, 2019. 5. M. Deziel, D. Olawo, L. Truchon, and L. Golab, “Analyzing the mental health of engineering students using classification and regression,” Educational Data Mining., 2013. 6. A. Danowitz and K. Beddoes, “Characterizing mental health and wellness in students across engineering disciplines.” presented at the Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference Proceedings, Crystal City, VA, USA, 2018. 7. M. E. Goodwin, “The impact of depression on academic success and academic help- seeking attitudes,” presented at the ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2020. 8. K. J. Jensen and K. J. Cross, “Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of
. 3, pp. 37-45, 2008.[9] Q. H. Mazumder and M. R. Karim, "Comparative Analysis of Learning Styles of Students of USA and Bangladesh," 119th ASEE Annual Conference, pp. 25-328, June 2012.[10] Y. Deng and I. H. Yeter, "Exploring engineering students' perspectives on hands-on, remote, and virtual laboratories use: An engagement level exploration.," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, 2024.[11] F. Zurita Ortega, A. Martinez Martinez, R. Chacon Cuberos and J. L. Ubago Jiménez, "Analysis of the psychometric properties of the Motivation and Strategies of Learning Questionnaire—Short Form (MSLQ-SF) in Spanish higher education students.," Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 132, 2019.[12] Department of
. Netemeyer, W. O. Bearden, and S. Sharma, Scaling procedures: Issues and applications, Nachdr. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publ, 2001.[2] S. Mersand, “The state of makerspace research: A review of the literature,” TechTrends, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 174–186, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11528-020-00566-5.[3] S. Timotheou and A. Ioannou, “On making, tinkering, coding and play for learning: A review of current research,” in Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019, vol. 11747, D. Lamas, F. Loizides, L. Nacke, H. Petrie, M. Winckler, and P. Zaphiris, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11747. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 217–232. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-29384-0_14.[4] M. Tomko, M. Alemán, R. Nagel, W
in the cohort met with an assigned engineering facultymentor individually twice a semester and interacted with all faculty mentors for the program atseminars held twice a semester. Two cohorts operated concurrently with one starting in Fall of 2019 and a second startingin Fall of 2020. At the time of this study, the first cohort had completed eight semesters of theirengineering program and cohort two had completed six semesters. For comparison across thetwo cohorts, only data from the first six semesters of each cohort was used for this study. As thiscohort is an outward-facing program, major enrollment and demographic information includinggender and race/ethnicity are removed to protect the identities of our participants
-based approaches to understanding this population. Dina is interested in understanding how first-generation college students author their identities as engineers and negotiate their multiple identities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2022-2023 Outstanding Research Publication Award by the American Educational Research Asso- ciation (AERA) Division I, 2018 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award and the Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) Distinguished Scholar Award. Dina’s dissertation pro- posal was selected as part of the top 3 in the 2018
landscape,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 2870–2875, Nov. 2019.[2] J. N. Magarian and W. P. Seering, “Characterizing engineering work in a changing world: Synthesis of a typology for engineering students’ occupational outcomes,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. n/a, no. n/a, May 2021.[3] K. Moozeh, L. Romkey, N. Dawe, and R. Khan, “Identifying Signature Pedagogies in a Multidisciplinary Engineering Program,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021, p. 18.[4] L. Romkey, R. Khan, and N. Dawe, “What is Engineering Science? Defining a Discipline through a Cross-Institutional Comparison and a Multi-Institutional Workshop,” Proc. Can. Eng. Educ. Assoc., 2020.[5] S. Hawse and L. N. Wood
]. 2017 Jun 24 [cited 2021 Jan 27];2017- June. Available from: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/enepubs/1331. Choe NH, Borrego M. Prediction of Engineering Identity in Engineering Graduate Students. IEEE Transactions on Education. 2019 Aug 1;62(3):181–7.32. Hamlet LC, Roy A, Scalone G, Lee R, Poleacovschi C, Kaminsky J. Gender and Engineering Identity among Upper-Division Undergraduate Students. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2021 Mar 26;37(2):04020113.33. Kaul S, Adams RD. Learning Outcomes of Introductory Engineering Courses: Student Perceptions. In: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2014. p. 24–854.34. El-Maaddawy T. Innovative assessment paradigm to enhance student learning in engineering
Interventions,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6.[12] B. Jimerson, E. Park, V. Lohani, and S. Culver, “Enhancing Engineering Ethics Curriculum by Analyzing Students’ Perception,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2013, p. 23.530.1-23.530.15. doi: 10.18260/1-2--19544.[13] M. Polmear, A. R. Bielefeldt, D. Knight, N. Canney, and C. Swan, “Analysis of macroethics teaching practices and perceptions in engineering: a cultural comparison,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 866–881, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2019.1593323.[14] A. Benham, R. Fotherby, A. W. Johnson, and C. L. Bowen, “Student Perspectives of Aerospace Engineering
. Particularly, his work is published in the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Computer Applications in Engineering Education (CAEE), International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET), and IEEE Transactions on Education. He is also serving as a reviewer for a number of conferences and journals focused on engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teaching Online Engineering: A Systematic Literature ReviewAbstractGlobally, online education is becoming increasingly popular because of its flexibility
the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001- 8791(81)90019-1 [4] Hurst, M. A., Polinsky, N., Haden, C. A., Levine, S. C., & Uttal, D. H. (2019). Leveraging research on informal learning to inform policy on promoting early stem. Social Policy Report, 32(3), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/sop2.5 [5] Removed for Double Blind Review [6] Lester, S., & Ruth, K. D. (2022, August). ’ook Who's Talking: Exploring the DEI STEM Librarianship Conversation. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. [7] Roy, J. (n.d.). Engineering by Numbers - ira | ASEE. ASEE. Retrieved February 8, 2023, from https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2018
, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1888–1895, July 2014,https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2293056[9] M. Drummond Oakes, K. Everett, M. T. Harris, M. Sydlik, and A. Godwin, “ExpandingSummer Research Programs at an NSF ERC: Innovation, Assessment, and Adaptation,” Paperpresented at ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 2020, https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34626[10] Z. Zhao, A. Carberry, W. Barnard, A. Cook-Davis, M. Jordan, J. Larson, M. O’Donnell, andW. Savenye, “Creating Common Instruments to Evaluate Education and Diversity Impactsacross Three Engineering Research Centers,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in EducationConference, FIE, October 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028711[11] Z. Zhao, A. R. Carberry, A. Cook-Davis, J. S. Larson, M. Jordan
Much Can Spatial Training Improve STEM Achievement?,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 607–615, Dec. 2015.[6] D. H. Uttal and C. A. Cohen, “Chapter Four - Spatial Thinking and STEM Education: When, Why, and How?,” in Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 57, B. H. Ross, Ed., in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 57. , Academic Press, 2012, pp. 147–181. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394293-7.00004-2.[7] S. Wood, W. Goodridge, B. Call, and T. Sweeten, “Preliminary Analysis of Spatial Ability Improvement within an Engineering Mechanics Course: Statics,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 25942. doi: 10.18260
about innate brilliance that exist in USculture have been shown to result in non-white and non-male individuals being presumed to beless competent than their majority counterparts despite their achievements (Gutiérrez y Muhs etal., 2012). Ultimately, the depiction of an engineer as an innately brilliant, analytically-mindedman reinforces the oppressive way that intelligence and smartness have been constructed inengineering (Carroll et al., 2019; Dringenberg et al., 2022) and implicitly reinforces falsestereotypes about white male intellectual supremacy.Additionally, MacGyver acting as the lone hero reinforces the “great man” narrative in Westernepistemologies of science that promotes the idea of working in isolation (Kant & Kerr, 2019).This
39th Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009.[5] B. E. Hughes, W. J. Schell IV PE, B. P. Tallman, R. Beigel, E. Annand, and M. Kwapisz, “Do I Think I’m an Engineer? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity on Retention,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32674.[6] H. Perkins et al., “Holistic Wellbeing and Belonging: Attempting to Untangle Stress and Wellness in Their Impact on Sense of Community in Engineering,” International Journal of Community Well-Being, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 549–580, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s42413-021- 00149-z.[7] R. M. Felder, G. N. Felder, and E. J. Dietz, “A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. V
-13, no. 2, pp. 72-83, Jun,1966, https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1966.6447087.[15] J. Mangold and S. Robinson, “The engineering design process as a problemsolving and learning tool in K-12 classrooms”, in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, pp. 23.1196.1-23.1196.14, Jun, 2013,https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22581.[16] D. P. Crismond and R. S. Adams, “The informed design teaching & learningmatrix,” Journal of Engineering Education-Washington, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 738-797,Oct, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x.[17] A. C. Graesser, S. M. Fiore, S. Greiff, J. Andrews-Todd, P. W. Foltz, and F. W.Hesse, “Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving,” PsychologicalScience
Improve Student Learning and Satisfaction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” AERA Open, vol. 5, no. 3, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1177/2332858419870489.[5] A. Prieto, J. Barbarroja, S. Álvarez, and A. Corell, “Effectiveness of the flipped classroom model in university education: a synthesis of the best evidence Eficacia del modelo de aula invertida (flipped classroom) en la enseñanza universitaria: una síntesis de las mejores evidencias,” vol. 391, pp. 143–170, doi: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-391-476.[6] V. Barabash, M. Milz, T. Kuhn, and R. Laufer, “Development of a competence ecosystem for the future space workforce: strategies, practices and recommendations from international master programs in northern
. N. B. Raikar and N. Banerjee, "Using anonymous grading for high-stakes assessments to reduce performance discrepancies across student demographics," in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland, 2023, doi: 10.18260/1-2--42859. 5. A. Satyanarayana, R. Lansiquot, and C. Rosalia, "Using Prescriptive Data Analytics to Reduce Grading Bias and Foster Student Success," in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), IEEE, 2019. 6. J. K. Dorsey and J. A. Colliver, "Effect of anonymous test grading on passing rates as related to gender and race," Academic Medicine, 1995. 7. M. Gusev, M. Kostoska, and S. Ristov, "A new e-Testing platform with grading strategy on essays," in 2017
have different work styles than mine.References[1] ABET. 2022. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022–2023[2] N. Ismail, N. A. Aziz, C. K. Hong, M. Z. Zainal, Assessing Teamwork Value in Project-Based Learning of Capstone Project Course. Atlantis Press, 2020.https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200921.025[3] Hung, W., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2019). A review to identifykey perspectives in PBL meta-analyses and reviews: trends, gaps, and future research directions.Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(5), 943–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09945-x[4] Phillips, A., Kecskemety, K. M., & Kajfez, R. L. (2019, October). Identifying Student TeamLeaders and Social Loafers in a First-Year
experiences of graduate students in engineering education research in Canada: A collaborative autoethnography," Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 20, pp. 98-115, 2020.[11] K. R. Maxey, "Becoming in action: An autoethnography of my professional identity development as an aspiring engineering education faculty member," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2019.[12] S. Barab and K. Squire, "Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground," in Design-based Research, pp. 1-14, Psychology Press, 2016.[13] H. Chang, F. Ngunjiri, and K. A. C. Hernandez, "Collaborative autoethnography," vol. 8, Routledge, 2016.[14] V. Braun and V. Clarke, "Using thematic analysis in psychology
Paper ID #38599Equitable Attainment of Engineering Degrees: A Tri-University Study &Improvement EffortRaian Islam, The University of Arizona Raian Islam is a current Master’s student and a Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering at The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. She received her BSc. degree in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh, in 2019. Her current research interests include higher education data analytics, ma- chine learning and photovoltaics.Prof. Gregory L. Heileman, The
Mentzer et al. study launched a quantitative investigation examining the extent to which basicpsychological needs were met prior to the pandemic in a traditional face-to-face only version of the coursecompared to a version of the course using our HyFlex model.This quasi-experimental study had two distinct components, each with their own research question and sample.First, we hypothesized that the HyFlex environment met students' basic psychological needs as well as orperhaps better than the traditional face-to-face only environment. As a test for this hypothesis, we accessedbasic psychological needs satisfaction data from Fall 2019 and compared these to data collected during the Fall2020 for a sample of 1344 students. Data were collected as part
Interventions on Women’s Sense of Belonging in STEM,” Sex Roles, vol. 80, no. 9–10, pp. 527–547, May 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11199-018-0952-2.[2] J. B. Arbaugh, “An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Gender on Student Learning and Class Participation in an Internet-Based MBA Course,” Management Learning, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 503–519, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1177/1350507600314006.[3] C. A. Moss-Racusin et al., “Reducing STEM gender bias with VIDS (video interventions for diversity in STEM).,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 236– 260, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1037/xap0000144.[4] C. A. Moss-Racusin, C. Sanzari, N. Caluori, and H. Rabasco, “Gender Bias Produces Gender Gaps in STEM Engagement,” Sex Roles, vol. 79, no
, "Comparison of student performance using web and paper-based homework in college-level physics," JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1050-1071, 2003.[7] H. G. Cooke and M. A. Al Faruque, "Impact of Mastering Engineering on Student Learning and Perceptions in a Strength of Materials Course," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[8] R. O’Neill, A. Badir, L. D. Nguyen and D. J. Lura, "Homework Methods in Engineering Mechanics, Part Two," in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[9] K. Hekman and Z. Zhou, "Using Blackboard Quiz Pools and Other Automated Grading in Mechanical Engineering Courses," in 2022 ASEE Annual
-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University Senay Purzer is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research is on
peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability,” Am. Psychol., vol. 63, pp. 160–168, 2008, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.160.[17] K. Beddoes, S. Cutler, and R. Croninger, “WIP: The Field of Engineering Education Research as Seen Through the Peer Review Process,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32349.[18] K. K. Janke, A. S. Bzowyckyj, and A. P. Traynor, “Editors’ Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development,” Am. J. Pharm. Educ., vol. 81, no. 4, May 2017, doi: 10.5688/ajpe81473.[19] M. Petrescu and A. Krishen, “The evolving crisis of the
learning goals for pre-college engineering are stillbeing contested. One argument, which is promoted in science standards, is that engineeringdesign provides an authentic context to apply science concepts [4] [5] [6]. However, others arguethat this represents too narrow a view of engineering and promotes misconceptions [7] [8]. Inresponse to these concerns, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) andAdvancing Excellence in P12 Engineering Education introduced a Framework for P-12Engineering Learning [9]. This framework outlines learning goals for engineering literacy thatmove beyond a narrow focus on practices, including engineering habits of mind and knowledge.In addition, the authors call for further research to scaffold learning
learning, and faculty experiences in teaching online courses. He has published papers at several engineering education research conferences and journals. Particularly, his work is published in the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Computer Applications in Engineering Education (CAEE), International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET), and IEEE Transactions on Education. He is also serving as a reviewer for a number of conferences and journals focused on engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
Graduate Student Service Award (2019), the Disserta- tion Completion Award (2020), and the International Faculty Recognition Award at Utah State University (2022). In August 2021, I joined Utah State University as an Assistant Professor (tenure-track) in Com- puter Science, where I now lead the Data Science and Applications lab (dsa.cs.usu.edu). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Leveraging Social Media in Engineering Education Research: Latent Dirichlet Allocation MethodAbstractIn our work, we explore how social media analytics can be leveraged in engineering educationresearch to understand lived experiences of marginalized groups outside of engineering
Enterprise Excellence in the Department of Computer and Information Technology with a courtesy appointment at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.E. in InformaMr. Joseph A. Lyon, Cornell University Joseph A. Lyon is a Lecturer for the College of Engineering Honors Program at Purdue University. He holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. His research interests are computational thinking and mathemat- ical modeling.Elsje Pienaar ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Evidence-based practice: ASEE Biomedical and Agricultural Engineering Undergraduate Students Programming Self-Beliefs and Changes Resulting from Computational
gratefully acknowledge the alumni participants in this study and the contributions ofour research team. Finally, we acknowledge the generous support of this work from theHasso Plattner Design Thinking Research Program.References1. National Academy of Engineering, U. S. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.2. Wigner, A., Lande, M., & Jordan, S. S. (2016). How can maker skills fit in with accreditation demands for undergraduate engineering programs?. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.4. ABET Student Learning Outcomes, Retrieved from