Conference Session

Student Teams and Project-Based Learning

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margaret Huyck, Illinois Institute of Technology; Daniel Ferguson, Illinois Institute of Technology; Rachel Wasserman, Illinois Institute of Technology IPRO Program

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

), and conducting a facilitateddiscussion with the team about constructing an action plan to deal with the perceived problem(s).This intervention was designed to provide relatively rapid feedback about team functioning, andto help team members understand more fully how individuals can influence the behaviors of theirteammates. However, over a three-semester assessment of this intervention, the conclusion wasthat the teams receiving this brief facilitated reflection-planning intervention did not functionmore effectively overall than those who did not receive this intervention.17 Page 12.266.5 We were (and are still) interested in improving

Conference Session

Design: Content and Context

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Melnyk, United States Military Academy; Daisie Boettner, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

even share based on the team size. For each major assignment a correspondingnumber of points was associated with the peer review. Each team member could receive more orless than this point value based on the results of the review. For example, on a team with four students each member should contribute 25% of theworkload. If one team member only contributes 20% of the workload, then that student wouldreceive 80% of the peer review points associated with the assignment. Since this method is azero-sum proposition, other team member(s) on this team would receive more than the allottedpoints because they would have contributed more than their theoretical share of the work. Thiswas a way to provide limited extra credit to those team members who

Conference Session

Knowing Our Students II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Turns, University of Washington; Steve Lappenbusch, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Page 11.1346.12AcknowledgementsThis work has been supported by the National Science Foundation through grant REC-0238392,Using portfolios to promote knowledge integration in engineering education. The authors wishto thank all members of the Laboratory for User-Centered Engineering Education for theinsightful reviews and comments that helped to shape this paper.References1. Lappenbusch, S., & Turns, J. (2005). Finding their place in TC: using a community of practice model to research emerging TC professionals. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Professional Communication, Limerick, Ireland.2. Guan, Z., Yellin, J.M., Turns, J., and Kumar, V. (2005). User-centered design of course-based portfolios for mechanical engineering

Conference Session

Student Teams and Design Skills

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tamara Moore, Purdue University; Heidi Diefes-Dux, Purdue University; P.K. Imbrie, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

begin to look atwhich kinds of team characteristics are more likely to produce better solutions to MEAs and howto teach students to embody those characteristics as team members. These findings could havegreat impact on how we teach problem solving and teaming to our students.Bibliographic Information1. ABET (2002). Engineering Criteria 2002-2003. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, http://www.abet.org/criteria.html.2. Imbrie, P.K., Maller, S.J., and Immekus, J.C., “Assessing Team Effectiveness,” Proceedings from the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2005.3. Guzzo, R. A. (1986). “Group Decision Making and Group Effectiveness.” In Goodman, P. S. (Ed.). Designing Effective Work

Conference Session

First Year Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Irene B Mena, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Paper presented at theASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. San Diego, CA, October 28-31.7.Mena, I., Zappe, S., & Litzinger, T. (2012). Preparing the Engineer of 2020: Analysis of Alumni Data. Paperpresented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition. San Antonio, TX, June10-13.8.Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.9.Benson, J. & Clark, F. (1983). A Guide for Instrument Development and Validation. The American Journal ofOccupational Therapy. 36(12): 789-800.10.Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.11.Kilgore, D., Chachra, D., Loshbaugh, H., McCain, J., Jones, M

Conference Session

Choice and Persistence in Engineering Education and Careers

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon University; Beth A. Powell, Tennessee Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

representative of the broader engineering faculty population. Future research shouldalso survey faculty directly to find out the extent to which left-of-center grading is deliberatelyemployed since most of our knowledge of the practice is filtered through student perceptions.We also need research that can better understand the motivations of faculty who use the practice.Understanding these motivations can help researchers come up with viable alternatives to left-of-center grading.5. AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1262274. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of

Conference Session

Problem-based and Challenge-based Learning

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fatin Aliah Phang, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Syed Helmi Syed Hassan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Mimi H. Hassim, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, Mohammad-Zamry J. and Nor-Farida H. (2011a). “Cooperative Problem-Based Learning (CPBL): A Practical PBL Model for a Typical Course”, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, Vol. 6, Issue 3, Sept 2011, pp 12-20. Page 25.557.162. Ariffin A. H., Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Mohd. Kamaruddin A. H., Mimi Haryani H., Azila A. A., and S Syed Helmi Syed Hassan (2004). A review and survey of Problem-Based Learning Application in Engineering Education, accepted for Conference on Engineering Education, Kuala Lumpur, 14-15 Dis. 2004.3. Syed Helmi Syed Hassan, Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Mohd Salleh Abu, Shahrin Mohammad (2011

Conference Session

Modeling Student Data

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jordana Hoegh, Purdue University; Alice Pawley, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

: Association of American Colleges.2. Berryman, S.E. (1983) Who will do science? Minority and female attainment of science and mathematics degrees: trends and cause. New York, NY: Rockefeller Foundation.3. Hesse-Biber, S. N. & Leavy, P. (2006). The practice of qualitative research Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.4. Yow, V. R. (2005). Recording Oral History: A Guide For the Humanities and Social Sciences. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.5. Reason, P. & Denzin, N. (1994) Three Approaches to Participative Inquiry in Handbook of Qualitative Research Norman K., and Lincoln, Y. (Eds). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.6. Few A. L., Stephens D. P., & Rouse-Arnett, M. (2003) Sister-to-Sister Talk: Transcending Boundaries and

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University; Mehmet Ayar, TUBITAK; Dennie L. Smith, Texas A&M University; Christine Ehlig-Economides, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

sustainability. Proceedings of the International Page 23.24.13 Symposium on Engineering Education and Educational Technologies (EEET). Orlando, FL.[5] Yalvac, B., Brooks, L. A., & Ehlig-Economides, C., (2008, June). Research on the evolution of college instructors’ perspectives of teaching and learning. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition. Pittsburgh, PA.[6] Barab, S. A., Barnett, M. G., & Squire, K. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 489–542.[7

Conference Session

Open-Ended Problems and Student Learning

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen M. Bursic, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Mary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Education, 94(1), pp. 41-56, 2005.8. Besterfield-Sacre, M. and LJ Shuman, “The Future of Assessment” (Chapter 12) in Spurlin, J., Rajala, S., & Lavelle, J. (2008) (eds.) Designing Better Engineering Education Through Assessment: A Practical Resource Page 22.836.12 for Faculty and Department Chairs on Using Assessment and ABET Criteria to Improve Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing; pp. 307-327.9. Diefes-Dux, H.A., Moore, T., Zawojewski, J., Imbrie, P.K., & Follman, D. (2004). A framework for posing open-ended engineering problems: Model-eliciting activities. Proceedings of the 30th ASEE

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research in K-12

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Dyehouse, Purdue University; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brenda Capobianco, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

, Engineering is Elementary web site: http://www.mos.org/eie/20_unit.php9. Museum of Science, Boston. (2011). Thinking inside the box: Designing a plant package. Retrieved from Museum of Science, Boston, Engineering is Elementary web site: http://www.mos.org/eie/20_unit.php10. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning: Belmont, CA.11. Hsu, M., Cardella, M., & Purzer, S. (2010). Assessing elementary teachers’ design knowledge before and after introduction of a design process model. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) annual meeting, Louisville, KY

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Potpourri I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hyun Kyoung Ro, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

college at America's public universities. 2009, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. xxi, 389 p.4. Ehrenberg, R.G., C.V. Kuh, and Cornell Higher Education Research Institute., Doctoral education and the faculty of the future. 2009, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ix, 308 p.5. Lowell, B.L. and H. Salzman, Into the eye of the storm: Assessing the evidence on science and engineering education, quality, and workforce demand. 2007, The Urban Institute: Washington, D.C.6. Sheppard, S., et al., Exploring the engineering student experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES). 2010: Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. TR-10-01.7. Astin, A.W

Conference Session

Digital Technologies and Learning

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Herold, University of California, Riverside; Thomas Stahovich, University of California, Riverside; Han-lung Lin, University of California, Riverside ; Robert C. Calfee, University of California, Riverside

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Educational Methods and Tools to Encourage Conceptual Learning I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrienne R. Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Jason M. Keith, Michigan Technological University; Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Technological University; Maria Fernanda Tafur; Aytug Gencoglu, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering, Educational Research and Methods

22.371.12 43. Right click on transport of diluted species, and select add selected.44. Click on the flag, select domain 1, and click on the plus sign .45. In the model builder, click on the plus next to transport of diluted species.46. Right click on transport of diluted species, select convection and diffusion, highlight the domain (domain number 1 is the entire rectangle), select velocity field spf1/fp1, and enter a diffusion coefficient of 1 x 10-6 m2/s.47. Right click on transport of diluted species, select inflow, and enter 41 mol/m3. Zoom in, select boundary 2, and click on the plus sign.48. Right click on transport of diluted species, select concentration, and enter 0 mol/m3. Zoom in, select boundaries 1 and 4, and click

Conference Session

Student Learning

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maya Trotz, University of South Florida; Ken Thomas, University of South Florida; Jeffrey Cunningham, University of South Florida; Qiong Zhang, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference, VolumeI, 10-13 Oct., pp T3A: 25-30. Page 15.705.127. Gruber, S.; Larson, D.; Scott, D. and Melvin, N. (1999). Writing4Practice inEngineering Courses: Implementation and Assessment Approaches. TechnicalCommunication Quarterly 8(4):419-440.Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.8. Flateby, T. (2008). Personal Communication (Dr. Flateby is a CLAWQA developerand Director of Assessment at University of South Florida). Page 15.705.13

Conference Session

Measurement Tools

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dina Banerjee, Purdue University; Alice Pawley, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

; transnational feminism and globalization; and sociology of developing nations. In her doctoral dissertation she has examined the effects of sex-segregation and racial/ethnic segregation on the job-related well-being of women workers in U.S.A. She is also associated with the Women’s Studies Program at Purdue University. Before coming to the U.S. as a graduate student, she worked as a lecturer in the University of Calcutta (Kolkata, India) teaching courses on gender, industry and labor market; gender and social change; women and development; and sociological theories and methods. Address: Discovery Learning Research Center, Suite 228, 207 S. Martin Jischke Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, 1-765-494

Conference Session

Classroom Engagement

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Parikh, Stanford University; Helen Chen, Stanford University; Kenneth Goodson, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Olds, Mary A. Nelson. What Conceptual Models Do Engineering Students Use to Describe Momentum Transfer and Heat Conduction? in Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. 2003. Chicago, IL.12. Dewey, J., Interest and Effort in Education. Riverside Educational Monographs, ed. H. Suzzallo. 1913, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.13. Meyers, C., Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. 1st ed. 1993, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.14. Bjorklunc, S., Norman Fortenberry, Measuring Student and Faculty Engagement in Engineering Education. 2005, Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering

Conference Session

Preparing for Practice

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alisha A Waller, Georgia Institute of Technology; Joseph M LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology; Wendy C Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

creation of a symbolic/mathematical (S)model for further analysis. Learning to solve problems in this particular way is a major goal forengineering education. The research presented in this paper focuses specifically on the text todiagram translation and the particularized representations utilized within a course onconservation principles. Previous research on student-generated diagrams revealed that, at thebeginning of the course, students are not able to construct useful diagrams that follow theconservation laws. This result led to the general question of whether students can recognizeuseful, correct diagrams; more specifically: 1) Given a set of diagrams, are students able todistinguish between effective and ineffective diagrams? and 2) How do

Conference Session

Student Recruitment and Retention

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yvonne Ng, College of St. Catherine

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Describing the Engineering Student Learning Experience Based on CAEE Findings: Part 2

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Jocuns, University of Washington; Reed Stevens, University of Washington; Lari Garrison, University of Washington; Daniel Amos, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Writing and Portfolios

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Turns, University of Washington; Kejun Xu, University of Washington; Matt Eliot, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Qualitative Methodologies

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joachim Walther, University of Georgia; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nicki Wendy Sochacka, University of Georgia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Knowing our Students, Part 1

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reed Stevens, University of Washington; Daniel Amos, University of Washington; Andrew Jocuns, University of Washington; Lari Garrison, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

it’s something that requires a lot more, it’s just because maybe it requires a lot more time, it just, it’s a, it, you know, it becomes a bigger part of you than a major might for a non-engineering person. (Walt, University of Coleman, sophomore year) Eleanor: I think that engineering students are stressed. And they are, they have a lot of work to do they, I-, s-, [inaudible] myself and my roommate, like I’m a engineering student this last semester, this semester, and she’s a, a communications major, and she, I never see her do any work. And she’ll always ask me, “Why you have so much work to do?” She always see me, uh, do homework, sitting at the computer, and I always see her on the phone

Conference Session

Design: Content and Context

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shanna Daly, Purdue University; Robin Adams, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Professional Skills and the Workplace

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margaret Huyck, Illinois Institute of Technology; daniel ferguson, Illinois Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Howard, Illinois Institute of Technology; June Ferrill, Rice University; Lisa Getzler-Linn, Lehigh University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference. Honolulu, HI.[5] Adams, J., Tashchian, A. & Shore, T.H. (1999). Frequency, recall and usefulness of undergraduateethics education. Teaching Business Ethics 3: 241-253.[6] Bekir, N., Cable, V., Hashimoto, I, & Katz, S. (2001). Teaching engineering ethics: A new approached. stProceedings of the 31 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, # 0-7803-6669-7/01. Reno, NV.[7] Muskavitch, K.M.T. (2005). Cases and goals for ethics education: Commentary on “connecting case-based ethics instruction with educational theory. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 431-434.[8] Rogers, T.B., Kniper, N.A., & Kirker, W.S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personalinformation. Journal of Personality and Social

Conference Session

Modeling Student Data

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isaac Wait, Marshall University; Andrew Nichols, Marshall University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Discussions on Research Methodology: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Karen Sweeney Gerow, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Assessment and Research Tools

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University; Heather Marie Sapp, Ohio Northern University; David Reeping, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

: Validity and reliability.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7, no. 10 (2000): 71-81.19. Estell, John K., John-David S. Yoder, Briana B. Morrison, and Fong K. Mak. “Improving upon Best Practices: FCAR 2. 0. ” In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2012 Annual Conference. 2012. San Antonio, Tx..20. Douglas, Kerrie Anna, and Şenay Purzer. “Validity: Meaning and Relevancy in Assessment for Engineering Education Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 104, no. 2 (2015): 108-118. APPENDIX A SINGLE POINT RUBRICSThe single point rubrics presented within this appendix were developed for use with the Spring2015

Conference Session

Knowing our Students, Part 1

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gary Lichtenstein, Stanford University; Heidi Loshbaugh, Colorado School of Mines; Brittany Claar, Colorado School of Mines; Tori Bailey, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

MT’s smallsize, some departments only offer courses once a year; if a student falls out of sequence for anyreason, s/he must wait an entire year to make up lost credits.At MT, as at Coleman, fundamental courses were often seen by students as something to getthrough before they could begin to engage in their “real work” as engineering students. The tworequired semesters of physics, an ethics and technical writing class, and an earth science classwere widely described as something to be survived before students could get to the Holy Grail:courses in their majors. Nevertheless, as with Coleman, required courses also introducedstudents to non-engineering majors and faculty. This was particularly the case among studentswho had been considering a

Conference Session

Issues in Advising and Mentoring

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen Zunkel, Iowa State University; Jason Pontius; Thomas J Brumm, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods