processes practiced in industry. The second goal was for students to learnteamwork skills as practiced in industry. The instructor used a teaching method advocated byMichaelsen. 10 To align with Michaelsen’s method, the instructor created 30 minute designproblems and a few longer-term projects that required students to use both design and teamworkskills to reach a solution. Each week the teams were to solve the assigned problem as a group inclass and report their solution to the class verbally and on a large sheet of paper. Student workwas begun and completed within class.The instructor video recorded approximately 30 minutes of team interaction each week duringclass. A different team was randomly chosen each week. Teams quickly forgot they were
interesting findings and observations. Theauthors acknowledge the fact that it is very important to create significantly differentlearning environments, particularly for engineering students.IntroductionHoward Gardner is the Director of Harvard Project Zero and Professor of Cognition andEducation at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. He has received numeroushonors and written dozens of books. He was the first American to receive the Universityof Louisville's Grawemeyer Award in Education. Gardner is best known in educationalcircles for his theory of multiple intelligences, a critique of the notion that there exists buta single human intelligence that can be assessed by standard psychometric instruments.During the past twenty years, he and
thinking in education; Page 12.252.4Mandinach & Cline’s on the assessment of the system thinking project in the K-12arena8. In addition, there is a broad range of studies in the field of systems thinking with astrong emphasis on psycho-pedagogical implications; such as: Toshima’s10 integratedaptitude test for systems engineers (SE), which includes intellectual abilities andpersonality factors; Richmond’s critical systems thinking skills (dynamic thinking,closed-loop thinking, generic thinking, structural thinking, operational thinking,continuum thinking, and scientific thinking)0 ; Zulauf’s study on locus of control andconceptual stages of cognitive
2006-1653: IDENTIFYING AND INVESTIGATING DIFFICULT CONCEPTS INENGINEERING MECHANICS AND ELECTRIC CIRCUITSRuth Streveler, Colorado School of Mines RUTH A. STREVELER is the Director of the Center for Engineering Education at the Colorado School of Mines and Research Associate Professor in Academic Affairs. Dr. Streveler holds a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Hawaii at Manoa, Master of Science in Zoology from the Ohio State University, and a Bachelor of Arts in Biology from Indiana University at Bloomington. She is co-principle investigator of three NSF-sponsored projects: Developing an Outcomes Assessment Instrument for Identifying Engineering Student
taught in the traditional way in a freshmen designcourse.________________________________________________________________________ S1.5 Which figure below is a rotation of the first? ________________________________________________________________________ Figure 3. Example of 3D rotation, Construct (S1).Construct (S2) requires translation of two-dimensional images to three-dimensional and vice versawhen solving engineering problems. This construct includes the interpretation of figures,diagrams, and word descriptions that represent engineering- or physics-based principles. There aretwo different skills that are included in this construct: a. Three-view two-dimensional projection drawing to a three-dimensional perspective drawing
AC 2010-1826: REPAIRING STUDENT MISCONCEPTIONS USING ONTOLOGYTRAINING: A STUDY WITH JUNIOR AND SENIOR UNDERGRADUATEENGINEERING STUDENTSDazhi Yang, Purdue University Dazhi Yang is a postdoctoral researcher and an instructional designer in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. She obtained both her master’s and Ph.D. degrees in Educational Technology from Purdue in 2004 and 2008, respectively. She has taught a variety of subjects at the K-12, undergraduate, and graduate levels. She also has worked on various instructional deign and technology-supported learning projects across disciplines. Dr. Yang’s research interests are instructional design and strategies
Paper ID #9662Recollecting experience in interviews: the structure and organization of engi-neering ’interview talk’Floraliza Bornilla Bornasal, Oregon State University Floraliza B. Bornasal is a doctoral student in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Ore- gon State University. Her research is currently in engineering education focusing on the transference of expertise among working professionals and undergraduate students. Prior to pursuing her doctoral degree at OSU, she worked as an engineering intern and project inspector for Garfield County Public Works and as an AmeriCorps Volunteer-in-Service-to
and the coming year. “We are striving for constant improvement, not constant change.” (Student, Green Team) “The robot is the students’ project. The students are my project.” (Lead Mentor, Green Team) Students had a sense of belonging because they felt their opinion had been heard. Thestudents also felt this reflective approach allowed their team to expand into other areas of thecompetition to have a more complete team. The act of expanding into more roles opened upopportunities for students with different interests to be involved and maintained high retentionrates. New students were paired with veteran students for student-to-student learning. Althoughstudents accomplished most of the work, mentors, sponsors
managed a European Social Fund Project in Women in Engineering contributing to widening participation and inclusion of women engineers, developed and ran world-class innovative aca- demic practice methods in Career Development, Employability and designed and managed staff workload models. Since 2014, Jo˜ao developed and led transnational education partnerships in several countries in south East Asia and led a group of institutions under the group Star Education based in Singapore as Executive c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #28870 Dean and Senior Vice President. His
assessing engineering student learning. She has participated in a number of curriculum innovation projects and has been active in the engineering education research and assessment communities. She is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and was a Fulbright lecturer/researcher in Sweden.Heidi Diefes-Dux, Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process Engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue University. Since 1999, she has been a faculty member within the First
registered professional mechan- ical engineer with 15 years experience as a practicing engineer. She earned a BSME degree from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, a MSME degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and is currently pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education at USU. She is Principal Investigator for Online Learning Forums for Improved Engineering Student Outcomes in Calculus, a research project funded by the NSF TUES program. Her research interests include engineering student learning, distance engineering education, and alternative pathways to engineering education.Dr. Joshua Marquit, Pennsylvania State University, Brandywine Joshua Marquit is an Instructor in the Psychology Department at Penn State
in Mathematics from International Christian University in Tokyo, Japan.Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington Emily Knaphus-Soran is a Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Evaluation and Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of Washington. She works on the evaluation of several projects aimed at improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM fields. She also conducts research on the social- psychological and institutional forces that contribute to the persistence of race and class inequalities in the United States. Emily earned a PhD and MA in Sociology from the University of Washington, and a BA in Sociology from Smith College.Dr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington
drawings for fire alarm and automatic sprinkler systems, as well as construction design documents including fire protection reports, code equivalencies, and general code consulting for many projects across the nation and abroad. Additionally, she has valuable technical knowledge in smoke control analysis including the commissioning of smoke control systems. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Engineering Student Perceptions of their Generic Skills Competency: An Analysis of Differences Amongst Demographics Oklahoma State UniversityAbstract Assessment and accreditation are an important aspect in
instructors have been shown to support greaterengagement, feeling of connected and belongingness to a part of the community, and enhancepersistence rates [12][13-14]. Finally, research also shows that student demographic characteristicssuch as age, gender, ethnicity, etc. have influenced students’ success in online courses [8][15-18].This study is a part of a larger NSF-funded project studying the persistence of students in onlineundergraduate engineering courses [19]. The Model for Online Course-Level Persistence inEngineering (MOCPE) framework, posited by this project, includes factors related to coursecharacteristics and individual characteristics [20]. Lee, et al. (2020) gives a complete treatment ofthe framework [20]. In this paper, we study the
of efficacy based on their ability to contribute toteam efforts or diminished confidence in success when they repeatedly required the assistance oftheir peers during group work.25, 26 This type of vicarious experience remained an influenceamong CHE 205 students as well. Ben, an international student in CHE 205, described doubts inhis ability to succeed in the course because he seemed to always be the person in his homeworkgroup asking questions and not understanding. …we’re sort of set up in like this group project where um, you’re working with a group on your homework and…I go in, personally, like reading the homework in advance and try to do it by myself but whatever I don’t understand, like I can’t – I don’t feel
they were learning in class to actual engineering design problems.Often, he created design projects from his current research to better engage his students in theclassroom. He described “this obvious case study that people were familiar with would also giveit a little bit more immediacy.” As a result, the students were getting hands on experience withintheir individual group projects, Nathan “felt like it was a much more gratifying experience” forhim as the instructor. Furthermore, the students presented their project findings to otherresearchers (from industry, government and non-profit organizations) who were interested in thefindings. This strategy also created a much more authentic experience for Nathan’s students.In Fay’s case, she
required in order to solve a particularproblem vs. the amount of structure you (as the instructor) prefer. It can be difficult to evaluatethe solutions of others in a way that is truly objective with respect to style, but if we are toadvocate the understanding and appreciation of cognitive diversity, we must be prepared to setthe right example from the start.Implications for Collaborative (Team) Problem SolvingOne of the most important implications of cognitive diversity arises when students need tocollaborate (e.g., in project work, team assignments, etc.). While Adaption-Innovation theorycannot predict whether a student prefers working in groups, it can help explain the relativesensitivity to and importance of group consensus and adherence to
2006-465: TEACHING CHEMISTRY AS A CROSS-CULTURAL SUBJECT: IT &LINGUISTICSMargherita Landucci, Liceo Artistico Statale Margherita Landucci is a graduate in Physical Chemistry of Pisa University. She has worked at CNR (the National Council for Research)in spectroscopy and electrochemistry and taught at Pisa University. She has published works in The Journal of Chemical Society. She is the Italian coordinator of the project "Science and Technology in Society" promoted by The Association for Science Education,UK, and is teaching Phisical Chemistry and Materials Tecnologies at the Liceo Artistico Statale of Venice, Venezia.Fabio Garganego, Municipality of Venice Fabio Garganego is a graduate
Paper ID #17900Specific, Generic Performance Indicators and Their Rubrics for the Compre-hensive Measurement of ABET Student OutcomesMr. Wajid Hussain, Wajid Hussain is an enthusiastic, productive Electrical/Computer Engineer with a Master of Science De- gree coupled with more than 15 years Engineering experience and Mass Production expertise of Billion Dollar Microprocessor Manufacture Life Cycle. Over the years Wajid has managed several projects related to streamlining operations with utilization of state of the art technology and digital systems. This has given him significant experience working with ISO standard
(typically Skype). At the startof the program (Interview 1), each participant was individually interviewed by a member of theresearch team. Participants were asked about their views and goals toward teaching engineering,their reasons for enrolling in the program, and a description of their most recent engineering unit.In both the initial and final interviews (Interviews 1 and 6) participants watched two videos ofstudents’ engineering, collected from our prior projects (we refer to these “research videos” inFigure 1). The research videos were chosen because they showed evidence of students’ thinkingin engineering, including their planning of a design solution, giving and receiving feedback on aprototype, and analyzing their solution using evidence
student when they’re spending all day every day working on their coursework, I was only spending all night every night working on my coursework. I was doing my job during the day. Same thing’s true writing up the thesis, same thing’s true studying for the qualifying exam. So it was pretty stressful.Another returning student, John, worked for a government agency that typically encouraged itsemployees to pursue advanced degrees. However, John found the agency was less supportive ofhis pursuit of education than he felt it was of many less senior employees. Thus, he was not ableto coordinate his efforts in his career and PhD. He explained: So some people get to do their homework or their projects or such on government time
Paper ID #22903Shame Amid Academic Success: An Interpretative Phenomenological Anal-ysis Case Study of a Student’s Experience with Emotions in EngineeringDr. James L. Huff, Harding University James Huff is an assistant professor of engineering at Harding University. He is the lead investigator of the Beyond Professional Identity (BPI) lab, which conducts research that is aligned with unpacking psy- chological experiences of identity in professional domains. Additionally, James directs multiple student projects that use human-centered design in the context of community engagement. James received his Ph.D. in engineering
number of research projects funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). In some of his recent projects he has applied big data techniques and tools to investigate the role of so- cial media in engaging public and under-represented communities towards STEM education and informal learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Situated Information Seeking for Learning: A Case Study of Workplace Cognition among Cybersecurity Professionals AbstractWorkforce development in engineering is a high priority to keep pace with innovation andchange within engineering disciplines and also within organizations. Increasingly
study is certainly generalizable to studies of identity in engineering andmathematics and science education. The authors propose social entrepreneurship identity can befacilitated by educators through defining the social category group in which the individual willidentify, exposure to prototypical members and member characteristics, and active engagementin the social category particularly through group projects. Similarly, Mead formulated that“society shapes self shapes social behavior.”13 These social behaviors were later taken up byStryker and redefined as role choice behavior.16; 17 While Stryker explores external structures,Burke explored internal mechanisms aligned with more modern cognitive theories of identitydevelopment, namely the
interviews of officials within Denmark’s ministries, this can only beconsidered a preliminary look at the institutional responses in Denmark. We also note that ouraccess at DTU was also limited by a recent, controversial decision on the part of one of thePROCEED co-investigators to relocate from DTU to Aalborg University. We believe ourfindings to be of significant interest to engineering educators in the United States. While the fullfindings of our study will be released in an edited volume produced by the PROCEED project, asummary of our findings is presented here for the ASEE audience. In the following section, wefirst present a brief introduction of the Bologna Process and the diverse reactions to it acrossnations and institutions.Varied
universities design their pedagogicaltraining to support their growth as instructors? To what extent do new engineering graduatestudent instructors reflect on their pedagogical training and apply the new skills from training totheir classroom experiences?To address these questions, this project was designed to explore first semester engineering GSIs’perceptions of their pedagogical professional development through the lens of Wlodkowski'smotivational factors for adult learners.8 As summarized by Felder, Brent & Prince (2011), thereare five key characteristics for motivating adult learners to engage in professional development(e.g., expertise of the facilitator, relevance of the topic, choice on how to apply best practices,praxis (action and
theirbachelor’s degrees in engineering. We focus on these individuals due to the scarcity of researchon their experiences and the relevance of their perspectives to engineering education.29-31Implications of this work will focus on recommendations for educational research and practice.Framework and LiteratureThe overall EPS project is broadly situated in social cognitive career theory (SCCT) which positsthat a variety of factors influence career choice including self-efficacy beliefs, outcomeexpectations, and learning experiences.32 SCCT has been used extensively in the study ofengineering students’ career choices.33-37 A main goal of our study has been to identify theschool and workplace factors related to the career choices made by engineering
of a larger National ScienceFoundation-funded study [35] dedicated to developing a theoretical model for onlineundergraduate engineering student persistence based on student LMS interaction activities andpatterns.Data SetAny study utilizing LMS interaction data requires researchers to actually have access to theassociated data. At the university where this research is situated, a separate university organizationoversees delivery of all the university’s online courses. This organization’s charge also includes aresearch mission. Correspondingly, they support related faculty research projects by providingaccess to the LMS interaction data, and the process of acquiring the data for this study includedbuilding a relationship between our research
applying themethods of user-centered design to the challenges of engineering education.) Final versionswere evaluated against criteria developed by the class. The use of peer feedback and consensusbuilding to develop criteria for evaluating students' final products also promoted communitybuilding among the students enrolled in the course.One additional project was required in the course: in teams of three, students were charged withpreparing and delivering to the class a 50-minute presentation about a state-of-the-art teachingpractice of their choice. Student teams identified an article the class would read about theteaching practice. Presentation content includes a description of the practice, evidence or theorysupporting it as a good practice