notcoincided with an increase in engineering graduates.3, 4 Therefore the departure of students fromthe discipline remains an issue. The primary focus in engineering education as well as other STEM fields has been toimprove the curriculum and pedagogy of faculty. STEM educators adopted this focus largely inresponse to Seymour and Hewitt’s seminal work studying students who depart from the STEMdisciplines. Noting that leavers do not differ significantly in terms of academic achievement orpreparedness, their findings indicate that students leave the STEM disciplines primarily due tothe content-laden curriculum, the inadequate and uninteresting instruction, and an overalldisinterest in STEM careers.5 As a result, engineering has invested
future discipline specific courses and careers. Anothercourse that is common to all engineering disciplines at J.B. Speed School of Engineering isDifferential Equations for Engineering, and is typically taken during the student’s sophomoreyear. These two courses provide the foundation for this study.The purpose of this research study is to assess the critical thinking skills of undergraduateengineering students as they progress through the engineering program. The specific researchquestion is: How do the critical thinking skills of undergraduate engineering students change asthey matriculate through the engineering program? This manuscript presents baseline criticalthinking data for the three cohorts enrolled in the study.IntroductionThe
success models in engineering, global engineering education, teamwork and team effectiveness, and production systems control and optimization. He worked as a production control engineer in Taiwan, and has taught laboratory classes in manufacturing engineering and freshmen engi- neering in the U.S. He earned his Bachelor and Master degrees in Industrial Engineering from National Tsing Hua University (Taiwan) and Purdue University (U.S.A). His ultimate career goal is to help cul- tivate world-class engineering graduates that can compete globally, as well as collaborate with the best engineers across different cultures.Xingyu Chen, Purdue University
-focused (career,international issues). What is not revealed in the summary provided for the last question in Table3 is the substantial drop in interest in major, and the rise in interest in pursuing higher levels ofeducation. This seems to be a product of a better understanding of the complexities associatedwith real international development issues and solutions.Table 3. Cohort (2009) rankings of top three reasons for four sample questions from the NeedsAssessment survey, before (pre) and after (post) ten weeks of field research in Tanzania (n=6) Question Pre Post Why did you want to participate 1. To understand global and 1. To do something meaningful in this
AC 2010-2153: CENTERING RESONANCE ANALYSIS AS A TOOL FORASSESSMENTCheryl Willis, University of Houston Cheryl Willis is an Associate Professor of Information Systems Technology at the University of Houston. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from the University of Florida. Her teaching focus is primarily on applications development and database management. Her research interests include curriculum revision processes for career and technology programs; service learning in information technology undergraduate programs and the use of emerging technologies in undergraduate teaching. She has developed curriculum for business education and information technology at the secondary
informed judgments incomputing practice based on legal and ethical principles”, and 3) “function effectively as amember or leader of a team engaged in activities appropriate to the program’s discipline”are soft skills that most undergraduate computing programs believe help students havelongevity in their software careers [1]. Tech companies hiring undergraduate softwareengineers state that soft skills like ability to listen effectively, empathize with others, and beagreeable and cooperative during team discussions [2] are skills that new graduates oftenlack. Undergraduate computing capstone courses and sometimes software engineeringcourses are usually a student’s first introduction to both working on a team-based project,creating a prototype
government and non-profit organizations. He claimed to be very interested and vested in his teaching career and teaching-related issues. Overall, he seemed reasonably satisfied with his student ratings, reporting them as good to excellent. However, he felt the need to improve his ratings and did so by continuing to modify the courses that he teaches, and to seek out resources when developing new courses.• Fay: Fay is an engineering educator who was trained in a traditional engineering discipline and has 15+ years of teaching experience within a traditional engineering department. She reported having limited industry experience, which consisted mostly of internships while she was a student. In her position at the time of the
economics, even though I'm taking the class.... It would be easier for me if I had someone else right now from economics.” - Xena “I am definitely, I feel pretty behind in terms of planning out my academic [career].... I have my transfer credits, they haven't all been aligned or something like that. The other negative is that I'm going to have to take the qualifying exam here…. Different teachers, different textbooks, different emphasis. I'm pretty worried about that….I usually rely on students to tell me about [opportunities], and I don't know too many people here…. I haven't done much preparing, honestly. I don't have a very clear plan.” - XenaThe number of hurdles she faced were intimidating
Paper ID #26300Negotiating Identity as a Response to Shame: A Study of Shame within anExperience as a Woman in EngineeringMs. Mackenzie Claire Beckmon, Harding University I am an undergraduate psychology major anticipating graduation in December of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in psychology through attending a graduate program for school or child psychology. It is my hope that these processes can lead to a career as both a researcher and practitioner.Dr. James L. Huff, Harding University Dr
. He received his PhD in biomedical engineering from Drexel University and was an NSF Graduate STEM Fellow in K-12 Education (GK-12).Dr. Diane C. Bates, The College of New Jersey Dr. Diane C. Bates is a Professor of Sociology, with research interest and expertise in education in quantitative methods and retention in higher education in STEM disciplines.J. Lynn Gazley, The College of New Jersey J. Lynn Gazley is Associate Professor of Sociology at TCNJ. Her research interests focus on diversity and inclusion in the sciences, and how these processes shape scientific knowledge-making. She has served as a Research Associate and Visiting Scholar with Northwestern University’s Scientific Careers Research and Development
to grow at a faster rate than the demand for qualified graduates inother occupations. Despite the value and increasing necessity of STEM skills within today’ssociety and the 21st century workforce, substantial numbers of Americans still do not have equalaccess to postsecondary STEM education and, thus, have limited opportunities for STEM-relatedemployment and careers [4].Along with unequal access to STEM degree programs, researchers report stark differencesbetween traditional and nontraditional undergraduate enrollment and degree attainment in STEM,wherein nontraditional students consistently fare worse. Chen and Weko [5] found it was atypicalfor students who were older, financially self-supporting, or from low socio-economicbackgrounds to
paper reports on a study conducted in a civil engineering department that is undergoing bothcurricular and cultural changes as part of an NSF-funded project. The focus of this paper is on students’sense of belonging within their engineering major and at their university, and how those perceptions differbased on student demographics and year in the program.Survey data was collected to assess students’ motivation, attitudes and beliefs about their courses,department, and university. The survey included eight constructs: sense of community, time-orientedmotivation, goal orientation, career outcome expectations, grit, identity, agency beliefs and personalitytraits. Subscales for students’ sense of community (which is the focus of this paper) were
reshaping man- agement. In 2004, the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers presented their Corporate Achievement Award to Rosales at their National Career Conference. This award is given to a Hispanic engineer who has made significant accomplishments in the scientific, technical, or engineering arena. In September 2008, the Colorado Rockies honored Rosales with a Hispanic Leadership Award for her leadership and contributions to the Hispanic community. In October 2012, MAES presented Rosales with the Medallo de Oro (Gold Medal) Award for her service to MAES and the Latino STEM community. Rosales is currently a managing partner in RS&Associates, a professional leadership development and management consulting
long term goals that students pursued as a result of their international learning experience were noted. Additionally, the interviews were coded for: (1) the inherent reason for pursuing an international experience, (2) reason for choosing a particular program or type of experience, and (3) if their experience influenced future career choices or motivated them to pursue other international experiences (desire for similar or dissimilar experiences). Beyond these aspects of motivation, the graduate and post-doctoral students looked at the factors that influenced the interviewee’s experience; for example, was it a class the student had to take (extrinsic motivation) or was the experience something the
their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Grant. She also was an NSF Graduate Research Fellow for her work on female empowerment in engineering which won the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 2015 Outstanding Doctoral Research Award.Jacqueline Doyle, Florida International UniversityDina Verdin, Purdue University, West Lafayette
experimental IM discussion sections. These TAs changed their teachingactivities and grading activities to focus on supporting students’ autonomy rather than any oneparticular learning outcome. Since these TAs also want to become faculty, this increasedresponsibility for the TAs created a secondary benefit of training these TAs to become agents ofchange in their future careers. To create an IM supportive environment for the TAs, the faculty gave the TAs greaterautonomy to choose the structure of their discussion sections and to choose grading procedures.This autonomy was supported by a weekly one-hour coaching and peer-support TA meeting.This meeting consisted of training in grading schemes, listening skills, team building skills, anddiscussions
Statics. The engineering learning community model integratedmathematics and engineering, and additionally through Problem-Based Learning (PBL) providedreal world application experiences for students. The goal of the program was to increaseretention of first year engineering majors by creating a community of learners that would formstudy groups early in their academic career, and use PBL to integrate mathematics and physicsinto practical engineering applications that increase student engagement.Two learning communities linked the courses of Fundamentals of Engineering with twofreshman mathematics courses pre-calculus and Calculus I. The key elements of the EngineeringLearning Community model were: 1) the emphasis of the goals of the learning
. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Exploring the Relationship Between Matriculation Model and Time to Enrollment in Engineering Graduation MajorAbstractThe Multiple
Xinrui (Rose) Xu graduated from the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She currently works at the Engineering Education Research Center of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Prior to her current role, she used to serve as a senior career consultant at the Purdue University Center for Career Opportunities. She received a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering and a Master’s degree in counseling and counselor education. Her research interests include student career development and pathways, student major choice, diversity in engineering, and student mental health.Dr. Douglas B. Samuel, Purdue University, West Lafayette My research focuses on the development of dimensional trait models of
post-tests covering conceptual information, and researcher field noteswere used as the primary sources of data. From these data, themes were identified, and actionswere taken to address each of these feedback themes to better correspond to the learning goalsidentified for the lesson.IntroductionThe face of science, engineering, and technology is rapidly changing. The biggest trends are alsothe smallest, as nano-scale phenomena prove to be more and more important in a wide range ofapplications. However, we still have yet to include these nano-scale phenomena in oursecondary science curricula, leaving students unprepared to enter important careers innanoscience, engineering, and technology.Professional development efforts are one way to combat
, Virginia Tech Maura Borrego is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Dr. Borrego holds an M.S. and Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Stanford University. Her current research interests center around interdisciplinary graduate education in engineering. She has an NSF CAREER and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) award for this work.Kacey Beddoes, Virginia Tech Kacey Beddoes is a Ph.D. student in Science and Technology Studies at Virginia Tech. Her current research interests are interdisciplinary studies of gender and engineering education. She serves as Assistant Editor of the journal Engineering Studies and co
predict whether or not a student will persist tograduate college with a degree in Science, Technology, Engineering, or Math (STEM). Page 14.966.2Literature ReviewThe identification of factors that show significant differences between STEM and Non-STEMstudents has been the subject of much prior study. Sax1 studied students that achieved abachelor’s degree in a STEM subject to determine the likelihood they would go on to pursue ascientific research career. She explored differences by gender in the students’ persistence in ascientific research career. Persistence in Sax’s research was defined as students who achieved abachelor’s degree in a STEM
advocates for change in their future careers. Hatchery Units are onecredit courses that are designed to address gaps in students’ technical knowledge identified bylocal industry, infuse ethics and social justice in the undergraduate computer science curriculum,and build communities of practice while providing a more streamlined integration experience fortransfer students to the program. Guided by Rawl’s [33] theory of social justice, the team willwork with students and faculty to create an environment that is welcoming and supportive for allundergraduate CS students and encourage graduates of the program to work to promote thesevalues as future computer science professionals. The development of these values will bepromoted by building communities
course make you wantto stay in E-Lead?” Seventeen students (65%) responded that the course made them want to stayin E-Lead somewhat more or much more. Only four students responded that the course madethem want to stay somewhat less or much less. Only one student surveyed did not stay in the E-Lead program but stated that they “did not enjoy any engineering program. I enjoyed the classbut not the engineering part. I'm majoring in […] special education K-12.” Further, the responsesto the open-ended question about how this course helped students make progress towardsacademic, work, and degree goals provided us with insight on retention. Thirteen responsesexpressed that the course helped enforce the choice to pursue an engineering career. Seven
be believed that absentee behavior may be due torational decision-making, the gap in research on the inverse—the drive to attend—appears moreclearly. Kottasz [5] outlined that a student’s decision to attend schooling depends on both theability and the motivation to attend, and in the case of the latter, additional research is sought.As students in higher education video game development will form interdisciplinary teams formajor projects, analogous (albeit at a smaller scale) to those in industry careers [10], and only alimited number of interactive lab sessions may occur before these teams form, every momentcounts for students to be able to synchronously meet, familiarize with each other, and formproductive subcultural bonds.Social
Technologi- cal University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts
it hold promise for research on engineering education?)MethodologyIn this section, we discuss grounded theory and template analysis. We identify the techniques weused for sampling and data collection, and the methods of analysis we used.SampleEight members of staff were interviewed (n = 8) for this study. This included six of the sevenmembers who committed to the more formal operation of the group during the academic year2009-10, representing all stages of the career ladder from new-entrants to near-retirement. We alsoincluded two more (mid-career) faculty members who are frequent and active participants ininformal group discussions because they provided insight into the wider set of motivations heldby teachers in the program. All
career in engineering. Brown and colleagues (2014) demonstrate the role of peer networks andsocial capital in interactive engineering classrooms. And Hilpert and Husman (2016) developed a measureof interactive engagement that describes the complex and adaptive ways students rely upon the social andintellectual capital of their peers to develop innovative solutions to engineering problems. These studiesprovide points of leverage for complex systems research to be integrated into studies of classroominteraction and collaboration, instructional strategy use, and how environment shapes student learning. Similar to the nature of learning environments, motivation, affect, and engagement are widelyaccepted to be composed of complex combinations
building where I work and use that time what promoted conversation and aiming to bring Meaning to get a fresh perspective about the task that topic up again in the future.” on which I am working.” “Talking to family members about where to live, Relationships N/A which career to pursue, who to associate with.” Setting/ “Time management and budget, primarily. To keep “I review my goals and
that students who leave engineering are oftendoing well academically, citing not only inadequate high school preparation as a major reasonfor leaving, but also such factors as unwelcoming academic climate, conceptual difficulties withcore courses, a lack of self-efficacy or self-confidence, insufficient interest-in or commitment-tothe field of engineering or a change in career goals, and racism and/or sexism [3]. Furthermore,other studies cite institutional factors such as disappointment with engineering advising assignificant, as academic advising to guide students through the proper sequence of classes is veryimportant to student success in engineering [13] [14] [15]. Specifically, students felt theinformation provided by advisers on course