Conference Session

Capstone Design Pedagogy I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Page 15.371.8While the technology readiness level is not linearly related to the rubric scores of capstoneproject demonstrations, when plotted against the TRL the demonstration score, S, has a quadraticdependence given by S = (TRL - 6)-.13 + 3.3. Thus demonstration scores are highest (mean of3.3) for a TRL of 6. This technology readiness level is defined as "Representative model orprototype system, which is well beyond the breadboard tested for TRL 5, tested in a relevantenvironment. Examples include testing a prototype in a high fidelity laboratory environment orin simulated operational environment."11. Thus capstone project which have students createprototype systems generally scored better than those which are more speculative or research

Conference Session

Design Communications & Cognition I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tiffany Tseng, Stanford University; Maria Yang, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Daniel Frey for consenting to use his course as acontext for this study and also thank the students for their participation. The work described inthis paper was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Award 0830134. Theopinions, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed are those of the authors and donot necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. Page 22.1501.15References1. Hsi, S., Linn, M., and Bell, J. (1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 151–158.2. Sorby, S. (2009). Educational

Conference Session

Early Engineering Design Experiences

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Douglas Oppliger, Michigan Technological University; Jean Kampe, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

summer months. In 2009, the Utica team qualified for, and participated in, the International MATE Finals in Buzzard’s Bay Massachusetts in June 2009. • RC Aircraft Kit: The Detroit Aerospace H.S. “Afterburners” built a 1/5 scale Piper Cub RC aircraft from a kit. They plan to use this to take aerial photos. • Environmental Consultants: Hancock H. S. PEAK (Partnering the Environment and Academics in the Keweenaw [peninsula of Michigan]) worked as an environmental consulting group focusing on a local watershed area. They performed stream monitoring, mapping, and plant inventory for the watershed.Each HSE team worked on its project during the 2008/2009 school year. In April 2009, teammembers from all five HSE

Conference Session

Assessment

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Logan Oplinger, Arizona State University; Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

data found here. This study can also be used as a basis for further insight into whycertain processes are considered “expert” models and others are considered novice.11 References 1. Smith, Robert P., and Primanata Tjandra. "Experimental Observation of Iteration in Engineering Design." Research in Engineering Design 10.2 (1998): 107-17. Springer Link. Web. 28 June 2013. 2. Adams, Robin S., et al. "Educating Effective Engineering Designers: The Role of Reflective Practice." Design Studies 24.3 (2003): 275-94. Science Direct. Web. 27 June 2013. 3. Adams, Robin. “Cognitive Processes in Iterative Design Behavior.” Diss. University of Washington, 2001. Ann Arbor: Dissertations, 2001. ProQuest Dissertations &

Conference Session

Student Feedback and Assessment in Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Tiago R. Forin, Rowan University; Cole H. Joslyn, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #19637Approaches to Coaching Students in Design ReviewsDr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Robin S. Adams is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. She researches cross-disciplinarity ways of thinking, acting and being; design learning; and engineering education transformation.Mr. Tiago R. Forin, Rowan University Tiago Forin is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education and researcher at Purdue University affiliated with

Conference Session

Design Methodologies 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Vicki V. May P.E., Dartmouth College; Ryan Michael Chapman, Dartmouth College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

.[3] May, Vicki (2014). “Broadening the Path to Engineering,” Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vicki-may/broadening-the-path-to- engineering_b_4941739.html. March 2014.[4] Mamaril, Natasha A., Usher, Ellen L., Li, Caihong R., Economy, D. Ross, and Kennedy, Marian, S. (2016). “Measuring Undergraduate Students’ Engineering Self-Efficacy: A Validation Study.’ Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 105, No. 2, pp. 366-395.[5] Hsieh, P., Sullivan, J. R., Sass, D. A., & Guerra, N. S. (2012). Undergraduate engineering students’ beliefs, coping strategies, and academic performance: An evaluation of theoretical models. Journal of Experimental Education, 80, 196–218. http://dx.doi.org

Conference Session

Design Pedagogy 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Imane Aboutajedyne, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez (Morocco); Yassine Salih Alj, Al Akhawayn University; Ahmed Aboutajeddine, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez (Morocco).

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, “The Field guide to Human-centered Design: Design kit”. IDEO (2015)[ 6] Biggs, John. "Enhancing education through constructive alignment", Higher Education, pp. 347‑364, 1996.[ 7] Biggs, John. "Aligning teaching for construction learning", Higher Education Academy, 2003.[ 8] Astin, Alexander W. “Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education”. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2012.[ 9] Brown, Tim. "Design thinking." Harvard business review 86.6 (2008): 84.[ 10] S. Doorley et al, "Design Thinking Bootleg", d.school at Stanford University, 2018.[ 11] Kleinsmann, Maaike, et al. "Communicating actionable user research for human-centered design." Artificial

Conference Session

Maker Spaces in Design Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Chieloka Mbaezue, Stanford University; Eric Reynolds Brubaker, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Eduaction - Poster Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Colin Campbell, TechnicalMastery.com Corp.; Steve Lambert, University of Waterloo

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

: Annual drinking water demand is met by runoff rain water supply in worst year Requirements: Safe to drink. Cost suits villagers’ incomes. Constraints: Amount of water available from any given source is limited. Ranking Criteria: Quality of Water; Legalities of Using Source; Impact on Others; Cost/Ease of Operation/Maintenance; Capital Cost; Quantity of Water 2. Conceptual Brainstorm Concepts: Rainwater Harvesting; Dam Stream; Hydro Reservoir; Spring; Well Design: Rank Concepts: (1) Rainwater Harvesting, (2) Hydro Reservoir, (3) Spring, … Select Concept(s

Conference Session

Design for the Environment

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Graham Armitage, University of Calgary; Phillip du Plessix, University of Calgary; Kara Chomistek, University of Calgary; Daryl Caswell, University of Calgary; Clifton Johnston, University of Calgary; Mohamed Nazir, University of Calgary; Marjan Eggermont, University of Calgary; Diane Douglas, University of Calgary; Brigit Knecht, University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

the engineering education front inthe 1990’s. The following quote from the EWB website explains their philosophy: Poverty is not about weakness. For the 800 million people who go hungry each day and the one billion who lack access to clean water, poverty is an absence of opportunity. Engineers Without Borders is responding to this urgent need, helping people in developing communities gain access to technologies that will improve their lives. We believe that technology, when appropriately incorporated into each community's social, cultural, economic and political context, can drive extraordinary change.The focus of EWB is on developing the technical capacity at the local level in developingcountries to ensure that innovative

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Eduaction - Poster Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Owen Carlson, Brigham Young University; Mason Webster, Brigham Young University; Greg Jensen, Brigham Young University; Daniel Korth, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Senior Design projects can develop these skills and possibleareas of improvement. It has shown that traditional methods are still applicable, but needsome adaptation to be effective. Future work could be done in exploring the effects ofdifferent languages and cultures on the designs from global design teams.AcknowledgementsSpecial thanks should be given to PACE for the sponsorship and support of the Seniordesign project.Bibliography1. Osborn, A.F., Applied Imagination. Third ed. 1963: Charles Scribner and Sons2. Ulrich, K., Eppinger, S., “Product Design and Development”, 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.3. Ullman, D.G., Wood, S., and Craig, D., The Importance of Drawing in the Mechanical Design Process. Computers & Graphics, 1990

Conference Session

Design Methodology

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Rinehart, NIOSH; Donna Heidel, NIOSH; Andrea Okun, NIOSH; Michael Barsan, NIOSH

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

andthe Steel Erectors Association of America that identifies the specific decisions structuralengineers can make to improve the safety constructability of their designs.21 Page 14.489.11 10Bibliography1. Cosman, M. and Pfahlert, J. 2006. Safety in Design in Construction Research Report. April, 2006. New Zealand Construction Industry Council.2. ORC WorldwideTM (ORC) EH&S Executive Business Issues Forum [Personal communication, April 12, 2007]. The ORC EH&S Business Issues Forum is a network for executives or directors with overall authority for environmental, health, and safety

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Potpourri

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Llewellyn Mann, Central Queensland University; Shanna Daly, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

experiences, so that practitioner may be able to develop the ability to work with anew approach.The frameworks presented in this paper were aimed to serve as supports to guide interactionswith professional practitioners. They come from our own experiences and our own goals to carryout the implications suggested by our work. In the future a wider exploration and development ofthe framework is needed, particularly due to the apparent disconnect between the results of Page 14.420.9design research and changes in practice.Bibliography1. DALY, S., MANN, L. & ADAMS, R.S., (2008) A New Direction for Engineering Education Research: Unique

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ding Yuan, Colorado State University, Pueblo; Nebojsa Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo; Jane Fraser, Colorado State University, Pueblo

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

fortheir professional development. All responses to the question “Is this course helping you preparefor your future career” were positive, except the following two neutral or partially negativecomments: - “Yes, but it is hard to tell since I already have a job.” - “No, the course has no bearing on my lack of career direction.”As for the comments on the overall course, one student suggested “work in more group activitiesand group discussion,” and another wanted to get a regular grade instead of an “S/U” grade; allother comments were positive. Some answers were - “The ethics section was done well.” - “Everything was great. Thank you very much! “ - “Overall if I was to have had this class before my design project, I would not have

Conference Session

Design for Community and Environment

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Craig Somerton, Michigan State University; Brian Thompson, Michigan State University; Alan Haddow, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Thompson, Michigan State University BRIAN S. THOMPSON Brian S. Thompson is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. Currently he serves as the Departmental Design Coordinator. Dr. Thompson has published in the following areas: mechanisms, smart materials, composite materials, flexible fixturing, robotics, variational methods and finite element techniques. He received a BSc and MSc from Newcastle University, England, in 1972 and 1973 respectively, and a Ph.D. from the University of Dundee in Scotland in 1976.Alan Haddow, Michigan State University ALAN HADDOW Alan Haddow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. Currently

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Krisztian Dancs, University of North Florida; Vanja Gadzic, University of North Florida; Tyler Dao, University of North Florida; Truong Nguyen, University of North Florida; Chiu Choi, University of North Florida

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

four control systems. Eleven commands were devisedto control the vehicle’s functions: 1. “A” – accelerate (depress gas pedal) 2. “S” – decelerate (release gas pedal) 3. “B” – brake (apply brake) 4. “U” – release brake 5. “P” – move transmission stick to Park Page 11.139.15 6. “R” – move transmission stick to Reverse 7. “N” – move transmission stick to Neutral 8. “D” – move transmission stick to Drive 9. “F” – steer left 10. “H” – hold the current steering wheel position 11. “J” – steer rightThe program did not support multi-tasking, for

Conference Session

Design for Manufacture and Industry

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rudolph Eggert, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

mutually exclusive question, they could select either:a) in one or more required courses, b) in elective course(s), c) both or d) neither. The results areshown as percentages in Table 7. Learning Experiences Provided. Perhaps the most significant column is the “Neither.” This column shows the percentageof respondents whose schools do not require the learning experience or offer it as an elective.The largest percentages occur for non-classroom experiences, items 7, 8 and 9 (visits, summerinternships and Co-op’s). While non-classroom experiences are meaningful and desirable, thesenumbers are understandable considering the resources required and the national trend to reducetotal curriculum credit hours. To determine the total “supply

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Postcard and Student Essays

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malini Josiam, University of Texas, Austin; Anita Patrick, University of Texas, Austin; Madison E. Andrews, University of Texas, Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. S., Talley, K. G., … Newstetter,W. C. (2015). A Review of University Maker Spaces. In ASEE Annual Conference andExposition (pp. 1–16). Seattle, WA.Forest, C. R., Moore, R. A., Jariwala, A. S., Fasse, B. B., Linsey, J., Newstetter, W., ... &Quintero, C. (2014). The Invention Studio: A University Maker Space and Culture. Advances inEngineering Education, 4(2), n2.Wilczynski, V. (2015). Academic Maker Spaces and Engineering Design. In ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition (pp. 1–18). Seattle, WA.Wilczynski, V., J. Zinter, and L. Wilen. (2016). Teaching Engineering Design in a HigherEducation Makerspace: Blending Theory and Practice to Solve Client-based Problems. In ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA.

Conference Session

Design Across the Curriculum 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Bekir Kelceoglu, Syracuse University; Efe Kutuk, Kean University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Where It's Headed Today," Channal Futures, 25 May 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.channelfutures.com/msp- 501/iot-past-and-present-the-history-of-iot-and-where-its-headed-today. [Accessed 3 February 2020].[6] S. Liu, "Global IoT end-user spending worldwide 2017-2025," Statista, 28 January 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/976313/global-iot-market-size/. [Accessed 02 February 2020].[7] S. R. Department, "Internet of Things - number of connected devices worldwide 2015- 2025," Statista, 14 November 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/471264/iot-number-of-connected-devices-worldwide/. [Accessed 03 February 2020].

Conference Session

Capstone Design Practices

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Xiuhua April Si, California Baptist University; Ziliang Zhou, California Baptist University; Jinxiang Xi, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

computationally simulate the flow before they startdesigning the rest. They were required to study and explore different simulation tools such asSolidworks Flow simulation, Comsol Multiphysics CFD, and Ansys Fluent, all available on campus.The first simulation in Fig 6a shows the flow in the testing chamber is not uniform as the designintention. It varies from bottom to top in the range of 18 to 40 m/s. This velocity variance is caused bythe sharp ninety degree flow direction change. The distance between the test chamber and the ninetydegree angle not long enough to allow the flow to fully develop. Obviously, 45 degree angled turningvanes needed to guide the flow gradually to the test chamber. The next three simulations in Fig 6b, c,and d show how the

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anu Osta, Rowan University; Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

others were all placed and secured inside here. The components are shown in Fig. 9.Side panels could be unscrewed from either side of the support base to access or modify thesecomponents. On the front of the support base we developed a user-friendly control panel (see Fig10) which had an on/off button, up and down buttons, and increase and decrease speed buttons.Fig. 8 CAD assembly of the portable mechanical tester (a) (b) (c) (d)Fig. 9 (a) Arduino (b) Nema23 Stepper motor linear stage (c) AMT10 modular incrementalradial encoder, (d) S-type Beam High-Precision Load CellFig. 10 Control panelFig. 11 Back plateThe back plate (Fig. 11) had to be specifically designed to attach to

Conference Session

Student Evaluation in Design Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Krista M Kecskemety, Ohio State University; Bob Rhoads, Ohio State University; Clifford A. Whitfield, Ohio State University; Jacob T. Allenstein, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

importance. This will help put all of theresults into the context of the larger picture of the MDC program.References1. Miller, R.L. and Olds, B.M., “A Model Curriculum for a Capstone Course in Multidisciplinary Engineering Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, 83(4), 1994, pp. 311-316.2. Todd, R.H., Sorensen, C.D., and Magleby, S.P., “Designing a Senior Capstone Course to Satisfy Industrial Customers,” Journal of Engineering Education, 82(2), 1993, pp. 92-100.3. Howe, S. and Wilbarger, J., “2005 National Survey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2006.4. Todd, R.H., Magleby, S.P., Sorensen, C.D., Swan, B.R., and Anthony, D.K., “A

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Delorme, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Systems Engineering Issues In US Defense Industry, National Defense Industrial Association Systems Engineering Division Task Group Report, Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved January 29, 2015 from http://www.ndia.org/Divisions/Divisions/SystemsEngineering/Documents/Studies 2. McGrath, B.; Lowes, S.; Squires, A.; Jurado,C. (2011, June 26-29) SE Capstone: A Pilot Study of 14 Universities to Explore SE Learning and Career Interest through DoD Problems. Presented at ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada. 3. Ardis, M.; Carmen, C.L.;DeLorme, M.;Hole, E. (2014, June 15-18) Using a Marketplace to Form Multidisciplinary Systems Engineering Capstone Project Teams. Presented at ASEE Annual

Conference Session

Understanding Student Development in Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University; Steven Patrick Potter

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

skills, which opens the doors for moreadvanced hardware design.The combination of these skillsets provides increased project possibilities, yielding more excitingand more educational projects, as group members teach each other these new skills as theydevelop their project. We will continue to integrate these recommendations and best practicesinto the two courses this spring and in the future.References[1] C. Fry and S. Potter, “The Design and Development of a Multi-Disciplinary Project inEmbedded Systems Design,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf-Southwestern Section AnnualConference 2018, Austin, TX, April 4-6, 2018.[2] T. Henzinger and J. Sifakis, “The Embedded Systems Design Challenge,” in Misra J.,Nipkow T., Sekerinski E. (eds) FM 2006: Formal

Conference Session

Design Communications

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Jonassen, University of Missouri; Tamara Knott, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Richard Goff, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

perform? Describe this function. What does it mean? How important is it that your design do this? How do you know? What evidence supports your evaluation of the importance? How will you measure how well your design does this function? How is this function related to other functions? What is an existing means for implementing this function? How do you know? Is this means feasible? Is this means incompatible with identified means for other functions? Which one(s)? What other means might you use to implement this function in your design? Is this means feasible? Is this means incompatible with other

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education (DEED) Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martin Grimheden, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

to the overall projectorganization but rather to how to deal with specific aspects of it or, as in team A:s case, tomore practical issues such as conflicting schedules.In particular, the following is found:  The embedded systems teams express more challenges relating to team spirit and team motivation  The embedded systems teams express more challenges relating to understanding the project, to company requirements, to client specifications  The mechatronics teams refer more explicitly to their method(s) and to challenges related to following these.The second study refers to overall learning outcomes. The student teams were asked toprovide the “top three learning outcomes from the course”:Team

Conference Session

Design Pedagogy and Curriculum 2

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott Anthony Grenquist, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

LEARNING : THEORY , CASES ANDRECOMMENDATIONS.6. Grenquist S. Final Team Interviews/Presentations. 2010.7. Technology WI of. Fall 2010 Course Evaluation. 2010.8. Michaud F, Clavet A, Lachiver G, Lucas M. Designing Toy Robots to Help Autistic Children - An Open DesignProject for Electrical and Computer Engineering Education.9. Böhne A, Faltin N, Wagner B. Self-directed Learning and Tutorial Assistance in a Remote 1 Introduction 2 The I-Labs Project and its Remote Experiments. 2002:1–13.10. Dixon WE, Dawson DM, Member S, Costic BT, Queiroz MS De. A MATLAB-Based Control SystemsLaboratory Experience for Undergraduate Students : Toward Standardization and Shared Resources.2002;45(3):218–226.11. Química E. Two Way Integration of Engineering. 2000;(April

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education (DEED) Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed E. El-Sayed, Kettering University; Jacqueline A. El-Sayed, Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

courseenvironmental sustainability assessment can also be considered as program assessment.References1. National Academy of Sciences on behalf of the national Academy of Engineering “Grand Challenges for Engineering” 2008.2. Henscheid, J. M., “Professing the disciplines: An analysis of senior seminars and capstone courses,” National Resource Center for the First Year Experience and Students in Transition, Monograph No. 30, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, 2000.3. Beyerlein, S., Davis, D., Trevisan, M., Thompson, P. & Harrison, K., “Assessment Framework for Capstone Design Course,” Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, June 2005.4. Pellegrino, J., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R

Conference Session

Early Engineering Design Experiences

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Garrett Clayton, Villanova University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, 3rd Ed, McGraw-Hill, 20003. C. Reidsema, S. Wilson, and C. Netherton. Impromptu Design as a Vehicle for Developing Team Work and Problem Solving Skills in Design Engineering. International Conference on Engineering Education, Gainesville, Florida, 2004.4. R. Bannerot, R. Kastor, and P. Ruchhoeft. Interdisciplinary Capstone Design at the University of Houston. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Arlington Texas, 2003.5. B. Adamczyk and S. Fleischmann. Engineering and Elementary School Partnerships (or Dean Kamen’s Challenge Revisited.) ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, Colorado, 2003

Conference Session

Capstone Design Pedagogy I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Howard Eisner, George Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

ofvideo and storage technologies, ways to better respond to student and institution needs andcreating even greater efficiencies while at the same enhancing the areas of focus, courseware andeducational experience. Finding new ways and means of expanding these notions can besupported by using some of the recommended “out of the box” thinking.Bibliography 1. Buede, D., “The Engineering Design of Systems”, John Wiley, 2000 2. Standard for Systems Engineering, IEEE P1220 (1994), Piscataway, New Jersey, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standards Department 3. C4ISR Architecture Framework, version 2.0 (1997), Washington, DC: Architectures Working Group, U. S. Department of Defense, December 18 4