American fraternities and sororities in engineering students’ educational experiences at a predominantly White institution. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, Arlington, VA. 19. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Page 24.903.11 20. Daly, S.R., Adams, R.S. & Bodner, G.M. (2012). What does it mean to design? Journal of Engineering Education, 101 (2), 187-219.21. Magana, A.J., Brophy, S.P. & Bodner, G.M. (2012). Computational Simulations as Learning Tools. Journal of Engineering
develop an engineering mindset. Mentors tookan approach of teaching students by first having them watch or closely assist them before settingthem free to continue the task on their own. Mentors’ goal was to have students doing most ofthe decision making and work. Mentors realized the FRC activity was complex and wanted theirstudents to push their limits but still work within their means in order to produce the bestproduct. “If you take somebody and you try to teach them how to do something, about the fourth iteration they start unlearning it. This is occasionally called “drill and kill.” If you teach somebody how to do something by doing it with them and then you back off and let them do it and then go through a Q/A
, R.A., “Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol 97, 2008.2 Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence , First edition. NY, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.3 Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. "Modeling the Days of our Lives: Using Survival Analysis When Designing and Analyzing Longitudinal Studies of Duration and the Timing of Events," Psychological Bulletin, vol. Page 23.1187.12 110, pp. 268–290, 1991.4 Li, Q., Swaminathan, H. & Tang, J., “Development of a
Page 23.857.20 speaking techniques. presentation.Table 6.2: Criteria for Idea Pitch and Final Exam Presentation Delivery SkillsCriteria Very poor = 1 Good = 3 Excellent = 53. How well did the Speaker did not Speaker understood the Speaker’s answers tospeaker answer the answer questions or questions and helped judge's questionsquestions from the provided answers clarify points in the strengthened the casejudges? which were not presentation to which for the idea andDid the Q/A period relevant to the the judge referred. speaker repeated
?” in Getting well, Sticking Together, Owning the Future Covid Shock, U.S.- China Rupture, and The World in 2050, Bloomberg L.P., November 2020, pp. 51-54, [Online]. Available: https://www.neweconomyforum.com. [Accessed January 25, 2021].[2] J. Causey, Q. Liu, M. Ryu, D. Shapiro, and Y. Zheng, “A COVID-19 Supplement to Spring 2020 Current Term Enrollment Estimates,” National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, June 2020. [Online]. Available: https://nscresearchcenter.org/wp- content/uploads/CTEE_Report_Spring_2020.pdf. [Accessed: January 25, 2021].[3] Ministry of Education (MOE) Department of Statistics, “大專校院研究生概況 [Summary of graduate students],” Highlights of Education Statistics, vol. 114, July 2019. [Online
? Economics of Education Review, 69, 125– 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.02.001Huang, F. L. (2018). Multilevel modeling myths. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 492. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000272Lee, W. C., Godwin, A., & Hermundstad Nave, A. L. (2018). Development of the Engineering Student Integration Instrument: Rethinking measures of integration. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20184Li, Q., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2009). Development of a classification system for engineering student characteristics affecting college enrollment and retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2009.tb01033
; Sons, 2020.[16] J. Kania and M. Kramer, “‘Collective impact’, Stanford social innovation review winter 2011,” Palo Alto, CA, 2011.[17] M. Q. Patton, Developmental evaluation : applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York : Guilford Press, 2011.[18] S. N. Leonard, R. N. Fitzgerald, and G. Riordan, “Using developmental evaluation as a design thinking tool for curriculum innovation in professional higher education,” High. Educ. Res. Dev., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 309–321, Mar. 2016.[19] J. M. Case and G. Light, “Emerging Research Methodologies in Engineering Education Research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 186–210, Jan. 2011.[20] D. Kember, Action learning and action research
. Interdiscip. J. Hum. ICT Environ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 47–61, May 2008, doi: 10.17011/ht/urn.200804151352.[5] J. Parkinson and Q. Cutts, “Investigating the Relationship Between Spatial Skills and Computer Science,” in Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, Espoo Finland, Aug. 2018, pp. 106–114. doi: 10.1145/3230977.3230990.[6] M. Fisher, A. Cox, and L. Zhao, “Using Sex Differences to Link Spatial Cognition and Program Comprehension,” in 2006 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, Sep. 2006, pp. 289–298. doi: 10.1109/ICSM.2006.72.[7] P. J. Guo, “Online python tutor: embeddable web-based program visualization for cs education,” in Proceeding of the 44th ACM
. Livingstone, D. Ramirez, E. B. Barko, and A. L. Johnson, “Racial Identity and Body Image Among Black Female College Students Attending Predominately White Colleges,” Sex Roles, vol. 63, no. 9–10, pp. 697–711, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9862-7.[41] S. Mir, “Not Too ‘College-Like,’ Not Too Normal: American Muslim Undergraduate Women’s Gendered Discourses,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 237–256, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01043.x.[42] L. D. Patton and S. L. Simmons, “Exploring Complexities of Multiple Identities of Lesbians in a Black College Environment,” Negro Educ. Rev., vol. 59, pp. 197–215, 2008.[43] V. Purdie-Vaughns and R. P. Eibach, “Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive
Applied, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 229- 245, 2011.[17] E. C. Kokkelenberg and E. Sinha, “Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students,” Economics of Education Review, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 935-946, 2010.[18] Q. Li, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, “Development of a classification system for engineering student characteristics affecting college enrollment and retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 361-376, 2009.[19] K. Klopfenstein and M. K. Thomas, “The link between advanced placement experience and early college success,” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 873-891, 2009.[20] P. Kauffmann, C. Hall, G. Dixon, and J. Garner, “Predicting
engineering: research and practice of an interest-based engineering challengesframework", European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 103-122.Krüger, M. & Diercks-O'Brien, G. 2013, Cooperative and self-directed learning with thelearning scenario VideoLearn: Engineering education using lecture recordings.Liu, W., Tan, R., Peng, Q., Li, H., Li, Z. & Yang, B. 2020, "Impact of TRIZ learning onperformance in biologically inspired design", International Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 974-987.Lönngren, J., Adawi, T. & Svanström, M. 2019, "Scaffolding strategies in a rubric-basedintervention to promote engineering students’ ability to address wicked problems", EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education
asked questions to thateffect, the audience and client were able to probe deeper into the assumptions and analysismethodology for the second team.Mentioned previously, during the proposal presentations, students in the class played the role ofthe client’s engineering team. They were tasked with assessing the proposal pitch from atechnical perspective and reporting to the client on how effective the product was described,assessing the technical merits of the proposed heat transfer analysis, and rating the ability of theteam to complete their stated deliverables. Completing this assessment necessitated the reviewersto ask questions and probe deeper into the presented proposal. An interesting phenomenonemerged between the in class Q&A and the
and J. Coughlin, “Examining Person–Environment Fit and Academic Major Satisfaction,” J. Coll. Couns., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 250–262, 2017.[29] D. W. Cox, A. L. Bjornsen, T. S. Krieshok, and Y. Liu, “Occupational Engagement and Academic Major Satisfaction: Vocational Identity’s Mediating Role,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 169–180, 2016.[30] R. S. Burt, Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., 1992.[31] M. Scheidt, R. Senkpeil, J. Chen, A. Godwin, and E. Berger, “SAT Does Not Spell Success: How Non-Cognitive Factors Can Explain Variance in the GPA of Undergraduate Engineering and Computer Science Students,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, vol. 2018- Octob, pp. 1–5, 2019.
Mental Illness,” Stigma Res Action, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–10, Jan. 2011, doi:10.5463/sra.v1i1.9.[24] O. Eylem et al., “Stigma for common mental disorders in racial minorities and majorities a systematicreview and meta-analysis,” BMC Public Health, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 879, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08964-3.[25] F. Gary, “Stigma: Barrier to mental health care among ethnic minorities.,” Issues in mental health nursing,vol. 26, pp. 979–99, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1080/01612840500280638.[26] E. C. Wong, R. L. Collins, J. Cerully, R. Seelam, and B. Roth, “Racial and Ethnic Differences in MentalIllness Stigma and Discrimination Among Californians Experiencing Mental Health Challenges,” Rand Health Q,vol. 6, no. 2, Jan. 2017, Accessed
). The Craft of Scientific Presentations. New York: Springer-Verlag.27 Atkinson, Cliff (2005). Beyond Bullet Points: Using Microsoft PowerPoint to Create Presentations That Inform, Motivate, and Inspire. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.28 Doumont, Jean-luc (2007). Creating Effective Presentation Slides. http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pcs/index.php?q=node/111, audio file. IEEE Professional Communication Society.29 Alley, Michael, Madeline M. Schreiber, Katrina Ramsdell, and John Muffo (2006). How the Design of Headlines Page 14.221.14 in Presentation Slides Affects Audience Retention. Technical Communication, 53 (2), 225–234
. NCES 2000-601.2. National Science Board (NSB). Science & Engineering Indicators 2008. Arlington,VA: National Science Board (NSB);2008.3. Hyde JS, Fennema E, Ryan M, Frost LA, Hopp C. Gender comparison of mathematics attitudes and affect: a meta-analysis. Psychol Women Q. 1990;14:299-324.4. Sax L. Mathematical self-concept: how college reinforces the gender gap. Res Higher Educ. 1994;35(2):141-166.5. Sax L. Gender and major-field differences in the development of mathematical self-concept during college. J Women Minor Sci Eng. 1995;1(4):291-307.6. Brainard SG, Carlin L. A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. J Eng Educ. 1998;87:369-375.7. Burtner J. The use
perceptions, whichwe believe warrant serious consideration when recruiting and designing programs for supportingtheir transition into higher education. ReferencesAgar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. William Morrow& Company.Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2004). Discourseanalysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographicperspective. Routledge.Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizingschools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2001
that programsmeet and surpass the standards necessary for technical fields; and that programs are “leading theway in innovation, emerging technologies and anticipating the welfare and safety needs of thepublic”9. One of many papers written that discusses the designing and teaching of courses tosatisfy ABET regulations was presented by Richard M. Felder and Rebecca Brent10. Topics suchas ethics and technical skills are readily available, but there is room for growth in the area of lifeand soft skills for engineering graduates. As far back as 1998 where Duyen Q. Nguyen wrotethat engineering careers remain technical but are shifting towards soft-engineering due to themultidisciplinary nature of the changing workplace11. The two areas he included
, 82(3): 330-348.[9] Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods : strategies for product design (3rd ed.): Wiley.[10] Neeley Jr, W. L. (2007). Adaptive design expertise: A theory of design thinking and innovation. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.[11] Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social science research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.[12] Foster, C., Lande, M. & Jordan, S. (June, 2014). An Ethos of Sharing in the Maker Community. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (DEED Division); Indianapolis, IN[13] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002
out of male-dominated occupations? In Eds. H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles, Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.16. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.17. Brown, P., & Matusovich, H. (2013). Unlocking student motivation: Development of an engineering motivation survey. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26.18. Li, Q., McCoach, D. B., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure
Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Integrating technology into computer science education (ITiCSE '96). ACM, pp. 52-54, 1996.[6] Simon, B., J. Parris, and J. Spacco. How we teach impacts student learning: peer instruction vs. lecture in CS0. Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 2013.[7] Porter, L., D. Bouvier, Q. Cutts, S. Grissom, C. Lee, R. McCartney, D. Zingaro, B. Simon. A Multi-institutional Study of Peer Instruction in Introductory Computing. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16), 2016.[8] Lyman, R.. Think-pair-share: An expanding teaching technique. Maa-Cie Cooperative News 1.1, pp. 1-2
desired equipment/instrument and such others. q) Incorporate safety features in products. r) Work independently for the responsibility undertaken. s) Participate effectively in group work. t) Ask for help from others, when required. u) Present generated information in the form of relevant charts/graphs in seminars and panel discussions and acknowledge the help rendered by others in success of the micro–project v) Confidently answer the questions asked about the micro–project.Although, all the above cannot be developed through a single micro–project, but a few of themdo get developed through each micro–project. Some of the skills may be repeated several timesin many of the micro–projects in the different courses as
- 336, 2010.[15] Q. Li, D. McCoach, H. Swaminathan, & J. Tang, “Development of an instrument to measure perspectives of engineering education among college students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 47-56, 2008.[16] H. M. Matusovich, R. A. Streveler, & R. L. Miller, “Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students' motivational values,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 289-303, 2010.[17] L. Goel, P. Zhang, & M. Templeton, “Transactional distance revisited: Bridging face and empirical validity,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1122-1129, 2012.[18] D.U. Bollinger, & T. Martindale, “Key factors for determining
Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024 14Pitterson, N. P., Brown, S., Pascoe, J., & Fisher, K. Q. (2016). Measuring cognitive engagement through interactive, constructive, active and passive learning activities. Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE, 1–6. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7757733/Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Wagner Alibali, M. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational
. [Online]. Available:https://www.inholland.nl/media/10230/the-effective-use-of-video-in-higher-education-woolfitt-october-2015.pdf[10] P. Guo, J. Kim and R. Rubin, "How video production affects student engagement: Anempirical study of MOOC videos," presented at ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, Atlanta,GA, March 4-5, 2014.[11] H. K. Tabbers, R. L. Martens and van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G, "Multimedia instructionsand cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing," The British Journal of EducationalPsychology, vol. 74, (Pt 1), pp. 71-81, 2004.[12] M. Hibbert, What Makes an Online Instructional Video Compelling?, Columbia UniversityAcademic Commons, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7916/D8ST7NHP[13] Q. Dunsworth and R. K. Atkinson, “Fostering
, distance is not considered and despite the visible dissimilarity between profiles on the right plot, entities would likely be assigned membership to the same cluster. 2) Euclidean distance. An intuitive measure for distance, Euclidean distance is the straight- line distance between two points in multidimensional space. It is calculated using 𝑑𝐸 (𝑝, 𝑞) = √(𝑝1 − 𝑞1 )2 + (𝑝2 − 𝑞2 )2 + ⋯ + (𝑝𝑛 − 𝑞𝑛 )2 where n represents the number of dimensions or variables being considered and p and q represent the respective measures of two points on each of the dimensions. A variation on this distance is the Squared Euclidean distance which eliminates the square root
to examine student interdisciplinary learning in science and engineering in higher education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 761–774, 2017.[20] D. Michelfelder, B. Newberry, and Q. Zhu, “Philosophy and Egineering: An Unconventional Work in Progress,” Philos. Eng., vol. 26, pp. 1–12, 2017.[21] J. J. Duderstadt, “Engineering for a Changing World,” in Holistic Engineering Education: Beyond Technology, D. Grasso and M. B. Burkins, Eds. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2010, pp. 17–35.[22] C. Dym, A. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” J. Eng. Educ., no. January, pp. 103–120, 2005.[23] S. R. Daly, R. S. Adams, and A. M. Bodner, “What does it mean to