presentation skills? Why or why not? What could be done to improve your oral presentation skills? ABET Criterion 3h: the need for abroad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context is met throughCSM’s system and stem courses and many of the junior and senior PE courses. Minimalsupporting evidence is necessary or provided in the supplemental document. ABET Criterion 3i: a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-longlearning is demonstrated based on six data sets including the preparation of “Individual Life-Long Learning Plans” by students, alumni surveys, research activities, student involvement instudent professional groups
2006-1647: A METHOD TO EVALUATE RELATIVE INSTRUCTIONALEFFICIENCIES OF DESIGN ACTIVITIES FOR PRODUCT PLATFORMPLANNINGAsli Sahin, Virginia Tech Asli Sahin is a PhD candidate in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on developing modeling systems that help designers to integrate engineering and management principles into conceptual design of products and systems. She received her M.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech in December of 2005. She has experience and interest in adapting and developing computer-based visualization instruction models for education and training purposes. She is currently a member of
DESIGN COURSES FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SKILLSIntroductionIn addition to completing a challenging technical curriculum, engineering graduates mustdemonstrate teamwork, communication, and other professional skills including professional andethical responsibility, life-long learning, and understanding the impact of engineering solutionsin a global and societal context. Unless these outcomes are integrated into students' conceptionsof being a "successful engineer" (getting a job and advancing their career), they will be under-valued and under-developed. This project demonstrates the use of industry-modeled 360°performance reviews in a team-based capstone project to link professional skills with an
environments actually helpingstudents to learn and to build confidence and motivation toward engineering design? Towardanswering this question, the juxtaposition of qualitative and quantitative research methods usedherein allows us to investigate the impact that these spaces are having on student motivation andconfidence in engineering design [8]. This paper presents results from mixed-methods researchconsisting of a longitudinal quantitative study and a qualitative interview study focused onunderstanding the factors leading toward student involvement in makerspaces.BackgroundThe longitudinal study presented in this paper consists of a survey that gathers information fromstudents on their involvement in the makerspace, self-efficacy for conducting
different tools and machines for prototyping and manufacturing,ranging from simple hand-tools like screwdrivers to high-tech 3D printers. These facilities allowfor plenty of hands-on experience and bring together diverse groups of people, promoting studentinteraction and the exchange of ideas, where the benefits of physical modeling and communitiesof practice are well-documented [6].The literature addressing the impact of makerspaces on engineering students continues to growand is an active area of research. Studies have shown these facilities have a number of positiveeffects on users. Early exposure to hands-on, team-based design work has been shown toimprove retention rates for engineering students [7]. Surveys have shown users feel these
Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school
to practice giving/receiving feedback, and, ii) a few studentsexpressed a wish that the content was more advanced since they were already familiar with someof it.Students also had a final opportunity to reflect on the impact of the workshop at the end of theproject. As part of their final report, teams were asked asked to answer six questions to capturetheir thoughts on the feedback workshop:1) What was the impact of the feedback workshop on your team’s final design?2) Was the feedback workshop helpful for your team’s feedback/design process? How?3) Was continuing to include feedback in your teamwork throughout the project helpful? Why or why not?4) What is one feedback area/skill you developed as a result of the feedback workshop? What is
considerably decreasingoriginality and fluency of ideas generated in fact resonates with many. Industry has perceivednew BS engineering graduates as lacking design capability or creativity, as well as anappreciation for considering alternatives. Further, a 1995 ASME report ranked creative thinkingas 5th of 56 top desired “best practices” for new BS-level engineers as seen by industry andacademe.12 In the past several years, universities have responded to these challenges by addingmore design content and introducing more open-ended design problems into their engineeringcurricula. Articles discussing the guarded success of these initiatives have appeared in journals.Yet the need to increase the creative potential of graduates still persists. 13 In fact
citizen with the abilities to help indiminishing poverty, discrimination, and inequality, is called to be an active agent in this aim.For that, design can be an integrative area where, through practice, as well as natural and socialsciences, can come together and tackle social problems directly. But, are these professionalsprepared for that challenge? According to previous research, Colombian student andprofessionals of Chemical Engineering consider that they do not perceive themselves as activeagents in the solution of social problems like poverty or armed conflict. Alike, when it wasinvestigated, in a later study, where they think this inaction comes from, the general answer wasrelated to the weak or nonexistent education in human or social
program at University of Maryland has been practicing the multi-year,multidisciplinary concept for a number of years now.28 As seniors in high school, students areidentified as candidates for the program when they apply to UMD and express interest inperforming undergraduate-team research. As freshmen the students develop a research topic thatcould have a societal impact, usually in the vein of science and technology. Their sophomoreyear, the teams develop a research proposal based on an approved research question and performa literature review. In the third year, students are encouraged to study abroad and continue toperform research on their approved topic. In their final year, students are required to write athesis as a team and present their
our students that are designed to build on our strengths and provide new areas of success.IntroductionMakerspaces are no longer novel or rare and are regularly being established on campuses and inurban spaces across the United States and beyond. A variety of research has been conducted tocatalog the positive impacts of makerspaces especially as it relates to engineering education. Ascampuses develop makerspaces, they have used the spaces as a type of laboratory to test theimpact of projects and courses related to making. We will build on this growing literature as wedevelop programming and policies for our Innovation Center (expected to open in the Fallsemester of 2022) that will promote an open and inclusive experience for users.New
Internet as well as experienced in FIEworkshops. The author has adapted/developed evaluation rubrics to grade the reports andpresentations. Finally a rubric to evaluate the students’ performance and their projects on thefinal showcase has been developed. Graduate students, faculty, and industrial advisors have usedthis rubric now for several semesters to find the best-presented project of the showcase.The author hopes that the full set of outlines along with evaluation rubrics stimulate ideas in thecommunity to develop new and better means of teaching and evaluating the technical as well asprofessional skills needed by our graduating seniors.IntroductionSenior Design or Capstone courses are common for most engineering degrees. These coursesprovide
Out- reach. She works for the NDSU College of Engineering as the K-12 Outreach Coordinator where she plans and organizes outreach activities and camps for students in the Fargo-Moorhead area.Mary Pearson, North Dakota State University Mary is a Ph.D. candidate in biomedical engineering with research focused in the area of bioelectromag- netics, specifically designing electronics that can be used as medical devices. She obtained her B.S. and M.S. degrees at NDSU in electrical and computer engineering. Mary is also interested in STEM education research.Mrs. Grace Sangalang Ng, Biola University Grace Sangalang Ng is a researcher, pursuing her Ph.D. in Educational Studies at Biola University. Her research interests
to build consensusaround a vision change that led to design becoming a major feature of the curriculum.Building Shared MeaningOur first goal was to explore the interests and priorities of those in the department and identifyareas of shared focus and those without. The change process started in a Fall 2013 ABET retreatwhere faculty and staff participated in two thought exercises. For the first exercise, each personwas asked to “write down the traits or behaviors you would look for if you were asked to identifya successful ... graduate five years after graduation.” Some example cards are shown in Figure 1.The second exercise asked each person to “describe the best undergraduate degree program inelectrical or computer engineering in the country
and synergy. The construction of teams with members fromdifferent disciplines and backgrounds is necessary for pervasive computing design. We postulatethat individuals are more engaged in groups that form randomly in a loosely coordinatedenvironment that is both self-organizing and self-managing.The research questions guiding our inquiry are: 1. What instructor strategies help to create an interdisciplinary environment that facilitates quick formation of cohesive teams? 2. How do self-organized and self-managed teaming impact individuals’ engagement in teaming and design?The results of this research describe pedagogical approaches that can be used to help expediteand facilitate team formation and improve collaborative practices
, students have a betterunderstanding that engineering design is not just focused on and limited to mechanical andelectrical design, but they will learn that civil engineering design has an important role in thehuman lives. Large and small civil/geotechnical designs are also critically important in theengineering profession in which students can choose a major to practice their engineeringknowledge and design skills.Introducing a real world project to the engineering students foreshadows courses they areexpected to take and learn to become best prepared for such a noble profession. It is observedthat most people including many engineering students do not have a complete picture and idea ofwhat is engineering and in particular geotechnical
taking activities or explicit prompting about empathy would impact theirreflections and empathic development.The factors for triggering empathy were the same across all the teams we looked at. There wasnot a clear indication of what specifically made the most impact. However, it is clear that humaninteraction with their teammates, mentors, community partner(s), etc. and reflection writing helpthem to articulate some level of empathy. For future research, it would be interesting to see ifthis articulation of empathy indicates an increase in their empathic development.As stated previously, in previous research on the program’s design process, we found correlationbetween empathy and students’ relationship with their team’s community partner [5
for accessibility, and engineering design education.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering students through the lens of identity theory (NSF BRIGE grant), advancing problem
Paper ID #16111A Tale of Three UAVs - or Design Lessons in Education for Projects Demand-ing Cross-Disciplinary IntegrationProf. Charles Pezeshki, Washington State University Charles (Chuck) Pezeshki is the Director of the Industrial Design Clinic in the School of MME at Wash- ington State University. The Industrial Design Clinic is the primary capstone vehicle for the School and focuses on industrially sponsored projects with hard deliverables that students must complete for gradua- tion. His research area is in knowledge construction as a function of social/relational organization.Prof. Jacob William Leachman, Washington
” STEM degrees and 2) 72% of thestudents are First Time in College students – meaning they do not come from households wherethe primary care giver is a college graduate. While at first glance these numbers may not seemsignificant, it is worth noting that in ASEE’s best practices for student retention,23 the first yearretention rates are on par with ours. 2) introduce students to aspects of engineering design;PrBL gave students experience with the engineering design process, with an emphasis on theidea creation, evaluation, planning and budgeting of a project that responded to a customerrequest. Basic calculating skills, divergent thinking around the creation of a solution, and the useof software tools for preparing oral and written documents
techniques and theories derived from systematic research in the form of scientificknowledge20. From the standpoint of technical rationality, professional practice should be aprocess of selection of the best means and methods available to solve a given problem. Realworld problems however, do not present themselves in a well-structured manner, rather ascomplex and ill-defined situations where mostly a process of tedious problem construction needsto be performed well before starting to solve them19.Technical rationality, unfortunately, does not prepare professionals to act in situations ofuncertainty, and these are the situations which offer the greatest potential for results in areasinvolving the creation of new methods and processes which are the
approach to learning” (Entwistle, 1992). Theselection and implementation of a peer assessment tool can have a profound impact on studentlearning and development as is the case with the choice of any assessment. Mandatory criteriawere related to practical implementation considerations and the desirability criteria were drivenby our desire to cultivate deeper approaches to learning.The mandatory criteria used for evaluation were: immediate availability, research-based peerand team evaluation components, and a well-developed instructor and student user interface.The possibility of LMS integration was investigated as a mandatory requirement but rejected, asit is dependent on the vendor motivation. The desirability criteria were: a match for the
Resources Team at Granta Design, Cambridge, UK. She has a Post Graduate Certificate in Design, Manufacturing and Management and a Bachelor’s degree in Materials Science and Metallurgy from the University of Cambridge, England and has worked in teams on various parts of product development, in different industries for 15 years. Page 24.590.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Facilitating the Teaching of Product DevelopmentAbstractProduct Development is a key topic for many engineering courses and educational programmes.The Product Development Process, as applied in
T. Allen, University of Texas, Austin David Allen is the Gertz Regents Professor of chemical engineering, and the Director of the Center for Energy and Environmental Resources, at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of six books and more than 200 papers in areas ranging from coal liquefaction and heavy oil chemistry to the chemistry of urban atmospheres. For the past decade, his work has focused primarily on urban air quality and the development of materials for environmental and engineering education. Allen was a Lead Investigator for the first and second Texas Air Quality studies, which involved hundreds of researchers drawn from around the world, and which have had a substantial impact on the
AC 2009-2071: DESIGN OF A FLEXIBLE RF/IR DATA LINK AND ASSOCIATEDLABORATORY CURRICULUM IN A FIRST ANALOG ELECTRONICS ANDDEVICES COURSEKip Coonley, Duke University Kip D. Coonley received the B.S. degree in physics from Bates College, Lewiston, ME, in 1997 and the M.S. degree in electrical engineering from Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, in 1999. Following graduation from Dartmouth, he developed electronically controlled dimmers for fluorescent and incandescent lamps at Lutron Electronics, Coopersburg, PA. From 2001 to 2005, he was a Research Engineer at RTI International, where he designed high-efficiency thermoelectrics using epitaxially grown superlattice thin-film structures. Since 2005, he has
/Durability/Reliability Integration of several General Motors Vehicles, Platforms, and Architectures. He was a Quality, Reliability and Durability (QRD) Performance Integration Team Leader and Subject Matter Expert at General Motors Car group, Truck Group, and Advanced Vehicle engineering for over ten years. Dr. El-Sayed has several awards from GM related to vehicle development and validation. Dr. El-sayed has also worked as the chief engineer for Joalto Design developing advanced automotive components and safety subsystems. Dr. El-Sayed has advised several Ph.D., Master and over a hundred automotive related theses. He has several patents, and published over seventy research papers.Jacqueline A. El-Sayed, Kettering
, we propose an interview study that aims to examine details and descriptions ofthe teaming experience in the students’ voices.IntroductionDesign projects are increasingly viewed as essential experiential learning opportunities forengineering students. Best practices for teaching design, such as limiting team size, consideringstudent diversity, scoping project tasks, and effective documentation is difficult to implementwhen projects are open-ended, largely student-directed, open to students at all levels,multi-disciplinary, competition-oriented, and so on. In previous work, we examined studentteaming experiences from a diversity perspective through an end-of-course survey and found thatstudents from different demographic backgrounds reported
Paper ID #32927Design and Validation of a System to Assign Students to Projects Basedon Student PreferencesMr. Siqing Wei, Purdue University, West Lafayette Siqing Wei received BSEE and MSEE from Purdue University. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree in Engineering Education program at Purdue University. After years of experience of serving the peer teacher and a graduate teaching assistant in first-year-engineering courses, he is now a research assistant at CATME research group studying how cultural diversity impacts teamwork and how to help students improve intercultural competency and teamwork competency by
AC 2007-2375: SUCCESS STRATEGIES FOR CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSESWITH LARGE CLASSES, DIVERSE PROJECT TYPES, SMALL TO LARGESTUDENT TEAMS, AND VARIED FACULTY INTERESTS AND APPROACHESJanis Terpenny, Virginia Tech Janis Terpenny is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education with affiliated positions in Mechanical Engineering and Industrial & Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. She is co-Director of the NSF multi-university Center for e-Design. Her research interests focus on methods and representation schemes to support early design stages of engineered products and systems. She is currently a member of ASEE, ASME, IIE, and Alpha Pi Mu. She is the Design Economics area
AC 2010-796: THE ENGINEER: A TREE OR A PRODUCT?Andrew Trivett, University of Prince Edward Island Dr. Trivett is a graduated with a Doctor of Science Degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology / Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint program in Oceanographic Engineering and a bachelor of Mechanical Engineering degree from Dalhousie University. His research has ranged from development of new ocean sensors for monitoring flow and turbulence in the ocean, to the design of numerous environmental technologies for small technology business in Atlantic Canada. He is currently an associate professor at the University of Prince Edward Island where his primary focus is teaching