, and mathematics (STEM) fields is to engage students in undergraduateresearch. The Summer Undergraduate Research in Engineering/Science (SURE) program at[INSTITUTION]--a highly selective technology-focused research institution--was firstimplemented in 1992. SURE is a ten-week summer program for junior- and senior-level minorityundergraduates from a variety of institutions. Students paired with faculty and graduate mentorson research projects attend enrichment activities and conclude the program with researchpresentations to their peers and program faculty. In 2005, a survey of former SURE participantswas conducted. Of the 62 respondents who had completed their bachelors’ degrees, 72.6 percentindicated they had enrolled in or completed a
. Page 22.693.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Extending Information on Time Effective Student Interactions to Engineering FacultyAbstractThe College of Engineering at The Ohio State University is one of ten initial institutionscurrently collaborating in an NSF funded Extension Services project entitled ENGAGE(Engaging Students in Engineering) (www.EngageEngineering.org). The main thrusts of theENGAGE Project are to encourage the implementation of research-proven techniques that havebeen shown to improve retention of undergraduates in engineering programs. One of the threethrusts is to introduce faculty to techniques for student interactions which are both effective
the College of Optics and Photonics. She holds a B.A. in Mathematics Education from the University of North Carolina, M.S. in Mathematical Science from the University of Central Florida, and M.S. in Electrical Engineering and Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics from the University of Washington, Seattle, WA. In 1997 she joined the faculty at UCF where she conducts research in the area of atmospheric effects on laser propagation. She has worked on laser satellite communication projects and laser radar projects for the Boeing Company, the US Navy, and the US Air Force. In 2001 Dr. Young was the recipient of the Young Investigator Award from the Office of Naval Research for a project entitled ”Turbulence Effects on Lidar
. The instructor explains, “Analogy and metaphor are powerful ways of explaining hard concepts. Moreover, analogies are an intimate part of the structure of physics.”At Michigan Tech, a move was made to develop a course which addresses the university’semphasis on writing in engineering and applied science courses. The resulting third-year courserequires students to work collaboratively in producing full-scale engineering reports in a project-based environment.UVU could have considered working toward establishing Writing Intensive (WI) rather than WEcourse in each discipline, and articulating how many of these courses students need to take. AWI course is a common model used at some universities. Drexel’s WI program describes such
Engineering Profession n/a I am familiar with what a practicing engineer does. n/a6a. Exposure to Project-Based Learning Methods (Individual n/a Projects) Since September, what percentage of your classes used the following n/a teaching methods? Individual Projects:6b. Exposure to Project-Based Learning Methods (Team Projects) n/a Since September, what percentage of your classes used the following n/a teaching methods? Team Projects:7. Collaborative Work Style .61 I prefer working as part of a team to working alone. .46 I am a collaborative person
Institute.Allen White, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Allen White is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; he co-developed and co-taught the kinesthetic active supplemental learning opportunities for this project. Allen’s educational research interests include engaging kinesthetic learners and project-based learning. Allen has six years of industrial experience at Honda of America Manufacturing and Honda R & D North America.Glen Livesay, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Glen Livesay is an Associate Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; he co-developed and co-taught the
Paper ID #18471The Variation of Nontraditional Teaching Methods Across 17 UndergraduateEngineering ClassroomsMr. Kevin A. Nguyen, University of Texas, Austin Kevin Nguyen is currently a doctoral student in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education program at University of Texas at Austin. He has a B.S. and M.Eng in Environmental Engineering both from Texas Tech University. As an engineering and STEM education researcher, he draws on a variety of social science research methods from ethnography to regression modeling. He is currently working on two projects: engineering faculty’s use of active
being supported by theirorganizations and perceiving their work as valued (Singh et al. 2014). More recent researchdemonstrated this uncomfortable culture exists well before entering the workforce.Undergraduate women cite informal interactions and sexism in teams as propagating a culturethat is unwelcoming to women (Seron, Silbey, Cech, & Rubineau, 2016).Most efforts to change these percentages of representation both in the workforce and in schoolfocus exclusively on those in the minority. However, our NSF funded study seeks to change theculture of engineering to be more welcoming and supportive of women and underrepresentedminorities by helping all engineers appreciate and seek out diversity In our project we haveworked with several
her B.S. from Missouri State University, and M.S. and Ph.D. from Purdue University.Dr. Steven Nozaki, Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College) Ph.D. Engineering Education - Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College)Dr. Sheryl A. Sorby, University of Cincinnati Dr. Sheryl Sorby is currently a Professor of STEM Education at the University of Cincinnati and was recently a Fulbright Scholar at the Dublin Institute of Technology in Dublin, Ireland. She is a professor emerita of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics at Michigan Technological University and the P.I. or co-P.I. on more than $14M in grant funding, most for educational projects. She is the former Associate Dean for Academic
University’s Board of Trustees. At Virginia Tech, he also serves as Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Engineering Education. His research interests are: Higher Education Finance and Administration; STEM Education; Migration and Immigration issues in education; and Quality Assurance.Mr. Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Tech Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury is a PhD student at Virginia Tech in the department of Engineering Edu- cation. Tahsin holds a BSc. degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from IUT, Dhaka and has worked as a manufacturing professional at a Fortune 500 company. He is actively engaged in differ- ent projects at the department involving teamwork, communication and capstone design with a
cohorts. The initialfaculty cohort team comprises five of the six facilitators of the new cohorts. Moreover, all sevenmembers of the initial faculty cohort continue to meet. This community of practice is leading thedevelopment of additional workshops, implementation of an assessment/evaluation framework todocument the effect of active learning as this continues and expands through SCSE, writing grantproposals to enable further dissemination of the multidisciplinary cohort model approach acrossa college of engineering and science, and supporting each other’s individual research endeavors.IntroductionThis paper describes Work in Progress (WIP) efforts to increase active learning in a college ofengineering and science. Motivation for this project
response to self-reported vulnerabilities and concerns of engineeringstudents. This paper presents data from practical efforts to identify and mitigate anxiety amongengineering students. A group of twenty-seven engineering and engineering technology studentswho were part of a scholarship program was asked to submit journal entries in which theyreflected on their fears and anxieties related to their participation in their degree program.Prominent themes which emerged from student reflection included time management and itseffects on academics and social activities, the likelihood of degree completion and success inengineering-specific coursework (e.g. senior capstone projects), and aspects of life followinggraduation such as handling accumulated
statistics and mathematics community. Page 11.1402.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Using Rapid Feedback to Enhance Student LearningAbstractIn this project our goal is to improve student learning in foundation engineering courses. Ourhypothesis is that learning is improved by providing rapid feedback to students of theirunderstanding of key concepts and skills being taught. This hypothesis was tested throughexperiments in which student performance on quizzes was measured after classes in which theywere provided rapid feedback or not. The feedback system acts as a catalyst to encouragestudents, working in
with him then he'd help me out through the class, so that's why I didn't drop it. (Interviewee 5)In addition, some students showed improved self-efficacy with regards to being involved withtechnical projects. Self-efficacy5, how confident a person feels in their abilities to do something,is used here to describe situations where students emphasized learning something about Page 25.1320.5themselves through the course that showed improved self-efficacy. As much as I disliked this class and it was a struggle for me, I did well when all was said and done and I realized that even though I … don't see myself as someone who is good at these
. Kim received a Ph.D. from the USC, and a master’s and a bachelor’s degrees from the Seoul National University. Her current interests include pedagogical discourse analysis, human-computer interaction, social network assistance, and assessment of student collaborative online activities. She leads synergistic work among machine learning experts, educational psychologists, NLP researchers, and STEM instructors. She is the PI of five NSF projects including the CCLI/PedDiscourse, CCLI/PedWiki and NSDL/SocRecomm projects under the EHR Directorate and CreativeIT/PedGames and IIS/PedWorkflow projects under the CISE Directorate. Under the retired PedDiscourse effort, her team designed, deployed and evaluated software
hold up when implemented in a real classroom.Studying students’ perceptions builds on other work about the nuances involved in implementingresearch-based instructional strategies (RBIS) effectively to provide insight on how new techniques arebrought into engineering classrooms (Borrego et al., 2013).This paper is part of a broader project to understand engineering students’ experiences and perceptionswith specifications grading, grading in general, and the relationship between grading and learning.Throughout the project, we use justice and fairness as the primary theoretical framework (Colquitt &Rodell, 2015). Justice and fairness provides a theoretically rigorous framework for understanding howstudents’ perceptions, expectations, and
online interactive text. Since this chapter dealt with making decisions on a ‘timed process’, itrequired the use of charts (such as a Gantt chart) or graphs (for example, a bar graph) to look atthe process with respect to time. The students had spent time on these methods, both in aclassroom lecture and as part of their final project; however, they did learn things from thischapter that they had not previously considered. Some student comments on their learningincluded: “Throughout this whole chapter I have learned many valuable lessons. Firstly I have learned as to how we approach a specific problem. This chapter has taught me all the key concepts we need to keep in or mind while solving a problem. This chapter also
beviewed by employers, recruiters, and/or others interested in how prepared an employee is. It isinteresting to note that there is little reason to expect such audiences to have commonexpectations of a portfolio since portfolios are relatively uncommon and few people have formalexperience in reading and evaluating portfolios. It should also be noted that if one were going toevaluate the effectiveness of a professional portfolio, it should be done by such authenticaudiences rather than by educators in the context of education.Annotations are a key element of most portfolios. Conceptually, an annotation could be anything(such as a title, a label, a paragraph) that draws attention to specific features of an artifact (e.g., awriting sample, a project
-organizer of Virginia Tech’s Research in Engineering Studies (RES) group.Miguel Hurtado, Purdue University Miguel Hurtado is Ph.D. Candidate in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He holds a B.S. in EE from Universidad de las Américas, Puebla, M.S. in Signal-Image Processing from ENST - Télécom Paris, M.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics and M.S. in Management, both from MIT. His research is focused on statistical methods for sensor fusion in automotive applications (Fisherian and Bayesian approaches), project management, and lean enterprise. He is also interested in engineering education perspectives in social and global context
99 ratings of“excellent,” 12 ratings of “good,” and no ratings of “average,” “fair” or “poor.” While they haveoffered a variety of suggestions for improvement over the years (many of which have beenadopted), they have not consistently complained about any individual aspect of the workshop. Page 11.1018.3 The participants’ open responses comment favorably on the following workshop features:• Mini-clinics. Many workshop topics are introduced by calling on participants to react to scenarios of common occurrences in the life of a faculty member. They critique a flawed research proposal; contrast two research project descriptions
Paper ID #18704The Influence of Perceived Identity Fit on Engineering Doctoral Student Mo-tivation and PerformanceBlanca Miller, University of Nevada, Reno Blanca Miller is a Computer Science & Engineering Graduate Student at the University of Nevada, Reno. Her research focus lies in engineering education across P-24. Her projects involve investigations of un- plugged computer science lessons in K-12, identifying how machine learning can facilitate formative assessment, and understanding the motivation and identities of engineering students. Her education in- cludes a minor in Mechanical Engineering, a B.S. in
the tasks involved in a research project, from selection of a research problem to thereporting of findings in a research manuscript [25]. EERSE is research self-efficacy within thedomain of EER, specifically. According to self-efficacy theory, higher levels of task self-efficacylead to increased motivation and performance in completing that task [24]. Better understandingof EERSE among those who conduct EER can assist in motivating them to grow their EER skillsand knowledge, continue their EER efforts, and eventually be successful in achieving EERproductivity [9, 23].Self-efficacy theory also states that self-efficacy is influenced by many factors such asperformance accomplishments, vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion, and
reversing the roles teachers and students play in a traditionallearning environment, the classroom is then “flipped” or “inverted” [2, 6]. As summarized bySchmidt and Ralph [15], the “I do”, “We do”, “You do” teaching approach has become “Youdo”, “We do”, “I do”.A flipped classroom, when designed and implemented well, can provide a range of benefits. Forinstructors, having students learn outside of the class gives them more time to cover additionalselected topics [6]. Instructors will also have the freedom to use class time for highly interactiveactivities [2] through team-based learning, problem-based learning, or hands-on projects etc..They will also likely to give more personal attention and guidance to the students. In addition,once the
evidence must be collected to validate fairness and 3) a quality-control mechanism mustbe available to correct poor results. For a mixture of human and automated assessment, he proposestwo options: weighting both or using automated as a validation (not contributing to the rater score).While AES solves most of the common human rater errors, it does so at the expense of failing todeeply understand the text. It is also confined to the essay domain. Scaling the number of humanraters to take advantage of the wisdom of the crowd averages out individual rater errors and ishighly adaptable to other assessment types (e.g. projects). Thus, we posit a third option to mix-ing human and automated grading, leveraging the best of both worlds in a unique way: we
Paper ID #14971Measuring Student Response to Instructional Practices (StRIP) in Traditionaland Active ClassroomsMr. Kevin A. Nguyen, University of Texas, Austin Kevin Nguyen is currently a Ph.D. student in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education department at University of Texas at Austin. He has a B.S. and M.Eng in Environ- mental Engineering both from Texas Tech University. As an engineering education researcher, he has worked on projects regarding self-reflection, teamwork, active learning, and participatory science com- munities.Dr. Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin
? What evidence is required to document a successful innovation?Engaging the Community – Our ProcessesA major emphasis of this project has been to engage audiences of the engineering educationcommunity (e.g., engineering education researchers, early adopters of engineering educationinnovations, engineering administrators who will promote propagation). During year one of theeffort, we engaged the community via three primary processes. The first two processes involveda Delphi study with subject matter experts (SMEs) from across the engineering educationresearch and administrative spectrum. The purpose of the Delphi study (conducted during thewinter and spring of 2015) was to identify the most critical unresolved issues facing engineeringeducation
project-based learning. Her previous education research, also at Stanford, focused on the role of cultural capital in science education. Her current interests include en- gineering students’ development of social responsibility and the impact of students’ backgrounds in their formation as engineers.Dr. Renee Falconer, Colorado School of MinesDr. Allison G. Caster, Colorado School of Mines After completing a B.S. in Chemistry at the University of South Dakota, I studied laser micro-spectroscopy and X-ray microscopy at the University of California-Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, earning my PhD in Physical Chemistry. I rounded that out with a post-doc in Bioengineering at the An- schutz Medical Campus in
) to explore the best pedagogical practices to improve the efficiency integrating classroom project-based learning and students’ real-world problem-solving practice. I have MS degree from Florida State University in Curriculum and Instruction and BA degree from China Nanchang University in English. I speak English, Chinese, and some Japanese. I am a proactive person. If you are interested in my research topic, please feel free to contact me via email: mt14n@my.fsu.eduMr. Shayne Kelly McConomy, Florida A&M University/Florida State University Shayne K. McConomy is the Capstone Design Coordinator in the Department of Mechanical Engineer- ing at FAMU-FSU College of Engineering; He holds a PhD in Automotive
5th year negatively predicts completion. Since all students in this program are required to TA,those who TA in early years may have less research responsibility and more time to devote toassociated TA duties without sacrificing any other tasks. However, as doctoral students gainresearch responsibility and feel pressure to make progress on dissertation work, having a TAcould increase their workload unaligned with their projects and inhibit progress, delayinggraduation.In contrast, having an RA assignment or fellowship may allow doctoral students to fully focus onresearch, as shown when RA and fellowship are positive predictors of persistence andcompletion. Students funded on both RAs and fellowships develop important researchcompetencies and
month industry placement program that combined work experience with the completion of an industry based final year thesis.32 - Students at Purdue University from the Engineering Projects In Community Service program (EPICS),33, 34 the Global Engineering Alliance for Research and Education (GEARE)35, 36 and the Co-op program.37 - Final year students from the University of Georgia who had gathered their industry Page 13.216.4 experience in vacation work and unstructured internships.The focus groups were based on a semi-structured protocol using critical incident techniques27-30to elicit instances of