Conference Session

Design Realization

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul O. Leisher, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Scott Kirkpatrick, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Richard W. Liptak, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Sergio Granieri, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Robert M. Bunch, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

changing the design objective, goal, and constraints between years, all teamswill compete on a level playing field.A short activity has been developed to present and reinforce the concepts of design formanufacturability. The activity is highly reusable; for example, by simply adjusting thedesignated costs or earning per widget each year, a previous year’s winning design can berendered ineffective given the new constraints. Further, this activity is not discipline-specific;we expect that it is well suited for students in all engineering fields.6. References[1] K. T. Ulrich and S. D. Eppinger, “Design for Manufacturability” in Product Design and Development, 5th ed., ISBN 978-007340477, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 253-287, (2012).[2

Conference Session

Capstone Design III

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed E. El-Sayed, Kettering University; Jacqueline A. El-Sayed, Kettering University; Timothy M. Cameron, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

achievements for theperformance indicators, the capstone course assessment can be viewed as a significant indicatorfor the program assessment, as well. It is a best practice that the set of performance indicatorsand rubrics used for identifying the gaps and assessing the course should be developed incollaboration with the program faculty and stakeholders.References1. Henscheid, J. M., “Professing the disciplines: An analysis of senior seminars and capstone courses,” National Resource Center for the First Year Experience and Students in Transition, Monograph No. 30, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, 2000.2. Kerka, S., “Capstone experiences in career and technical education,” Practice Application Brief No16, Clearing house on Adult

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Susannah Howe, Smith College; Steve Blair, University of Utah; Peter Rogers, Ohio State University; Junichi Kanai, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; R. Keith Stanfill, University of Florida; Glen A. Livesay, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Society in Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition. 2010. Louisville, KY.3. Howe, S., "Where are we now? Statistics on Capstone Courses Nationwide." Advances in Engineering Education, 2010. 2(1): p. 1-27.4. McKenzie, L.J., et al. "Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study." in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2004. Salt Lake City.5. Sheppard, S., et al., Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2008, Hoboken: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Page 25.284.7

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jingshan Wu, Zhejiang University; Xiaodong Zou, Zhejiang University; Hanbing Kong, Zhejiang University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. He teaches education planning for graduate students. Zou has published 70 papers and a book on discipline organization innovation of research universitiesinnovation of S&T education.Ms. Hanbing Kong, Zhejiang University Hanbing Kong, PhD Deputy Director, the Research Center for S&T, Education Policy, and Associate Professor of Management, Zhejiang University, and JEE Liaison for Research in Higher Education of Engineering. Page 25.372.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Cultivating T-shaped Engineers for 21st Century: Experiences in ChinaAbstractThe

Conference Session

Design Across Disciplines

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hosni I. Abu-Mulaweh, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne; Hossein M. Oloomi, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne; Donald W. Mueller Jr. P.E., Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne; Omobola Ayoyimika Thomas, Cummins Filtration, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

25.74.9 85 Desired Temperature Actual Temperature 80 75Temperature (°C) 70 65 60 55 50 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time (s) Fig. 8: Transient response before control modification 85 80 Desired Temperature Actual Temperature

Conference Session

Design Tools and Methodology II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Cozzens, Southern Utah University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Greatly improved Yes Surfing/Skimming Not included in Site dependent. Yes phase ITable 1: Comparison between Phase I, Phase II and Phase III*(Artino and Stephens (2009) stated “ To succeed in autonomous online learningenvironments, it helps to be a highly motivated, self-regulated learner.”) Page 25.1502.43. Methodology3.1 The ProcessThis information was obtained using action research. Action Research is a specific variationof Evaluation Research. McMillan and Schumacher state (2001) ”Evaluation Researchfocuses on a particular practice at a given site(s). The practice may be a program, a product,or a

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education (DEED) Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stewart Parnell Prince, California State University Northridge; Yassaman Tarazkar, California State University, Northridge

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

results. As thethrottle openings were the same on both throttles, and as the geometry was similar, the manifolditself was not the problem. Upon further inspection, it was determined the throttle shaft on thecommercial unit was not circular in cross section (as was the AIMS2 manifold) and wasmachined with “flats” on each side further reducing the silhouette area at wide open throttle. 70 60 50 Mass Flowrate (g/s) 40 Commercial 30

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yuyi Lin P.E., University of Missouri; Xiuting Wei, Shandong University of Technology; Lanmei Wang, Shandong University of Technology; Yanfei Zhang, Shandong University of Technology; Wenqiang Yu P.E., Shandong University of Technology; Yufeng Sun, Shandong University of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

(CSV) Specifications,” http://www.patriot-products-inc.com/csvspecsht.htm (Oct.30, 2009).[5] Yu. V. Rubtsov, G. V. Konnova, V. S. Shchetinin and S. V. Zolotoreva. Improving the Cutting Mechanism of a Disk_Type Wood Chipper. Russian Engineering Research, 2011, 31(1): 28–30.[6] The International Association for Natural Gas Vehicles, Natural Gas Vehicle Statistics (Revised: Apr.10, 2010).[7] The Alliance for Collaborative Research in Alternative Fuel Technology, Goals and Objectives, http://all-craft.missouri.edu/goals.php (Nov.20, 2010). Page 25.1223.10[8] O. Pupier, V. Goetz, R. Fiscal. Effect of cycling operations on adsorbed

Conference Session

Creativity and Innovation in Engineering Design

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Geoff Wright; Paul Skaggs, Brigham Young University; Richard Fry, Brigham Young University; Brian Howell, Brigham Young University; Richard West, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

to institute an Innovation Boot Camp. In short, the Innovation Boot Camp was an intensiveworkshop focused on teaching innovation in a collaborative hands-on environment.BackgroundKleppe (2001) noted dating from the late 1700’s to modern day, “a major source of technologicaladvancement has been the result of individual inventors [and] innovations” (p. 16); surprisingly,most technology and engineering programs around the U.S. do not explicitly teach innovation(Smoot, 2006). With the increasingly complex and competitive global market, and with newinterest and concern over environmental issues, biotechnologies, and so forth, many companies(American and foreign) are reforming how and in what they do business. Additionally manyacademic

Conference Session

Capstone Design Pedagogy I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daria Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Gary Pawlas, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Engineering Curriculum.” Journal of STEM Education Volume 8. Issue 3. &. 4 June-December 2007. 15.4. Hadim, H., Esche, S., Schaefer, C., “Enhancing the Engineering Curriculum Through Project-Based Learning.” Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, 2002.5. Shuman, L., Besterfield-Sacre, M., McGourty, J., "The ABET “Professional Skills” – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol, No 94, January 2005, pp. 41.6. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.7. Paiget, J. 1970. The Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. NY: Grossman.8. Brunner, J., Goodnow, J., & Austin, G. (1956). A Study of Thinking. New York: Wiley.9. Bruner, J

Conference Session

Design Spine

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ming-Chien Hsu, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

frontier: an empirical exploration. ResearchEvaluation 2006, 15, (1), 17-29.10. Fruchter, R.; Emery, K. In Teamwork: Assessing cross-disciplinary learning, Conference on Computersupport for collaborative learning, Palo Alto, CA, 1999; International Society of the Learning Sciences: Palo Alto,CA, 1999; p 19.11. Schaffer, S. P.; Lei, K.; Paulino, L. R., A framework for cross-disciplinary team learning and performance.Performance Improvement 2008, 21, (3), 7-21.12. Muis, K. R.; Bendixen, L. D.; Haerle, F. C., Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personalepistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework.Education Psychology Review 2006, 18, (1), 3-54.13. Klein, J. T

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin M. Sevilla, Virginia Tech; Maura J. Borrego, Virginia Tech; Alexander Leonessa, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

compared to the earlier andmore standardized phases of the project.References 1. McKenzie, L. J., Trevisan, M. S., Davis, D. C., & Beylerlein, S. W. (2004). Capstone design courses and assessment: A national study. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. 2. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. The Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120. 3. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2003). Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria. The Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7-25. 4. http

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory K Watkins, California State University, Chico

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Page 22.281.8the best practices presented here would hopefully produce similar positive results in othercapstone design programs.1. Somerton, C. W., Thompson, B. S., Gunn, C., The Role of the Faculty Advisor in the Capstone Design Experience: The Importance of Technical Expertise, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition2. Taylor, D. G., Magleby, S. P., Todd, R. H., & Parkinson, A. R.). Training Faculty to Coach Capstone Design Teams., International Journal of Engineering Education, 17 (4-5) 20013. Kallio, G. K., Mechanical Engineering Annual Program Improvement Report 2003-05, Internal Document to California State University Chco, 20054. Kallio, G. K., Mechanical

Conference Session

Design Tools & Methodology II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Kendra Crider, U.S. Air Force Academy; Kristin L. Wood, University of Texas, Austin; John J. Wood, U.S. Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

departure from its intended design purpose. This enabling technology could be directly applicable (and relatively obvious) to improving the system’s function (e.g. lightweight battery with 30% more capacity). However, the ideas that we are most interested in are ones where some technology can be used to change the way to perform a primary function or meet a critical capability (e.g. capture the material expansion energy from flux capacitor super heating of the robot structure) that will provide a technology “leap” on the innovation “S” curve. 3- As a team, discuss the results of your research. Identify insights into either your specific results or your process; how you mentally processed or organized the information

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pete Hylton, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Wendy Otoupal-Hylton, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Motorsports Program.” Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE IL/IN Section Conference, Indianapolis, IN, March 2007.2. Hylton, P. & Otoupal, W. (2014). “Engineers Can Interact in a Liberal Arts World.” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE National Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June, 2014.3. Hylton, P, Raymond, S. & Otoupal, W. (2012). “Constructing a Collegiate Motorsports Engineering Program.” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, October 2012, Seattle, WA.4. Lynch, D. & Russell, J. (2009). “Experiential Learning in Engineering Practice.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 135(1). Doi 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2009)135:1(31

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education (DEED) Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mario W. Gomes, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Annual Conference and Exposition,, Nashville, TN.[5] J. Malmqvist, et al., “Lessons Learned from Design-Build-Test-Based Project Courses”, Proc. International Design Conference – Design 2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia.[6] Crittenden, K., Hall, D., Brackin, P. “Living with the Lab: Sustainable Lab Experiences for Freshman Engineering Students” 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY.[7] D. N. Rocheleau, “Habitat for Humanity Freshman design and Build Experience”, 1998 Frontiers in Education Conference, Tempe, AZ.[8] S. Pugh (1981) “Concept selection: a method that works”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, March 1981, Rome. Zürich: Heurista

Conference Session

DEED Poster Session

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karim Muci-Küchler, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Jonathan Weaver, University of Detroit Mercy; Daniel Dolan, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. 4 Performance 46 The SF is imaginative. 4 Performance 47 The SF has moving parts. 4 Performance 48 The SF has detachable parts. 4 Performance 49 The SF has interchangeable parts. 4 Exciting The SF is 50 The SF has a landing mechanism. 2 Exciting entertaining. 51 The SF has storage area(s). 4 Performance 52 The SF glows in the dark. 2 Exciting 53 The SF is

Conference Session

The Best in DEED

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Howe, Smith College; Laura Mae Rosenbauer, Smith College

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Research on Design Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cassandra Telenko, Georgia Institute of Technology; Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology; Christopher Saldana, Georgia Institute of Technology; Todd Sulchek, Georgia Institute of Technology; Shannon K. Yee, Georgia Institute of Technology; Wendy C. Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology; Thomas Kurfess, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

prospects with sponsor(s)Research Labs Manufacturing Research Recruitment of in-class, trained Research experience,Doubling as Lab Invites Class Students students who previously used jobsEducational to Participate in Lab equipment; feedback with freshSpaces Meetings perspective Environmental Studies of Publications, research data and Training on effective use Waste and Operation from access to “free” space and student and 3D printers,Extracurricular 3D Printers in MakerSpace researchers

Conference Session

Maker Spaces within the University

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vincent Wilczynski, Yale University; Joseph Zinter III, Yale University; Larry Wilen, Yale University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #16951Teaching Engineering Design in an Academic Makerspace: Blending Theoryand Practice to Solve Client-based ProblemsDr. Vincent Wilczynski, Yale University Vincent Wilczynski is the Deputy Dean of the Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science and the James S. Tyler Director of the Yale Center for Engineering Innovation & Design. As the Deputy Dean, he helps plan and implement all academic initiatives at the School. In addition, he manages the School’s teaching and research resources and facilities. As the James S. Tyler Director of the Center for Engineer- ing Innovation & Design he leads the

Conference Session

Student Empathy and Human-Centered Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benedikt von Unold, Stanford University; Annette Isabel Böhmer, Laboratory for Product Development and Lightweight Design; Tua A. Björklund, Aalto University Design Factory; Nicolas Ledl, Stanford University; Udo Lindemann, Laboratory for Product Development and Lightweight Design; George Toye, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Studies in Engineering Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

May-Ling Tan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Jamalludin Harun, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Howe, Smith College; Jessica Wilbarger, Smith College

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

havebeen missed or dismissed.Survey responses were compiled and processed electronically. Most of the questions hadparticipants choose from a list of responses, and could thus be digitally tallied and graphed withrelative ease. The qualitative section at the end presented more of a challenge, however, and thedata from that are still being processed. Many questions throughout the survey allowed space forcomments, particularly if "Other" was an option. We read through these comments, and ifenough respondents wrote in a similar answer, tallied the remark and presented it with thecorresponding quantitative data.The questions/results presented in this paper are primarily those discussed in Todd et al.'s "ASurvey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North

Conference Session

Design with External Clients

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Fleishman, Western Washington University; Eric Leonhardt, Western Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Capstone Design Practices

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimberly B. Demoret P.E., Florida Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

straightforward process. Table 1. Time Card Template: Weekly entry by each individualTEAM NAME: Team Awesome: WEEK 1- Jan 9th-15th WEEKLY STATUS FOR: Your Name Here (JOHN DOE) Day Location(s) & Time Activities, Contributions Time (hours) Class Lecture (3-4); Team meeting- Lecture. Team Meeting: agreed to get drawing feedback from Mon Mon TOTAL 2.5 Library (4-5); At home (9-9:30pm) Mr Jones & look at CDR. At home incorporated CDR feedback Machine shop(2-230); Mr Jones drawing feedback. Fixed dimensions on page

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Design in the Classroom

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Pines, University of Hartford; Hisham Alnajjar, University of Hartford

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

years has led to changes in theformat of the semester long design project. While the overall outcome of having the studentsmore competent in the design methodology, program management, communication skills, andunderstanding the ethical considerations of their design have been met, it is important that thestudents are excited about selecting engineering as their professional career. The design coursesequence provides this opportunity if the courses are planned and implemented in a way toharness the students creativity and passion.Bibliography1. NSF Grant Award Number 9872433, “Integrating Engineering Design with the Humanities, Social Sciences, Sciences and Mathematics,” 1998.2. Shetty, D., D. Leone, H. Alnajjar, S. Keshawarz, L. Nagurney and

Conference Session

Design Across the Curriculum 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Charlotte Marr de Vries, Pennsyvania State University, Behrend College; Jill Johnson P.E., Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Brian Lani

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

in future semesters in order to assist a greater number of teams.Table 2: Results from each semester. *Fall 2017 did not include a formal mentorship program,and as such had poor outcomes. Semester # of Mandatory # of Voluntary Number of Number of teams Teams (Honors) Teams/Total mentors with successful Teams (Standard) prints Fall 2017 (H)* N/A N/A N/A 2 out of 12 Fall 2018 (H) 13 N/A 31 13 out of 13 Spring 2019 (S) N/A 12/20 17 12 out of 12 Fall 2019 (H and S) 5

Conference Session

Making, Hacking, and Extracurricular Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victoria Bill, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering; Anne-Laure Fayard, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

such acommunity.ReferencesAllen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technologicalinformation within the R&D organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Barrett, T. W., Pizzico, M. C., Levy, B., Nagel, R. L., Linsey, J. S., Talley, K. G., Forest, C. R., & Newstetter, W. C.(2015, June). A Review of University Maker Spaces. Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Seattle, WA.Bratteteig, T, Bødker, K., Dittrich, Y., Mogensen, P. and Simonsen, J.. (2012). Methods: Organizing Principles andGeneral Guidelines for Participatory Design Projects. In Routledge Handbook of Participatory Design, JesperSimonsen and Toni Robertson (eds.)Carlson, L. E., & Sullivan, J. F

Conference Session

Best of DEED

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica A. Kuczenski, Santa Clara University; Erin Susan Araj, Santa Clara University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

 concerned in this study showed strong gains using electronic notebooks.     Works Cited [1] Dawn Kowalski.. (1994 ­ 2012). Project Notebooks. Writing@CSU. Colorado State University. Available at http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/guide.cfm?guideid=80​ .  [2] Kelley, T. t. (2011). Engineer s Notebook ­­ A Design Assessment Tool. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 70(7), 30­35.  [3] Bird, C., Willoughby, C., & Frey, J. (2013). “Laboratory notebooks in the digital era: the role of ELNs in record keeping for chemistry and other sciences.” Chemical Society Reviews, ​ 42​ (20), 8157­8175.  [4] Bruce, S. (2003). “A Look at the State of Electronic Lab Notebook Technology

Conference Session

Making in Design

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vincent Wilczynski, Yale University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #13724Academic Maker Spaces and Engineering DesignDr. Vincent Wilczynski, Yale University Vincent Wilczynski is the Deputy Dean of the Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science and the James S. Tyler Director of the Yale Center for Engineering Innovation & Design. As the Deputy Dean, he helps plan and implement all academic initiatives at the School. In addition, he manages the School’s teaching and research resources and facilities. As the James S. Tyler Director of the Center for Engineer- ing Innovation & Design he leads the School’s efforts to promote collaboration, creativity, design and