outside Texas A&M University. He is a Fellow of ASEM, a professional member of INFORMS, ASEM, ASEE, and a senior member of IISE.Dr. Noemi V. Mendoza Diaz, Texas A&M University Dr. Mendoza is a faculty member of Technology Management in the College of Education-Engineering at Texas A&M University. She has worked as electrical engineering professor in Mexico. She recently obtained funds from NSF to investigate enculturation to engineering and computational thinking in engi- neering students. She is the co-advisor of the Society for Hispanic Professional Engineers and advisor of Latinos in Engineering and Science at TAMU and is interested in computing engineering education and Latinx engineering studies
, 145(2).https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056232Luberto, C. M., Shinday, N., Song, R., Philpotts, L. L., Park, E. R., Fricchione, G. L., & Yeh, G.Y. (2018). A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy,Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors. Mindfulness, 9(3), 708–724.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0841-8Martin, J. R. (1997). Mindfulness: A Proposed Common Factor. Journal of PsychotherapyIntegration, 7(4), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPI.0000010885.18025.bcNaphan-Kingery, D. E., Ridgeway, M., Brockman, A., Mckane, R., Botchway, P., & McGee, E.(2019). Engineering Empathy. ASEE Prism, 29(1), 43–43.Nolte, H., Huff, J., & McComb, C. (2022). No time for that? An investigation of mindfulness andstress
/FIE49875.2021.96371Benham, A., Fotherby, R., Johnson, A. W., & Bowen, C. L. (2022). Student Perspectives of Aerospace Engineering Macroethics Issues and Education. 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962654Bielefeldt, A. R., Polmear, M., Swan, C., Knight, D., & Canney, N. (2017). An overview of the microethics and macroethics education of computing students in the United States. 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190445Bielefeldt, A., Rulifson, G., & Canney, N. (2019). Military-Bound and Veteran Student Views on Socially Responsible Engineering. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 33109. https
, however nopreference was given in recruitment for level of sight or how long students had been withoutvision. The EQ program for BLV youth was held during the summers of 2018 and 2019 at theNFB national headquarters in Baltimore, Maryland. The program lasted for one week in each ofthe years it was offered and consisted of STEM-based activities that were designed to increasestudents’ spatial ability. Week-long national NFB conventions provide members withinformation about blindness culture, technology, and research, and attract thousands of BLVpeople from around the country. State NFB conventions operate in a similar manner at a less-populated state-level.Data AnalysisTMCT items were analyzed by examining answer choices picked from those who took
Development of Undergraduate Latina Students,” Journal of Latinos and Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 181–200, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1080/15348431.2019.1648269.[14] B. E. Rincón and S. Rodriguez, “Latinx Students Charting Their Own STEM Pathways: How Community Cultural Wealth Informs Their STEM Identities,” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, p. 1538192720968276, 2020.[15] H. Darabi, P. Nelson, R. Nazempour, Renata Revelo, L. Nitsche, and J. Abiade, “An Integrated Program for Recruitment, Retention, and Graduation of Academically Talented Low-income Engineering Students: American Society for Engineering Education,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Jun. 22
how students understand and respond to agency and howtheories of agency from science education may be more fully adapted for EER.References[1] J. Swenson, A. Johnson, T. Chambers, and L. Hirshfield, “Exhibiting Productive Beginnings of Engineering Judgment during Open-Ended Modeling Problems in an Introductory Mechanics of Materials Course,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, FL, 2019.[2] J. Swenson, M. Magee, and M. Caserto, “Investigating the Transferability of the Productive Beginnings of Engineering Judgment Framework from Statics to Dynamics,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[3] V. Svihla, T. Peele-Eady, and A. Gallup
perceptions of engineering stress culture [Paper Presentation]. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--324189 The Gallup–Purdue Index Report Study Year 3. (2016). Great Jobs. Great Lives. Washington, DC: Gallup, Inc. https://news.gallup.com/reports/199229/gallup-purdue-index-report-2016.aspx10 Scheidt, M., Godwin, A., Senkpeil, R. R., Ge, J., Chen, J., Self, B. P., … Berger, E. (2018). Validity evidence for the SUCCESS survey: Measuring non-cognitive and affective traits of engineering and computing students. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 1–28). Salt Lake City, UT.11 Scheidt, M., Godwin, A., Chen, J., Ge, J
. Mayled et al., “Coaching and feedback in a faculty professional development program that integrates the entrepreneurial mindset and pedagogical best practices into capstone design courses,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019, doi: 10.18260/1-2--32513.[6] S. Zappe, K. Hochstedt, E. Kisenwether, and A. Shartrand, “Teaching to innovate: Beliefs and perceptions of instructors who teach entrepreneurship to engineering students,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 45–62, 2013.[7] F. M. Connelly and D. J. Clandinin, “Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry,” Educational Researcher, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 2–14, Jun. 1990, doi: 10.3102
publicationvenues and research products (Borrego & Bernhard, 2011; Jesiek et al., 2009). In addition to thescale-up of engineering education research activities, an emergence of innovative researchmethods are contributing to the advancement of the field (Carstensen & Bernhard, 2019; Case &Light, 2011). In particular, quantitative research methods have been critical in the growth ofengineering education as a field of inquiry (Borrego et al., 2009; Chou & Chang, 2010; Malmi etal., 2018). Engineering education research is benefiting from the applications of these innovativequantitative methods, especially methods designed for big data and person-centered analysis thatallow researchers to tackle more nuanced research objectives such as the
, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning, faculty experiences in teaching online courses. He has published papers in several engineering education research conferences and journals. Particularly, his work is pub- lished in the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Computer Applications in Engineering Education (CAEE), International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Journal of Engineering Education Transforma- tions (JEET), and IEEE Transactions on Education. He is also serving as a reviewer for a number of conferences and journals
). Learning to Conduct “Team Science” through Interdisciplinary Engineering Research. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 3. Knight, D. B., Davis, K. A., Kinoshita, T. J., Twyman, C., & Ogilvie, A. M. (2019). The Rising Sophomore Abroad Program: Early Experiential Learning in Global Engineering. Advances in Engineering Education. 4. Jesiek, B. K., Shen, Y., & Haller, Y. (2012). Cross-cultural competence: A comparative assessment of engineeringstudents. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(1), 144. 5. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2022-2023/ 6. Miskioglu, E. (2018, June). It takes all kinds
Sophomore Bridge Program," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 6 2019.[4] K. Evans, M. Desselles and M. K. Orr, "Year 3 of an S-STEM summer scholarship for a sophomore bridge program," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2020.[5] K. Evans, M. Desselles and M. K. Orr, "Successes and Lessons in Year 4 of an S-STEM Summer Sophomore Bridge during the COVID-19 Pandemic," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2021.[6] K. Evans, M. K. Orr and M. Desselles, "S-STEM Summer, Sophomore Bridge: Successes of Two Cohorts and Experiences of our Year 5 Cohort," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2022.[7] L. Fogg, A. T. Gros, K. Evans, M. K. Orr, C. Belk, E. Hilton and M. Desselles, "Fast- Forward Program: PSVT:R Test Results and
Leadership, 2022. doi: 10.35613/ccl.2022.2048.[27] B. Beigpourian, F. Luchini, M. Ohland, and D. Ferguson, “Psychological Safety as an Effective Measurement in Engineering Classrooms,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 33214. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33214.[28] H. B. Carlone and A. Johnson, “Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1187–1218, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1002/tea.20237.[29] J. R. Morelock, “A systematic literature review of engineering identity: definitions, factors, and interventions affecting development, and means of measurement,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 6
Accommodate and Disability Rights. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 8(3).Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 3E [Third edition]. Los Angeles; London: SAGE Publications.Slaton, A.E. (2013). Body? What Body? Considering Ability and Disability in STEM Disciplines. ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013.Tracy, S.J. (2010). Qualitative Quality: Eight ‘Big-Tent’ Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qual. Inq., 16(10), pp. 837–851.Willis, R. (2019). The use of composite narratives to present interview findings. Qualitative Research, 19(4), 471–480. DOI: 10.1177/1468794118787711
Capacity, Access, Participation, and/orExperience, as based on the CAPE Framework [3]. Overall, models focused on partnership 1Zarch, McGill ASEE 2023collaborations, including RPPs, are designed to enable a more balanced power structure betweenresearchers and practitioners to create an asset-based approach to research [4].Recently, three organizations, all of which focus on CS education implementation, formed anRPP to identify problems of practice and develop an intervention to address them. Since this workfocuses on the collaborative partnership model of an RPP, a clear definition is needed. RPPs aredefined as “...long-term
, “Engineering Ph.D. students’ research experiences: A think-aloud study,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Educ. Conf., 2019, pp. 1–4.[21] N. H. Choe and M. Borrego, “Master’s and doctoral engineering students’ interest in industry, academia, and government careers,” J. of Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 325–346, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20317.[22] G. Sallai, J. Vicente, C. Berdanier, and K. Shanachilubwa, “Coping landscapes: How graduate engineering students’ coping mechanisms correspond with dominant stressors in graduate school,” in 2022 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., 2022.[23] E. Hocker, E. Zerbe, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Characterizing doctoral engineering student socialization: Narratives of mental health, decisions to
, “Progress with the professional spine: A four-year engineering design and practice sequence,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 63–74, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.7158/22054952.2013.11464079.[3] Z. S. Roth, H. Zhuang, and A. Zilouchian, “Integrating design into the entire electrical engineering four-year experience,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/integrating-design-into-the-entire-electrical-engineering-four-year- experience[4] R. Khan and L. Romkey, “Scaffolding reflection across the design curriculum: Triangulating Student, Alumni, and Faculty Perspectives of the Role of Design within an Engineering Science
, Minnesota State University, Mankato Catherine Spence is an Assistant Professor at Iron Range Engineering through Minnesota State University, Mankato in the Integrated Engineering Department. She received her PhD in Engineering and Science Education in 2019 and a BS in Electrical Engineering in 2014 at Clemson University.Dr. Marissa A Tsugawa, Utah State University - Engineering Education Marissa Tsugawa is an assistant professor at Utah State University focusing on neurodiversity and identity and motivation. She completed her Ph.D. in Engineering Education focusing on motivation and identity for engineering graduate students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP
et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, p. n71, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.[25] E. Rutz, “Adaptable and Agile - Programs to Meet Emerging Workforce Needs,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/adaptable-and-agile-programs-to-meet-emerging- workforce-needs[26] S. Barker and A. Clobes, “Work in Progress: A Holistic PhD Admissions Rubric--Design & Implementation,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/work-in- progress-a-holistic
problem solvers to problem seekers: The necessary role of tension in engineering education,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2016- June, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26976.[12] A. D. de Figueiredo, “Toward an Epistemology of Engineering,” in 2008 Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering, 2008, pp. 94–95.[13] D. Riley, “Rigor/Us: Building Boundaries and Disciplining Diversity with Standards of Merit,” Eng. Stud., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 249–265, 2017, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2017.1408631.[14] E. P. Douglas, M. Koro-Ljungberg, and M. Borrego, “Challenges and promises of overcoming epistemological and methodological partiality: Advancing engineering education through acceptance of diverse ways of knowing
of Clusters of Participation in Engineering Co- curricular Activities on Student Outcomes,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jun. 2020, p. 35305. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 35305.[22] A. Walsh, E. Diehl, and C. Faber, “Studying the Resource Networks of First-year Engineering Students: Establishing a Data Collection Method,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 33321. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33321.Appendix 1. Example Survey QuestionsPlease describe the most significant learning experience you have had at [School]. (open)Please describe a satisfying learning experience while at [School]. Why was it satisfying?(open)Please describe a
, 2017). Elements of a chilly climateinclude managing stereotypes (McGee, 2018), juggling competing responsibilities (Bowman, 2006),feelings of isolation (Ong et al., 2018), as well as feelings of hypervisibility (Smith et al., 2016) for Blackstudents. While many Black students can successfully navigate this climate, enduring the chillyenvironment in Engineering can perturb their journeys through STEM (McGee & Martin, 2011). ASEE(2021) reported that only 8669 Black females and 21,000 Black males were enrolled in undergraduateengineering programs. Also, ASEE (2021) highlighted that Black students represent just 3.6% of alldoctoral degrees in engineering. While there is a growing body of literature aimed at unpacking theexperiences of Black
edge cutting test (TMCT) and authoring an ASEE paper on potential impacts on spatial ability performance from COVID-19 among blind and low-vision individuals. His focus in coursework during his time at the university has been on engineering, kinesiology, and psychology. He also has been involved over the last year in an Instructional Technologies and Learning lab where he has helped code, analyze, organize, and prepare data on cognitive load in college students.Daniel Kane, Utah State University Daniel Kane is a graduate student at Utah State University pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education with a concurrent master’s degree in Civil Engineering. His research interests focus around the study of spatial ability with
Guevara, J. C. Tudón Martínez, D. Hernández Alcántara, and R. Morales-Menendez, “Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences,” Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. IJIDeM, vol. 13, pp. 909–922, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8[3] S. Olson and D. G. Riordan, “Engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Report to the president.,” Exec. Off. Pres., 2012, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed541511.[4] E. ASEE, “Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering: Phase II: Insights from tommorow’s engineers,” Wash. DC Natl. Sci. Found., 2017.[5] A. J. James, C. K. Chin, and B. R. Williams
., and Finkelstein, N.D. (2020) Epistemic stances toward group work inlearning physics: Interactions between epistemology and social dynamics in a collaborativeproblem solving context. Physics Education. arXiv:2005.02425Kajfez, R. L., Mohammadi-Aragh, M. J., Clark, A., Sassi, S., and Petrie, J. (2019, June), Board29: Initial Qualitative Exploration into First-Year Engineering Community and Identity. The2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—3231Knapp, H. (2018) Intermediate Statistics Using SPSS. SAGE Publications, Inc.Leslei I. (2021) Conflicted: How Productive Disagreements Lead to Better Outcomes. HarperCollins.Loignon, A (2022) Comments made during the Advisory Board Meeting for the NSF Project #[Blind for
’ Attitudes and Self-Assessment Towards Computational Thinking,”CTE-STEM 2022, 2022.[21] O. Yaşar, J. Maliekal, P. Veronesi, L. Little, M. Meise and I. H. Yeter, “Retrieval PracticesEnhance Computational and Scientific Thinking Skills,” Frontiers in Psychology 13, pp. 142-154, 2022.[22] Diordieva, C., & Yeter, I. H., & Smith, W. S. (2019, June), Middle School STEM Teachers’Understandings of Computational Thinking: A Case Study of Brazil and the USA Paperpresented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--33107[23] O. Yasar, P. Veronesi, J. Maliekal, J. Little, L. S. E. Vattana and I. H. Yeter,“Computational Pedagogy: Fostering a new method of teaching,” Computers in EducationJournal, 7(3), pp. 51–72.[24] V
semesters, from Winter 2019 to Fall 2021(Table 1). We analyze data based on instructor sex and COVID; future work will analyze this datafor other demographic characteristics, such as race/ethnicity and nationality.Data pre-processing Some of the courses in our data are associated with multiple instructors,and some of the evaluations target teaching assistants rather than professors. We performextensive data cleaning before analysis, including: (1) removing multi-instructor courses (courseswhere multiple instructors were referenced in the evaluations); (2) removing lab and recitationsections where teaching assistants were likely to be mentioned in evaluations; (3) replacingpersonal names detected with Named Entity Recognition1 with generic PERSON
environmentmanagement.Consequently, the control of the effect that emotional self-regulation could have on therelationship between mental well-being and self-regulated learning remains open, so future workshould incorporate other dimensions of self-regulation learning into the proposed model,analyzing how these are impacted by the two dimensions of mental well-being. Future work isalso expected to estimate the indirect effect of the gaps in social integration of specific groups ontheir mental well-being and on the self-regulation of their learning.AcknowledgementsReserved for blind review.References[1] S. J. Bork and J. L. Mondisa, “Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Graduate Student Mental Health: Insights from the Healthy Minds Network Dataset,” in 2019 ASEE
his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Pro- gram Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Introduction Engineering classrooms have adopted team-based learning as a popular and effectivepedagogy for a long time [1-3]. Given the booming of computer-assisted learning technologies,instructors could easily observe the different ways of interaction and collaboration across teamsand among team
about the students’ motivation, identity, success, and involvement in engineeringwhile participating in a four-year-long engineering cohort. For this study, we leveraged directedcontent analysis to explore how participants accessed and utilized cohort resources through thelens of social capital theory [24].ParticipantsThis study was conducted at a large, land-grant, R1 university, with initial data collectionbeginning during students’ first semester in the fall of 2019. The participants were 16undergraduate engineering students who voluntarily applied to join a four-year scholarship-basedcohort program beginning just before the start of their fall semester. Selection criteria for theparticipants included full-time enrollment in an engineering