the student population responded that they are more satisfied with KACIE incomparison to other courses. The other half had the opinion that they are satisfied with KACIEjust like any other course. Finally, nearly all responded that KACIE sheets were useful for betterunderstanding and learning the concepts. TABLE IV STUDENT SURVEY DATA TABLE Completely Somewhat Disagree (%) agree (%) agree (%) Q.1 The supplementary videos provided helped to 50 50 0 understand the course material in better manner Q.2 These videos equipped
pattern was distinguished by the phrase “I feel” as well as the word“just.” The use of “just” seemed to reference an innate feeling the student had about theirattitudes and beliefs, rather than a specific affinity towards some trait such as creativity or actionsuch as problem solving. Students expressed two kinds of emotional responses to belongingness:comfort and enjoyment. An excerpt from Candace’s interview transcript is an example ofstudents’ comfort towards being in engineering. Q: Do you feel like you belong in engineering? Candace: Yes. I don't know, I've just never felt like I wasn't in the right place or I wasn't- I guess I've never felt like I didn't belong, so I don't know why I feel like I do belong, but
: Yeah but then… S1: Think about the physical system and what’s going to be happening and how the heat transfer is going to change…as the temperature inside the pipe increases to our target… Q out is going to increase because your temperature gradient is getting larger. Right? S2: I think it’ll go…I think it’ll actually go the opposite way, it’ll come down because there will be less of a temperature gradient.Figure 1: Examples of self-construction and collaborative engagement in team dialogueAnalyzing the remaining lines of dialogue in Figure 1, S1 must defend his hypothesis to histeammates who are questioning its validity. The dialogue is laden with engineering worldreasoning, leading to substantive exchange
to decode. Story Develop a chapter (100-200 words) individually and independently in week 1 and Telling work as a team in week 2 to resolve all conflicts or inconsistencies. Exploring Explore sensory stimuli at a particular site (sounds, sights, smell, etc.) and document observations. Simile Poses “simile” descriptions and participate in team-to-team Q&As to solicit guesses and descriptions relevant to a particular object. Machine Devise ways to test a black-box mysterious machine without causing harm to Testing humans while attempting to reveal the functionalities of the machine. Calendar Build a calendar for a planet with
application/technology technology (Microsoft, Cisco, etc) Does not provide solutions to situation involving multiple technologies or products Product bias by vendorOnline Forums Discussion and Q&A Provide solutions to Trustworthiness of information is forums (StackExchange, common problems questionable depending on forum etc) Provide answers to very used
63.4 11.0 25.71: Q: Question from survey (see Appendix A)2: Total number of students that provided feedback of “Strongly Agree”3: Total number of students that provided feedback of “Agree”4: Total number of students that provided feedback of “Neutral”5: Total number of students that provided feedback of “Disagree”6: Total number of students that provided feedback of “Strongly Disagree”7: % (+): Positive feedback expressed as a percentage (rounded up) of the total number of students that responded to the survey as either “Strongly Agree” or “Agree”8: % (-): Negative feedback expressed as a percentage (rounded up) of the total number of students that responded to the survey as either “Strongly Disagree” or “Disagree”9
success,” Educate, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2007.[16] J. Otero, J. M. Campanario, and K. D. Hopkins, “The Relationship between Academic Achievement and Metacognitive Comprehension Monitoring Ability of Spanish Secondary School Students,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 419–430, Jun. 1992.[17] P. R. Pintrich, “The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing,” Theory Pract., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 231–236, 2002.[18] O. Lawanto, “Students’ metacognition during an engineering design project,” Perform. Improv. Q., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 115–134, 2010.[19] O. Lawanto and S. Johnson, “Student’s cognitive self-appraisal, self-management, and the level of difficulty of an engineering design project
: Diversifying the pipeline through the development of social capital,” in Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, 2007.[14] S. R. Harper, “Niggers no more: a critical race counternarrative on Black male student achievement at predominantly White colleges and universities,” Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 697–712, 2009.[15] Q. S. Hughes, R. L. Shehab, and S. E. Walden, “‘Success is different to different people’: A qualitative study of how African American engineering students define success,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011.[16] T. Fletcher, M. Ross, D. Tolbert, J. Holly, M. Cardella, A. Godwin, and J. Deboer, “Ignored
. The impact of thebias reduction in the purpose sampling could lead to objectivity obtained by probabilisticsampling subject to future studies.References[1] L. A. Palinkas, S. M. Horwitz, C. A. Green, J. P. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood, "Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research," Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, vol. 42, pp. 533-544, 2015.[2] C. L. Livneh, "Characteristics of lifelong learners in the human service professions," Adult Education Quarterly, vol. 38, pp. 149-159, 1988.[3] M. Q. Patton, "Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry: A Personal, Experiential Perspective
–10, 2012.[15] L. Chang, “Connotatively Consistent and Reversed Connotatively Inconsistent Items are Not Fully Equivalent: Generalizability Study,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 991–997, 1995.[16] W. D. Perreault, “Controlling Order-Effect Bias,” Public Opin. Q., vol. 39, no. 4, 1975.
? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions forevaluation, 2007(114), 11-25.[10] Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Healthservices research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189.[11] Geertz, C. (1994). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Readings inthe philosophy of social science, 213-231.[12] Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1991). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, andschooling in social context. Cambridge University Press.[13] National Research Council. (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation sciencestandards. National Academies Press.[14] Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. TheMIT Press
. [Online]. Available:https://www.inholland.nl/media/10230/the-effective-use-of-video-in-higher-education-woolfitt-october-2015.pdf[10] P. Guo, J. Kim and R. Rubin, "How video production affects student engagement: Anempirical study of MOOC videos," presented at ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, Atlanta,GA, March 4-5, 2014.[11] H. K. Tabbers, R. L. Martens and van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G, "Multimedia instructionsand cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing," The British Journal of EducationalPsychology, vol. 74, (Pt 1), pp. 71-81, 2004.[12] M. Hibbert, What Makes an Online Instructional Video Compelling?, Columbia UniversityAcademic Commons, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7916/D8ST7NHP[13] Q. Dunsworth and R. K. Atkinson, “Fostering
Dysfunctional Cooperative Learning Teams Based on Students' Academic Achievement," J Eng Educ, vol. 99, (1), pp. 45-54, 2010.[16] M. C. Thomas and K. W. Phillips, "When What You Know Is Not Enough: Expertise and Gender Dynamics in Task Groups," Person. Soc. Psychol Bull., vol. 30, (12), pp. 15851598, 2004.[17] A. Joshi, "By Whom and When Is Women’s Expertise Recognized? The Interactive Effects of Gender and Education in Science and Engineering Teams," Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 59, (2), pp. 202-239, 2014.[18] H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner, The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. 2004.[19] L. U. Eric and G. L. Cohen, "Constructed Criteria: Redefining Merit to Justify Discrimination," Psychol. Sci., vol. 16, (6), pp. 474-480, 2005
Using nStudy Trace Data and the ICAP Framework. Paper presented at the LAL@ LAK.Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of educational psychology, 80(4), 514.Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and psychological measurement, 53(3), 801-813.Pitterson, N. P., Brown, S., Pascoe, J., & Fisher, K. Q. (2016). Measuring cognitive engagement through interactive, constructive, active and passive learning activities. Paper presented at the Frontiers in
on nonresponse in web surveys.Social Science Computer Review, 25(3), 372.[24] Zhu, J., Hu, Y., Liu, Q., & Cox, M. F. (2015). Validation of an instrument for Chineseengineering students’ epistemological development. International Journal of Chinese Education,4(2): 135-161.[25] National Academy of Engineering. (2005). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering inthe new century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
1424 O’Keefe, C. M., & Head, R. J. (2011). Application of logic models in a large scientific research program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 174–184. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.00825 Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.26 Funnell, S. C., Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. San Francisco: Wiley.27 Kelly, A. E. (2014). Design-based research in engineering education: Current state and next steps. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 497–418). New York: Cambridge University Press.28 Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A