2006-142: THE PARALLEL CURRICULUM MODEL: UNDERSTANDINGENGINEERING EDUCATIONAL INNOVATIONS TO OPTIMIZE STUDENTLEARNINGYvonne Ng, College of St. Catherine Yvonne Ng, M.S.M.E., teaches computer science and engineering for non-majors at the College of St. Catherine. Educated as a mechanical and aerospace engineer, she worked in industry as an automation design engineer and contract programmer. She made computer science a more appealing topic for her all-women undergraduate student body by presenting this technically valuable course in a more comprehensive manner. She is currently working with the college’s AS and AAS program to create pathways for students to enter technical colleges and engineering
Youngstown State University, with a Bachelors of Engineering degree in Electrical Engineering in 1981. He then obtained his MS and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from GA Tech in 1982, and 1988 respectively. He joined the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at the University of New Mexico where he is currently professor and was the chair between 2005 and June 30, 2011. Since July 1, 2011, Professor Abdallah is the Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs at UNM. Professor Abdallah conducts research and teaches courses in the general area of systems theory with focus on control and communica- tions systems. His research has been funded by national funding agencies, national laboratories, and by
was always taught to go above and beyond and challenge accepted thinking.” Participant 24) Research experiencesFor many students their research experiences in various environments helped them develop as aresearcher. These experiences allowed them to develop a range of laboratory skills, workindependently on projects, and gain a first-hand idea of what research is like. “My internship at [Company X] that helped me understand that I liked laboratory work on the industrial scale.” Participant 31 “Working in a laboratory at a Singaporean university for a summer, in which I was generally left to my own devices, allowing me to plan my own activities and learned to be self-motivated, along with becoming
options of online teaching methods1,2,3 prior to making thetransformation of the on-campus course to the on-demand course. Our on-demand approach boresome resemblance to the online modality. The following steps were taken in such transformation.Revision of the course learning outcomesIn the transition from the on-campus, in-person course in fall 2019 to the online, on-demandcourse in summer 2020, the course learning outcomes for the in-person course were reviewed. Inthe review, we found that most of the outcomes could be transitioned to the on-demand coursewithout modifications. For outcomes involving in-person, in-laboratory experiments, they werenot feasible in that summer term due to campus closure. They were replaced by computer-aidedcontrol
.: ‘A Hands-On Approach to Teaching Product Development’ World Transactions on Engineering &Technology Education vol. 5, no.3, (2006) pp 397-400.4. Ssemakula, M.E; Liao, G.; Ellis, R.D; Kim, K-Y; Aguwa, C.; and Sawilowsky, S.: ‘Manufacturing Integrated Learning Laboratory (MILL): A Framework for Determination of Core Learning Outcomes in Engineering Curricula’ Int. Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 27, no. 2 (2011) pp. 323 – 332.5. Basken, P.: “Why Engineering Schools Are Slow To Change.” Chronicle of Higher Education, January 22, 2009. http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Engineering-Schools-Are/1470.6. Curricula 2015: Moving Forward. SME, Manufacturing Education Web Forum Series: http://www.sme.org
the ASME at the University of San Diego and the President of the Pacific Division of the AAAS. He received the Outstanding Engineering Educator Award from the San Diego County Engineering Council in 2008, the Faculty of the Year Award from the Zeta Omega Chapter of Beta Theta Pi Fraternity in 2013, the Outstanding Undergraduate Research Mentor Award from the University of San Diego in 2014, the Preceptor Award of the University of San Diego in 2015, and Best Paper Awards from the Division of Experimentation and Laboratory Oriented Studies of the American Society for Engineering Education in 2008 and 2014.Dr. Ernest M. Kim, University of San Diego Ernie Kim received his BSEE from the University of Hawaii at Manoa
, S. Crosby, B. Flugman, S. Issac, H. Everson, and D. B. Clay, "Using formative assessment and metacognition to improve student achievement," Journal of Developmental Education, vol. 37, p. 2, 2013.7 J. Emig, "Writing as a Mode of Learning," College Composition and Communication, vol. 28, pp. 122-128, May 1977.8 J. M. Ackerman, "Reading, Writing, and Knowing: The Role of Disciplinary Knowledge in Comprehension and Composing," Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 25, pp. 133-178, May 1991.9 J. L. Auerbach, C. M. Bourgeois, and T. R. Collins, "Do Students Benefit? Writing-to- Learn in a Digital Design Laboratory Course," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, vol. 1, pp. T1F-20
Colorado Boulder 1999-2008 Assistant Professor, lecturer and academic administrator, Department of Mathematics, UCLA 2008-2011 Engineering Education, Ham- burg University of Technology Since 2011 Scientific Staff at Center for Teaching and Learning Since 2013 Head of Center for Teaching and Learning, Hamburg University of TechnologyProf. Christian H Kautz, Hamburg University of Technology Christian H. Kautz has a Diplom degree in Physics from University of Hamburg and a Ph.D. in Physics (for work in Physics Education Research) from the University of Washington. Currently, he leads the Engineering Education Research Group at Hamburg University of Technology
. in educational leadership and policy studies with a focus on higher education. She has over six years of research and professional experience in the field of higher education. With a dedication to diversity, equity, and inclusion, she is committed to using qualitative and quantitive research to inform impact-driven decisions.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as
(including research- and teaching-stream faculty, sessional lecturers andteaching assistants) from across three core second-year courses elected to participate in the studyin 2012-2013; in 2013-2014, nine (9) faculty (including teaching-stream faculty and teachingassistants) from across two core third-year courses elected to participate in the study. Courseswere chosen based on our previous research, notably those that garnered the most frequentmentions from former students as to the impact on their professional development. Theseincluded: • CHE297, Communications Portfolio I • CHE298, Communication • CHE230, Environmental Chemistry • CHE324, Chemical Process Design Laboratory • CHE326, Thermodynamics and Kinetics LaboratoryIndividual
interested in a topic for a long period of time.4,5 This couldrelate back to activities that can teach students basic engineering principles that they can usethroughout college and in their careers. The final component, caring, can also be broken downinto two components: academic caring and personal caring. Academic caring deals with studentsbelieving that their instructor cares about their academic success.4,5 The benefit of a gamifiedlearning environment is that feedback is given to students throughout their participation to letthem know if they are doing well, or what areas should be improved upon. Personal caring dealswith students believing that their instructor cares about their well-being.4,5 Instructors canexplain to students within the
University of Louisiana at Lafayette. His research interests are in Hydrology, Water Resources, Rainfall Remote Sensing, Water Management, Coastal Hydrology, and Advances in Hydrology Education ResearchProf. David Tarboton, Utah State University David Tarboton is a professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University. He received his Sc.D. and M.S. in Civil Engineering (Water Resources and Hy- drology) from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and his B.Sc Eng in Civil Engineering from the University of Natal in South Africa. His research and teaching are in the area of surface water hydrol- ogy. His research focuses on advancing the capability for hydrologic
South Korea. She currently works as graduate research assistant in engineering education department. Her research interests are assessment for learners in diverse settings, and teacher education in multicultural settings.Prof. Jeffrey F Rhoads, Purdue University at West Lafayette Jeffrey F. Rhoads is a Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University and is affiliated with both the Birck Nanotechnology Center and Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at the same insti- tution. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees, each in mechanical engineering, from Michigan State University in 2002, 2004, and 2007, respectively. Dr. Rhoads’ current research interests include the predictive design, analysis, and
Delaware where he expanded his knowledge on simulation of multiphase flows while acquiring skills in high performance parallel computing and scientific computation. Before that, Dr. Ayala hold a faculty position at Universidad de Oriente at Mechanical Engineering Department where he taught and developed graduate and undergraduate courses for a number of subjects such as Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics, Multiphase Flows, Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Machinery, as well as Mechanical Engineering Laboratory courses. In addition, Dr. Ayala has had the opportunity to work for a number of engineering consulting companies, which have given him an important perspective and exposure to industry. He has been
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Pilot Program in Open-Ended Problem Solving and Project ManagementAbstractThis research is motivated by the need for students’ early exposure to work readiness skills thatpromote effectiveness in dealing with complex open-ended technical problems as may beencountered in senior capstone projects or professional practice. This paper presents preliminarywork in the building of Rube Goldberg machines as student projects to foster some of theseskills. Design of Rube Goldberg machines may be employed in a number of settings as a vehiclefor teaching basic engineering skills. These designs require students to creatively consider avariety of
engineers are educated.IntroductionIncreasingly, high profile organizations including ASEE1, National Academy of Engineering2-4,Association of American Universities5, National Research Council6-8, and the National ScienceBoard9, 10 are calling for widespread improvements in undergraduate STEM education.Tremendous investment and related efforts over the past few decades have built up a substantialknowledge base about STEM learning and many effective pedagogies and interventions11, 12. Yetthese groups are increasingly expressing dissatisfaction with the rate of implementation, whichdraws attention to implicit assumptions and models of how change occurs in STEM highereducation and how it might be accelerated. Broad scale changes to teaching practices
Paper ID #19206Complex Systems Research and Evaluation in Engineering EducationDr. Jonathan C. Hilpert, Georgia Southern University Dr. Jonathan C. Hilpert is an Associate Professor of Educational Psychology in the Department of Cur- riculum Reading and Foundations in the College of Education at Georgia Southern University. His re- search interests include student motivation, engagement, and interactive learning; emergent and self- organizing properties of educational systems; and knowledge construction of complex scientific phe- nomena. He teaches courses in learning theories, research methods, and assessment and statistics
found that graduate student mentors who work closely withstudents on their projects served as “coping models” in developing undergraduates’ self-efficacyfor research and graduate school. Specifically, we reported that the REU program served as a“taste” of graduate school, and gave participants access to graduate students and professors whoserved as both role models and sources of information about academic and career options.Several factors contributed to their reported increased in self-efficacy for graduate school andresearch careers: their accomplishments in the laboratory, new knowledge about graduate schooland potential career options, and vicarious learning3 that took place over the summer via theirgraduate student mentors. In particular
York: Collier/Macmillan4 Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T., and Smith, Karl A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Report on Higher Education. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.5 Johnson, D., Johnson, R.& Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.6 Taconis, R., Ferguson-Hessler M.G.M., & Broekkamp, H. (2001). Teaching Science Problem Solving: An Overview of Experimental Work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 442-468.7 She, H. (1999). Students’ knowledge construction in small groups in the seventh grade biology laboratory: Verbal communication and physical engagement. International Journal of
underrepresented racial and ethnic minority students using motivational frameworks.Mr. Harrison Douglas Lawson, Michigan State University I completed my undergraduate Chemical Engineering degree at the University of Pittsburgh. I am cur- rently a graduate student at Michigan State University pursuing a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering. My research is biology and education focused. After graduating, I aspire to continue working with education programs and join a university as teaching faculty.Dr. Daina Briedis, Michigan State University DAINA BRIEDIS is a faculty member in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University and Assistant Dean for Student Advancement and Program Assessment in
Paper ID #17703Evaluating Freshman Engineering Design Projects Using Adaptive Compar-ative JudgmentDr. Greg J. Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Greg J. Strimel is an assistant professor of engineering/technology teacher education in the Purdue Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. His prior teaching experience includes serving as a high school engineering/technology teacher and a teaching assistant professor within the College of Engineering & Mineral Resources at West Virginia University.Dr. Scott R. Bartholomew, Purdue University My interests revolve around adaptive
Paper ID #14997Applying ”The New Age of Innovations Principles” to Software EngineeringEducationDr. Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Guruji Education Foudation Dr Pradeep Waychal is a founder trustee and the chair of Guruji Education Foundation that provides holistic support to the education of underprivileged students and operates on funding from friends. The foundation has recently extended its work in diverse areas such research in engineering education, youth employability and teaching computer science to adolescents. Earlier, Dr Waychal has worked at Patni Computer Systems for 20 years in various positions including the head
nine students and therefore essentially function as sites 1. TheREU program solicitation 2 states: Page 14.1307.2 The REU program is a major contributor to the NSF goal of developing a diverse, internationally competitive, and globally-engaged science and engineering workforce. It draws on the integration of research and education to attract a diversified pool of talented students into careers in science and engineering, including teaching and education research related to science and engineering, and to help ensure that these students receive the best education possible.In spite of the significant
4 graphical user interfaces.Koretsky, Kelly, The authors conducted a .93, .85, and .89 Cohen’s Kappa score for& Gummer content analysis to contrast three different laboratories offered under(2011) the survey responses of each of the two conditions. undergraduates who attended a virtual laboratory versus those who attended a physical laboratory.Mentzer, Becker, The authors coded the The authors reported the interrater& Sutton (2015) engineering design thinking reliability, as indicated by Cohen’s kappa, of 59 high school students’ for
) andQualitative Content Analysis (QCA) to analyze and compare student survey responses about peerinteraction and resource use to student performance data within the context of a 2nd yearengineering materials science course taught during the spring 2019 semester. Researchers haveapplied SNA across social science disciplines to quantitatively describe the interactions betweenindividuals in a network. For example, SNA has been used in engineering education to analyzefaculty communities of practice [5] and to compare instructor and teaching assistant (TA) onlineforum participation [6]. While use of SNA to better understand how student interactions withpeers may affect course performance exists in the computer-supported education [7] and onlinelearning [8
instructional materials, activities, and as- sessments by using a cognitive framework of differentiated overt learning activities for designing effective classroom instruction in materials science and engineering.Glenda Stump, Arizona State University Glenda Stump is a Post-doctoral Scholar in the School of Social and Family Dynamics at Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona. Dr. Stump earned a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology and a certificate in Educational Technology from Arizona State University in May of 2010.Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging
Paper ID #19918Characterizing the Complexity of Curricular Patterns in Engineering Pro-gramsProf. Gregory L. Heileman, University of New Mexico Gregory (Greg) L. Heileman serves as the Vice Provost for Teaching and Learning at the University of New Mexico (UNM). From 2011 until 2016, he served as the Associate Provost for Curriculum at UNM. During that time he led campus-wide student academic success initiatives, and worked with key stakeholders on campus, to produce all-time record retention and graduation rates. In 1990 he joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at the University of New Mexico
AC 2009-902: IMPROVING AN ABET COURSE ASSESSMENT PROCESS THATINVOLVES MARKER PROBLEMS AND PROJECTSBruce Murray, State University of New York, Binghamton Bruce T. Murray is a professor of mechanical engineering at the State University of New York at Binghamton and is the Director of Undergraduate Studies in the ME Department. He received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in ME from Rutgers University in 1978 and 1980, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in ME from the University of Arizona in 1986. Earlier in his career he was a Member of Technical Staff at Bell Laboratories where he was involved in system thermal management and reliability. He also was a research engineer at the National Institute of
AC 2009-577: LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT OF A PROJECT-ABROADPROGRAM IN SOUTH AFRICA: TOWARD "A BETTER ENGINEER IN THEREAL WORLD"Laura Hahn, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Laura Hahn is a specialist in education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She consults with faculty in the College of Engineering on curriculum, instruction, teaching assistant development, and learning outcomes assessment. She has helped develop two project-abroad programs for students in the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering.Alan Hansen, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Alan Hansen received his PhD from the University of KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa, where he joined
AC 2010-823: USING THE EMERGENT METHODOLOGY OF DOMAINANALYSIS TO ANSWER COMPLEX RESEARCH QUESTIONSLindsey Nelson, Purdue University Lindsey Nelson is a graduate student in Engineering Education. She graduated from Boston University with her bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering. In trying to gain knowledge about teaching and learning within an engineering context, Lindsey pursued some graduate study in mechanical engineering and shifted to teaching high school physics. As an active member of the American Association of Physics Teachers, she developed an interest in curricular innovations. Combining her interest in curricular innovations with a passion for social justice, Lindsey