level in engineeringtechnologies. Engineering education is typically comprised of multiple disciplines such asindustrial, mechanical, civil, electrical, and other specialties. Program graduates in applicabledisiplines are eligible to sit for the Professional Engineer (PE) exam after completing the Bachelorof Science degree and ive years of verified field experience.Engineering education has taken on additional meaning as an engineering iscipline with the establishmentof departments such as Freshman Engineering Programs and the less common Engineering Education, inmany schools across the country. This move defines the widening responsibility felt by engineering schoolsto conduct research in areas such as social responsibility, ethics, learning
and dynamics of machinery for undergraduate engineering programs. He has advised on over forty (40) Senior Design Projects and his teams of students have received five (5) National Championships and three Best Design Awards. In the recent years, he has challenged himself with the creation of an effective methodology for successful Invention and Innovation. He was part of a 14 member multi-disciplinary team to design and create the ”Society, Ethics, and Technology (SET)” course at TCNJ in 1994 and has c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27214taught multiple regular and Honors sections
, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Shuman is the Founding Editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University in Operations Research and a B.S.E.E. from the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Shuman is an ASEE Fellow
participationUndergraduate research. Hirsch, Linsenmeier, Smith, and Walker investigated theeffectiveness of summer research experience in improving bioengineering students’ competencyin ethics and communication.17 Through comparing 39 participants’ assessment results at thebeginning and end of the summer research, this study revealed that students developed a greaterawareness of key concepts in ethics, and understood the importance of audience and themultifaceted nature of technical communication.Zydney, Bennett, Shahid, and Bauer investigated the impact of undergraduate research onstudent development by comparing 157 graduates with research experience and 88 graduateswithout research experience.18 They found that the graduates with undergraduate
study was embedded into the delivery of the problemanalysis and modeling module (module 1) (Frank, Strong, Sellens, & Clapham, 2012).The problem analysis and modeling module (module 1) is a semester-long integrative experiencethat uses concepts from engineering sciences, natural sciences, and mathematics courses to solvecomplex open-ended problems. The course is structured around three complex problems knownas model-eliciting activities (MEAs) that were addressed sequentially in three-week blocks overthe semester. The situations described in the MEAs require students to create and use amathematical model of a physical system using MATLAB, and deal with professional issuesincluding ethical dilemmas, conflicting information, and incorrect
contribute money to environmental organizations I would sign a petition in support of tougher environmental laws I would take a job with a company I knew was harming the environment Page 22.235.4Another instrument, developed by Forsyth, Nye and Kelley, measures the ethic of caring[15].This 10-item scale is a 9-point scale ranging from completely disagree (1) to completely agree(9). Their testing of this unidimensional scale revealed a high internal consistency as measuredby Cronbach alpha (α=0.85). It is intended to indicate the ethic of caring. The items are listed inTable 2.Table 2. Items from the Ethic of Caring Scale by
create quality programs that “satisfies the needs of constituencies in a dynamic andcompetitive environment.”1, p. 1 Many of the general criteria for basic level programs require theeducational experience to expand from one being focused on book knowledge learning and“canned” experiments to one that also emphasizes authentic real-world applications of thisknowledge.Some institutions might believe that satisfying ABET criteria means requiring students to takemore courses (e.g., communication, ethics, public speaking, psychology) in an already intensivecurriculum. Others might believe that students need to have projects in more courses, whichcauses concern because little time is left for instruction of core knowledge and concepts. Othersmight
AC 2012-5232: EXPLORING IF AND HOW KNOWLEDGE OF A HU-MANITARIAN DISASTER AFFECTS STUDENT DESIGN THINKINGRyan C. Campbell, University of Washington Ryan Campbell is pursuing his doctorate through the University of Washington Graduate School’s inter- disciplinary Individual PhD (IPhD) program, in which he combines faculty expertise in the College of Engineering and the College of Education to create a degree program in the emerging field of engineering education. Campbell earned his M.S. in electrical engineering from Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea, and his B.S. in engineering science from Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colo. Camp- bell’s research interests include engineering education, ethics
resources for a solution, implementinga solution, and review; however, for most engineers, design connotes a broader, moreencompassing landscape.Popper12 claims “All life is problem solving!” and hence all humans solve problemscontinuously. ABET, Inc. lists problem solving as a separate educational outcome from design inthe a-k outcomes, stating that students must have: “(c) an ability to design a system, component,or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental,social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability and (e) an abilityto identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems”5.Although we have stated that, in the engineering domain, problem solving is often
, University of Pittsburgh Harvey Wolfe is the William Kepler Whiteford Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. After many years working in the area of applying operations research methods to the health field, he is now active in the development of models for assessing engineering education. He is a co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press, 1997). He holds the B.E.S. in Industrial Engineering, M.S.E. in Operations Research, and Ph.D. in Operations Research (Johns Hopkins University).Mary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh Mary Besterfield-Sacre is an Associate
; e-mail: gmn3@pitt.edu.Harvey Wolfe, University of Pittsburgh Harvey Wolfe is the William Kepler Whiteford Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. After many years working in the area of applying operations research methods to the health field, he is now active in the development of models for assessing engineering education. He is a co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press, 1997). He holds the B.E.S. in Industrial Engineering, M.S.E. in Operations Research, and Ph.D. in Operations Research (Johns Hopkins University).Mary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh
plagiarism and increases an ethics sprit inside the students. Similar to turnitin.com, it matches the submitted papers from the term papers available online. ≠ MyDropBox.com7: This is also an online service that prevents plagiarism. When a paper assignment is submitted into this site, computer compares the paper against the online paper mills.2. Plagiarism in Programming: As mentioned before, students cheat in their programming assignments [16], since it is very easy to copy and paste the programming code that will be hidden from a compiled executable file. However, it is very difficult for instructor to find out the plagiarism in code files rather than in writing assignments. Therefore, few companies
design derived from the exercises.There are many ways of using class exercises in the classroom setting. For a small class size, theteacher may simply use an exercise to engage students in discussion and hands-on practice. Forlarger classes, the students can be assigned to small groups using the class exercise as aninstrument leading to group projects. Woods and Howard [12] effectively used class exercisesfor Information Technology students to study ethical issues. Day and Foley [13] used class timeexclusively for exercises, having their students prepare for class with materials provided online.Bishop and Verleger [14] presented a comprehensive survey of the research that revieweddifferent ways of using class exercises in the classroom, often
Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Professor and Chair of Materials Engineering at California Polytechnic State University where he teaches courses in synthetic and biological polymers, materials selection, and fracture mechanics. He has conducted educational research in the areas of ethical decision making, reflection and innovative pedagogies for the past 19 years. He serves as Associate Editor of the journal Advances in Engineering Education. He has served as division chair for the Community Engagement Division and Materials Division of ASEE. Dr. Harding was invited to deliver a workshop on Ethics in the Engineering Curricula at the 2009 NSF Engineering Awardees Conference and to
problems [14]. Furthermore, the literature exploring philosophy andengineering commonly discusses the ethical implications of these designs and their influence onhumankind [15]. While discussions about the relationship between philosophy and engineering isconstantly evolving, the focus on application of science for some practical means continues to beprevalent in discussions [20]. Because the focus of engineering is not on a specific knowledgebase, but rather a utilization of scientific principles to meet changing societal needs [21],engineering disciplines continue to evolve and therefore must be consistently analyzed to betterinform curricular design.The design process is also commonly discussed in engineering literature [14], [15], and has
ortheir preference for aggregated or disaggregated data in a given project.3We see all such choices by STEM education researchers as powerful indicators of socialunderstandings of equity and inclusion and find the absence of routine inquiry about theseconditions of research to be concerning. As Riley writes of one ubiquitous methodologicalcommitment in particular, “The evidence-based process [of STEM education research] isinstrumental in that it is a means to a given end, and the ethics or morality of those ends is notconsidered.”4 We see “ethics or morality” configuring all research choices and along with Riley,envision a set of critical questions that could potentially increase the impact of educationalresearch upon social inequities. Such
., Hinkin, 1998). Inaddition to authentic engineering practices, we used ABET’s EC2000 Criterion 3a-k as atheoretical basis for defining elements of engineering practice: a. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. an understanding of professional and ethical
broader aspects of for example social and ethical awareness4, 9.However, taking stock after ten years of outcomes-based education in engineering shows that theimplementation is still a “formidable challenge”10 (p. 181). Several authors indicate thatengineering education still falls short of the goal of preparing students adequately forprofessional practice: A recent report of the Business Council of Australia11, an organizationrepresenting the leading one hundred corporations in Australia, points out that engineeringgraduates have deficiencies with respect to crucial job skills such as “problem-solving,communication or entrepreneurship” (.p 14). In a similar way, with respect to the situation in theUS, Wulff12, 13 indicates that “many of the
% represented randomized controlledexperiments. This decline in randomized experiment studies may partly be attributed to thefollowing factors: (1) randomized designs rarely duplicate real-life situations 15; (2) practicalconditions for randomized experiments are generally not satisfied 16; (3) the randomizationprocess may be especially challenging in an educational setting where study groups may not bealtered to form comparable intervention and control groups; and (4) ethical considerationsemerge when a promising or potential educational intervention is provided to the interventiongroup while the control group is denied of its benefits 17. Interestingly, the decline in proportionof experimental education studies has occurred despite the fact that
undergraduateengineering curricula. Communication, especially in the context of working with teams and othersoutside of business organizations, was lacking in new engineers, and they emphasized teamworkskills from capstone design projects to hold the most value. Survey results also found that criticalthinking, seen in design skills for parts, processes, and systems were of utmost importance forsuccess in the workplace.Through a survey of Atlanta area construction engineers and managers, the highest emphasis wasplaced on competencies of “communication, ethics, professionalism, commitment to lifelonglearning, and multi-disciplinary team collaboration.” In comparing these industry preferences withundergraduate engineering programs, the study concluded that
Distinguished Teacher-Scholar at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His interests include computational complexity theory, professional ethics, and engineering education research. He serves as Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education and as a member of the editorial boards of College Teaching and Ac- countability in Research. He is a Carnegie Scholar and an IEEE Fellow. Professor Loui was Associate Dean of the Graduate College at Illinois from 1996 to 2000. He directed the theory of computing program at the National Science Foundation from 1990 to 1991. He earned the Ph.D. at M.I.T. in 1980. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 WIP: Designing a Course to Promote
of Engineering Education 26 (2010).10 Adams, R. S., Turns, J. & Atman, C. J. Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design studies 24, 275-294 (2003).11 Pavelich, M. J., Olds, B. M. & Miller, R. L. Real‐world problem solving in freshman‐sophomore engineering. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1995, 45-54 (1995).12 Bucciarelli, L. L. Designing engineers. (MIT press, 1994).13 Downey, G. & Lucena, J. When students resist: Ethnography of a senior design experience in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education 19, 168-176 (2003).14 Perry, W. G. Forms of intellectual and ethical development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and
or agile methodologies rely on iterative development and consistent user feedback5,6.Which style of development one uses depends on the specifics of the problem or opportunityassessed?For existing engineering programs, the business case has already been made and accepted. To agreat extent, the problem or vision statement is also already defined. In general, the goal is toeducate individuals to be competent and ethical engineers. There is variation in the type ofengineer being produced – electrical, chemical, biomedical – leading to a correspondingvariation in the vision or problem statement and there can be slight variations in the exact natureof the mission – engineers primarily for industry vs. research oriented practitioners – but
lacking. Many groups defineengineering circuitously, by using technology or engineering within the definition itself. He thenworks to define engineering through the ethical considerations of the profession. Additionally,to define engineering, he differentiates it from science. In a workshop given to scientists andengineers, he asked whether they would rather “invent something useful” or “discover newknowledge” 16. The scientists had a hard time answering and ended up split in their decision,while all of the engineers chose something useful. Therefore, he claims, “The primarycommitment of engineers is not to knowledge, theoretical or applied, as one would expect ofscientists, but to human welfare” 17. He concludes that engineers believe they are
2006-882: EVALUATING METHODS TO IMPROVE TEACHING INENGINEERINGCynthia Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli (cfinelli@umich.edu)is Managing Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT) North and Associate Research Scientist of Engineering Education at University of Michigan (U-M). Her current research interests include evaluating methods to improve teaching, exploring ethical decision-making in engineering, developing a tool for comprehensive assessment of team-member effectiveness, and assessing the effect of the first year experience on under-represented student retention. She serves on the Executive Board of the Educational Research and
pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 WiP: Developing an Observation Protocol to Categorize Formative Assessment in Engineering CoursesIntroductionStudent assessment is a necessary component of engineering education that gives instructorsinsight into their students’ learning [1]. Two broad types of assessments include summativeassessment and formative assessment
, pp. 71-103, Feb. 2010.[8] K. Huutoniemi, “Communicating and compromising on disciplinary expertise in the peer review of research proposals,” Social Stud. of Sci., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 897-921, Dec. 2012.[9] B. Paltridge, “Referees’ comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: When is a suggestion not a suggestion?” Stud. in Higher Edu., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 106-122, Feb. 2015.[10] W. Lopworth and I. Kerridge, “Shifting power relations and the ethics of journal peer review,” Social Epistemology: A J. of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 97-121, Jan. 2011.[11] M. Eisenhart, “The paradox of peer review: Admitting too much or allowing too little?” Res. in Sci. Edu., vol. 32, no. 2, pp
course was complete using several qualitative methods: an anonymous on-line open-ended survey, a semi-structured focus group interview, individual interviews with students, the instructor and teaching assistants, and document analysis of student course work. The instructor was also asked to communicate his learning objectives in written form, and we took anecdotal field notes during our initial meetings when we discussed the possibility and implementation of the study. Two consecutive cohorts of students (N=80 per cohort) were invited to participate from two course offerings: Winter 2013 and Winter 2014. Ethics approval was procured from our institution’s Research Ethics Board. The
-Scholar at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His interests include computational complexity theory, professional ethics, and engineering education research. He served as the editor of the Journal of Engineering Education from 2012 to 2017. He currently serves as a member of the edito- rial boards of College Teaching and Accountability in Research. He is a Carnegie Scholar and an IEEE Fellow. Professor Loui was Associate Dean of the Graduate College at Illinois from 1996 to 2000. He directed the theory of computing program at the National Science Foundation from 1990 to 1991. He earned the Ph.D. at M.I.T. in 1980. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 WIP
, how problem solving is taught, how empathy and ethics areincorporated into the engineering curriculum, and so on.In order for EER&I to have impact, people from many audiences need to hear about the resultsand resolve to act on what they have learned. Some audiences identified were internal to theuniversity and some were external. Internal audiences include faculty who are interested inadapting new approaches to teaching, faculty who are skeptical but curious, and administratorsinterested in utilizing research results or starting their own engineering education researchprograms. External audiences include students and parents who want to know how engineeringwill be taught at universities they are considering and faculty at other