Paper ID #22528An Introductory Design and Communication Course Intended for all Engi-neering Majors Takes it to the FarmDr. Jennifer S. Mullin, University of California, Davis Jennifer S. Mullin is a faculty member in the Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at UC Davis.Prof. Jean S. VanderGheynst, University of California, Davis Jean VanderGheynst is Executive Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Studies and Professor of Biological and Agricultural Engineering in the College of Engineering at University of California, Davis. Her prior leadership positions at UC Davis include Associate Dean for
skills.The question of student motivation is an interesting one. The goal is to intrinsically motivatestudents, but we know from our own experience and from research studies that most situationsinvolve a mixture of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors. As a clear example, considerhow many students would submit a design report documenting their work if it was not beinggraded and the only motivation to do so was to get experience writing and to get formativefeedback from the instructor to improve their writing skills. The book chapter Motivation toLearn in College Science14 details various factors that influence college student motivation andlists some practical suggestions for increasing it, including showing relevance of activities
Page 22.868.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Industry Based Projects and Preparing Engineers for the 21st Century WorkforceIntroductionAt the October 2005 National Science Foundation Advanced Technology Education (NSF-ATE)Annual Meeting, Dr. Renee S. Lerche, an executive at The Ford Motor Company and a nationalauthority on global leadership and workforce development, said that, “employers need workerswith deep experience with scientific inquiry, design and problem solving solutions.” Studentsmust be able to apply what they learn to real world problems that are relevant and meaningful. Inparticular, research has documented that contextual learning
development course, asenior capstone design course sequence, and a graduate level course in product development. Inall cases, the students started the task of setting functional requirements and target specificationsfor the product after following a structured methodology to identify the customer needs. In thispaper, the process followed, an assessment of the results obtained and suggestions for futureimprovement are discussed presenting examples taken from different projects carried out bystudents.IntroductionAt the present time many undergraduate engineering programs in the US include one or moredesign courses aimed at better preparing students for the “real world” practice of the profession.In addition to the traditional Senior Design Project or
, given newadvances in cloud-computing and real-time synchronous collaboration, the ability to quicklydigitally prototype unique concepts in CAD has never been easier. Given that new engineeringgraduates are part of the “digital native” generation, anecdotal evidence suggests these designershave a natural inclination and ability for this digital prototyping. Our study seeks to formally testwhether a dichotomy exists between younger designers who are entering the workforce, andolder designers who are veterans in product development, regarding the best-practices in CADusage for conceptual design - “Conceptual CAD”.The paper begins with a critical review of the existing body of literature which advises thedesigner against Conceptual CAD. Next, we
improve the model, plans are in process to provide additional instructionand support specifically for PMs as a separate cohort. Additional evening class meetings areplanned just for the student PMs. Local alumni, whose primary job is project management, arebeing sought to serve as resources and mentors, and offer first-hand examples of effectivemanagement tools and techniques. A follow-up survey is planned after the changes have beenfully implemented.References1. Watkins, G., “Best Practices for Faculty Mentorship of Capstone Design Projects, Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia2. Howe, S., Poulos, S., & Rosenbauer, L., The 2015 Capstone Design Survey: Observations from the Front Lines, Proceedings
graduate in May 2017. She is a participant in the Stevens Scholars program and through experience has specialized in packaging design and engineering.Dr. Steven Hoffenson, Stevens Institute of Technology Steven Hoffenson is an Assistant Professor in the School of Systems and Enterprises at Stevens Institute of Technology. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Maryland, College Park, and an M.S.E. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Dr. Hoffenson served as a Congressional Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2014-15. His research focuses on systems modeling, policy analysis, design methods and optimization, and
Paper ID #34379The Smart Campus as a Testing Ground for Smart CitiesDr. Amin Malek Mohammadi, California State University Professor Malek Mohammadi is a fellow of the UK Higher Education Academy (FHEA) and a Senior Member of IEEE, Member of Engineering Council (CEng), IET and Optical Society of America (OSA) and has published over 90 Scientific Research Papers and a Postgraduate Textbook. Currently, he has two successful commercialized products and is the holder of 4 patents on Telecommunications Systems.Amir Hajrasouliha, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoMr. Joseph P. Cleary, California Polytechnic State
stand improved the project experiencein several ways: 1. Water turbines could compete side-by-side for head-to-head competition. 2. It doubled throughput by allowing two teams to setup and test simultaneously. 3. It could be used in the center of the room to allow maximum viewing by the entire class. Students directly observe the outcomes for their design decisions. 4. It provided a positive role model for a device that had been created by students to meet a specific need. 5. It recycled water, conserving resources.Although the credit hour change and the sequencing of the course would likely have some effecton overall outcome of the course, they were not individually investigated. This research
published in the leading technology manage- ment journals and he has published four books. His research has received several awards. In 1999 at the Rent 13 Conference in London he received the best Paper Award. In 2010 he received the PMI Project Management Journal Paper of the Year Award. He has received several research grants from NSF and from other funding organizations. From 2003-2005 he was appointed NASA research fellow in project management. Page 26.81.3 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Pilot for Integrating Capstone Design with a Two-Semester
teams(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context(j) a knowledge of contemporary issuesThus our desired learning outcomes for the engineering senior design experience are extendedbeyond those that are required of the culminating design experience and are intended toencompass a broader range of expectations and engage the students in activities that are trulydirected towards development of an understanding that technology must serve humanity. Page 12.622.2Building on
at WorcesterPolytechnic Institute, PBL is considered a high-impact education practice. He states “Theypromote active engagement, requiring students to spend considerable time on task. They involvecollaboration, both in and out of classroom settings. Students are asked to take responsibility fortheir learning, while faculty members assume coaching and mentoring roles” [1]. We havecertainly seen the collaboration aspect in our interdisciplinary student teams. For the purpose ofthis paper, we define an “interdisciplinary team” as the following: a project team comprised ofstudents from both ETAC (engineering technology) and EAC (engineering) degree programs.This paper will discuss the history and structure of our interdisciplinary PBL courses
well as becoming a certified Professional Engineer while working for an electrical engineering consulting firm in Pennsylvania.Dan Bosse, Weldon Solutions Dan Bosse graduated from York College of Pennsylvania with a degree in mechanical engineering in the summer of 2011. He now works at Weldon Solutions in York, Penn., designing automation systems and precision grinders. The capstone design project was one of the highlights of his time at York College. Given the opportunity, he would gladly work on another robotics project.Berne S. Edwards, Graham Packaging Company Berne Edwards received his B.Sc. degree in mechanical engineering from York College of Pennsylvania in 2011 and works as a Project Management Engineer at
design projects. Specifically,since learning occurs in the context of a design project the question asked is "do the specificcontext and details of the design project impact the course outcomes?" To determine if certaintypes or classifications of design projects lead to more or less successful capstone designexperiences for students, six years of evaluation data on electrical engineering capstone designprojects at a large, public research university were reviewed. Additionally transcripts from fouryears of an end-of-semester “after action review” of a capstone design course by faculty,students, and teaching assistants were reviewed as well as artifacts from design projects ifavailable.Previous Work on Design Project Characterization and
the integration of the theoreticaltenants of knowledge management, i.e. the information ladder, with the practice of the Page 12.1016.7prototype systems design methodology. Not only is the prototyping methodology a goodfit for a university research environment that is characterized by frequent student turnoverand emerging knowledge, but it also is a good fit for climbing the rungs of theinformation ladder. The iterative process of prototyping is conducive to a flexible,organic system growth in which the initial system versions collects data and is followedby increasingly sophisticated versions which organize the data into useful informationand
participated in a build activity as partof the course.For the 2012-2013 academic year, Purdue University was added to the cohort; additionally,graduate students at the University of Washington who were also Boeing employees joined theprogram. Student participation almost doubled to a total of 16 undergraduate students and 3graduate students. While a design-build-fly activity was desired, it was determined to be toodifficult to achieve in this second project iteration. Instead, a design-build-test framework waschosen as an intermediate step on the way to a collaborative full design-build-fly activity.In order to avoid repeating the same student project every year, the project’s leadership teamsearched for a test activity template to best fit with the
Jason Weaver is a graduate research assistant at the University of Texas at Austin. He is currently pursuing a PhD in Mechanical Engineering. Previously, he received a Masters from the University of Texas and a Bachelors from Brigham Young University. His current research focuses include Transformation Design Theory, design methodologies, energy harvesting, and environmental power sources for wireless sensor arrays.Kristin Wood, University of Texas, Austin KRISTIN WOOD is the Cullen Trust Endowed Professor in Engineering and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Wood’s current research interests focus on
education and explore the means to address thoseproblems and needs." [21] Therefore, the following research questions were formulated todisseminate best practices to the engineering design education community: 1. What are the challenges that capstone design faculty faced during remote instruction? 2. How did those challenges impact the way faculty teach and approach capstone design? a. What adaptations have been made successfully to address the primary challenges? b. What advice can be provided to faculty who are facing those challenges?Survey Tool. To answer our research questions, a survey was developed and conducted with thebroader capstone community. As noted above, the survey intended to gain insights into thenature of
Paper ID #13710Incremental Self-Assessment Rubrics for Capstone Design CoursesProf. James Trevelyan, University of Western Australia Professor James Trevelyan works part-time as a Winthrop Professor in the Mechanical and Chemical En- gineering School at The University of Western Australia, Fellow of Engineers Australia, and also practices as a mechanical and mechatronics engineer developing new air conditioning technology. His main area of research is on engineering practice, and he teaches design, sustainability, engineering practice and project management. He is well known internationally for pioneering research that
. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University. Dr. Barrella has investigated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sus- tainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. Prior to joining the WFU faculty, she led the junior capstone design sequence at James Madison University, was the inaugural director of the NAE Grand Challenges Program at JMU, and developed first-year coursework.Mr. Charles McDonald Cowan II, Wake Forest University Mack Cowan is a recent graduate of James Madison University’s
-accredited engineering or computing programs, but two teams constructingaugmented-reality historical simulations include students majoring in History and GeospatialInformation Science. Most projects have external sponsors - typically a government agency thatappoints a senior engineer to serve as the customer. These customers provide project ideas, inputon scope and requirements, and financial support for equipment and travel.We have formulated an iterative “agile-waterfall” design process combining the traditional“waterfall” design practice found in engineering with agile methodology common to softwaredesign [8], [9]. This process encourages rapid prototyping and short term goal-setting (through aseries of “sprints”) and requires our students to
AC 2012-5247: A NEW VISION FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN INSTRUC-TION: ON THE INNOVATIVE SIX COURSE DESIGN SEQUENCE OFJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering
AC 2008-2629: DESIGN AND INTEGRATION OF A CAPSTONE COURSE TOACHIEVE PROGRAM OUTCOMESMohamed El-Sayed, Kettering University Professor of Mechanical Engineering and director of the Hybrid Vehicles Integration Laboratory. He has been teaching at the undergraduate and graduate level for over 30 years. He teaches Machine Design, Automotive Design, Machine Design Capstone, Automotive Design Capstone, Design Optimization, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, linear and Nonlinear Finite Element analysis, and Design for manufacturability. He has been a PI and Co-PI on several research grants and a consultant to several engineering corporations. He has over seventy research papers in addition to several
themselves, as African American, Latino, Asian American or Native American. o 83% received financial aid – full scholarship. o Financial sponsors included: NSF, MESA, industry, individuals, JHU and Foundations.The following is a synopsis of the recommendations of the Carnegie Mellon University retreat:• We should think more broadly about the faculty and inclusion of teachers of who will teach the class – team teaching to provide professional development for both faculty and high school teachers.• Design the AP® assessment process to address what is known about best practices in engineering education – take into consideration ABET criteria and aligning to the AP® curriculum.• Perhaps an AP® in STEM should be considered as
AC 2009-1259: TOWARD A DESIGN TAXONOMY AS A PARADIGM IN DESIGNPEDAGOGICSKeelin Leahy, University of Limerick Keelin Leahy is a PhD Researcher with the Department of Manufacturing and Operations Engineering in the University of Limerick. In 2005 she successfully completed a first class honours Bachelor of Technology, Materials and Construction concurrent with Teacher Education at the University of Limerick. On Graduating she won the Advanced Scholar Award. She has also received the IRCSET scholarship for the duration of her PhD completion. She also assists in the teaching of design strategies and design communication at the University of Limerick.William Gaughran, University of Limerick
positive role in the development of design skills and mindset.However, research on peer-to-peer learning and best practices in extracurricular contexts is scant.This paper presents the use of peer teaching in an extracurricular setting and investigates how itcan be used to develop a system to teach design and innovation outside of the classroom.A series of design interventions in an academic makerspace are described which aimed toexplore ways to teach design engineering skills and nurture a design thinking mindset amongundergraduate and graduate students. The workshops had three major foci (technical, process,and interest-based) and involved four main actors (teaching assistants, student champions,student clubs and outside experts). The paper is
undergraduate science laboratory classes," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 463-492, 2017, doi: 10.1002/tea.21373.[45] M. edx. "Working in Teams: A Practical Guide." Framework for Effective Teamwork Assessment inCollaborative Learning and Problem Solving (accessed 08/03/2021.[46] P.-N. Chou and C.-C. Chang, "Small or large? The effect of group size on engineering students’ learning satisfaction in project design courses," EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 10, p. 1579, 2018.[47] L. Daniela and A. Rūdolfa, "Learning platforms: How to make the right choice," in Didactics of Smart Pedagogy: Springer, 2019, pp. 191-209.[48] K. D. McConnell, E. M
. Page 25.282.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Capstone 101: A Framework for Implementation of an ABET-Compliant Capstone SequenceIntroductionAccreditation of an engineering or engineering technology degree program depends on theinclusion of a Capstone Design (CD) sequence in the required curriculum. Specifically, ABETCriteria 5 for Accrediting Engineering Programs states, “Students must be prepared forengineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on theknowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work and incorporating appropriate engineeringstandards and multiple realistic constraints.” ABET Criteria 5 for Accrediting
Bioengineering at Washington State University where he directs the Transferable Integrated Design Engineering Education (TIDEE) Consortium as well as the Engineering Education Research Center. He is the lead investigator on the NSF/ASA grant.Michael Trevisan, Washington State University Michael Trevisan is director of the Assessment and Evaluation Center within the College of Education at Washington State University. He has been instrumental in instilling best practices from educational research in TIDEE curriculum and assessment initiatives.Phillip Thompson, Seattle University Phil Thompson teaches at Seattle University where he is a professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and where he
responsibility (c) design to meet desired needs within realistic constraints (h) understand the social impact of engineering (d) function on multidisciplinary teams (i) need for life-long learning (e) identify, formulate, and solve problems (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (g) communicate effectively (k) use the techniques, skills, and tools necessary for Note: Text has been condensed for formatting engineering practice. purposesExisting Assessment InstrumentsExisting assessment tools for design ability rely on self-assessment and analyze student gradesfrom design reports, presentations, and logbooks4-5. This type of assessment relies on studentsproviding