Conference Session

Design Across Disciplines

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael A. Gennert, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Taskin Padir, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

.  MQP Presentation Evaluations: In April every year all graduating students present their MQPs to their departments and the public. The RBE faculty evaluates every presentation using a standard form. The resulting data are mostly used to evaluate presentation skills.  Advisor's Evaluation of MQP: Every MQP has a faculty advisor who provides an evaluation of every completed MQP. The resulting data are used to provide a view of how well MQPs are supporting outcomes. Page 25.215.5The specifics of the assessment process can be highlighted using an approach that is two-fold.First, the faculty advisor(s) of a

Conference Session

Design Across Disciplines

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Besser, University of Saint Thomas; AnnMarie Thomas, University of Saint Thomas

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Annual Page 22.25.7Conference & Exposition. 2006.[2] Evbuomwan, NFO, S. Sivaloganathan, and A. Jebb. “A survey of design philosophies, models, methods andsystems”. Proc. of Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Vol. 210. 1996. 301-320.[3] Dym, Clive L. “Learning Engineering: Design, Languages, and Experiences”. Journal of Engineering EducationApril (1999): 145-148.[4] National Academy of Sciences, Rising Above the Gathering Storm Two Years Later, Washington D.C.:National Academies Press, 2009.[5] Seidel, Rainer, Linda Haemmerle, Chris Chambers. “A Multidisciplinary Design Education Approach forSupporting Engineering Product

Conference Session

Capstone Design

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Renee D. Rogge, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Glen A. Livesay, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Jameel Ahmed, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Robert M. Bunch, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Michael Wollowski, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Case Study for the Invention to Innovation Process.” Engineering Management Journal. Vol. 17, No. 3, September 2005.6. Sheppard, S, Kelly Macatangay, Anne Colby, and William M Sullivan. Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.7. Atman, C.J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., and Saleem, J. J. (2007). Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359 -379.8. Liebenberg, Leon and E.H. Mathews. “Integrating innovation skills in an introductory engineering design-build course.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 22(2012): 93-113.9. Jarratt, T.A.W

Conference Session

Design Methodology and Evaluation 1

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tamecia R. Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. References1. Carr RL, Bennett IV LD, Strobel J. Engineering in the K-12 STEM Standards of the 50 U.S. States: An Analysis of Presence and Extent. Journal of Engineering Education. 2012;101(3):1-26.2. Committee on K-12 Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering, National Research Council. Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.3. Dym C, Agogino A, Eris O, Frey D, Leifer L. Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education. 2005;94(1):103-120.4. Goldman S, Carroll MP, Kabayadondo Z, et al. Assessing d. learning: Capturing the Journey of Becoming a Design Thinker. In

Conference Session

Impact of COVID-19 on Design Education 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kevin Schmaltz, Western Kentucky University; H. Joel Lenoir, Western Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

in theSPF with the staff machinist teaching ~10 students to operate all of the equipment.Distancing requirements necessary for Covid made that final two-hour session impossible toconduct in the same fashion. In the fall 2020 semester “S” training sessions were reduced to onehour, but involved only two students at a time. This nearly tripled the number of hours that thestaff machinist spent in training, but resulted in comparable student training quality. For the 45students in Freshman Design I this meant nearly 30 hours of total training time. Fortunately,overall project activities during this time at WKU were lower so this was possible. In the spring2021 semester a total of 65 Mechanical and Electrical freshmen required “S” training

Conference Session

Best in DEED

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Isil Anakok, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Umair Shakir, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

-learning-and-ethical-reflection-framework-i-celer.[17] K. L. d’Entremont and A. S. Merryweather, “Board 87 : Integrating Product-Safety Curriculum to Enhance Design and Reinforce Engineering Ethics,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018, Accessed: Jan. 22, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-87-integrating-product- safety-curriculum-to-enhance-design-and-reinforce-engineering-ethics.[18] V. Subbian and L. R. Shaw, “Piloting an Adaptive Ethical Decision-making Tool for Engineering Students,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020, Accessed: Jan. 26, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/piloting-an-adaptive-ethical-decision

Conference Session

Design Methodologies 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sangarappillai Sivaloganathan, United Arab Emirates University; Ali H. Al-Marzouqi, United Arab Emirates University; Essam K. Zaneldin P.E., United Arab Emirates University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

energy for the transformation (c) Transmission- or energy distribution system that distributes energy to the system component (d) Control system, Composed of sub-systems for controlling, supervising and inspection of other systems’ state and performance, creating man/machine interface, and establishing the human safety system (e) Frame system that keeps the whole system together in space, and (g) Helping system(s) that Solves different necessary helping tasks [15]. The design process using this method starts with the identification of the sub-systems needed for the

Conference Session

Design Teams 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Meagan Flus, University of Waterloo; Ada Hurst, University of Waterloo

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Yes 3 model(s) did your Did you update yourElectrical Engineering group use? Other project plan often, 4 Did you ever have (Select all that based on new

Conference Session

DEED Postcard Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Molly H. Goldstein, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Engineering from the University of Illinois in Urbana- Champaign.Dr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Robin S. Adams is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. She researches cross-disciplinarity ways of thinking, acting and being; design learning; and engineering education transformation.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) enay Purzer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Eduaction - Poster Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Helbling, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Darin Marriott, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Thomas Gally, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

the design teams at the end of the semester. An attempt will be made in the future to provide Page 12.248.4teams with more of the required analysis tools earlier in the semester to help spread the workloadmore evenly and potentially allow for a more complete analysis of their design options. Bibliography 1) Brandt, S. A., Stiles, R. J., Bertin, J. J., Whitford, R, Introduction to Aeronautics: A Design Perspective, 2nd Ed., AIAA, 2004. 2) Sellers, J. J., Understanding Space: An Introduction to Aeronautics, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, 2005. 3) Texas Space Grant Consortium (TSGC) Spacecraft

Conference Session

Multinational and International Design

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Mehalik, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

., Michael Lovell, and Larry S. Shuman. “Product Realization for Global Opportunities: Learning Collaborative Design in an International Setting.” International Journal of Engineering Education, forthcoming Spring 2008.2. T.L. Friedman, “China’s Little Green Book,” New York Times, Nov. 2, 2005, Section A, p. 29.3. Eric Beckman, Mary Besterfield-Sacre, Gena Kovalcik, Matthew Mehalik, Kim LaScola Needy, Robert Ries, Laura Schaefer, Larry Shuman, and Doris Kowaltowski, “Creating the Holistic Engineer: A Focus on Sustainability in an International Setting.” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education, Rio Conference, 2006.4. C.K. Prahalad, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School

Conference Session

Design for Society and the Environment

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Williams, Virginia Tech; Richard Goff, Virginia Tech; Janis Terpenny, Virginia Tech; Jenny Lo, Virginia Tech; Tamara Knott, Virginia Tech; Karen Gilbert, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

). Page 14.2.9 Figure 1. Design “Tools” Covered in ENGE 1114Table 2. The Phases of the Design Methodology and of the ROXIE Project Design Phase Project Components • Partner with community service group • Serve community group in order to better understand their needsIdentify the problem • Meet with community group leader(s) to identify specific needs and begin project planning • Draft project proposal (must be approved by instructor) Clarify the design • Develop project plan (Gantt chart, Linear Responsibility Chart, Work Breakdown task

Conference Session

Design Projects

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Schultz, University of North Dakota; William Semke, University of North Dakota; Douglas Olsen, University of North Dakota; Arnold Johnson, University of North Dakota; Ofer Beeri, University of North Dakota; George Seielstad, University of North Dakota

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Site participants and supervising research projects.Table 1. REU Site management team members. Investigator Title(s) REU Site R&D Expertise Involvement Dr. Richard R. Schultz Associate Professor & Interim Chair, Principal Digital Signal and Electrical Engineering Investigator Image Processing; Embedded Systems Dr. George A. Seielstad Director, Northern Great Plains Center for Co-Principal Earth System Science

Conference Session

The Best in DEED

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University; Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

projectchanges, but also to raise their level of professional skills in expecting, coping with, accepting, managing,and even embracing uncertainty as preparation for their professional careers. These are skills andperspectives that we can also embody as faculty, to serve as examples and role models to our students.References:[1] Dutson, AJ, Todd, RH, Magleby, SP, & Sorensen, CD, “A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 17 (1997) pp 17-28.[2] Furnham, A & Ribchester, T. “Tolerance of Ambiguity: A review of the Concept, Its Measurement, and Applications”, Current Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 3 (1995) pp 179-199.[3] Mohammed, S, Okudan, G, &

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Methodology

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elise Barrella P.E., Wake Forest University ; Charles McDonald Cowan II, Wake Forest University; Justyn Daniel Girdner, James Madison University; Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel; Robin Anderson, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

moreholistic design paradigm. Engineering design itself is described as “a creative decision-makingprocess that aims to find an optimal balance of trade-offs in the production of an artifact that bestsatisfies customer and other stakeholder preferences” [1]. Sustainable design only requires thatsustainability principles be incorporated into this complex decision-making process to promoteconsideration of and balance between the economic, environmental, and social systems duringproject development [2]. Describing this innovative approach to design, Skerlos et.al. [1] statesthat sustainable design “brings focus” to the design process, while McLennan [3] describes thatsustainable design “expand[s] the definition of good design to include a wider set of

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Teams

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Laura K. Alford, University of Michigan; James A. Coller, University of Michigan; Stephanie Sheffield, University of Michigan; Magel P. Su, California Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. K., Fowler, R., and Sheffield, S. (2014). Evolution of student attitudes towardteamwork in a project-based, team-based first-year introductory engineering course. PaperPresented in 2014 at the ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN.[10] Coller, J. A., Su, M. P., Alford, L. K., Sheffield, S., Fowler, R. (2017). Assessment of peermentoring of teams in a first year design-build-test-communicate class. Proceedings of the 2017ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.[11] Jones, J. E., & Pleitter, J. W. (1981). The 1981 Annual Handbook for Group Facilitators.San Diego: University Associates.[12] https://tinyurl.com/ASEE19teams[13] Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate womenin engineering and

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Capstone Design Practices

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University; Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University; Hugh L. McManus, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael J. Scott, University of Illinois, Chicago

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

best describes the level of importance of this concept: (a) Unimportant (b) Somewhat important (c) Important (d) Very important 4. (Round One) Select the appropriate level(s) for this concept: (a) Undergraduate (b) Graduate (Round Two) Indicate if this concept is only appropriate at a graduate level.Table 1: Paired t-test for comparing the standard deviations of average importance and averageunderstanding between rounds one and two Average Importance Average Understanding Round One Std. Dev. Mean 0.6600 24.520 Round Two Std. Dev. Mean 0.7086 21.540

Conference Session

Idea Generation and Creativity in Design

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samuelina M. Wright, University of Michigan; Eli M. Silk, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley; Seda McKIlligan, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith G. Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Christos Christodoulatos, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Kate D. Abel, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Leslie R Brunell, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Sandra V. Furnbach P.E., Stevens Institute of Technology; Vikki Hazelwood, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Kishore Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Eirik Hole, Stevens Institute of Technology (SSE); Bruce McNair, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Thomas G. Lechler, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

constituencies while assuring a uniformity of outcomes acrossprojects and programs. The scale up has brought new challenges, especially ones unsurprisinglyassociated with needing to coordinate many design advisers and entrepreneurship instructors inthe two integrated course sequences. It has also not yet met expectations for the true integrationthat is desired. A comprehensive review following assessment of the current first implementationof the Phase 2 scale up will determine if the program is ready for full scale up and the furtherchanges needed to make it happen.  Bibliography  1. Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., and Weilerstein , P., “Entrepreneurship: Its Role in Engineering Education”, The Bridge, Vol. 43, No. 2, Summer 2013, National

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqulyn Baughman, Iowa State University; Lesya M. Hassall, Iowa State University; Nadia V. Jaramillo Cherrez, Iowa State University; Mathew Hagge, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120. 2. Kiefer, S. and Kuchnicki, S. (2013). Project-based learning: Teaching engineering design not tinkering. 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, June 23-26, 2013. 3. Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem-based Learning: Influence on students' learning in an electrical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 253-280. 4. Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83. 5. A.W. Chickering and Z.F. Gamson, “Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education.” AAHE Bulletin, 39: 3-7, 1987. 6. Baillie, C., & Fitzgerald, G. (2010). Motivation and

Conference Session

Design Methodologies 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Aaron Justin Joya, Georgetown University; Khadijah Jordan; Miranda Nicole Washington; Grace Barar, University of Washington; Alison Gray, University of Washington; Rylie Sweem; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

● Identify areas of themes, ideas, or concepts that designers might need to be aware of when designing Learn about different design models, specific research results Session 3 Design Models and about design processes, and visualization of design. The goals of &4 Design Research these sessions are to: Findings Investigation ● Investigate how we might help designers notice/be more aware of “something” within the design process Choosing one (or couple of) idea(s), concept(s), and theme(s) Session 5 Brainstorm Session that are interesting, most frequent, and or exciting relating to

Conference Session

Design Methodolgy

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rudolph Eggert, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, Jim Schaaf, Tim Hight, Drew Nelson,Ramesh Shah, Andrew Davol, Steve, Laguette, Jawaharlal Mariappan, Amir Rezaei, JawaMariappan, Keiko Nomura, Nathan Delson.8.0 References[1.] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, ABET-Accredited Programs, www.abet.org, AccessedJanuary 2007.[2.] Dixon, J. R., “Engineering Design Science: The State of Education,” Mechanical Engineering, ASME,February 1991, pp 64-67.[3.] Dixon, J. R., “Engineering Design Science: New Goals for Engineering Education,” Mechanical Engineering,ASME, March 1991, pp 56-62.[4.] Todd, R., Sorenson, C., and Magleby, S., “Designing a Senior Capstone Course to Satisfy IndustrialCustomers,” Journal of Engineering Education, April 1993, pp. 92-100.[5.] Todd, R., Magleby, S

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oenardi Lawanto, Univ Of Illinois-Urbana Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

interrelations. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P.J. Marescaux (Ed.) Metacognition Process, Function and Use. (pp. 19-34). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 8. Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychology, 34, 907-911. 9. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.10. Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C. S. Jones, B. F. Presseisen, B. Z., Rankin, S. C., & Suhor, C. (1988). Dimensions of Thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum

Conference Session

Design for Manufacture and Industry

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alvin Post, Arizona State University; Thuria Narayan, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

workbook will be available through the SMEsometime in the near future. Over time, it may be possible to establish a growing and freelyavailable collection of workable DFX exercises through the contribution of thoughtful problemsfrom skilled design practitioners. No formal repository or mechanism is yet in place to do so, butthe authors will investigate the possibility of making this workbook ‘expandable’.References1. Andreasen, M., Kahler, S., and Lund, T., (1983), Design for Assembly, IFS Publications Ltd., U.K.2. Bakerjian, R., (1992) Tool and Manufacturing Engineering Handbook (vol 6) Design for Manufacturability,Fourth Edition, Mc Graw-Hill Book Co.3. Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P., and Knight, W. (1997), Product Design for Manufacture and

Conference Session

Developing the Design Skillset

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Antonette T. Cummings P.E., Purdue University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ming-Chien Hsu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

well.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Briana Dorie for her feedback on this paper.Bibliography[1] C. J. Atman, R. S. Adams, M. E. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg and J. Saleem, "Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 359 - 379, 2007.[2] ABET, "Engineering Criteria 2000: Criteria for accrediting programs in engineering in the United States, 3rd ed," 2000. [Online]. Available: http://www.ele.uri.edu/faculty/daly/crite- ria.2000.html.[3] National Academy of Engineering, "The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century," National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2004.[4] L. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre and J. McGourty, "The ABET "Professional

Conference Session

Engineering Design in Pedagogy

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kyungsuk Park, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

students starting andfinishing the sequence of engineering courses at each high school to help the team address thesecond research question: Does student participation in a multi-year sequence of courses focusedon engineering correlate with changes in performance or design knowledge?AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. DRL-0918621. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect theviews of the National Science Foundation. References1. National Center for Technological Literacy. Our Nation's Challenge. 2010 [cited 2010 January 12

Conference Session

Design Communications & Cognition II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Caleb DeValve, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Richard M. Goff, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Page 22.904.12References[1] Malik Q, Koehler MJ, Mishra P, Buch N, Shanblatt M, Pierce SJ, 2010. Understanding student attitudes in a freshman design sequence. International Journal of Engineering Education; 26(5): 1179-1191[2] Farrell S, Hesketh RP, Newell JA, Slater CS, 2001. Introducing freshmen to reverse engineering and design through investigation of the brewing process. International Journal of Engineering Education; 17(6): 588-592[3] Al-Rizzo H, Mohan S, Reed M, Kinley D, Hemphill Z, Finley C, Pope A, Osborn D, Crolley W, 2010. Directional-based cellular e-commerce: undergraduate systems engineering capstone design project. International Journal of Engineering Education; 26(5): 1285-1304.[4] Hines PD

Conference Session

Design Tools & Methodology I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pedro Renato Acosta, University of Texas, El Paso; Rafael Gonzalez, University of Texas, El Paso; Noe Vargas Hernandez, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

for options. For example, adesign engineer may use brainstorming for all occasions; there can be various reasons for this, Page 22.174.4some of them understandable. First, learning a new method may require some time, further,identifying which method is more appropriate to learn for the particular design problem can bedifficult. The knowledge or expertise to identify which method(s) are most appropriate for eachdesign problem, takes time to develop, and when considering multiple areas or disciplines in thedesign process, one can imagine the difficulty of becoming expert in more than one area (e.g.design quality, design creativity, sustainable

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rob O. Hovsapian, Florida State Univeristy ; Chiang Shih, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; Bruce A. Harvey, Florida A&M University/Florida State University, College of Engineering; Okenwa I. Okoli, Florida A&M University/Florida State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

capstone senior design course objectives and outcomes are met, the senior designteams and each student is evaluated by course instructor, faculty advisor(s), two or more in thecase of the multidisciplinary teams, peer evaluation, external sponsors, Mechanical EngineeringAdvisory Council (MEAC) and by senior exit interviews. These evaluations are conductedthrough presentations, reports, staff meeting and Peer self evaluations. Grading rubrics weredeveloped for assessment during the course. It was established to assess the students on the courseobjectives and student outcomes as set forth in the course syllabus. During the two semesters the teams present their project a total seven times. During the 1stsemester the team has three presentations