork. Guiding principles used in creating the workshopcontent include ● Collaboration between diverse stakeholders ● Providing accessible and clear communication for all ● Addressing and challenging “unstated assumptions” ● Recognizing the emotions surrounding the subject of salary and equityOver the first year of the project, the workshops presented communication and facilitationchallenges with this audience. American Sign Language (ASL) interpreting within multiplebreakout rooms of mixed-hearing-status participants was of
bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering. He is currently the Lab Manager for the Ashesi Resourceful Engineering Lab (AREL), where he super- vises and supports both educational and engineering-based research projects. As part of being the Lab Manager at AREL, Jeremiah has spearheaded unique projects to develop the fluids lab. He also plays a vital role as the mechanical designer for an emerging up-cycling and down-cycling textile firm. Jeremiah believes in diligence.Gordon Adomdza Dr. Gordon Kwesi Adomdza is Associate Professor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Ashesi Uni- versity. He teaches courses that use Design Thinking to develop innovative concepts for new ideas and business models. He is the faculty lead
Paper ID #39681Common Metrics: Lessons from Building a Collaborative Process for theExamination of State-level K–12 Computer Science Education DataRebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group Rebecca Zarch is an evaluator and a director of SageFox Consulting Group. She has spent nearly 20 years evaluating and researching projects in STEM education from K-12 through graduate programs.Sarah T. DuntonJayce R. Warner, University of Texas, AustinMr. Jeffrey XavierJoshua Childs, University of Texas, AustinDr. Alan Peterfreund, SAGE ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Common Metrics: Lessons from
theresearcher-in-residence altogether) explore how one learns through making. We make variousprojects alone and together with others, all along reflecting on the practices and experiences oflearning through making.Building on designs developed in a STEM learning program by the second author [22], Making toLearn is organized around five making projects: restorying making, make something move,interaction, making do, and movements and improvements. The materials and tools presented toparticipants and the prompt for each project are listed in Table 1.Participants also read research papers and articles that focus on important issues of equity inmaking and have regular discussions. They interrogated the narrative of “the maker movement” -while Dougherty [23
Paper ID #36943Teamwork Perception in Engineering Programs through the Lens of Genderand RaceDr. Raheleh Miralami, Mississippi State UniversityDr. Saeed Rokooei, Mississippi State University Saeed Rokooei is an assistant professor in the Building Construction Science program at Mississippi State University. His professional responsibilities include project planning and management as well as architectural design practice in private and public construction and engineering firms. He has taught in architecture and construction programs since 2006. Dr. Rokooei’s primary research interests include simulation and serious games
“active learning.” We chose to limit the scope of this review to studies thatspecifically focus on social justice, but want to recognize that additional empirical work is beingdone, and, although not included in this review, that work also informs the implementation ofsocial justice work in our engineering classrooms.Literature examining courses that integrate social and technical aspects of engineeringMost of the papers we reviewed did not mention the use of a framework in the design of thecourse or in the evaluation of student outcomes (e.g., [1], [28]–[30]). Those that did used avariety of different frameworks. Specifically, Chen et al. [31] used Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning (e.g., [32]), Leydens et al. [13] and Reynante [33] used
to technology-richenvironments like makerspaces for traditionally underserved youth in engineering. Several pro-Makerspace actors purport that having experiences in such open-ended project-based settings canencourage engagement with engineering. However, as we know from prior work in the area,simply providing access to technology-rich spaces does not allow underserved youth to feelownership and belonging in both makerspaces and engineering environments. Additionally,formal and informal engineering education experiences do not center on preventing harm tocommunities and the environment in engineering work. Not only do future generations ofengineers need to reduce the harm caused by engineering and technology proactively, but harmreduction
exclusion andbarriers to use, as well as research and design methods by which these can be overcome. Thecourses consisted of 34 (BID) and 37 (MID) students each, and included a multi-week,team-based participatory co-design project that would meet the needs of a diverse range ofusers—such as older adults, users with visual, cognitive, or motor impairments, and users whoare deaf or hard of hearing. Both classes were project-based, where students were placed into 2groups based on their interests. Students were asked to interview their participant and identifycurrent pain points with existing artifacts, and then co-design solutions to improve userexperience
Administration from The George Washington University. She is also an NSF IASPIRE Fellow and the Principal Investigator on a nearly $3-million dollar grant aimed at advancing access, diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM . Her research interest includes exploring the relationship between faculty mentor engagement and minoritized student STEM persistence. She is a critical methodologist who uses both post positivism and postmod- ernism to guide her inquiries.Dr. Dianne G. Delima, University of California, Irvine Dr. Dianne G. Delima is the Project Policy Analyst for The Institute for Meaningful Engagement (TIME). Dr. Delima received her doctorate in Higher and Postsecondary Education at Teachers College, Columbia
; f) healthand biomedical workforce disparities; g) differences in patient perspectives on health care; and h)cultural norms and their effects on health care [4].Several academic programs have attempted to incorporate healthcare disparities content into theirundergraduate coursework, particularly at minority-serving institutions. For example, at CityCollege of New York, a Hispanic-serving institution, undergraduate biomedical engineeringstudents engage in healthcare disparities challenges through curricular modules, researchinitiatives and design projects [6] – [7]. Additionally, the HBCU University of D.C. uses a seminarseries to integrate the physiological determinants of health and social determinants of health. Atthe University of
beach.Ms. Connie Syharat, University of Connecticut Constance M. Syharat is a Ph.D. student and Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of two neurodiversity-centered NSF-funded projects, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation” and In- novations in Graduate Education (NSF:IGE) Encouraging the Participation of Neurodiverse Students in STEM Graduate Programs to Radically Enhance the Creativity of the Professional Workforce”. In her time at the University of Connecticut she has also has served as Program Assistant for an summer pro- gram in engineering for middle school students with ADHD. Previously, she spent
how to behave, succeed, and interact. Inengineering specifically, this can be seen in how traditionally, there have been lecture stylecourses where students are listening to learn, whereas in other disciplinary domains, like thehumanities, discussions are a part of how the learning is done. Other discipline specific rulesinclude how learning is measured, such as exams, projects, like in engineering or even aperformance piece, such as in an art discipline.StructuralIn the structural domain, institutions have policies and procedures that benefit some and notothers. In higher education, these policies and procedures include admissions processes andrequirements, defined by the institution itself.The structural domain of power is relevant as the
, experience and imagine. Their decisions havean impact beyond the end users of their creations, which gives their work broader socialimplications. The breath of one’s knowledge, stemming from individual or group experiences,encompass a multitude of factors such as ability, socioeconomic status, gender and race – isoften overlooked in the decision-making process. If there is failure to consider the experiences ofall stakeholders when considering the design, implementation, and execution of projects, thereare lasting negative effects. A good example of this phenomenon was the construction of theCross Bronx Expressway [6] which was built between 1948 and 1972. When Robert Mosesenvisioned it, he had no regard for the fact that the proposed location of
transportation systems is driving a significantly increasing demand forminerals critical to the construction of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) like lithium and cobalt. As thepredominant electrochemical energy storage technology for EVs, the demand for LIBs has tripled from2015 to 2020, and it is expected to grow to “2.2 million tons by 2030” [10]. One means of projecting andlegitimizing the notion that transitioning to electrified transportation systems improves quality of life andis sustainable is through the use of life-cycle assessment (LCA). Yet there are a plethora of crucial factorsLCA either has not or cannot consider [11, 12]. In this paper, we leverage an interwoven framework ofabolition, degrowth, and environmental justice to elucidate nominally
location—specifically, moving closer to senior leaders or farther away from them—are related to getting apromotion and/or getting assigned to a new manager (i.e., getting “re-org’ed”). We ask whetherthese relationships differ by gender and race, and consider how these relationships havesignificant consequence for gender and racial equality at this and similar companies. Ourfindings suggest that in our focal early-career cohort, White men have a reporting advantagerelative to all other race/gender groups over just a three-year span, especially in supportengineering and project management positions.As we consider our findings in context of sociological understandings of organizationalinequality, we look ahead to conversation with engineering faculty
awards, leadership awards, teaching and mentoring awards, and a PECASE in 2012. She is strongly involved in Purdue’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors. Her research group’s diverse projects and group members are described at pawleyresearch.org. Email: apawley@purdue.edu ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 On faculty responsibility for increasing students’ sense of support in the classroom: lessons from I-MATTER about Black and Brown studentsAbstractTeaching engineering students how to work in teams is necessary, important, and hard to do well.Minoritized students experience forms of marginalization from their
Paper ID #37342Talking Tech: How Language Variety in Engineering Curriculum InstructionCan Ease Delivery and Engage StudentsIngrid Scheel, Oregon State University Ingrid Scheel is a Project Instructor at Oregon State University. She works to teach from an integrated sociotechnical perspective in engineering science and design courses. Her focus is systems engineering and program management. Scheel has experience in small business strategic planning and risk assessment, designing and deploying fiber optic sensors and sensing systems, prototype development, instrumentation, data acquisition and analysis, and reporting
Development in UW–Madison College of En- gineering’s Inclusion, Equity, and Diversity in Engineering (IEDE) Office, and the Assistant Director of Wisconsin’s Equity and Inclusion Laboratory (Wei LAB). Don also serves as PI and co-PI of multiple NSF-funded projects, including: the NSF Eddie Bernice Johnson INCLUDES Aspire Alliance, the NSF IUSE: Inclusive STEM Teaching Project, and the NSF LEAPS: EVOLVED project. He received his Ph.D. in Cell & Molecular Biology (University of Wisconsin-Madison) and B.S. in Biology (Bucknell University). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Creating Inclusivity in Engineering Teaching and Learning Contexts: Adapting the Aspire
students read, reflect, and discuss various equity and justice-themedarticles. The second is four weeklong projects over the semester that require a sociotechnicalperspective to complete. Lastly, students complete an open-ended final project that requiresattention to equity dimensions in each project step. This paper will examine the students’responses to the weekly discussion reading on environmental racism.In this study, we focus on one week in which students read and reflected on two articles. Onewas an article from The Atlantic, titled “A New EPA Report Shows that Environmental Racismis Real” (Newkirk II, 2018). The other was an article from Vox titled, “There’s a clear fix tohelping Black communities fight pollution” (Ramirez, 2021). The
consideration of thestories we tell as scholars and helps move us towards more critical and nuanced modes ofrepresenting our participants.The Danger of a Single StoryIn her TED talk, Adichie describes how western media project the narrative of African countries.As a child, Adichie read many American and British books where the characters drank gingerbeers, talked about the weather, and had snow, which wasn’t typical in a country like Nigeria.These books opened new worlds for Adichie as a kid and her imagination of how these countrieslooked like. But as she grew up and discovered African books, she related more to them andrecognized herself in them. When she came to the US to attend university, her roommate wasshocked by Adichie’s English-speaking
about therole that these faculty can play in advocating for themselves towards work justice while beingsupported structurally in doing so. The purpose of this paper is to share how a structural mentoring hub for BIPOCxcontingent faculty in engineering was conceived and designed. While the mentoring hub is yet tobegin, the authors believe that sharing their conception process, that led to an NSF-funded project,can better support others to create similar types of initiatives at their home institutions. The 1mentoring hub, called Raíces (or roots in Spanish) Institute for Transformative Advocacy (RITA;Figure 1) is anticipated to start later
Choosing Self Care and Preservation: Examining Black Women STEM Faculty’s Decision to Pursue Entrepreneurship Education ProgrammingAbstractDespite recent STEM diversity initiatives, there still exists structural barriers on who can pursuetheir STEM aspirations. The lack of diversity in STEM fields hinders individual self-actualization and economic advancement as well as STEM innovation efforts. Notably, Blackwomen remain underrepresented in STEM higher education and academic entrepreneurship. Thegoal of this project is to increase the understanding of the entrepreneurship-related experiencesof Black women in STEM higher education. Specifically, we examine how the erasure andmarginalization of Black women in STEM academic entrepreneurship
groups in our faculty.[6]The program utilizes a hierarchical “badging” (recognition) system (e.g., bronze and silver) to rec-ognize degrees of dedication toward increasing diversity in engineering. These badges are intendedto acknowledge institutions that pledge themselves to ADRP’s goals of continuous improvementin engineering diversity and inclusion projects. The purpose of ADRP is to promote DEI by re-viewing DEI commitments from engineering colleges as well as their goals and progress overtime. Reviews are conducted by Deans who are active in ASEE and all institutions accepted intothe program. The program utilizes “badges” to recognize degrees of dedication toward increas-ing diversity in engineering. These badges are intended to acknowledge
student strengths.The realityBefore the first year of the project began, 1301 was added to the university’s core curriculum andmade available to all first-year engineering students. Students from civil engineering, computerscience, electrical engineering, engineering innovation and leadership, industrial engineering,metallurgical and materials engineering, and mechanical engineering enrolled in 1301 andparticipated in the program. Additionally, three sections (approximately 80 students) of 1301were offered during the fall semester. During the spring semester, one section of 1301 and onesection of 1402 (approximately 62 students combined) were offered. Enrollment in 1402 wasonly available to students whose declared major was in the piloting
-changing digital landscape are needed. Workforce development and shortages are significantwith needs for talent at all levels. For engineers in particular, workers need to be able utilize andadvance technology, excel in the interdisciplinary nature of complex engineering problems,within interconnected digital spaces, make decisions, and be versed in ‘soft skills’ required forcollaboration and communication.Traditionally, undergraduate and graduate engineering education has been siloed according todisciplinary departments. Students navigate their education through a series of courses intendedto prepare them via methods and tools that define the discipline. This approach is based largelyon 20th-century needs. While team-based and project-based
hop-inspired pedagogics and its intersection with design thinking, computational media- making, and integrative curriculum design.Sabrina Grossman, Georgia Institute of Technology I am currently a Program Director in Science Education at Georgia Tech’s Center for Education Integrat- ing Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC), which is a K-12 STEM outreach center for the university. I am working on several exciting projects inc ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Music, Coding, and Equity: An exploration of student and teacher experiences in decoding messaging and discussing equity with the Your Voice is Power curriculum